1 Tuesday, 2 March 2010
2 [Open session]
3 [Defence Opening Statement]
4 [The accused entered court]
5 --- Upon commencing at 9.00 a.m.
6 JUDGE KWON: Good morning. Mr. Karadzic, please continue.
7 Please plan your statement so as to leave about ten minutes at the end of
8 today's hearing for a Chamber's oral ruling.
9 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] Thank you, Your Excellencies.
10 As we saw yesterday, in an incredible rhythm or a shocking rhythm
11 that prevailed in Croatia
12 month affecting the Serbs. The same situation was with us. Before I
13 come to the October declaration adopted by the SDA and HDZ deputies
14 contrary to the way the Assembly sessions are convened and contrary to
15 the provisions of the constitutions of Yugoslavia and Bosnia
17 last ethnic party to be established. We did that reluctantly, because we
18 didn't think that ethnic democracy was a proper thing, but we were forced
19 by the events to do so.
20 The elections took place on the 18th of November, and each
21 nationalist party won, because all the peoples adopted ethnic
22 differentiations based partly on fears and partly on the ambitions that
23 they hadn't had before in Yugoslavia
24 January 1991, and the first campaign for an independent
25 Bosnia-Herzegovina started in January, although Mr. Izetbegovic vowed to
1 remain in Yugoslavia
2 Mr. Izetbegovic formed a secret council for the defence of Muslims,
3 although he was the chairman of the public council for defence of
5 The Serbs expressed their approach as during the first campaign
6 for independence. After Izetbegovic has formed this council which acted
7 as the command of the secret army of the SDA, the Serbian public did not
8 protest against this, although we knew that that was happening.
9 There was an attempt in February to adopt a declaration on
10 sovereignty and independence. The Serbs protested and filed a veto and
11 referred the matter to the Council for National Defence, and we announced
12 that we were going to work on communities of municipalities, because
13 municipalities can adopt different decisions based on their economic
15 The Patriotic League was established on the 31st of March, and
16 the Supreme Command now has its army. The Serbs were deeply concerned
17 over this. The Serbs employed in the police and the MUP that were
18 brought into power, although they were not members of the SDS because we
19 don't think that there were -- should be any political affiliations in
20 the police. They tried to prevent any abuse of the police and to inform
21 the public about what was going on. This was the first time that we in a
22 way had some misunderstandings with our deputy minister that we nominated
23 for that position.
24 So in March 1991, a second attempt to adopt a declaration on
25 independence took place. After these consultations with our partners, we
1 lodged a veto and continued consultations with the municipalities.
2 Famously, the declaration on the sovereignty of Bosnia-Herzegovina will
3 be passed with or without the Serbian delegates is what Alija Izetbegovic
4 said in 1991. So we have consumed all the brotherhood of unity and all
5 the idyllic relationships and the abuse of the police gathered pace. The
6 police was full of criminals, and you heard yesterday from my
7 conversation with the deputy minister in which he agreed that we didn't
8 bring any new personnel to the police, unlike them, and we particularly
9 didn't bring in any criminals as they did.
10 The SDA personnel in the police were keeping everything secret
11 from the Serbs. They're keeping them away from all the illegal
12 activities that they were involved in, and that was the first split that
13 happened in the MUP in May 1991, and it affected actually the de facto
14 division of the MUP. So our personnel had no insight into the events and
15 no impact on it.
16 The Serbian autonomous areas were proclaimed but nothing was
17 going on. They were there just in case if something happened. And if
18 communications are cut off, the people would be severed from their
19 leadership, and they, in that case, should have some regional leaderships
20 to lead them.
21 In June 1991, decisions were taken on this independence of
23 secret agreement to attack the JNA and Yugoslavia. This conspiracy and
24 this secret pact will be confirmed here thanks to the evidence provided
25 by the Prosecution, and we also have our own sources of information.
1 Now, there's already talk about regionalisation, and we thought
2 that they should start functioning because this was no joke any longer.
3 All our moves were imposed on us. These were not our goals. That was
4 done out of necessity. If you do not know these unlawful decisions, we
5 are going to activate our plans.
6 The German newspapers "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung" and
7 "Die Welt" wrote about Yugoslavia
8 created through agreements from the Paris conference, and they --
9 THE INTERPRETER: Periphery, interpreter's correction.
10 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] -- and they were mocking the
12 the First World War.
13 Let me remind you that in 1977 and 1978, while Tito was still
14 alive, Josef Strauss gathered the European elite in Munich and tried to
15 persuade them to proclaim Yugoslavia
16 Gallois we acquired this information. General Gallois is an exceptional
17 personality who didn't agree with that either then or now.
18 In June, the Serbs proposed their ideas in Serbian and in
19 English. Now, I wonder why the Prosecution doesn't mention this
20 agreement at all and why they didn't want to learn what the Serbian
21 position was vis-a-vis Yugoslavia
22 was that because that was such an important time, the crisis was
23 accelerating and the Serbs proposed a solution for the Yugoslav and the
24 Bosniak crisis. This proposal excludes absolutely any possibility or any
25 notion of a joint criminal venture -- enterprise. So that should be
1 excluded from the indictment as well.
2 In the beginning of July, the Muslim-Bosniak organisation led by
3 Adil Zulfikarpasic and Muhamed Filipovic who had left the SDA once they
4 learnt about the conspiracy that was being pursued behind the backs of
5 the whole party and the whole Muslim people. When Filipovic and
6 Zulfikarpasic, as experienced politicians and dissidents of long
7 standing, needed some time to see where all these moves were leading to,
8 this led Mr. Causevic, after leaving the SDA, to say to Mr. Begovic the
9 following: Do you think that the Serbs are a fool who cannot see what
10 you're doing?
11 The Serb side was delighted with this proposal of the
12 Serbian-Muslim agreement, and they decided to abandon all the
13 counter-measures that they had envisaged, and these counter-measures were
14 conceived in order to thwart the violation of our constitutional rights,
15 provided that the Muslim side would give up the way that they have taken.
16 Mr. Zulfikarpasic and I met with Mr. Begovic who said, Just go
17 on. And he said to Zulfikarpasic, Please continue your work because the
18 Serbs don't trust me any longer and maybe you can achieve something.
19 In July and August of 1991, we were working on this historic
20 Serbian-Muslim agreement. We had joint meetings that were full of
21 tensions, but the leaderships of the SDS and the MBO were visiting
22 sensitive areas such as Trebinje and they're holding rallies there. But
23 everybody was happy, both the Serbs and the Muslims. Then we went to
24 Zvornik, which was also sensitive area, which exploded at a later stage.
25 People were delighted. We had a crowded sports hall, and they were happy
1 to see that there was a change in the relations between the Serbs and the
2 Muslims. So during this six-month period we didn't apply any
3 counter-measures that we had envisaged because we reached an agreement
4 with the Muslims.
5 Towards the end of August, all of a sudden Mr. Izetbegovic
6 withdrew his support to this agreement while Professor Koljevic and
7 Professor Filipovic, both from the philosophical faculty, who were
8 authorised by Zulfikarpasic and myself to continue our work, presented
9 this agreement to the public with a view to relaxing the situation in
10 Bosnia-Herzegovina, to say that Bosnia
11 Croats and Muslims, and to convince them that there were no problems,
12 although there were conflicts in Croatia already going on, but they said
13 that this would prevent spill-over into Bosnia.
14 The MBO and Mr. Filipovic were proclaimed traitors of the Muslim
15 nation. So all this game of trying to deceive the Muslims and the Serbs
16 with the aim of defeating politically the MBO, that would have amounted
17 to a Pyrrhus victory. That was a costly and dearly victory. Immediately
18 the following day, tensions rose in Bosnia-Herzegovina, and the Serbian
19 side, particularly the autonomous region of Krajina, without asking us
20 anything about it, proclaimed an Autonomous Region of the Krajina. We
21 have an intercept on this subject, and we can always show it to the Trial
22 Chamber should they find it of interest.
23 After that, Izetbegovic withdrew, and we adopted a declaration in
24 the Assembly whose basic elements were, firstly, that all options should
25 be treated as equal; and secondly, that there would be no imposition of
1 solutions by any party. A solution had to be found that would be
2 acceptable for everyone involved without any imposition and all options
3 were legitimate. So this relaxed the situation a bit, but it didn't last
4 longer than a month.
5 By mid-October we have this famous Assembly session where a
6 constitutional coup d'etat took place where the continuation of the
7 session was convened unlawfully and all the Serbian deputies, 83 of them,
8 72 from the SDS
9 of the Assembly, and the Serbian side announced that unless these
10 decisions were revoked within a week, then the Serbian side was going to
11 establish their own Assembly as a kind of personal autonomy.
12 This is a pivotal moment for both the Prosecution and the
13 indictment. In paragraph 34 of the pre-trial brief, the Prosecution says
14 the leadership of the Bosnian Serbs established on the 24th of October,
15 1991, a separate Serbian Assembly. As Karadzic explained to the
16 delegates, this was an historic move which dispelled the last illusions
17 that the Serbs might have. It will help them to recognise who their
18 friends or foes were, and they will never again be threatened from
19 internal forces.
20 So Karadzic said this is the point when we gave up on all our
21 illusions. We know exactly who our enemies and who our friends are, and
22 we know exactly where threats are coming from. Therefore, in
23 November 1991, again in paragraph 34, it reads that immediately before
24 the SDS
25 remain in Yugoslavia
1 establish their own power in their respective areas. "Please be very
2 energetic in pursuing this policy and establish your power and prepare
3 yourselves for restructuring and regionalisation based on
5 This is a quotation of my words by the Prosecution. But this
6 does not have the meaning that was attributed to by the OTP. I'd like to
7 remind you that between the 24th of October, when the Serbs realised
8 where the SDS
9 beginning of the war several chances and options for peace, and they even
10 were prepared to give up on their own Assembly. So Serbs established an
11 Assembly as their last defence. If all else failed, they would have that
13 As the Trial Chamber says in the Krajisnik judgement,
14 paragraph 195 or 196, if the old system fell apart, the central
15 government has to do something in order to prevent the ground from
16 falling apart. And what is stated here, prepare your own territories if
17 the central government fails and if the municipalities have no one to
18 rely upon; or if they call the central government, the central government
19 is going to issue them orders that are contrary to the survival of the
20 people, then we have to organise ourselves. We already have our
21 authorities there but they have to function in extraordinary
23 I believe, and I think that all international documents
24 corroborate that, that it is better to have any kind of authority than no
25 authority at all. Chaos is the worst that you can have.
1 It is no longer only the SDS
2 Serbs are there, and they schedule a plebiscite for November 1991. Let
3 us see whether the people want what Izetbegovic is insisting upon, or do
4 the people want something else.
5 The referendum question has to do with Yugoslavia, with the
6 joining of all who wish to remain in Yugoslavia, and that referendum was
7 indeed held. Since this was an ethnic referendum, there was a
8 possibility for others to vote as well, and indeed, between 40 to
9 60.000 Muslims and Croats did vote, and -- in the referendum, and they
10 voted in favour of preserving Yugoslavia.
11 I am afraid that the Prosecution is being malicious when they say
12 that this was a yellow leaflet. I don't know what the colour of this
13 ballot or leaflet was, but it was written in the Latin script. Most
14 Serbs use the Cyrillic script, but it was printed in Latin so that they
15 would find it more pleasant, as it were.
16 Now, on the 20th of December, the government of
17 Bosnia-Herzegovina, contrary to the position and opinion of all Serb
18 ministers and deputy ministers who were members of the government, passed
19 a decision to ask the European Community to recognise an independent
20 Bosnia-Herzegovina. There are no prerequisites for that. That decision
21 was not made in the right way. It could not have been reached at the
22 referendum either, because two -- less than two-thirds of all voters
23 voted in favour of that, and it also couldn't pass through the Assembly
24 because we had over two-thirds. And it's not a government that asks for
25 independence. It can only be an Assembly on the basis of more than
1 two-thirds of all MP votes.
2 We are going to make you aware of each and every detail of this
3 Assembly, because it is often exploited.
4 They asked for an annulment of this independence, or as a counter
5 measure, they're going to proclaim a Serb republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina
6 Let us have a look at this map. The Serbs are blue. This was
7 1991. It didn't change much. That's basically the way it was. After
8 the genocide in the Second World War, the Serbs continued to live in
9 two -- they are a majority, rather, in two-thirds of the territory of
10 Bosnia-Herzegovina, and regrettably they have only one-third. Up until
11 the Second World War they were the majority population.
12 The SDA refuses to withdraw this request and they move on.
13 From the 20th of December until the 9th of January, they were
14 given 20 days. On the 29th they were given this time to decide. On the
15 29th of January the Serb republic was proclaimed, but like all other Serb
16 measures it is just treated as a possibility. It doesn't really
17 function. So the Prosecution is not right when they believe that we
18 established the Assembly of the Serb people in order to achieve some
20 We are actually right. We established the Serb Assembly in order
21 to prevent the SDA from achieving their objectives at the expense of our
22 security and our own will. We can see on the basis of all the interim
23 steps taken, and one of the interim steps was the Assembly that was held
24 on the 24th and 25th of January, where Karadzic and Cengic -- this is
25 Muhamed Cengic from the SDA. It's not the MBO anymore. The MBO all the
1 time was in favour of reaching an agreement with the Serbs. Now the
2 vice-president of the SDA, Cengic, we mentioned that yesterday, reaches
3 agreement with me at the rostrum itself. This is very well-known
4 footage. We all agree at the same time that the government carries out a
5 regionalisation within 15 days, and the Serbs vote in the referendum.
6 Whatever they do, they vote and in this way give the referendum
8 Izetbegovic initiated the referendum because Cengic publicly said
9 that it was Izetbegovic who authorised him in this manner. It lasted
10 only for two hours. With the MBO, the agreement lasted for two months;
11 whereas this one lasted for only two hours.
12 Now what happens? February, the conference starts. Although we
13 had been receiving monitors from the EU a lot earlier, like
14 Ambassador Wijnaendts, Ambassador Cutileiro, Lord Carrington, et cetera,
15 but officially it is in February that the conference started, and on the
16 22nd or 23rd of February, definitely what is reached is an agreement on
17 three Bosnias
19 framework of these boundaries of Bosnia-Herzegovina once they are
20 recognised on the condition that we get this one unit inside and that
22 are going to have those guarantees and that security that the republics
23 in Yugoslavia
24 On the 22nd or 23rd of February, a decision was made to the
25 effect that the future constituent units will have their own powers.
1 Inter alia, they will have the right to their autonomous sovereign police
2 that is accountable only to that government and that Assembly.
3 Since we had experience already to the effect that, say,
4 yesterday we reach agreement on ten points, and Mr. Izetbegovic the next
5 day comes and says that we had agreed to nothing, zero. We say if we
6 agreed on ten questions, tomorrow we discuss the eleventh question. We
7 cannot go back to square one yet again. So then we adopt the principle
8 nothing has been agreed upon until everything is agreed upon, and then we
9 have to go on.
10 Then the Assembly reaches a decision. The Serb Assembly and the
11 council of ministers, on the 28th of February, decides that preparations
12 are carried out for establishing a Serb MUP. And why immediately after
13 the agreement? Because there was massive, massive abuse of the joint
14 police. The Muslim police, they were wreaking havoc. We can see that as
15 testified by Prosecution witnesses, that the police, the Muslim part of
16 the police, and the SDA and the Patriotic League had all become one, and
17 you cannot distinguish between different institutions anymore, but we
18 will go back to this abuse.
19 So on the 28th of February and on the 1st of March there was a
20 referendum. The Serbs did not vote in the referendum, but they didn't
21 prevent it from happening either. We had our own in November, our
22 plebiscite. All right, but if they wanted two-ethnic, bi-ethnic
23 referendum, let them have it, but it did not happen in a lawful way.
24 On the 1st of March, criminals, well-known criminals, notorious
25 criminals, who are now activists of the Patriotic League, they killed the
1 members of a wedding party in front of the old church, where they wrote
2 graffiti against the Serbs on the very next day after the establishment
3 of the SDA was announced. This old church was built during the days of
4 the Turkish occupation. The anecdote says that the Sultan said, All
5 right, you can build a church that will be as big as the skin of an ox.
6 And then, allegedly, the Serbs cut this skin of an ox into a thread and
7 in this way circled the area where the church would be built. The Sultan
8 also said that it should not be higher than even the lowest minaret of
9 all the mosques. They built the church partly underground, so you really
10 have to walk downstairs when you walk into the church. I hope you go to
12 deep down into the ground. This is church that is very dear to the
13 hearts of the Serbs.
14 Anyway, the Muslims tried to engage in deceit and say that this
15 was not an active church. It was always an active church, even in the
16 days of the Turks, and even the Turks did not touch it.
17 So a young man hits Nikola Gardovic, the father of the bridegroom
18 on that day, and already the next day he appears on TV as a hero, and he
19 said, "Yes, I shot at him. Why would he carry a Serb flag?" Serb flags
20 were carried even in the Turkish days at weddings. It was not a national
21 flag. It was a religious flag and it was customary.
22 Then on the 2nd of March, barricades were put up in Sarajevo
23 the time, Mr. Koljevic, Mr. Krajisnik and I are negotiating in Belgrade
24 So we were not there. Barricades were put up, and they were there for a
25 few days. The SDS
1 Bosnia-Herzegovina with regard to these barricades, and the Crisis Staff
2 that was headed by this gentleman, who was arrested in London just now,
3 Mr. Ejup Ganic. He was a member of the Presidency, a Yugoslav who turned
4 against Yugoslavia
5 So in this situation rife with tension, on 18th of March, an
6 agreement was reached, the Lisbon Agreement. The Cutileiro Peace Plan
7 was adopted, stating that this territory of Bosnia-Herzegovina would be
8 reorganised with three internal units of the Serb, Croat, and Muslim
9 people, and we all celebrate.
10 May I remind you that Mr. Ajanovic celebrated the most, saying
11 that 80 to 85 per cent of all Muslims will be in their constituent unit,
12 and only about 20 per cent of the Serbs and Croats would be in their
13 unit, whereas the Serbs fared the worst. Only 50-something per cent will
14 be in the Serb unit, whereas the rest would be scattered throughout
16 exchanges or any expulsions.
17 On the 24th of March, the SDA withdrew their agreement. I remind
18 you that on the 18th of March, Ajanovic said, If the Serbs refuse this
19 agreement this is going to be yet another foolish thing that they are
20 doing, and it will be proof that they had opted for war. However, a week
21 later they are the ones that annul the Lisbon Agreement.
22 Mr. Ajanovic says, Well, we did this sort of as a trick in order
23 to buy time, to wait for recognition, to wait for international
24 recognition at that.
25 Perhaps we could have a look at this slide. Could we have the
1 previous one, actually. Yes.
2 "If the Serbian Assembly rejects the Cutileiro Plan, it will
3 become evident who is against peace in Bosnia, and it will become evident
4 who wants to trick the European Community and the chairman of the
5 conference." Lord Carrington, that is.
6 Excellencies, this is an admission: Who does that will be
7 guilty. And this is exactly what he did a week later.
8 "[In English] The SDA originally accepted the Cutileiro Agreement
9 because it was a political game to secure the international recognition
10 of a sovereign and independent Bosnia and Herzegovina, and because it
11 would be responsible for the failure of the negotiations. The SDS, HDZ,
12 and the European Community were in favour of BiH -- B and H remaining in
13 its present borders but for its territories to be transformed."
14 [Interpretation] Now, this is something that he found
15 unacceptable, and on the 18th, 19th, he said, if This is deceit on the
16 part of the Serbs, it is clear that they want to deceive the European
17 Community, and they are to be blamed for the war. And now the gentleman
18 admits that that's what they actually did, and that thereby they were the
19 ones who wanted war. The Serb people and the Serb political parties
20 accepted the minimum. We leave Yugoslavia
21 concession we could have made. The borders of Bosnia-Herzegovina remain
22 as they are if internally we get our own constituent units. This is what
23 Ambassador Cutileiro wrote in 1995, when the war was already over. This
24 is what he wrote about what was being said about the Lisbon Agreement.
25 This is what Ambassador Cutileiro wrote, and he felt that he should make
1 this public to the world and that it was not that way, not quite as he
2 had put it. This is his letter.
3 "[In English] After several rounds of the talks -- of talks, our
4 principles for constitutional arrangements for Bosnia and Herzegovina
5 were agreed by all three parties (Muslim, Serbs and Croats) in Sarajevo
6 on 18th of March, 1992. These continued -- this continued until the
7 Muslims reneged on the agreement. Had they not done so, the Bosnian
8 question might have been settled earlier with less loss of mainly Muslim
9 life and land. To be fair, President Izetbegovic and his aides were
10 encouraged to scupper the deal and to fight for a unitary Bosnian state
11 by well-meaning outsiders who thought they knew better."
12 [Interpretation] And this is the moment when we can also ask
13 ourselves what could Karadzic or the SDS do, or all a million and a half
14 Serbs in Bosnia-Herzegovina? They accepted everything. They accepted
15 everything that was consistent with their survival. They accepted that
16 their unit should be the worst, that it should be the one least to
17 satisfy the interests and goals of the Serb people, but they accept it
18 all and still they don't have a chance of preserving peace. The only
19 thing that is expected of them, quite obviously, is what
20 President Tudjman told the American delegation. He said the Serbs should
21 leave Bosnia
22 Serbs out of Bosnia
23 I have to go back to the wedding party and the killing there and
24 the barricades. They are mostly interpreted in a biased way by the
25 Western media. They said that the barricades were set up because the
1 Muslims voted for independence. That's just not true. It's not true.
2 We didn't prevent that anywhere.
3 And let's have another look at the ethnic map of
4 Bosnia-Herzegovina. Let's see that again. Wherever you see blue is
5 where we were in power, because that was the Serb majority, the blue.
6 And nobody in that area could they have conducted a referendum had we
7 decided against it. So we didn't prevent it. Therefore, it's not true
8 that the barricades were set up because of the referendum. They were set
9 up because of the killing, because a young man, who was a well-known
10 criminal, by the way, understood that it was okay to shoot at a Serb
11 wedding party and kill someone, and he was even celebrated by his ethnic
12 community as hero. He wasn't arrested for a long time afterwards. And I
13 think he was ultimately liquidated after the war, some three or four
14 years ago in some cafe somewhere, but nobody took any steps to apprehend
15 him at that time. So that was the 24th and 25th of March, when it was
16 published that the SDA had withdrawn from the meeting.
17 Now, on the 25th of May -- look at the rhythm, look at the tempo
18 of this. We're no longer talking about a month or weeks as we were in
20 we've now reached the 25th of March, where the armed forces of Croatia
21 the National Guards Corps, the MUP, whoever, you don't know who was
22 active there, anyway, they transferred from Croatia to Bosnia-Herzegovina
23 to Bosanski Brod where they met illegal two paramilitary units, Pohara
24 who was the member of a party but he had some military formations,
25 whatever. They sang, they shot sporadically, and they shot -- I think
1 the man's name was Petrovic, they shot his son at a petrol pump, where
2 they weren't, of course, allowed to shoot there, but when it came to
3 shooting the Serbs, they went ahead and killed these two people. Nobody
4 stood up to them, not the police of Bosnia-Herzegovina, not the Yugoslav
5 People's Army who couldn't do anything about it because they were busy
6 fighting in Croatia
7 say on the 26th of March, in the neighbouring village.
8 Same thing happened as with the wedding party. Nobody stopped
9 them and said, Hang on, what are you doing? On the 26 of March there was
10 the slaughter of the Serbs in Sijekovac, and that poor village,
11 Sijekovac, during World War II, well, a third of the population fled, a
12 third of the population was converted, a third was killed, but some of
13 them did not come back. Some of them were Catholics, of course.
14 Now, the Serb side and this accused here was -- called up the
15 people in the police saying, What's happening, who's going to save
16 people? They said, We haven't got enough policemen. Why don't you
17 recruit the reserve force? We can't without the minister. It was only
18 the minister who was authorised to mobilise the reserve police force to
19 go into action.
20 Now, we asked them, We have the deputy minister, we have
21 high-ranking officials in the ministry, we had Stanisic at the municipal
22 level, we had Mandic at the republican level, so we asked Mandic and
23 Repic, Why aren't you doing something to mobilise the reserve police
24 force? And their answer was, We can't. Somebody has to order us to do
25 that. There was nobody to issue the order. There was no barrier between
1 the killers and the Serb people, Serb civilians. There was no barrier,
2 and the Serb Assembly was to establish that barrier on the 27th of March,
3 the day after the slaughter and 13 months after a far mightier body was
4 set up by the SDA in February 1991 which was the National Security
5 Council as an advisory body to the Assembly of the Serb people in
6 Bosnia-Herzegovina. And the Prosecutor treats -- deals with that in
7 paragraph 66 of its pre-trial brief. And that is how the paragraph
9 "[In English] The SNB
10 1992, with Karadzic as its president. Although initially intended as an
11 advisory body, the SNB
12 organ resembling a central Bosnian Serb Crisis Staff and executing powers
13 similar to those of the Presidency. Thus, as president of the SNB,
14 Karadzic exercised authority over the Bosnian Serb state organs, that is,
15 the Bosnian Serb forces and republican, regional, and municipal
16 authorities. The SNB
17 government passed decision on strategic and military issues such as
18 ordering the activation of the Crisis Staffs in certain conditions;
19 appointing the acting commander of the Territorial Defence; defending
20 Serb positions reached; and ordering a full mobilisation. Moreover, the
22 ministers and the adoption of legislation."
23 [Interpretation] Now, of course, the fact that the Prosecutor is
24 summarising, this only happened actually when the war broke out. Until
25 the war broke out, this body, the Council for National Security, was an
1 advisory body, an advisory body, as the title says. And for want of any
2 other body, any command or any formations, the Serb Assembly decided to
3 have the Serbs in the police, that the Assembly should, through the
4 advice of an advisory body, issue orders to the police to save the
5 people. And the decision was taken on the 28th of February, had been
6 taken that the Serb MUP be set up in conformity with the conference.
7 However, it still had not been established and was still not working
8 because it needed the agreement from -- of the other two sides to go
10 Of course, in a paragraph the Prosecutor says that Stanisic and
11 Mandic did that off their own bat. It's not got nothing to do with their
12 volition. It was a decision taken by the Serb Assembly on the basis of
13 the results of the conference on Bosnia-Herzegovina that was held in
15 officer being Ambassador Cutileiro.
16 Now we come to the 1st of April. Agreements and decisions are
17 being made in the police force about the division of resources, the joint
18 resources, and this was the distribution balance. The Prosecutor sees
19 this as a criminal act, but it was quite normal where you have an entity
20 split in two, an organisation split in two. You have to do the balance
21 sheet to see what belongs to whom and who will get what in order to carry
22 out the duty of keeping law and order. And agreements were reached in
23 that respect and on that level. And on 1st of April, the Muslim
24 extremists attacked Bijeljina. Not the Serb extremists, it was the
25 Muslim extremists, and it was established here, through all the
1 testimonies heard in this Tribunal, that somebody was riding a horse and
2 he wanted to throw a bomb on a Serb cafe. There's no justification for
3 that. They say that 10 or 12 days prior to that, the Serbs had caused an
4 incident, a Serb had caused an incident in a Muslim cafe. However, the
5 police arrested that Serb and sent him to Tuzla, to Muslim territory.
6 They escorted him there and handed him over to the authorities. So there
7 was no justification for this act.
8 It came as orders from Sarajevo
9 problematise Bijeljina so that they could take over power and authority.
10 The Prosecution says in its pre-trial brief "the forcible taking of
11 Bijeljina by the Serbs," et cetera, et cetera, in one of the paragraphs
12 of the indictment or pre-trial brief. That's completely absurd. It's
13 absurd to say anything like that in view of the fact that Bijeljina
14 municipality is predominantly Serb, and that the authorities were the
15 Serb Democratic Party, and that everything was functioning property.
16 I would just like at this point to go back a bit, backtrack to
17 paragraph 66 that we read out, where the Prosecution says the following:
18 That the council took over or had authority over Serb forces. Which Serb
19 forces and which republican organs existed at that point in time? That's
20 the question. Not a single one is the answer. There was the Assembly
21 which was working as a joint Assembly and in a joint Assembly. There
22 were no executive organs, none at all, nowhere. It was just not in the
23 SAOs, nowhere. They were prepared in case of chaos, and especially Serb
24 forces except for the Territorial Defence which existed in all the
25 municipalities until the 20th of May, there were no Serb forces.
1 The Prosecutor furthermore states that after the crisis, the
2 crisis in Bijeljina lasted two days, so they call -- they say that Arkan
3 was called in from Belgrade
4 that there was a crisis and fighting in Bijeljina for a whole night, and
5 that Arkan only arrived subsequently. Now, why did somebody call Arkan
6 in? Because I don't justify this and I don't condemn it either. All I
7 want to do is throw light on the truth. Sijekovac is some 100 kilometres
8 away from Bijeljina and it was clear to one and all what had happened in
9 Sijekovac, it was published, and what could the citizens of Bijeljina
10 think but that they would suffer the same fate.
11 And let me remind you and we have map about this and we will
12 address that in due course if we have time. But by the 1st of April, let
13 remind you, throughout Bosnia
14 killed. Whereas the Prosecutor for that period of time is holding me
15 accountable and accusing me of pursuing a policy of warmongering, and we
16 can see that on this map if we look at the border villages and the places
17 in depth that were aflame. And it was exclusively against the Serbs that
18 the barricades were set up in these areas. Check-points. Killings were
19 taking place. People were being beaten up, intimidated. Exclusively the
20 Serbs until the war broke out or, rather, the 1st of April.
21 Now, the Prosecutor goes on to say that leading official
22 Biljana Plavsic of the SDS
23 defend myself from things of that kind. It's just improper.
24 Biljana Plavsic was in Bijeljina as a member of the state Presidency. It
25 was a state delegation, not a party delegation, and it included
1 Fikret Abdic, who was also not a member of the SDS. There was Jerko
2 Doko, the minister of Defence, a Croat, who wasn't a member of the SDS
3 either. So why was that the Prosecutor just focuses on Biljana Plavsic
4 and notice her and not the members of the Presidency, the others ones,
5 Abdic and so on? Well, it means that somebody's aiding and abetting the
6 Prosecutor, that people assisting the Prosecutor are biased and helping
7 the Prosecutor in that way. Biljana Plavsic was a state official there
8 and it was a state delegation.
9 On the 3rd of April we have the attack on Kupres. May we have
10 the map back again, please. It was an attack launched by Croatian
11 forces, local Croatian forces, and forces, regular forces from Croatia
12 An attack on Kupres. Kupres was a very sensitive area. You had
13 52 per cent Serbs, 40-odd per cent Muslims and 7 or 8 per cent -- or,
14 rather, 40 per cent Croats and 8 per cent Muslims. So that is the
15 largest flame that broke out, the largest flame on the map there, that's
16 where Kupres is. For Croats in Central Bosnia this is significant
17 because it is a mountain ridge linking Central Bosnia with Dalmatia
18 the coast, and that is where the fighting went on for several days, where
19 the Serbs were slaughtered in Malovan, Vukovsko, and the villages around
20 Kupres, and it was a terrible tremendous attack and tremendous suffering
21 and fatalities on the part of the Serbs, but there was still not a war
22 on. And the Serbs had nothing but the police to protect it them, whereas
23 the police was not actually protecting them but working against them, and
24 the Yugoslav People's Army that didn't have time with the situation. The
25 Knin Corps appeared there which tried to protect the people in the
2 Now on the 4th of April, the shocks didn't come every day, they
3 came every hour. On the 4th of April Mr. Izetbegovic proclaimed general
4 mobilisation. It is common knowledge -- it was common knowledge to him
5 that the Serbs wouldn't respond because they knew what the police was
6 doing. They knew what the Patriotic League was doing. They knew what
7 the Green Berets were doing, and so the Serbs he knew would not join
8 those units because they were afraid and it was their assumption that
9 they would be killed.
10 Karadzic calls up Izetbegovic and asks him to give up on the idea
11 of mobilisation. That is a common -- that is common knowledge. Karadzic
12 says, Why did you proclaim mobilisation? Nikola Koljevic and
13 Biljana Plavsic was expressly against that. And he wasn't the president
14 of Bosnia-Herzegovina; he was the president of the Presidency, therefore
15 a collective Presidency. So he wasn't in a position to do that and I
16 told him that publicly, and we have the footage of this. We -- I say
17 it's madness. The people are armed. Nobody will be able to control the
18 armament of the people, and now you're proclaiming general mobilisation
19 to legalise rifles which people are secreting. That is tantamount to a
20 declaration of war, and we have footage of that.
21 And on the 5th of April, I state that it was a mistake to go
22 ahead with -- that was a mistake. Recognition should be delayed, the
23 conference should have been speeded up, and then we would have had peace.
24 Instead of that, what was accelerated was recognition and the conference
25 was slowed down. That was a recipe for war. On the 5th of April, in the
1 morning, the apartment of my family was bullet-ridden, with a
2 machine-gun, and we have witnesses to bear out the fact that they were
3 waiting to kill us but we were all downstairs, but always -- already in
4 the Holiday Inn, the party offices, and they failed to kill us.
5 On the 5th of April, Izetbegovic, Kljujic, and I left -- or was
6 it Brkic, I don't remember. Anyway, we went to the television station
7 with General Kukanjac to appeal for peace. At the same time, a day
8 before, the Serb MUP was given agreement that the headquarters of the MUP
9 should be in the school of the Ministry of the Interior at Vraca, above
10 Grbavica. So on that April the 5th, while we were broadcasting over
11 television, the Serb MUP which came to take up its offices was held in
12 ambush, and two wonderful young Specials, Serbs, were killed. The other
13 30 men who came to help them take up their premises, they were -- they
14 captured 140 Muslims and 400 of the pupils, but not a hair of their head
15 was harmed; whereas these wonderful two young Serb men were killed.
16 On the 5th and 6th of April, on the 5th of April in the evening,
17 terror broke lose in Sarajevo
18 snipers in all the high-rise buildings, Green Beret snipers. A policeman
19 was killed in the joint police station - his name was Petrovic - by them,
20 and it was terrible to be a Serb that night in Sarajevo.
21 The Serbs withdrew to their own districts and areas and tried to
22 defend those districts and their families and the people living in them,
23 and that is how the line dividing the town was established. It wasn't a
24 siege, a line of siege, but it was a line separating and dividing two
25 parts of the town.
1 Now, in the Milosevic trial, witness Eve-Anne Prentice, from
3 was a city divided. And George Kenney from the State Department, who was
4 well acquainted about our situation, said on his own initiative, without
5 having to be asked by the Prosecution or the Defence, said that it was
6 wrong to state that Sarajevo
8 population living in one area and the other in the other. In Beirut
9 was common knowledge that after the working hours, at 3.00, shooting
10 broke out; whereas by 3.00 p.m.
11 On the 12th of April, Ambassador Cutileiro arrives, and at that
12 time Vance was also in Sarajevo
13 Mr. Cutileiro. During the talks with Mr. Cutileiro and Cyrus Vance, we
14 established that we had to accelerate the defining of these three
15 constituent units because that could have stopped war. So if anyone knew
16 that their village was going to be in a certain constituent unit, they
17 didn't have any need to fight. However, on the afternoon of that same
18 day, Hasan Efendic, then commander of the Territorial Defence, issued the
19 well-known directive for combat readiness which translated meant an
20 attack on all Bosnian Serb targets.
21 On the 22nd of April, this accused announced and offered his
22 platform for the cessation of hostilities and the continuation of seeking
23 for a political solution. This is a very important moment, and during
24 this trial we shall see that this was the position of the Serbian side
25 which were contained in documents. The Serbian positions were expressed
1 in the Serbian Assembly. There was a provision that a deputy cannot be
2 held accountable for his speech. However, an Assembly is not there for
3 people to deliver speeches but, rather, to legislate, to adopt
4 resolutions, declarations, decisions, conclusions, and recommendations.
5 So at least seven documents of that type were produced by the
6 Assembly, and an instrument for producing this kind of documents is free
8 The OTP said that an enraged or angry deputy that was affected by
9 something during the war had said something in the Assembly, and they say
10 that Karadzic didn't warn him and caution him. The president didn't have
11 to be present in the Assembly. I was there often but not always, and
12 particularly the president is not a teacher who should discipline the
13 deputies. That was not my place to do that and not my right. However,
14 if I can see that this could affect some legislature or some other
15 decision, then I intervened and tried to have an impact on the final
17 In addition to thousands of documents officially adopted by the
18 Assembly, published in the Official Gazette, the OTP couldn't find a
19 single document to charge me with or to lay blame on me for it, although
20 I was not responsible for that body. I was only responsible for signing
21 documents and legislature, and I was entitled to refuse to put my
23 Among all these laws, decrees, and other documents that were
24 adopted, the OTP did not rely on a single one that could have held this
25 accused accountable for any breach of domestic legislature or any
1 international instrument of international law.
2 So this was the course of events that led to war between the
3 12th, when the elections were held.
4 Let us look briefly at paragraph 78 of the pre-trial brief where
5 it says:
6 "[In English] Even before its inaugural session, Karadzic and the
7 leadership planned that the Assembly would have a role in the acquisition
8 of Serbian-claimed territories."
9 [Interpretation] So on the 24th of October, when we walked out of
10 the Assembly and decided to form our own Assembly in order to exert
11 pressure on the SDA to give up on their war plans, the OTP says, no, no,
12 they establish this -- but this was in October 1991. They established
13 this Assembly to serve as an instrument for capturing territories.
14 Can we please now look at the map again. The ethnic map. What
15 territories were Serbs allegedly to capture? Those were already their
16 territories. If you look at the front lines, you will see that -- [In
17 English] Can we -- can we have a map.
18 [Interpretation] Of these Serb territories held by them for
19 centuries, the Serbs were prepared for the sake of peace to give up on
20 some of them. You can see how it looks like without front lines, but now
21 you're going to see how it looked like with the front lines.
22 The OTP claimed that on the 24th of October we established our
23 own Assembly in order to -- can we have it?
24 JUDGE KWON: You have to turn on the ELMO or video.
25 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] So you can see the same map. The
1 Serbian forces, the Serbian people, the Territorial Defence, according to
2 the law every municipality had Territorial Defence. The president of the
3 municipality was commander of the TO. Tito's doctrine of an armed people
4 should be taken and an underlying reason for all the explanations that we
5 can offer. Bosnia
6 forces, and these people went to the edges of their own territories in
7 order to prevent slaughter.
8 These were the front lines throughout the entire war. If you
9 look at the central part, Your Excellencies, if we had advanced further
10 on we would have benefitted from that because we would have shortened the
11 front lines and increased the deployment of our forces and include our
12 reserve forces. However, if the Croat forces advanced, they would have
13 stretched their front and would have been weakened. So from the
14 strategic point of view, if we had advanced, we could have been more
15 strong. We could have been stronger and we could have captured the whole
16 of Bosnia
17 Now, what the OTP claims about our Assembly being established to
18 prevent any violation of the constitution, they say that this was created
19 in order to take over the territories that were already ours. We never
20 left our own ethnic territories. And the fact that there were Muslims in
21 Prijedor and Eastern Bosnia, wherever there were 20 or 30.000 Serbs
22 and -- or Muslims or Croats, this could have become a canton without war.
23 So I have to defend myself from the allegations that we didn't
24 have enough power on the 24th of October, or the 27th March, or the
25 6th of April, because we had our own forces only on the 20th of May, not
1 counting the Territorial Defence. The Territorial Defence existed in
2 every enterprise, in every company. That was the concept of an armed
3 people. We have a situation different than in the rest of the world, and
4 in order for you to understand that, you should know that even every
5 company had their own territorial unit and its weapons, and that
6 particularly applied to municipalities.
7 Your Excellency, I don't know if I managed to portray for you
8 this horrible course of events against the Serbs who constituted
9 one-third, who were not organised in any respect other than having its
10 own Assembly and its deputies who were partly performing in the joint
11 Assembly and partly trying to protect the Serbian people from their own
12 state, from the police, from the state-sponsored terror of their own
14 Now let us see what the police was doing. Why did the SDS ask
15 Ambassador Cutileiro for the constituent unit to have their own police
16 forces? Everywhere in the world the police forces are decentralised all
17 the way down to the level of municipality. In the US, you have city and
18 district police forces, and there are state police forces, and then you
19 have federal police forces, and this is what we were asking for.
20 Let us just see what this police did. I'm talking about the
21 joint police in which we had our representatives and our own positions
22 won at democratic elections.
23 At the very beginning, the joint police forces set out to effect
24 Muslim supremacy and the SDA, the government organs, the police, and the
25 Green Berets and the police became almost one and were equal to one
1 another, and all of that was under the control of the SDS. The number
2 one man in the joint police of Bosnia-Herzegovina was priest
3 Hasan Cengic, who was not a member of the police.
4 For example, on the 11th of July, 1991, while we were in
5 negotiations with Zulfikarpasic and Filipovic about the historic
6 Serbian-Muslim agreement supported by Izetbegovic:
7 "[In English] The SDA -- on 11th of July, 1991, the SDA issued
8 instructions for sending candidates of the MUP educational centre in
10 [Interpretation] What is this all about? In see secrecy, behind
11 the back of the Serb deputy minister, Mr. Stanisic, and Mr. Stanisic who
12 was chief of police for Sarajevo
13 of policemen to Croatia
14 They were being sent to undergo training so that they can repeat the same
15 activities that Croatia
16 You can also see a lot of indications of what they did.
17 Hasan Cengic, his father, Halid Cengic, was the first one to establish
18 the first armed unit in Foca in August 1990, before the elections.
19 Hasan Cengic took control of [Previous translation continues] ... [In
20 English] In accordance with the agreement between officials of the
21 Bosnian and Croatian police MUP, and pursuant to the instructions
22 regarding the employment of police candidates as the Croatian and MUP
23 educational centre, the SDA recommends the above-mentioned candidates for
24 the course at your centre."
25 [Interpretation] This is a cover letter sent with a list of
1 Muslim policemen who were to be trained in Zagreb secretly. This cover
2 letter was not signed by anyone from the police, but, rather, by a person
3 from the SDA, and this is the proof that there was a complete merger
4 between the SDA and the Muslim part of the police. So this is how this
5 joint MUP looks like, and there was a reason good enough for us to leave
6 the police but this wasn't done until 1991.
7 The police is intercepting politicians' conversations, private
8 conversations of ordinary citizens, et cetera. We are going to see a lot
9 of intercepts of that kind. I'm not concerned about that at all. They
10 are going to be very helpful to see what was done at the time. I
11 recently asked to be provided with intercepts of conversations between
12 Izetbegovic, Ganic, and others. I naively suppose that if they listened
13 in to everybody's conversation I could have them, but it turns out the
14 only ones who were -- whose telephones were tapped were the Serbs.
15 So until that moment the SDA established -- [In English] The SDA
16 established its military wing, the so-called Patriotic League. SDA armed
17 the Patriotic League. SDA obstructed the appointments of SDS personnel
18 in the MUP, of Serbian personnel in the MUP. SDA replaced a large number
19 of Serbian employees in the Bosnian MUP. SDA sent Muslim police
20 personnel to the Croatian MUP for military training [Interpretation] That
21 was at the time when Croatia
22 SDA carried out an illegal mobilisation of the reserve forces for
23 Bosnian MUP. SDA illegally intercepted telephone conversations of the
24 Serbian leadership.
25 [Interpretation] And they did a lot of other things but these are
1 the most striking ones, describing what our government partners were
2 doing without any core decisions, and they shouldn't have done that
3 without proper core decisions. Needless to say that the SDS and the
4 entire Serbian nation knew about all this, but without a smoking gun and
5 without solid proof there was no way to disclose that. And even when
6 that was divulged, this was refuted immediately and the Serbian side was
7 accused of corrupting inter-ethnic relations and raising tensions.
8 This is one conversation between the accused and the deputy
9 minister, who was a Serb but not a member of the SDS, but he was
10 nominated by the Serbs to protect the Serbian interest and to be part of
11 the checks and balances. Let's hear it.
12 [Audiotape played]
13 "Karadzic: Alija can only made a decision to call upon the
14 Muslims to join the Territorial Defence, and some people around him are
15 ready to start the war. We know that quite well. They are preparing a
16 war, they organised the Main Staff, you don't know that, where the staff
17 is. There is a huge number of armed people. There are preparations for
18 war. There are drills to block barracks. There are counter-manoeuvres
19 of the army and here they are going for war. They want the unlawful way
20 although we've proved to them that they cannot legally or politically
21 carry that out. We've told them to use the constitutional procedure to
22 change the constitution but they don't want to because they don't they
23 know they stand a chance with international public. They don't stand a
24 chance within the legal system. The only chance they've got is to try
25 and trick us, but the Serbs won't allow that
1 "Zepinic: Izetbegovic is getting a chance to achieve what no one
2 has ever achieved. That is to establish an Islamic state in Europe
3 "Karadzic: Europe
4 They would make the state without us, but Europe would not recognise an
5 Islamic -- that is, a Muslim state at all, and that's a big problem for
6 them. They are trying to make us their hostages, hostages of their
8 That was the 17th of June, 1991, my conversation with our top
9 representative in the police force who will come here to confirm this,
10 although there's really no need to have this confirmed
11 I believe that there is no need for me to go on about the MUP any
12 longer. It's time for the break anyway, isn't it? The MUP was then the
13 strongest support of the SDA policy anyway.
14 JUDGE KWON: Yes.
15 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] Excellency, is it the right time to
16 take the break now? I can go on.
17 JUDGE KWON: No, we'll take a break for 20 minutes.
18 --- Recess taken at 10.13 a.m.
19 --- On resuming at 10.46 a.m.
20 JUDGE KWON: Yes, Mr. Karadzic.
21 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] These are the further contacts
22 between this accused person and the highest positioned Serb in the
23 police, who is not a member of the SDS
24 police expert. And we see that this accused says:
25 "We've been tricked at the MUP especially at the state security.
1 Please don't let them not know. Nothing should be done single-handedly.
2 This is not a private thing. The entire collegium should meet and they
3 should be told: This position is vacant and we suggest this man for the
4 job. I beg you to stop doing these things in a private basis."
5 I'd like to draw your attention to what the president of the
6 ruling party is saying here. It's not that he is saying that they should
7 listen to him. It's the Serbs at the MUP who say, "We don't want you to
8 impose some Serb on us. We want to be the ones who are going to say
9 which Serb deserves to be in that position." So it's not being done by
10 Radovan Karadzic. It's Radovan Karadzic who is asking members of the
11 police to defend their own people by putting professionals in the right
12 positions. They, not the political party.
13 And then we go on, on the 22nd of July, what I read out just now
14 was on the 8th, this is the 22nd of July:
15 "Tell them not to play games. Look, they're in Prijedor in the
16 afternoon, Friday afternoon. They positioned a man there. The Muslim is
17 a chief, the chief of defence is a Muslim, and the chief of the
18 Territorial Defence is a Muslim, and the commander should have been
20 That was one of the routine manipulations. The Serbs get a
21 particular position, and they don't allow it to happen, or they put a
22 Muslim as deputy. But you see what the scenario is, for bloodshed in
23 Prijedor that will eventually happen and we will see how.
24 Let's move on. September, the 17th of September, 1991, Karadzic,
1 "Today we'll probably talk to them," the Muslims, that is, "and
2 I'll say no talks until they stop deciding in MUP where each Serb is
3 going to work. Until they stop making decisions for us. We'll separate
4 our part of the MUP there. We'll divide the MUP into cantons. You
5 should know that we'll do that. They are proving to us how we are going
6 to live here," in that state that is.
7 Excellencies, these were the shocks that we had to deal with, not
8 on a weekly or a monthly basis like in Croatia, but on an hourly basis.
9 Now, this is the accused talking to the chief of the political
10 party in Bosanska Krajina, Dr. Vukic.
11 [Audiotape played]
12 THE INTERPRETER: "[Voiceover] Karadzic: There are forces in
13 Bosnia and Herzegovina who know what they cannot achieve what they want
14 without a war, and they need a reason for starting war so they could
15 blame someone else. We must not give them the reason to start the war,
16 and that's the most essential thing. By the way, both the international
17 and our constitutional laws are on our side."
18 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] For the transcript, I think it's
19 clear. Izetbegovic wants to wage war. Babic is playing into his hands.
20 I mean, playing into the hands of warmongering Izetbegovic, and this
21 reference is to the late Milan Babic who was in Krajina often because it
22 was close to him. And as you will see during the trial he visited and
23 that was very difficult for us. We had to put out the fire every time he
24 went there. Babic is playing right into the hands of this warmonger
1 "You tell our people from Krajina that I said to
2 Alija Izetbegovic that he is preparing a war and that he is seeking
3 assistance for a war. Please give him this answer of ours. Tell him
4 there are forces in Bosnia
5 doesn't come from above, and they need a pretext for war. They want to
6 blame someone else. We should not give a pretext for war. That is the
7 most important thing. International law and humanitarian law are on our
8 side. The basic thing is that we shouldn't do anything that should be a
9 pretext for war."
10 [Audiotape played]
11 THE INTERPRETER: "[Voiceover] The Muslims are strongly turning
12 against Alija's war intentions. They have a republic. They have
14 to change that, and now Alija cannot explain to the Muslim people why he
15 would go to war. The only thing that he needs now is an alibi for a war.
16 We should not help him achieve that."
17 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] This is a conversation between
18 Professor Koljevic, member of the Presidency, and Karadzic, where we say
19 that our -- irresponsible people should not make silly statements. They
20 won't do anything else. We -- that they shouldn't do anything that would
21 be taken as an alibi for waging war.
22 And now let us look at paragraphs 109 and 110 of the Prosecution
23 pre-trial brief. This is how these two paragraphs treat the accused in
24 relation to the MUP.
25 "[In English] From the outset of the conflict, the MUP played a
1 significant role in establishing and maintaining Bosnian Serb authority
2 over the territory and in implementing the common criminal purpose.
3 Following the take-overs, the MUP took a lead role in disarming,
4 arresting, rounding up, detaining, beating, killings, and expelling
5 Muslims and Croats.
6 "For months prior its division, Karadzic contemplated the
7 division of the MUP as an essential component of the division of B and H
8 and the realisation of the final goal 'to break off with Muslims and
9 Croats forever.'"
10 [Interpretation] Well, that's what the Prosecution says about
11 Karadzic and Karadzic's wishes and intentions to create a MUP just like
12 that and in this way break up this idyll between the Muslims and the
13 Serbs. And the Prosecution is actually trying to reconstruct Serb
14 intentions, as it were, on the basis of Serb behaviour. Serb behaviour
15 is a response. It's a reaction. It is impermissible, it is impossible
16 to say that that is intention rather than reaction. The SDA decides what
17 the Serbs are going to do. It's not the Serbs who are deciding that, and
18 that's the way it was throughout. From February 1992, after the
19 elections, the Serbs' hand was forced, if I can put it that way, and we
20 have to react to what they do, otherwise we will go down the drain.
21 Now let us look at our efforts to have a police. We actually
22 asked the European Community for constituent units to have their
23 respective police forces. This is an excerpt from the Lisbon
24 Agreement -- or, rather, the Cutileiro Plan.
25 [In English] "The statement of principles for new constitutional
1 arrangements for Bosnia and Herzegovina.
2 "(D) The constituent units.
3 "The civil service, the police, and the local judiciary and any
4 national guard established by a constituent unit would reflect
5 proportionally the national composition of the constituent unit."
6 [Interpretation] From Ambassador Cutileiro and the
7 European Community we got the right to our own police force. It was only
8 then, on the 28th of February, that we decided, the Assembly decided that
9 we would have our own police force, but we did not establish it before
10 the 1st of April. So our hand was forced, but nevertheless, the
11 Prosecution charges me that I did this in a premeditated fashion with the
12 intention of achieving something at some point in time. Instead of
13 clearly seeing that this was caused by SDA behaviour.
14 Throughout that time, we were aware of the secret agreement
15 between Kucan, Tudjman, and Izetbegovic to go to war and we are aware of
16 the information to the effect that Izetbegovic was asked, in the second
17 half of 1991, why he did not go to war with Yugoslavia. And he says, I
18 will, I will, but I'm just waiting for the right moment, that is the
19 moment when he is given encouragement. And from mid-October onwards, he
20 does away with any possible solution for a peace -- a peaceful
22 The OTP has a few cornerstones upon which they would like to
23 construct Serb guilt and Serb responsibility. One of the things that the
24 OTP charges me with is the paper versions Variant A and B.
25 Unfortunately, that was not created within the SDS. We did not discuss
1 it. We did not adopt it. And there are no traces of any such thing, and
2 if that had happened, there would have been traces because of all our
3 transcripts were seized. Old officers, pensioned officers, when they
4 realised what Martin Spegelj recommended to Croats, You go to one
5 apartment, dum, dum, and you shoot him in the stomach, et cetera, et
6 cetera. When they saw that in Sarajevo
7 marked and that an assassin may ring their doorbell and, bang, shoot them
8 in the stomach, they therefore prepared some guidelines as to what should
9 be done in order to prevent a war from happening, that kind of thing from
11 There is no political party and no person like Karadzic who could
12 do anything about it if there is chaos. No one knows what they are going
13 to do. So now let us see what this paper that I referred to says.
14 Paragraph 36:
15 "[In English] On or about 20th of December, 1992, at a meeting in
16 the Holiday Inn in Sarajevo
17 leaders instructions for the establishment of clandestine bodies, the
18 Serbian Crisis Staffs (A/B). The confidential instructions established
19 the bodies that would be among the primary instruments through which
20 Karadzic and other members of BSL asserted control over territories and
21 removed non-Serbs."
22 [Interpretation] Look at what it says in this piece of paper.
23 It's the pensioned officers who actually provided this:
24 "In the implementation of all these measures ensure the respect
25 for the national and other rights of members of all peoples and
1 subsequently ensure their involvement in the administrative authorities
2 to be set up by the Assembly of the Serb people in the municipality."
3 Again we have to view all of this in the context of the
4 conference, the Lisbon
5 the SDA is going to try to derogate it by way of war. This was envisaged
6 to avoid war and to avoid chaos, and to preserve the heritage of the
7 conference and to keep people out of harm's way.
8 There is no need to emphasise to what extent the interests of
9 others are being taken into account, especially by these officers who
10 were in favour of brotherhood and unit anyway.
11 The other cornerstone of the OTP are strategic objectives.
12 Strategic objectives were not adopted. As a matter of fact, they were
13 just stated to the Assembly on the 12th of May, that they would be the
14 platform for the conference. When it was clear that there would be a war
15 and that we would elect a Presidency, a Presidency was indeed elected,
16 and two members of the Presidency of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Mrs. Biljana
17 Plavsic and Mr. Nikola Koljevic, and the third one was yours truly,
18 elected to the Presidency.
19 We then stated what our position would be vis-a-vis the European
20 Community in continuing our efforts to resolve the crisis through
21 peaceful means. Since there was a war on, we could no longer have
22 enclaves on a discontinuous basis because people would not dare live
23 there. Something changed in the objectives -- or, rather, our position
24 changed vis-a-vis the negotiations with the European Community.
25 A month later, in June or July, the Presidency made a decision.
1 The strategic objectives were not made public yet, but then a decision
2 was made to make them public and to send them to the European
3 Community -- or, rather, the negotiators, together with the map. So this
4 is no secret document, secret piece of paper. This is the terribly
5 unfair judgement against Krajisnik. This is what it says with regard to
6 this matter:
7 "It would be incorrect to place these goals on a pedestal, as the
8 Prosecution does, for in the final analysis they are anodyne statements
9 serving as official state policy and even qualifying for a publication in
10 the Bosnian Serb Republic
11 them -- to find in them insidious hidden meanings, it is because of the
12 context and the events that followed. An anachronistic reading of the
13 May goals is not only inadvisable, it misses the point. Just as an
14 anachronistic reading of the December instructions," that's Variants A
15 and B, "misses the point. The instructions and the goals lacked
16 substance and utility, but they did symbolise a new central authority at
17 a time when the old order had disintegrated."
18 This Chamber shows that we are right to reorganise when the old
19 system was collapsing and parts of this disintegrated system are flying
20 at us with the aim of destroying us.
21 So this paragraph deals with two cornerstones in the indictment
22 against me and it -- as far as both of them are concerned, the
23 Prosecution is not right, but although this judgement was made earlier
24 and in the final judgement this was not appealed, the Prosecution still
25 maintains that it could use this against me.
1 Now let's see, to wind up this area, how Lord Owen sees the
2 situation who came to the Bosnia
3 because he had the wrong information given to him, and he was soon to be
4 surprised, as were indeed other people from the United Nations who came
5 and thought the Serbs were brutal and then changed their mind. This is
6 what Lord Owen says in his book "Balkan Odyssey."
7 "The image of unarmed Bosnian Muslims was not changed even when
8 Alija Izetbegovic openly admitted on television that the Bosnian
9 government had smuggled weapons through secret channels: 30.000 rifles
10 and machine-guns, 20 million bullets, 37 mines [as interpreted],
11 4.600 antitank rockets, 20.000 grenades, 90.000 uniforms, and
12 12.000 boots."
13 And I should like to add to that, from the Muslim sources in
15 In that same Sarajevo
16 the Serb army, they had a factory in which they manufactured
17 80.000 mortars and mines. And the -- but the Prosecution persists. On
18 the basis of our reactions, panic and in defence, is trying to construe
19 this and present it as being something that we had planned a long time
20 ago; whereas in actual fact we were responding to the challenges of
21 Hasan Cengic and others, the ones they laid in our path, according to the
22 Islamic Declaration as a pretext for chaos, because they said, We can't
23 wait for natural pretexts and causes, we must construct our own.
24 Now, the SDS
25 conditions have reacted and normal conditions would have been to accept
1 the agreements offered by the Serbs or by others. What would have
2 happened in those regular circumstances? How could they have planned
3 separating parts of Bosnia-Herzegovina that they considered to be
4 Serbian? The Prosecution skips over that and says how did the SDS dare
5 engage in the acts they engaged?
6 Now, this ethnic mixture is true of the SDA too. They, too, did
7 not dare and should not have engaged in forceable secession from
9 of stepping down from Yugoslavia
10 they left Yugoslavia
11 But we're all a mixed-up population there, you see.
12 Now we have a well-known session held on the 24th of January, and
13 this accused is advocating that the agreement with Cengic about
14 regionalisation should be accepted. It could have been done within a
15 fortnight, by the end of January, and at the end of February there's a
16 referendum. And here's what I say: I say that I and all of us can now
17 imagine what would have happen, gentlemen, if, God forbid, unrest were to
18 break out between the ethnic groups and have a religious war in
19 Bosnia-Herzegovina. And we can draw it on the board. The Serbs would
20 flee from Muslim areas, and the Muslims from Serb areas. The Croats
21 would go to their own regions. There would be a lot of shooting along
22 the way. Cities would tumble. There would be bloodshed up to our knees.
23 And where would we be then? The same place we are now. The Serbs in
24 Serb regions, the Muslims in Muslim regions, and the Croats in Croatian
25 regions, homogenous.
1 And what need we do then? We would once again have to sit down
2 to the negotiating table and to put three signatures to an agreement,
3 because without three signatures to an agreement there's no solution to
4 Bosnia-Herzegovina. And here's the proof of it: On the 24th of January
5 this accused here says it is clear to one and all, and it was clear to
6 him, too, that there was no fait accompli, but -- and we're talking about
7 January 1992, a month before the referendum.
8 Now, where is this common criminal purpose or joint criminal
9 enterprise that this accused stands accused of along with his associates?
10 Where is it? When we say we -- unless we reach an agreement, we will
11 have such and such. And there's another portion where this accused says
12 let us avoid having the situation slip out of our control. We are in the
13 hands of chaos. We cannot bridle chaos.
14 So those are matters which guided us the -- in seeking from
15 Cutileiro to enable us to have our police force, and it was accepted.
16 Now, I'd like to draw your attention to the following. Let's
17 take a look at Sarajevo
19 and where it says "HVO," that area there, on the one hand -- facing us we
20 have the HVO, on the other side we have the Muslims and then there's us.
21 So we are being encircled by them. We are under their siege.
22 May I be allowed to get up to show you this on the map.
23 This is the Sarajevo
24 later on, but these are Serb territories and they're under Serb control.
25 Not all of them but some of them are.
1 Now, part of the Serb territory is surrounded by Croatian and
2 Muslim forces. So we are also under siege. This is the city proper, and
3 we have a divided town, and you'll see why the Serbs are around Sarajevo
4 located around Sarajevo
5 Let's go back to the ethnic map -- or, rather, let's have the
6 ethnic map of Sarajevo
7 THE INTERPRETER: Microphone, please.
8 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] It was compiled by the same
9 institute as the Bosnia
10 and you can see the borders. The white -- thin white line is the city
11 proper, the inner city. The blue are the settlements and districts where
12 the Serbs were in a significant majority, and the light blue areas where
13 they were a relative majority.
14 So this was the city of Sarajevo
15 it was the property of the Pavlovic family, the squires. When the Turks
16 arrived, the family was destroyed, but the Serbs remained living in and
17 around Sarajevo
19 When the war broke out, the Serbs managed to protect this area in
20 the centre of town.
21 May we zoom into that and see the front line there. I can't see
22 that on my screen. Do I have it?
23 Now we can see that the Serbs have succeeded in protecting part
24 of town, and it's the well-known settlement -- Serb settlement of
25 Grbavica on the left bank of the Miljacka River
1 Pofalici, a Serb settlement, was one they did not succeed in defending
2 it, and there was not a single person left living there. 250 people at
3 the hands of Mr. Izetbegovic were killed. Mladic's house was there as
4 well. Luckily his family managed to escape but the whole area was
6 Now, Your Excellencies, take a look at this. The Serbs here are
7 only controlling their own parts, their own parts of town, that's all.
8 The city proper and the surrounding parts. And those Serb territories
9 are located under a Muslim siege, surrounded by Muslim forces, the
10 Muslim-Croatian Army.
11 Now I'd like to ask you to focus on the Hadzici municipality in
12 the lower left-hand corner. Can we zoom into the Hadzici, please. It's
13 on the other map, the left-hand corner. The Prosecutor says that the
14 Serbs took over control of Hadzici where they were in the majority. It
15 was true that we were the minority, but all this green area to the very
16 left, to the extreme left, is Hadzici municipality which the Serbs were
17 not in control of. The Serbs only controlled the Serbian part of
18 Hadzici. And throughout Bosnia-Herzegovina, wherever they say or write
19 that the Serbs had assumed control over such and such a municipality in
20 which they were a minority, that is just not true. It's not correct.
21 All the Serbs were in control of was the Serb portion of the
23 Then it says "Hrasnica" down there, number 5. Number 5 is
24 Hrasnica. Half of Hrasnica is half of Ilidza municipality. The Serbs
25 only controlled the Serb half of that municipality, the Ilidza
1 municipality. They never attempted to take control of Hrasnica. Can you
2 see that? I think you can see number 5. Number 5 is Hrasnica on this
3 map. And opposite Hrasnica to the right is Lukavica, Dobrinja, and so on
4 and so forth.
5 So in actual fact we didn't control any Muslim settlement nor did
6 we attempt do so; whereas the Muslims did control significant Serb areas,
7 and nobody remained alive there in mid-May. The people had to flee those
9 Now, the truth set in stone or marble that Sarajevo wasn't under
10 a siege is true. The truth of it is it was a divided city, both the city
11 proper and the area around it. And on this map we can see the city
12 proper, and we see the front lines which are being held at 1 to
13 200 metres between each other and sometimes the distance between them is
14 just 50 metres. Sometimes in one flat you have the Muslims, in another
15 you have the Serbs. And here you have the division line.
16 I would like to be allowed to get up again and approach the
17 screen so that I can explain this to you using the map.
18 This is my city. I've spent 50 years of my life living in it.
19 This is Grbavica. This is the Miljacka River
20 The Serbs protected Grbavica because it was a majority population over
22 THE INTERPRETER: Could the accused kindly be provided with a
23 microphone. Thank you.
24 JUDGE KWON: Mr. Karadzic, could you start again with your
25 microphone on.
1 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] Now we see the front line, and the
2 front line follows along and stretches -- well, the two lines run
3 alongside each other. The red line contains the Muslim and Serb front
4 line. We are adjacent to each other there. And when somebody says a
5 Serb shell, and you will hear from Prosecution witnesses, all they can
6 say is the direction the shell came from. Now, who's going to say, if
7 you look at this, what were legitimate targets in this area, in the old
8 part of town? What were the legitimate targets that the Serb side had
9 the right to respond to? I'd like to ask you to focus on this area. We
10 still don't have the entire map and we will in due course when the trial
11 gets going, but look at all the schools and nurseries that were
12 transferred into military premises, turned into military premises.
13 The nursery called Pcelica, kindergarten Pcelica, in the
14 Svetozar Markovic area, it was the command post of the 105th Brigade, a
15 battalion of the police. In a kindergarten, mark you. So that is the
16 city that was helpless and innocent, and there were always three times
17 more soldiers than in the Serbian Romanija Corps. They always had three
18 times the manpower that we did. Here you have the command post of the
19 105th Mountain Brigade, as I said, the Razija Omanovic primary school
20 this time. This is the old city core, the old part of town called
21 Bascarsija, dating back to Turkish times, and we're being shot at there
22 and we're suffering losses. And you'll be able to see that we have
23 mortars on this bank over here from which most -- which were most
24 probably used to shoot at Markale because that's the general axis, the
25 direction from which the shells are coming towards that part of town.
1 I think that you have that in the lists, that that is listed.
2 It's somewhere around there, in the Bistrik area.
3 Fire positions, Bistrik area, Bistrik street, mortars, a battery
4 of mortars. So it's a slope facing town, facing their positions. We
5 were behind them and -- to the south. And if you hold that position you
6 can shoot at any part of town whenever you feel like it.
7 Now look at this very narrow part of town. How many legitimate
8 targets there are. This -- these are 10 per cent of the legitimate
9 targets that were -- 10 per cent of what we're going to show as being
10 legitimate targets, but we are going to show the abuse of hospitals,
11 schools, kindergartens turned into military facilities. Here we have the
12 command of the 152nd Mountain Brigade which is a foreign language school
13 in Vaso Miskin Street. It's been renamed now but it's the same street
14 where there was that explosion in the bread line on the 27th of May,
16 Here we have the command post of the military police. Here we
17 have Bascarsija, the Old Town
18 left -- could you zoom in to the left. Can we move to Skenderija,
19 opposite Skenderija. There we have Dositejeva Street. Pan left. Pan
20 left a bit more. Upstream. Here we have the command post of the 105th,
21 and it's the Sipad building, a civilian facility turned into a military
22 facility. And if, from a flat roof of that building, they shot at us and
23 we returned fire, they would portray this as nonselective shelling of the
24 town by the Serb army.
25 This is a logistics base on the Dositejeva Street, now called
1 Branislava Djurdjeva number 2. This is a helicopter fleet in the centre
2 of Sarajevo
3 Here we see Marin Dvor, which is in the Old Town
4 next to it is Holiday Inn hotel where foreign journalists were residing.
5 And around this area was the stage of all these stage-managed events and
6 shells. For example, if you look at the Catholic cathedral, this was the
7 logistics base of the 105th Mountain Brigade. Right next to the church.
8 This is the street that leads to Vrbanja bridge. There's a firing
9 position, a mortar firing position on -- at the corner of this street.
10 So you see these firing positions in the centre of the town.
11 Also, 12.7 was a submachine -- or machine-gun nest in the centre
12 of the town. This is a sniper position at the corner of the streets
13 Gundulica and Branimira Cosica.
14 Now we're going to see how many schools and kindergartens were
15 used -- abused. This is a faculty near Vrbanja, and that's what we see a
16 minute ago.
17 Now, the museum building had a firing position as well in it. We
18 were being shot from that position, and we had to respond, and we were
19 accused of firing at the museum. 12.7. So if we are attacking this
20 position, we were accused of firing indiscriminately at Sarajevo.
21 There is a footage where Mladic says, "Turn the weapons at
22 Velesici. There no Serbs there." But the one firing knows what the
23 targets are. The targets are legitimate targets, because we know that
24 there were legitimate targets in Velesici. It was a firing position of
25 the 101st, Centrotrans Buca Potok, and there was a maintenance repair
1 shop for armored vehicles.
2 Now, the building of the transport institute, which was another
3 legitimate target, this is a forward command post in Velesici, in the
4 auto repair shop. And when Mladic says, "Target Velesici," he is not
5 referring to civilian facilities. He is referring to legitimate targets.
6 On the other hand, the OTP thinks that although we know what it was all
7 about we had to say a false sentence, fire at the car repair shop in
8 Velesici which is the command post. This is not how this is being done.
9 The Kosevo Hospital now, the OTP witnesses are going to confirm
10 that they riddled it with bullets from their own weapons, and this is a
11 legitimate target in the yard of the Kosevo Hospital which belonged to
12 the 105th Brigade.
13 Now, this is the physical education faculty which is a university
14 facility also abused, and there's another faculty building of the civil
15 engineering which was occupied by the 105th Brigade.
16 The Vuk Karadzic elementary school. I don't believe it's call
17 that any longer. Karadzic was an ancestor of mine who was born in Serbia
18 who carried out the reform of the Serbian culture and Serbian alphabet.
19 I think this was enough. Now, I would like to enumerate for you
20 things that can be said with relation to Sarajevo. So overall, Sarajevo
21 was build on the Serb-owned land. For a long time it was populated by
22 majority of Serbs. Some of its neighbourhoods have always been majority
23 Serb. Some quarters had Serb minority before the war, and especially
24 before the Second World War, some of the neighbourhoods were even
25 100 per cent Serb.
1 Before the breakout of this war and with regard to the conference
2 on Bosnia-Herzegovina, the Serbian side did not propose a division of
3 time but regionalisation of the town, like Brussels and like it was done
4 in Switzerland
5 one carried out in Brussels
7 But yet it is only the Balkan peoples who are being asked to try to live
8 in a melting pot that will be pregnant with tensions and other
9 problematic things. So the request was to transform Sarajevo into one
10 municipality and to remove at least one of the reasons for tensions.
11 This precludes any intention of terrorising the town.
12 Your Excellencies, in the map that you saw, we didn't have
13 professional army. These were the people living 50 metres from the front
14 line. They had nowhere to escape. They had to fight 50 metres from
15 their own home. They were sleeping in their homes. They were not
16 billeted in barracks. These were people's army. They had to fight for
18 into several municipalities, and each municipality would take care of its
19 own affairs.
20 The so-called gerrymandering was carried out in the whole of
21 Bosnia-Herzegovina, including Sarajevo. Gerry Mander [sic] was a master
22 of election manipulation. He managed to establish such constituencies so
23 that weaker parties would win the elections, and this phenomenon of
24 gerrymandering was very much present in Bosnia-Herzegovina. For example,
25 Hrasnica was attached to Ilidza so that the Serbs would not have their
1 own municipality. Rajlovac, the place where Mr. Krajisnik hailed, used
2 to be a municipality, was attached to Novi Grad where Serbs became a
3 minority, and any development of Rajlovac was halted.
4 We are going to demonstrate to you this gerrymandering process
5 applied in the whole of Bosnia
6 devastated. So the plan for Sarajevo
7 administratively, and it was necessary anyway to make smaller
8 municipalities. Previously there were enormous municipalities and nobody
9 could do anything without resorting to bribe. Even without the war and
10 without the crisis this should have been done.
12 Serbs only had control in Serbian municipalities, and in Muslim majority
13 municipalities, they only controlled Serbian neighbourhoods. If we can
14 have back the map with the front line. I have it on my screen. Yes.
15 To the far left is Pale, and this is Renovica. The Muslim
16 municipality of Pale was something that we never tried to take and place
17 under our control. So to the far right. Yes, yes, to the far right.
18 The part of the town controlled by the SDA police and army was
19 taken over by the 1st Corps of the BH Army and later by the
20 12th Division. They had between 35.000 and 80.000 troops. They had
21 their legitimate targets. Kindergarten Pcelica; elementary school Beta
22 Isakovic [phoen]; Pira's [phoen] cafe; Pastrema [phoen]; Ferhadija, which
23 is a foreign language school; military police on Marsala Tita Street
24 Sipad, also a civilian facilities. Flats in the well-known elite
25 Carrington building was a legitimate target because it was full of army
1 troops, mortars, and other lethal and combat assets. PAM was -- a PAM
2 was on Vrbanja Most, which is a mortar. So during the trial we are going
3 to establish very precisely and tell you an absolute truth about all
4 these targets were located.
5 The United Nations are going to say that never in Sarajevo it was
6 the Serbs who started fighting. We kept saying, Let us wait for a
7 political solution with the sole purpose of saving people's lives.
8 The Muslims boasted that this internal line towards the city
9 proper was at the beginning of war 42 kilometres long. By the end of
10 war, they boasted of this having extended to 60 kilometres. If you take
11 into account that this was urban warfare, to advance 22 kilometres in
12 city warfare is a clear indication who was attacking in Sarajevo
13 was defending themselves in Sarajevo
14 In Bosnia
15 territories. Quite the contrary. They were prepared to make some
16 concessions for the sake of peace. We never did anything in the town
17 that was contrary to our interests, and our interest was to revive the
18 peace process and to acquire and accomplish three signatures that would
19 spell a peaceful solution. There was never intentional shelling. We are
20 going to prove here that all massive killings were the result of a
21 cunning strategy as called by Sefer Halilovic of Izetbegovic's policy.
22 This was war trick -- these were war tricks aimed at bringing in foreign
23 troops and foreign intervention. What the young Muslims wanted can only
24 be achieved through terror or by foreign intervention. The SDA failed to
25 manage to achieve that through terror. They tried to maintain terror and
1 to invite foreign intervention. All the mediators will tell you that
2 everything that happened on Bosnia-Herzegovina that was done by the
3 Muslim side was with the purpose of drawing in NATO and Western countries
4 into war on their side.
5 I am convinced that regardless of all the reforms and innovations
6 in the international jurisprudence, the principle in dubio pro reo is
7 still valid. It is sufficient for us that we know that we can prove that
8 they did shell their own people and that they killed all their own people
9 from snipers, and we would like to demand the OTP to prove that this was
10 done by the Serbs. We don't need to prove that this was done by the
11 Muslim. Once there is evidence that they did that or they did that as
12 well, then we have to identify which killings were not committed by them
13 and to prove that they were committed by Serbs.
14 Our retaliation, and I think that my letter to General
15 Milovanovic is quoted, where I say that foreign observers are not blaming
16 us for retaliation, but they are just objecting to the number of mortar
17 shells that we are using, and my response was they have more troops but
18 that we had better weapons and I really criticised our side for doing
19 that, but it turned out that that was not exactly true. The fact remains
20 that somebody who didn't have enough troops could retaliate with more
21 mortar shells.
22 You will see on around 10th of July that we said we can reduce
23 shelling but we have to bring a brigade from Krajina. We have to
24 maintain a strategic balance, otherwise the people would vanish. It is
25 said in the minutes, Yes, we are going to reduce the shelling, but we
1 have to bring a brigade from the Krajina in order to enable these people
2 to defend themselves. This is not a war between armies, this is the war
3 between peoples. Wherever SDA army trod, there was nothing left alive.
4 The war in Sarajevo
5 Biblical apocalypse the number is 1260.
6 The city was never under blockade when it was not necessary in
7 military terms. You will see when we talk about the Croats from Bosnia
8 confirming that units were able to enter and exit Sarajevo as they
9 pleased, and you can see from the BH Army orders that a certain brigade
10 should be returned to Cita [phoen].
11 Concerning transportation, it was I who proposed at the beginning
12 of war for Sarajevo
13 the UN. Izetbegovic didn't need that. He wanted to have influence on
14 the international community with emotional demonstrations and thereby
15 provoke intervention.
16 We thought that any restrictions imposed should pertain only to a
17 military transport. However, they never allowed this transportation to
18 be reduced because the prices of the black market would fall if that
20 If you look at the city proper, which was under control of the
21 SDA army, did not get a single drop of water, not a single cubic metre of
22 gas that hadn't crossed the first -- the Serbian territory first. We
23 never deprived them of anything of that sort intentionally. How can you
24 call this terrorising the city? Whenever we had a little water, we
25 shared it with you. All the wells are in the Serbian territory, and we
1 shared these water sources with them.
2 There is a letter in which I'm writing to our generals, and they
3 were resentful over the fact that we were allowing all the humanitarian
4 aid to pass through that was distributed only to Muslims and not to Serbs
5 later on, we received maybe one-third or one-fourth, where the accused
6 said that the civilians were not our opponents or our enemies. We are
7 not going to wage war by using water and food.
8 Your Excellencies, in this area between Hrasnica and this narrow
9 passage on the front line is an airfield that we handed over to the
10 United Nations in July 1992. Over 10.000 humanitarian flights landed at
11 this airfield without a single incident from the Serbian side. They shot
12 at the planes occasionally in order to blame us.
13 Humanitarian flights, is that terrorising a city? That is what
14 the Serbian side ensured, and it is we who held the airport, and we
15 handed it over to the United Nations. Thousands of convoys of
16 humanitarian aid entered Sarajevo
17 like. The documentation of General Wahlgren, Mr. Akashi and others will
18 show you that the incident with convoys were only due to irregularities
19 caused by the convoys themselves. That is what Wahlgren explains in his
20 letter and that is confirmed by the representatives of the UN. They say
21 Serbs do not make any problems regarding convoys, but if there is a
22 superfluous truck or an extra truck, then they have to take a second
24 This has to do with elementary military skill. If something is
25 not in line with the list provided, then that's the way it has to dealt
1 with. When -- there would always be TV crews there, CNN and the like.
2 There would always be someone who was not informed. There would be a
3 soldier who was not informed, and soldiers did not have the authority to
4 be creative and flexible, as it were. They would be announced at one
5 bridge and then they would appear at another bridge, and the guard there
6 would not know a thing about it.
7 So this is our town. 200.000 Serbs live there. Almost
8 30.000 declared themselves as Yugoslavs, but almost all of them were
9 Serbs. It's a Serb city as well. I lived that city of my own free will
10 because I loved the city. I love it to this day, and we're never going
11 to give up on it. We have our own part of town. Had our proposal been
12 accepted, that it be declared an open city, there would have been no
13 casualties. Had the transformation of municipalities been agreed to,
14 Serbs, Croats and Muslims, see the brown colour here, all the way up to
15 Ilidza, there would be peace and prosperity. However, a policy that
16 wanted to have 100 per cent authority in 100 per cent of Bosnia against
17 the Christian majority led to what it led to. And the Prosecution
18 believes that we did not have any right whatsoever to protect ourselves
19 or that we had no right to defend ourselves.
20 I would now like to draw your attention to something that I'm
21 going to read out, an excerpt from General Rose's book. He says the
22 reports of the French were a lot more serious.
23 THE INTERPRETER: Interpreters note, we do not have the text.
24 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] "They opened fire at their own
25 citizens. This was a rule rather than an exception. Bosnian brigadier
1 Hajla Rahovic [phoen], nicknamed Italian, and General Jovan Divljak were
2 the persons I told that the first examination of the creator of the bomb
3 that had exploded in Markale -- rather grenade, showed that it was fired
4 from the Bosnian side. The room fell silent and Hajla Rahovic looked at
5 me in a hostile way. Obviously the shell had been fired from a very
6 short distance or perhaps it was planted on the spot and activated. Then
7 I asked him why they moved parts of this."
8 JUDGE KWON: Given that the interpreters do not have that script,
9 could you slow down.
10 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] I do apologise.
11 Then I asked him why they had removed some parts of the exploded
12 shell before the UN forces this arrived on the spot.
13 You will see, Excellencies, that this Prosecution calls as their
14 witnesses and expert witnesses from the UN people who are not those who
15 are the first to arrive on the scene. We don't see their findings. They
16 call a man who came 40 minutes after the incident, in August 1995, and
17 seven days after the incident in 1994. When we ask these people what the
18 best time is for investigating this kind of incident, they say the very
19 next minute. Right after the incident. That is to say that the first to
20 arrive on the scene stand the best chance of providing accurate findings.
21 The OTP has mislaid or put away those documents or persons who
22 were the first to arrive on the scene, because obviously they don't like
23 their findings.
24 Lord David Owen in his book "The Balkan Odyssey" says, and I
25 quote --
1 THE INTERPRETER: Interpreter's note again we don't have the
2 original document.
3 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] The Muslim government prevented the
4 departure of their own people through internal obstacles and bureaucratic
5 red tape. It was the army, not the government, saying that able-bodied
6 men were not allowed to leave, between the ages and 18 and 45, that is,
7 as well as women -- or, rather, up until the age of 65 and women up until
8 the age of 60 because they were in indispensable for the defence of the
9 city. However, their main reason was different.
10 The Serb siege in the propaganda war led to the compassion of the
11 world. Therefore, it was necessary for the elderly and children to
12 remain there. That was their most emotional propaganda weapon in order
13 to draw the Americans into the war, because they didn't want to get
14 weaker in any way.
15 Furthermore -- so that was the objective, to draw the Americans
16 and NATO into the war. That is what had to do with the shelling of
18 At one point General Rose says it would be a lot easier if they
19 did not fire at their own people, at their own population. The war would
20 end a lot quicker.
21 We're not talking about in dubio pro reo. We have proof that
22 they did that kind of thing. You saw the footage yesterday of the empty
23 marketplace. You also saw footage of preparations that led to that
24 incident. I am truly surprised not only at the life sentence imposed on
25 General Galic but also by the fact that the OTP continued to use that in
1 the indictments against General Milosevic, myself, et cetera. Therefore,
2 we have to be aware of the fact that it would be a very good thing if the
3 Trial Chamber would instruct the OTP to have a good look at the
4 indictment yet again and to see what -- what the detriment is when there
5 are proceedings only against one side, the weaker one at that, one that
6 was on the defensive all the time, that awaited a political solution.
7 How can that side be declared the belligerent side, the aggressive side,
8 and a terrorist against their own city from which 80 per cent of the
9 Serbian population had been expelled into the suburbs.
10 I believe that if they were to have a careful look at all the
11 material they have available, they would not only withdraw the indictment
12 against me, but they would even ask for a review of the judgements
13 against my generals to save the idea of international justice, to save
14 the idea of courts of this nature.
15 The idea of international justice stands a grave chance of being
16 compromised altogether. If these proceedings continue, I shall prove
17 what it was that happened in Bosnia-Herzegovina. You will see that it is
18 primarily part of the international community that is responsible. First
19 and foremost the SDA, but they could not have done a thing had they not
20 had the encouragement to opt for all, for the Croats and later on the
21 Islamic fundamentalists, allegedly the Muslim people. Had they not opted
22 for that, this could not have happened.
23 The idea of the fundamentalists is still Ottoman rather than
24 democratic. You would still have the Begs, Silajdzic and others, who
25 would be the sole benefactors. I mean, they would impose that kind of
1 regime and they would be the ones who would get all the benefits.
2 Do we have more time before the break or --
3 JUDGE KWON: We can go on for five minutes, but if you wish, we
4 can take a break now.
5 THE ACCUSED: [Interpretation] Well, I thought that perhaps I had
6 said enough about general matters concerning Sarajevo, because during the
7 proceedings we shall be dealing with Sarajevo in detail.
8 This Defence does not agree with the approach taken by the OTP
9 that some Serbs killed some Muslims. We want to know exactly what
10 happened. I still don't have regular forensic material for Markale 1,
11 for Markale 2, for the bread line in Vasa Miskin. For other incidents of
12 mass suffering. I am convinced that in Markale 1 and Markale 2 perhaps
13 there weren't any civilian casualties at all. Perhaps it is corpses that
14 were planted throughout. And the representatives of the UN are going to
15 confirm here that their predecessors had warned them to be very careful
16 about this kind of planting of bodies throughout Sarajevo with a view to
17 accusing the Serb side for that.
18 How are we going to deal with this since we cannot count on
19 objective investigations of an investigating judge, we cannot count on
20 the modesty of the OTP, that they should take care as to what they're
21 doing. We can count on you only and you alone. The Trial Chamber is
22 going to prevent this kind of trickery or planting, and not allow the
23 codification of lies and tricks that are supposed to remain in the
24 history of our people as some kind of truth.
25 We saw yesterday what happened in Markale. It is only someone
1 who wishes to believe that that can believe that, and even that with
2 great difficulty. If you think straight, you see that the Serbs could
3 not have done it. You see that it was staged. But do you realise what
4 that does to the people down there, to the Serbs and the Muslims? We're
5 going to talk about Srebrenica today as well. We are going to see what
6 these false myths and false victims do to the souls of the ordinary
7 people who cannot penetrate the essence of the matter. We have to see
8 what this is going to do to the future and what kind of seed of future
9 hatred and suffering has been sown in this way for our children and
10 grandchildren. Whoever believes this, who codifies these things, saying
11 that the Serbs did something that they never did, whoever does that
12 ensured the continuation of further conflicts and slaughters. Whenever
13 there is a crisis in the world, as has been the case so far, it always
14 turns out into a -- turns out be a fratricidal war as well.
15 Perhaps I could stop at this point.
16 JUDGE KWON: We'll break for half an hour.
17 --- Recess taken at 11.59 a.m.
18 --- On resuming at 12.32 p.m.
19 JUDGE KWON: Yes, Mr. Karadzic.
20 THE ACCUSED: Thank you, Excellency.
21 [Interpretation] I'd like now to recapitulate -- or, rather,
22 summarise the facts and enumerate them with respect to the first joint
23 criminal enterprise. I'd like to draw your attention, to have you focus
24 on some facts that we shall be dealing with and easily prove during this
25 trial. I will deal with everything I said in my opening statement, and I
1 dealt with matters that I would easily be able to prove during the trial.
2 The forcible removal of Bosnian Muslims and Croats was never our
3 plan, to begin with. Not ever. It was never in our minds, let alone
4 plans, let alone putting that into practice, and I have been saying over
5 the past two days what proposals the Serbs made, what agreements the
6 Serbs agreed to which absolutely excluded any joint criminal enterprise
7 or common criminal purpose, especially the expulsion of Muslims and
8 Croats from Republika Srpska.
9 We said that we always wanted to live together with the Muslims.
10 We entreated them to remain in Yugoslavia
11 come under a Muslim fundamentalist regime in Bosnia, and there's no doubt
12 about the fact that it was such a regime because Mr. Izetbegovic's
13 Islamic Declaration was to be at the core of their constitution.
14 All the agreements, let me remind you, from the five peace plans
15 put forward, this accused agreed to four of them. We reduced to the
16 maximum our wishes and desires and goals in order to avoid war. We bore
17 them down to the very minimum. And I want to remind you of another fact
18 set in stone or marble, this marble fact as I refer to it. From
19 February 1992. Now, let's see what the Serb side was doing and what the
20 Muslim side was doing.
21 The Serb side is bona fides negotiating, and whereas it is taking
22 counter measures of a protective type, should the negotiations fall
23 through, should they be tricked, should we be tricked and deceived. Now,
24 the Prosecution considers that we did not have the right to be cautious
25 when trickery was afoot and then says Karadzic, yes, he did negotiate,
1 but he had a back-up plan. Well, what kind of politician would I be had
2 I not had a back-up plan, had I not had a reserve plan when I knew who I
3 was dealing with. But I didn't -- this back-up plan was not my priority.
4 My priority was negotiation and agreement through negotiation.
5 The SDA did quite the reverse. They falsely negotiated, and they
6 left traces that they engaged in false negotiation, whereas bona fides
7 they were preparing for a war. So the reverse position, and it was God
8 who saved us, not to have gone under in a situation of that kind, where
9 we were negotiating in full faith and had to deal with the situation if
10 it took a different course.
11 Now I'm going to put to you an example of what happened in the
12 municipalities. In all the municipalities, agreements were underway
13 about the transformation of those municipalities into two or three
14 municipalities, depending on whether there was a Croat population or two
15 Muslim sets of people or whatever.
16 When the Prosecution says that as soon as they took over the
17 municipality, now, where would we -- who would we take the municipality
18 from? We were in power over there. They were our municipalities. And I
19 think in paragraph 105, it is, that I've remembered the number correctly,
20 where the Prosecution states that they dismissed people, dismissed
21 Muslims from the police or whatever.
22 Now let's see what really happened. There were Serb
23 municipalities such as Sanski Most, Kljuc, Prijedor, and so on and so
24 forth, but as for Bijeljina, it doesn't say "Serb municipality." For
25 Banja Luka it doesn't say Serb municipality, Pale either. Why? Because
1 there are no conditions for it to become a Muslim municipality. So where
2 it says Serb municipality, the agreement was that it would be a Muslim
3 municipality too. If a Serb municipality had a Serb police force, then
4 negotiations were underway for the Muslims to go to join up with the
5 Muslim police station. So that was the source of what it says here, that
6 the Serbs dismissed people.
7 Why weren't the Muslims dismissed from the Bijeljina police
8 force, Gradiska, Banja Luka? Why were they not dismissed anywhere
9 elsewhere you didn't have a Serb municipality? Not only policemen but
10 every institution which needed -- which wasn't at the level of the town
11 but every Muslim municipality, negotiations were underway. And if it
12 says Serb municipality, then that means that the services were divided
13 there into two municipalities. If it didn't say Serb municipality, let
14 them show me where it is we dismissed someone from, say, Banja Luka or
15 Bijeljina, and we will have a witness coming in, a Muslim from Bijeljina
16 who worked in the police force for as long as he wanted to. Everybody
17 knew he was a Muslim. Nobody killed him.
18 Yes, Muslims and Serbs were killed in Bijeljina but the
19 difference between that is who held the gun. That's the exclusive
20 difference. So you were able to see from Rabija Subic's letter to
21 Izetbegovic, where he is calling upon the fact that he should implement
22 agreements achieved by the Serbs and Muslims in Vlasenica and Bratunac
23 all over Bosnia
24 that they would live in peace without interfering with each other.
25 Now, this process of negotiation which served to preserve peace
1 and excluded any kind of population resettlement and transference was
2 brutally interrupted by the SDA party using all resources including the
3 directive for combat readiness straight away, as of the 12th of April.
4 And then pursuant to instructions and orders of the SDA of the
5 12th of April, all the military-able population was on the move because
6 there was general mobilisation, which meant men from 16 to 65 were called
7 up. It was proclaimed on the 4th of April, and all the soldiers,
8 according to their assertions and documents, over 75 per cent were not in
9 uniform. They did not have a uniform. And for the entire first year of
10 the war, there were no uniforms, and if the person was killed wearing
11 civilian clothing did not mean that it -- he was a civilian.
12 The Serbs didn't have uniforms either but neither about the
13 Muslims. They didn't go to the army. They sabotaged the JNA for a week
14 prior -- for a year prior to that, and they went to war wearing civilian
15 clothes. And if they proved victorious somewhere then they would
16 celebrate and so would their foreign allies. If they were defeated
17 somewhere else, then they would cry out and say that it was an aggression
18 by the aggressor. What aggressor? Whose aggression in Kotor Varos, for
19 instance, or Sanski Most, or Kljujic, inhabited by both the Serbs and
20 Muslims, the local Serbs and the local Muslims?
21 We will have a witness from Prijedor here to confirm -- who will
22 confirm, and he was asked in the Kovacevic case by another counsel, How
23 did you dare? He said, Well, they were better organised than us. They
24 were a better army than us. And counsel asked him, How did you dare to
25 lead your people against an army like that? He said, What could I do?
1 That was the order I received from Sarajevo
2 So you will see several examples. One is Visegrad and Zvornik.
3 In Visegrad, for instance, which was thrown out of my indictment, removed
4 from my indictment, unfortunately, let me say, there was a terror
5 exercised by the Muslims against the Serbs. There were rapes of young
6 girls on an ethnic basis, and there were killings, and there was the
7 destruction of the monument of Ivo Andric, the Nobel prize winner, a Serb
8 Catholic. They -- some Western countries did not allow Serb Catholics to
9 remain Serbs but Andric always remained a Serb, and in 1991, the monument
10 to Ivo Andric was destroyed.
11 Then there was the saint day killing. Each Serb has a family
12 saint day. They invited two Muslims to attend the luncheon, and at the
13 end, they killed the man for celebrating a Christian saint day in a
14 Muslim Bosnia
15 back people going to Herzegovina
16 stopped the JNA whenever they felt like it. Then the Serbs fled from
17 Visegrad to the surrounding parts and then the army set up law and order
18 again. The Serbs returned, and then the Muslims said that they were
19 attacked for no reason at all.
20 In Zvornik there was -- they enforced fear in the population.
21 And as for Zvornik, they said that we controlled Zvornik. Well, in
22 Zvornik we controlled the Serb parts of Zvornik, and when you deduct
23 Sapna, Kovacevic and other Muslim concentrations, you will see that the
24 rest was not a Muslim majority. Then the Serbs returned, and they
25 were -- they revived, and then they were victorious and then that was
1 considered to be an aggression.
2 In Prijedor a similar situation unfolded itself. The agreement
3 was -- well, first of all they lost on the 12th of April. They were
4 prevented on the 12th of April, and then the whole of the Sana
5 Klujc, Sanski Most, Prijedor, Bosanski Novi, that whole area. As soon as
6 the JNA left, on 20th of May, they attacked. So along the Sana River
7 valley they had the elite Patriotic League unit there, and the Sana River
8 valley pursuant to orders from Sarajevo
9 Then we have Sanski Most. I'm still not ready to examine
10 witnesses from Sanski Most, but I do know that there are different types
11 of villages. In certain villages nothing happened. In other villages
12 conflicts and clashes took part. Hrustovo and the others. And they had
13 900 fighters. And the Muslims write in their books, they say, While we
14 stood guard we didn't have any problems. When we launched an offensive,
15 we were hit on the hands. So we knew that they stood watch, that they
16 had shifts. We didn't mind. That was a defensive measure. If they felt
17 unsafe, let them stand guard, but that's another matter. When they start
18 killing people in Serb villages, then a conflict is unavoidable.
19 So there were two types. There was terror with the Serbs
20 fleeing. Then they came back to protect their homes, their thresholds.
21 Sometimes they were victorious, in other parts not. And then there was
22 this other way of dividing up the municipalities. Sanski Most was Serb.
23 The rest was Muslim. Everything was agreed to, and then they attacked
24 us, and once they lost -- when they lost, we had this hullabaloo created.
25 Twelve thousand Muslims during the war lived in Sanski Most under Serb
1 control. Sanski Most is well known from World War II. There was
2 Susnjar, the hill on which 5.300 Serbs were killed in a single day. So
3 no -- nobody can expect the Serbs to be -- to lack caution and to allow
4 themselves to be killed again that way, on Susnjar. Twelve thousand
5 Muslims live and work in Sanski Most today without any problem and
6 several hundred are at Manjaca, and the difference is only that the one
7 fought and the others didn't.
8 Now let's take Prijedor, Your Excellencies. The powers in
9 Prijedor, once they had decided to attack, on the 23rd of May, they shot
10 at car -- at a car with four Serbs and two Croats. They were seriously
11 wounded, and they explained that the six of them attacked them at a
12 check-point. That's ludicrous.
13 So when the Muslims started out towards Prijedor, and they did do
14 so, they proclaimed over the radio that the civilians shouldn't leave
15 their homes until they had settled accounts with the terrorists, but many
16 did not listen to that caution, and we'll hear this testimony from many
17 witnesses because they've already made public statements to that effect.
18 Omarska and Keraterm, they weren't camps. Omarska and Keraterm
19 were investigating centres of regular state organs. The Prosecution has
20 and has not disclosed to me over 3.000 documents of the investigations
21 and inquiries undertaken and recorded by the investigating organs in
22 Keraterm and Omarska. 1.500 people were captured in the space of two
23 days. The Croatian intercepts will bear that out as will other sources.
24 There was massive capture of fighters and civilians who had interfered.
25 So there was this triage in the centre of Omarska and Keraterm and the
1 following results were achieved: 41 per cent had not taken part in any
2 combat and they were released. And then they reached Trnopolje and were
3 safe there because you couldn't have enough policemen to guard every
4 house. But when they were in Trnopolje, then five policemen would be
5 enough to provide security for them, and they confirm this and you will
6 see that on the footage. 41 per cent of the detainees in Keraterm and
7 Omarska were released after this selection and triage on the basis of an
8 investigation. They were Muslims just like the others. They were all
9 Muslims. So 59 per cent were found to be combatants, fighters, and so
10 they were sent to Manjaca, to the military camp there, prisoner of war
11 camp, and 41 per cent were released.
12 Now I'd like the Prosecution to provide me with those
13 3.000 investigation documents and they should see how these
14 investigations were conducted, because they were normal institutions
15 carried out by the regular organs, not party organs, and then we can see
16 and establish what happened, although it would have been better for this
17 to have been established beforehand. Then we'll see how in a short space
18 of time of the 1.500 that were held in detention, 41 per cent were
20 This speaks something which was contrary to what is claimed by
21 the Prosecution, meaning that people who were completely innocent were
22 being arrested and detained.
23 Concerning other relocations or deportations, we are going to
24 prove here, on the basis of documents provided to us by courtesy of the
25 Prosecution, that civilians from both communities asked to be allowed to
1 leave. The Serbs had to pay exorbitant amounts of money to be let out of
3 the process by the Croats because all these Serbs were fleeing, and on
4 the other hand, we also helped Croats and their civilian.
5 In the areas of Srebrenica and Zvornik, General Morillon was
6 under the constant pressure from both the Serbian and Muslim sides. The
7 Muslims wanted him to take civilians to Tuzla. The Serbs said, All
8 right, we shall allow that, but give us the Serbs from Tuzla. They are
9 suffering there, and they are in danger there. There is no doubt that
10 Morillon was exposed to such pressure. He testified to that, and he
11 enabled the Muslim civilians to leave for Tuzla. Unfortunately, the
12 Muslims of Tuzla
13 way in which the SDA compromised the SDS in the eyes of the Serbian
14 people, by saying, They're incapable of taking you out of Tuzla.
15 We have evidence that the Muslims from Trebinje via
16 Biljana Plavsic exerted pressure which enraged me. I said if they have
17 any problems, the police is there to protect them. They nevertheless
18 left, and after three months the SDA wanted to have Trebinje on the basis
19 of ethnic cleansing. These are primitive tricks. We know that they
20 ordered the Trebinje Muslims to go to Montenegro. They didn't come into
21 any harm's way.
22 In Professor Koljevic's diary, who was witness to the events, he
23 was the vice-president of the republic, he was a very responsible person,
24 he was born in Banja Luka, lived in Sarajevo, says that one of the most
25 privileged international organisations such as UNHCR and ICRC demanded
1 that I let a large number of Muslims and Croats from Krajina and the
2 surrounding of Banja Luka to be taken to third countries. That also
3 enraged me and I didn't allow that. After lengthy pressures, I approved
4 five trucks a day to be allowed leave instead of 80 requested as they
5 requested. If somebody was so much under threat and wanted to be
6 reunited with their families, they were allowed to go.
7 The Prosecutor -- a Prosecution witness in his statement, and
8 he's going to testify here, confirmed this in the very same words. The
9 Prosecution is going to say that it was us who cleansed these people from
11 to take them to Croatia
12 that many municipalities made a lot of obstacles, asking them to provide
13 proof that they had paid taxes and things like that.
14 The Serbs fled from the Muslim area in a disarray. The Muslims,
15 on the other hand, left in an orderly fashion, escorted by the police.
16 We are going to prove all this. So the Bosnian Krajina was not cleansed.
17 The Croatian minister, who is now in the Government of Republika Srpska,
18 recently said, "I never left Republika Srpska. Those who left were angry
19 with me for staying behind." So his own fellow Croats who left Doboj
20 left in order to exploit this fact, and they were angry at him for
21 staying behind and thereby negating his -- their claim that it will -- a
22 co-existence with Serbs was impossible. We have an interview with this
24 So we are going to refute these things, and I believe that we
25 are -- believe that that was untrue. We are going to prove that not a
1 single village that surrendered their weapons or didn't have them at all
2 in the first place had no problems. Not a single Muslim who was not
3 engaged in fighting had any problems. Those who were imprisoned were
4 extremists without exception.
5 I would now like to move to the subject of Srebrenica and the
6 elimination of Muslims from Srebrenica by organised killing of men and by
7 deportation of women and children and genocide of the Srebrenica Muslim.
8 Here in this title there are no men and boys mentioned without
9 the Prosecution explaining what "boy" means, but this is an emotional
10 impact which implies that the Serbs were killing boys. When you say a
11 boy, it could be a 16 or 17 boy who was mobilised and who was a member of
12 a unit.
13 Quite briefly let me tell you this, that there was fear fighting
14 and there was terrible terror exercised by the Muslims of the area. They
15 shot at the army in the back, and no army in the world shall tolerate
16 that. They killed entire villages on Christian holidays, and this
17 accused easily prove that he issued orders for all Catholic and Muslim
18 holidays to exercise restraint in both this war and the second war --
19 world war, they killed Serbs on their Christian holidays. In 1992, they
20 slaughtered people on Christmas Day, including civilians, without any
21 reason whatsoever, and that was actually an attack on civilians that was
22 provoked by nothing.
23 I'm going to request the Prosecution to provide reliable
24 information about how many Muslim women and children were killed and how
25 many Serb women and children were killed, and we are going to demonstrate
1 where it was that the Serbs were being killed and where the Muslims were
2 being killed, and both these groups were mostly killed in Serbian
3 villages. The Muslim army attacks a Serbian village and the result is
4 end of both Serbs and Muslims. The place of death will clearly
5 demonstrate what -- what was being done by everyone in this war.
6 Before I move to Srebrenica, let me tell you something about
7 directive. We are talking here about directives 4 and 7, these two
8 directives, and I'm not going to go into this whether I signed any of
9 this, but I will focus on what General Mladic said about them leaving the
10 zone together with the population.
11 The population made an ultimatum and wanted to be allowed to
12 leave. In November, in Kotor Varos, there was an uprising among the
13 Muslims, and they wanted their population to be allowed to go, and I
14 approved of that. Mladic, not knowing about that, said no. They cannot
15 just allow the civilians to go and they would remain there and fight
16 against us in our territory.
17 Two weeks after that, Mladic issued directive number 4, relating
18 to Eastern Bosnia, and he says the same thing, that they would either
19 leave alongside with the civilians or disarm themselves and remain to
20 live as civilians.
21 We have a problem with the transcript, don't we.
22 Directive number 4, there is a sentence in this directive which
23 is perpetuated further on in directive 7, and this sentence, which is
24 ascribed to both Mladic and me, says that we had ordered for the
25 civilians to disappear from a certain area, but that is not true. What
1 Mladic said was that the fighters should leave together with the
2 civilians and not the civilians with the fighters. We are going to prove
3 that it was the civilians who asked and who were given permission to
4 leave. Then Mladic added that, You shall also go with them. Mladic
5 didn't say the army should leave and take civilians with them, but quite
6 the opposite. If the civilians are going to leave, then the army should
7 join them. There's no doubt about that.
8 Two weeks before directive 4 was issued we had this case in
9 Kotor Varos and now this case has become a pattern of the Serbian
10 conduct. If the civilians want to leave, you should leave with them and
11 not stay behind and to shoot us in the back. The essence of directive
12 4 and directive 7 was that the civilians should bring the army
13 alongside with them. These requests were made in Eastern Bosnia to
14 Morillon and in Kotor Varos to the municipal War Presidency. It was an
15 ultimatum for their civilians to be allowed to leave. There is proof
16 that I said it's all right, allow them safe passage. But soldiers have
17 their own logic. They would say why -- why would you leave and allow
18 civilians to leave without army joining them? We cannot allow that.
19 Based on that some people were condemned, which is totally untrue. This
20 sentence says that the army should join civilians, not the other way
21 around, and it has been established that two weeks prior to that the
22 civilians were allowed to leave and that the army was ordered to leave
23 together with them and not stay behind and fight us.
24 As for Srebrenica, I will just briefly describe the period before
25 1995. In 1993, Srebrenica and Zepa were declared safe zones before I
1 halted the advance of Serbian Army. We had been under constant attack
2 from that area. They were attacking not only army. They would set an
3 ambush and they would kill a bus full of civilians. That's what was
4 impossible to tolerate any longer. The negotiations did not yield any
5 results. They followed orders from Sarajevo to provoke the Serbian Army
6 everywhere they could. That is how fighting took place in the area
7 around Zvornik, Kamenica, towards Srebrenica, which they lost. Many of
8 them went to Srebrenica.
9 There was enormous propaganda surrounding Cerska. The same like
10 the one concerning Srebrenica. There was rivers of blood. The Serbs
11 were slaughtering people.
12 General Morillon wanted to enter Cerska to see for himself which
13 he did, and he reported that there was no fighting whatsoever, let alone
14 massacre. For that reason we ordered an investigation to be carried out
15 regarding Srebrenica, because the same propaganda that was applied to
16 Cerska was repeated two years later to Srebrenica.
17 I halted the advance of our army towards Srebrenica, and I even
18 ordered not to investigate any crime -- war crimes, although there were
19 lots of them, just to avoid any revenge killings.
20 A border between the two safe zones were agreed, and the passage
21 was left between Skelani and Milici. Throughout the whole period, as
22 testified by the UN Secretary-General, Srebrenica and Zepa were not safe
23 haven, but they were, rather, military strongholds of armed troops from
24 which at least one Serb was killed daily by shooting from these zones.
25 We have daily reports of the Secretary-General to the Security Council
1 about what was happening there. The Prosecution, probably based on that,
2 accepted that these were legitimate operations, but our operation was not
3 aimed at capturing Srebrenica.
4 In all the agreements, in all peace plans we had accepted that
5 Srebrenica and Zepa would be connected to Gorazde and that it would
6 become a canton, as is the case today with Gorazde, and they would be
7 Muslim. All of a sudden it turns out, once all soldiers enter
8 Srebrenica, that they had left Srebrenica. That's when I ordered them to
9 enter the town to restore peace and order. I have a letter to that
10 effect because General Tolimir says what actually I ordered.
11 Once they entered Srebrenica there were no civilians in sight nor
12 any members of the military. The army fled to the woods. The civilian
13 authority surrenders. The army didn't listen to the civilian
14 authorities. They fled to the forests and wanted to continue fighting.
15 And the civilian population were not taken out of their homes by the Serb
16 army but, rather, by the UN.
17 So starting from the villages, they had a plan for men to join
18 the units to make a breakthrough towards Tuzla, whereas the civilians
19 were supposed to go to Potocari and then to be taken by UNPROFOR to
20 Kladanj and Muslim-held territory. Our entry was a complete surprise but
21 also any -- also the absence of civilians in the houses was a surprise.
22 The Prosecution still insists, nevertheless, that this was a
23 forcible deportation, whereas we have every possible evidence that that
24 was not the case and that was never planned.
25 When we heard that they want to leave their homes and to be
1 transferred to Kladanj and Tuzla under Muslim control, we hastily started
2 looking for buses and trucks to provide for transportation because we
3 were afraid of revenge, of acts of revenge. There had been no killing
4 until the 14th. There was some incident on the 13th, in Kravica, when a
5 Muslim detainee grabbed a rifle and started shooting. There were no
6 incidents prior to the 14th of July.
7 The crown witness of the Prosecution against me in the Srebrenica
8 case was late Deronjic, and they laid all their hopes in him according to
9 92 quater rule. He actually testified in my favour. He said that on the
10 evening of the 13th and morning of the 14th, there was a colonel who was
11 allegedly wanting to kill certain detainees and that he prevented them
12 from doing that. He told him, "If you keep behaving like that, I'm going
13 to call the president." That was on the 13th in the evening, and he
14 eventually withdrew.
15 We have a language problem here between the terms "detainees" and
16 "prisoners of war." When we speak about prisoners, this is not a
17 detainee in our language. When you say "prisoner," that implies a
18 prisoner of war, and those who are detained are called detainees. So we
19 are talking about POWs. And when we speak about an exchange of prisoners
20 without saying "prisoners of war," then the Prosecution claims that this
21 was an exchange of detainees. This is another linguistic problem that we
22 are facing here. Once you say a prisoner, it is understood that this
23 means a prisoner of war captured in fight. Those who were detained were
24 detained on a different basis and due to different reasons.
25 Thank you for this correction in the transcript.
1 On the morning of the 14th, as testified to by Deronjic, I don't
2 know whether that actually happened or not with that colonel, but
3 Deronjic himself says, "I met him at Yellow Bridge, and he asked that we
4 use the brick factory, and I said I'm going to Pale to see the
5 president." And indeed he did come to see me on the 14th, and then this
6 man withdrew.
7 A member of -- a small town SDS president stops a member of the
8 Main Staff twice by using the name of Radovan Karadzic. Had
9 Radovan Karadzic ordered some kind of unlawful killing, the colonel would
10 have said, "What do you want, kid? I have my instructions." Even if
11 Mladic had said something to him, he would say, "What do I care about
12 you? I have my boss. See?"
13 So the strongest Prosecution witness, according to what has been
14 said so far, absolutely does not speak in favour of the thesis that is
15 advocated by the Prosecution.
16 Deronjic testifies also to the fact that allegedly he said to me
17 on the 14th that some officers want to kill prisoners of war and that I
18 said that all these officers were crazy. The driver who brought him
19 testifies to the following: When Deronjic returned from me, when he got
20 into the car, he said, "I cannot believe that the president knows nothing
21 about this."
22 The OTP knows that. I don't remember about him having said that.
23 If he made an allusion, perhaps I didn't understand it, but saying that
24 officers were crazy, well, there was a quite a bit of tension between the
25 officers and the civilian authorities. We held a lot of things against
1 each other. But when a psychiatrist said that somebody is crazy, then
2 that may sound like a diagnosis, but this wasn't a diagnosis. This was
3 just speaking figuratively. So they cannot use Deronjic against me and
4 they really don't have anything else.
5 Then there's the report of the Dutch government that says that
6 Karadzic's role is unclear. In dubio pro reo is the rule that prevails.
7 Therefore, there is no culpability.
8 There is no investigation. There is no investigation for
9 Srebrenica. I cannot say anything about Srebrenica because there is no
10 investigation. What they created there was a place of worship. It's a
11 myth again. On the stone there it says "Over 8.000 Muslims," and they
12 could not bury more than 2.500. I don't know what the exact figure is
13 now, but please have a look at where these Muslims come from, those who
14 were buried on this hallow ground. See, Bratunac; Bijeljina, that is
15 100 kilometres away from there; Foca; Han Pijesak; Rogatica, Sarajevo;
16 Sokolac; Srebrenica; Srebrenik, which is even further away; Ugljevik;
17 Visegrad; Vlasenica; and Zvornik.
18 And now what they're saying is that the Serbs killed Muslim boys
19 and men, 8 .320. Over four years of war, deaths during the course of
20 four years of war, deaths in forests around Srebrenica when attempts were
21 made to forcibly break through Serb territory. Nevertheless, including
22 all of that, they could not bury more than 2.000, 3.000 people.
23 And then this investigating material. People are being tried for
24 Srebrenica here and this investigating material is being dealt with just
25 like that. Let us see where the DNA
1 Now I am in the stage of establishing the truth concerning
2 Srebrenica. Let us see whether there was anything unlawful, whether
3 there was any unlawful killing, how did it happen, and what the extent of
4 it was, if any. However, we have the report of the Muslim municipality
5 itself that says we have 37.000 people. We are showing 45 for the sake
6 of humanitarian aid so that we could feed our troops too. So if we are
7 to add up natural deaths and death in -- deaths in combat and also all of
8 those who managed to get out of Kladanj and Tuzla, and when we see what
9 they identified and in which day they identified the cause of death,
10 executions do not take place by shells. There have to be investigations
11 for the sake of the future, not for Karadzic's sake, for the sake of the
12 future of the peoples over there. It has to be established who got
13 killed how and in which way and where. But just to have trials
14 off-the-cuff saying such and such a number of Serbs killed such and such
15 a number of Muslims, I hope this Trial Chamber is not going to support
16 that. Let it be established once and for all what happened in
18 I have to say that I cannot accuse Trial Chambers of not having
19 established that, because in our system it is the investigating judges
20 who are in charge. However, the Defence teams were not in a position to
21 present the truth to the Trial Chambers involved because there was no
22 investigation. Simply there was no investigation, and there was no way
23 of saying this happened or that happened because there was no proper
25 Now, after the investigation concerning Srebrenica, and I am
1 going to ask for each and every report that exists, I have been given the
2 consent of the Trial Chamber to receive all the material involved, all
3 the information, and then let us create a 5 per cent sample of the DNA
4 and then let us see whether there are significant deviations. If that is
5 the case, then everything has to be examined.
6 You see, we know to this day that graves are being exhumed in
7 Bosnia and Herzegovina, all over Bosnia and Herzegovina so that somebody
8 could be buried in July in Srebrenica. Well, of course the death of a
9 single person is significant, but then why exaggerate.
10 I have another 15 minutes left; is that right?
11 I would like to say, finally, something about paragraph 11 -- or,
12 rather, joint criminal enterprise that pertains to hostage-taking.
13 My essential objection is that an army cannot be held hostage.
14 Civilians are hostages, and they are not taking part in fighting in any
16 These gentlemen who were held hostage, if I can put it that way,
17 were not civilians, and they were involved in combat.
18 Let me say straight away it's going to be easy for me to prove
19 that I have nothing to do with that. A Prosecution witness said Karadzic
20 found out from the media and the entire world without out from the media
21 that people were panic-stricken before the unlawful air-strikes by NATO,
22 unlawful bombing, because this was not close-air support, which would
23 have been legitimate if a UN unit had been endangered. However, this
24 operative [indiscernible] was bombing the Serb positions, and it was a
25 strategic decision in order to weaken the position of the Serbs so that
1 they could not defend themselves easily.
2 The Serbs kept these foreigners close to a bridge so that that
3 bridge would not be hit, because in a different situation, the SDA would
4 have slaughtered them -- or, rather, their army would have slaughtered
6 The general said in his first interview, Karadzic found out from
7 the media. He called and said that they should be released straight
8 away. However, that could not have been helped any longer. The media
9 had already carried these news and everyone started takes these hostages.
10 Why are they not hostages, though? Why are they combatants? We
11 are going to prove here that all UN generals are asking their civilian
12 chiefs, "Please do not involve us in the conflict. You're going to
13 expose to us to danger, and you are going to make us become part of one
14 of the sides involved." All of the commanders were aware that if they
15 bombed the Serbs, with a call made to these troops, that these troops
16 will be involved. And it's not that they were involved through the
17 action of their commanders only. They were even involved individually.
18 General Rose has the transcript of a broadcast as to how his
19 soldiers were involved, because they were the marksmen of the aircraft
20 flying above them. And then this young man says, "I have chosen a target
21 and I can hear the aircraft. I have the target -- oh, my goodness. The
22 Serbs hit my target. My target falls," and so on and so forth.
23 Let us leave aside what our suspicions are and what our proven
24 suspicions are to the effect that these UN units were involved in
25 smuggling. For a while UNPROFOR was called the taxi of the Muslim army
1 because they crossed our lines unannounced. They smuggled ammunition,
2 weapons, but nobody would have taken them as hostages because of that.
3 They were taken as hostages when the bombing started, not for the sake of
4 close-air support but tactically, operatively and almost strategically
5 for other reasons.
6 Now, all of these military observers, we have a witness who says
7 that -- says that these people are experts, and one such individual is
8 more valid than an entire company of mine. I am very sorry that they
9 bombed us in the first place, but I am sorry that this was done, but this
10 is not hostage-taking. They were involved in a war against us. They
11 called NATO aircraft to bomb us. They helped them. They selected
12 targets for them. They were their marksmen. Well, people like that
13 cannot be called hostages.
14 So you will see during the Defence case how many foreign soldiers
15 in Bosnia were killed by the Muslim side. You will see that they downed
16 the Italian aircraft. The Serbian Army couldn't have done that in any
17 way. And then a no-fly zone was introduced after that.
18 You'll see how many times the Muslims shelled convoys that were
19 escorted by UNPROFOR from Igman. All of this we have on the basis of the
20 material that the OTP has and uses against me. You will see what they
21 did to the foreigners who smuggled weapons for them, gave them vast
22 amounts of humanitarian aid. They shelled them. They hit them with
23 sniper fire in order to cause odium against the Serbs. Actually it was
24 clear and it was unequivocally established that they were the ones who
25 were doing that. You will not find a single case except for one that the
1 Serbs did that.
2 A lieutenant-colonel, when he became very nervous, he did not
3 kill anyone but he simply scattered the things belonging to a convoy all
4 over the place.
5 I apologised to Mr. Wahlgren, and I dismissed this man. His
6 nerves were shaken and he was upset because UNPROFOR was interfering and
7 doing all sorts of things that they were not supposed to do. But the
8 most important thing is what the UNPROFOR commander says, Do not get us
9 involved against the war. We will become a warring party if you involve
10 us in this. And the moment when they started bombing us outside the
11 close-air support, they did become a warring party.
12 Now, I don't need to dwell on this any longer. Suffice it to say
13 that soldiers who take a particular side, regardless of what their weapon
14 is, a laser or a rifle or whatever else, they cannot be hostages. They
15 are combatants. They are fighting against one of the sides that can at
16 least take them prisoner. Of course that was not a decision taken by
17 civilian authorities, it was not a decision taken by the military
18 commands, but it did so happen that the people did that, and we have
19 proof of that in OTP material. I remember that that was the case. I
20 remember that the images were carried all over the world, and it was hard
21 to release them silently because the bombing was going on and the people
22 all of a sudden realised that that would save us.
23 Excellencies, I'm not afraid of these proceedings. It is with
24 great enthusiasm that I am preparing for these proceedings. Regrettably
25 this may endanger my health because I'm working all night because I don't
1 have enough time. Why do I not have enough time? Because inter alia for
2 three and a half or four months, whatever, I did not have proper
3 assistance. My advisors could not work with me, and the OTP had
4 indiscriminately thrown together loads of material and alleged evidence
5 guided by the fact that they did not have evidence. And then, like our
6 Marxists, they thought that some day quantity would become quality, or
7 that it's better to use a shotgun against a little bird and then you will
8 hit one at least.
9 If the Security Council does not pass a Resolution sanctioning
10 the agreement with Holbrooke on my immunity, I am going to tell you what
11 I'm thinking about. I don't know whether all of it is possible, but I'll
12 tell you what I think. I think it would be a good thing if the
13 Trial Chamber were to return the indictment to the OTP, to see all the
14 things that they presented there that can easily be swept up as false
15 evidence. So they should either amend the indictment, narrow down the
16 indictment, and they cannot just say that Karadzic's intentions can be
17 heard through Tom, Dick, and Harry's words. I'm a politician. I make
18 speeches. If I have an intention to carry out something, I have to
19 pacify people, and it is deeds that speak, not words.
20 If they don't want to withdraw the indictment, if they don't want
21 to reduce the indictment, if they don't want to isolate the things that
22 really pertain to me, then it would be a good thing for me to get time
23 and resources, because the President of the Tribunal also established
24 that I did not have sufficient resources, so let us have exemplary
25 proceedings that will be to the credit of the Trial Chamber, the OTP, and
1 Defence. Exemplary proceedings that is going to be a blueprint for
2 international justice, that is going to rehabilitate international courts
3 and trials of this nature.
4 In that case, I could take it upon myself, up until the end of
5 May or, say, mid-June, if the trial were to be resumed in mid-June, then
6 by the second half of May I could provide you with thousands of facts, my
7 agreed facts list. These are facts that the OTP will not be able to
8 challenge, practically not at all. For example, that Serbs took over
9 such and such a municipality, and Serbs lived there in the first place.
10 For example, Hadzici was under Serb control. Serbs held under their
11 control only a very part -- a small part of Hadzici. Only the Serbian
12 neighbourhood there, actually. So these are facts that we could agree
13 on. By the end of May or, say, by mid-May I could provide these agreed
14 facts and this would disburden these proceedings. We could agree on so
15 many things. That would shorten the proceedings to a maximum of, say,
16 one or one and a half year, because there would be very few facts that
17 would be challenged and that we would be dealing with here in this
19 Your Excellencies, I would like to end on that note, and I think
20 that the best thing would be to observe the Holbrooke Agreement, because
21 that actually did take place. However, somebody did not do their work.
22 I did my share.
23 Could the Office of the Prosecutor ask you to have the indictment
24 withdrawn? However, if we are going to go to trial, then there are going
25 to be reviews of other trials where innocent men were convicted. I will
1 be able to prove that they were convicted as innocent men as I defend
2 myself here in these proceedings. If we go to trial, then I'm going to
3 do whatever is up to me. If we are going to have expeditious, fair
4 proceedings that will be to the credit of the international community and
5 international justice, I am going to give a constructive contribution, as
6 I have been doing all along. And my constructive contribution is going
7 to be in singling out the facts that we can all agree upon, and in this
8 way, we can cleanse these proceedings from unnecessary material that
9 would just exhaust us here. We have to go to the basic merits of this
11 Thank you.
12 JUDGE KWON: Thank you.
13 This is an oral ruling of the Chamber.
14 Following the Trial Chamber's decision on the accused's motion
15 for the postponement of trial, issued on 26 February 2010, the accused
16 yesterday filed an application for certification to appeal and for stay.
17 The Prosecution responded to that application yesterday, stating that it
18 does not oppose the granting of certification to appeal the
19 Trial Chamber's decision but that it does oppose staying the proceedings
20 until such time as the Appeals Chamber determines the matter.
21 Pursuant to Rule 73(B) of the Tribunal's Rules, a Trial Chamber
22 may grant certification to appeal one of its decisions if that decision
23 "involves an issue that would significantly affect the fair and
24 expeditious conduct of the proceedings or the outcome of the trial, and
25 for which, in the opinion of the Trial Chamber, an immediate resolution
1 by the Appeals Chamber may materially advance the proceedings."
2 Having considered the submission of the parties, the Chamber is
3 satisfied that the issue of the accused's readiness to actively
4 participate in his trial at this stage of the proceedings, which is
5 determined in the Chamber's decision on postponement, pertains directly
6 to the fairness of the proceedings and that therefore the first prong of
7 the test for certification under Rule 73(B) is met in the present
9 Since a resolution of this matter at any later stage could
10 require in the specific circumstances of this case a retrial in the event
11 that the Trial Chamber decision is found to have been incorrect, the
12 Trial Chamber is satisfied that the second prong of the test is also met.
13 Given that both prongs of the test for certification are
14 satisfied and the Chamber's view that it is in the interests of justice
15 for the Appeals Chamber to rule on this issue, certification to appeal is
16 hereby granted.
17 The Trial Chamber is mindful of the fact that staying the
18 proceedings at this stage would have an adverse effect on witnesses who
19 have already been brought to The Hague to testify this week and next.
20 However, should the proceedings continue tomorrow with the hearing of
21 those witnesses' evidence and the Appeals Chamber subsequently overturn
22 the Trial Chamber's decision on postponement, those witnesses would have
23 to return to The Hague for a third time and repeat their testimony as
24 would all the other witnesses whose evidence was heard between now and
25 the Appeals Chamber's decision.
1 Having considered the matter carefully, the Trial Chamber is thus
2 convinced that it is in the interests of justice for it to stay the
3 effect of its decision on postponement until the Appeals Chamber resolves
4 the matter.
5 The Chamber regrets the inconveniences caused to those witnesses
6 who have already travelled to The Hague or who are in transit, and trusts
7 that the Appeals Chamber will resolve this matter speedily so that we can
8 proceed to hear their evidence as soon as possible. Plainly, it is in
9 everyone's interest that both sides use any time available before the
10 Appeals Chamber's decision to continue with active trial preparation.
11 Therefore, now that Mr. Karadzic's opening statement has concluded, these
12 proceedings will be adjourned until further order following the
13 Appeals Chamber's ruling.
14 The hearing is now adjourned.
15 --- Whereupon the hearing adjourned at 1.35 p.m.,
16 sine die.