Tribunal Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

Page 3603

 1                           Monday, 1 December 2008

 2                           [Open session]

 3                           [The accused entered court]

 4                           --- Upon commencing at 8.51 a.m.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Today, we are to hear the Defence of

 6     Sredoje Lukic.  Mr. Cepic.

 7             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you, Your Honour.  Our first witness is

 8     Mr. Veroljub Zivkovic, and we will have no opening statement.

 9             JUDGE ROBINSON:  You'll have no opening statement.  I should say

10     that the motion that you made for the witnesses to testify under 92 ter

11     is granted.

12             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you.

13             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Subject, of course, to the requirements of the

14     rule being met.  You know what those requirements are.

15             There is one other matter I should mention.  It's Sredoje Lukic's

16     motion for certification to appeal the decision of the 13th November,

17     2008, in relation to the admission of a particular exhibit.  The Chamber,

18     I am to say, will deny that motion, and a written decision will be given

19     later today or, at the latest, tomorrow.

20             I want also to mention, Mr. Ivetic, you're here.  Mr. Alarid is

21     not here?

22             MR. IVETIC:  That's correct.  He's still traveling in the

23     United States.  He should be returning Wednesday morning, Your Honours,

24     from the States.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  Okay.  I just wanted to mention and to

Page 3604

 1     recall the Chamber's order pursuant to Rule 73 ter of the 27th of

 2     November.  We allowed the Defence of Milan Lukic to call 45 witnesses

 3     within 60 hours of examination-in-chief.  The reasons for the decision

 4     are set out in the Chamber's decision, and I want to say that the Chamber

 5     will hold the Defence strictly to the time framework that it has

 6     identified.

 7             I notice there is no application for protective measures from

 8     either side.  Mr. Ivetic, does that mean that you have no application for

 9     protective measures?

10             MR. IVETIC:  No, Your Honour.  What it means is that we have not

11     had an opportunity to go out in the field to meet with the witnesses and

12     ask specifically of each one for protective measures.  We do know about

13     the MLD alibi witnesses, that they did require protective measures, and

14     an application will be brought shortly for those; so there is at least a

15     group that will have protective measures, although we suspect that group

16     will expand in size once we have an opportunity to interview fully the

17     witnesses who end up being on the final list to see who would want to

18     apply for protective measures and what their basis would be for those

19     protective measures.

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  You are aware, of course, that normally you file

21     a motion.  It's done in court exceptionally.  I've allowed the

22     Prosecution exceptionally to make oral applications, but the normal rule

23     I expect to apply, that's a motion, so it can be considered by the

24     Trial Chamber with the other party being given an opportunity to comment

25     on it, so that the protective measures for witnesses to be heard before

Page 3605

 1     the Christmas recess may exceptionally be made orally, but must be done

 2     so at the earliest opportunity.  The measures for witnesses to be heard

 3     after the recess, they should be made at least two weeks prior to

 4     testimony.

 5             MR. IVETIC:  We will try to stick to that, Your Honour, and there

 6     will be written motions.  If we could be back up, Your Honour, for some

 7     clarification as to the order pursuant to Rule 73 ter, which we are

 8     working to try and comply with for the tomorrow deadline.  We wanted to

 9     bring to Your Honours' attention, there are about seven witnesses on our

10     list who are witnesses that were OTP witnesses who are being merely

11     brought to authenticate their statements to be introduced into evidence,

12     and there are five document custodian witnesses who are being put on the

13     list because of the Prosecution's insistence that even requests for --

14     requests for assistance be authenticated by the records custodians.  We

15     would ask for at least those 12 witnesses to be -- to not count towards

16     the 45 that we have since these are really witnesses that are being

17     brought upon the direction of the OTP for administrative matters that

18     really ought to be quick, and they are not really substantive witnesses

19     going towards the flow of events to the Defence.  So we'd like to bring

20     that to the Court's attention, and we will work on trying to at least

21     pare down the witness list and at least give groups of potential

22     witnesses where we would call one out of five, one out of six, depending

23     on who's available and who has the most -- the most -- best recollection

24     of events to present the best testimony for this Trial Chamber.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  You say that the witnesses are being brought as

Page 3606

 1     a result of the Prosecution's insistence.

 2             MR. IVETIC:  Correct, Your Honour.  They -- they --

 3             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Can you clarify that.

 4             MR. IVETIC:  Sure, if I can.  We have several witnesses for whom

 5     they were OTP witnesses.  They were either named in this case as OTP

 6     witnesses or disclosed as OTP witnesses for the Vasiljevic case.  They

 7     have sworn statements that contradict in many times family members or

 8     other OTP witnesses who did come here to testify, and we would be

 9     bringing them just to authenticate those OTP statements, which at one

10     point in time the Prosecution even said, we don't know how --

11             THE INTERPRETER:  Would counsel please slow down.

12             MR. IVETIC:  -- they're the statements of the OTP.  So ... I

13     apologise.  The Prosecution said that they are not reliable, but those

14     are OTP statements.  So in essence, those that were being forced to bring

15     live individuals to introduce statements, we could perhaps do that under

16     a 92 bis except for the fact that the Prosecution is refusing to give us

17     the contact information for those witnesses, but in any event, even if we

18     were to bring perhaps --

19             THE INTERPRETER:  Again, would the counsel please slow down.

20             MR. IVETIC:  -- count towards our 45 total, because they're being

21     brought upon the insistence of the Prosecution and not stipulating to

22     some --

23             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I hesitate to interrupt, but no one has

24     earphones on.  The interpreters are asking you to slow down, Mr. Ivetic.

25     Several times now.

Page 3607

 1             MR. IVETIC:  I apologize, Your Honour.

 2             JUDGE ROBINSON:  You do tend to speak very fast --

 3             MR. IVETIC:  I do.  I know that.

 4             JUDGE ROBINSON:  -- so you have to make a special effort to slow

 5     down.

 6             MR. IVETIC:  Yes.  In this courtroom, I tend to speak even faster

 7     it seems than the smaller courtroom.

 8             So as I was saying, Your Honour, if we bring those seven former

 9     OTP witnesses and five document custodial -- custodian-type witnesses, we

10     would ask for the Court to clarify its order or reconsider its order to

11     not have those count towards our 45 witness total that was specified in

12     the Rule 73 ter order.  Thank you.

13                           [Trial Chamber confers]

14             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, Mr. Groome.

15             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, just a brief comment.  I don't recall

16     ever having made such a blanket statement with respect to the reliability

17     of OTP statements.  It seems to me that if Mr. Ivetic wishes to introduce

18     the statements of witnesses, there is a procedure for that.  He's correct

19     in saying it's 92 bis, and we'd be happy to, where appropriate, not

20     oppose admission of certain statements with respect to 92 bis.  He raises

21     an issue with respect to the Prosecution providing the contact details of

22     the witnesses.  I'm not sure that's necessary for 92 bis because 92 bis

23     would allow the registrar simply to go and validate or take the sworn

24     portion of the statement, but I am mindful of that, and I am mindful that

25     I have no ownership of witnesses.

Page 3608

 1             What I have tried to do to resolve this is I've -- I don't feel

 2     comfortable handing over to Milan Lukic the addresses and the phone

 3     numbers of witnesses without their consent, so I can either contact those

 4     witnesses and find out whether they do consent, or it seems to me one

 5     other way to do this is to have a neutral party, such as VWS, contact the

 6     witnesses and perhaps arrange some communication between the Defence team

 7     and the witness.  I've spoken to Mr. De Witt, the head of VWS, on Friday,

 8     about his views on this, and he's going to let me know today whether he

 9     thinks it's something that VWS could appropriately undertake.  So, you

10     know, I will report back to the Chamber when Mr. De Witt let's me know

11     what his views are on it, but it seems to me, that would be one way to

12     deal with this matter.  I would provide the contact information to VWS

13     and leave it to them to, in a way that is mindful of the wishes and the

14     security of the witnesses, to place them -- place the Defence team in

15     communication with those witnesses.

16             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Are these witnesses in respect of whom

17     protective measures have been applied?

18             MR. GROOME:  I'm not sure all of them.  I think some of them may

19     have had some protective measures at some point, Your Honour.  I would

20     have to check that before I could speak specifically to that, but again,

21     I'm not comfortable simply handing over the contact details.  Of course,

22     if the Chamber orders me, to I'll certainly comply with that order; but

23     it seemed to me the more appropriate way to do this would be to have a

24     neutral party contact those witnesses and make some arrangements, either

25     through a conference call that they could arrange between Defence counsel

Page 3609

 1     and the witness if the Defence counsel want to speak to these people

 2     directly, or they could simply ask the witness, are they happy to have

 3     their contact information provided to the Defence?  But it seemed to me

 4     by placing that in a neutral party, it would avoid any kind of concern

 5     they may be asked in a leading way whether or not they wanted to speak

 6     with Defence.

 7                           [Trial Chamber confers]

 8             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Ivetic, please stand.  I'm not going to rule

 9     on your request that -- is it 12 witnesses?  12 witnesses not be counted,

10     in the number -- among the 45 witnesses that the Chamber has indicated

11     the Defence will be allowed to call.  I'm not going to rule on that now.

12     I will consider it.

13             You must file a motion, a written motion, and file that motion

14     today.  Similarly, I advise you also to file a motion requesting that the

15     Trial Chamber consider requiring the Prosecutor to provide the contact

16     details of the witnesses in question.  That will give the Chamber some

17     time to consider it.  I can see arguments going both ways, and so I don't

18     wish to rule on that now.

19             MR. IVETIC:  Thank you, Your Honour.

20             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, just maybe one additional matter to

21     maybe relieve Mr. Ivetic of some of his burden.  He said that the

22     Prosecution was opposing any -- requiring people to come and authenticate

23     requests for assistance.  I will state on the record that the Prosecution

24     will accept any request of assistance made to a government.  So if any

25     government in response to a request for assistance by the Milan Lukic

Page 3610

 1     team receives documents through an official request for assistance, I

 2     will accept that.  Similarly, just as we have put forward in written

 3     filing a request for assistance for some records that we received, and

 4     the Chamber did admit them, I would expect the same treatment for the

 5     Prosecution.  So if the request for assistance is from a government and

 6     officially provided by that government, the Prosecution will accept those

 7     documents as authentic.

 8             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Very well.  Yes, Mr. Cepic.  Your first witness.

 9             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you, Your Honour.  Our first witness is

10     Mr. Veroljub Zivkovic.

11                           [The witness entered court]

12             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Let the witness make the declaration.

13             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] I solemnly declare that I will

14     speak the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

15                           WITNESS:  VEROLJUB ZIVKOVIC

16                           [Witness answered through interpreter]

17             JUDGE ROBINSON:  You may sit, and you may begin, Mr. Cepic.

18             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you, Your Honour.

19                           Examination by Mr. Cepic:

20        Q.   [Interpretation] Good morning, Mr. Zivkovic.

21        A.   Good morning.

22        Q.   For the record, would you give us your full name.

23        A.   Veroljub Zivkovic.

24        Q.   Thank you.  Please give us your place and date of birth.

25        A.   I was born on the 3rd of May, 1961, in Obrenovac.

Page 3611

 1        Q.   Thank you.

 2             MR. CEPIC:  Madam Usher, I'm going to ask you to pass the

 3     document to the witness.  In the meantime, could we have on our screens

 4     65 ter Exhibit number 17.  ID number is in B/C/S, 2D04-0121, and in

 5     English, 2D04-0125.

 6        Q.   [Interpretation] Mr. Zivkovic, do you see the screen before you?

 7        A.   Yes.

 8        Q.   In the meantime, I'll ask you, have you given a written statement

 9     to this Defence team on the 26th of November, 2007?

10        A.   Yes.

11        Q.   Mr. Zivkovic, during proofing with the Defence team of

12     Mr. Sredoje Lukic, did you ask for certain corrections to be made to the

13     statement?

14        A.   Yes.

15        Q.   Was one of these corrections related to paragraph 2 of your

16     statement, namely the distance between your house and the house of

17     Mr. Milojko Popadic in the settlement where you live?

18        A.   Yes.

19        Q.   What exactly did you want to change?

20        A.   It was written there that the distance between

21     Mr. Milojko Popadic's house and mine was 300 metres.  I noticed

22     immediately that it was perhaps a typo.  In fact, the distance is 700 to

23     800 metres.

24        Q.   Thank you.  In paragraph 4, in the third sentence in B/C/S, which

25     is the fourth sentence in English, did you ask that after the words:

Page 3612

 1     "After his arrest when he came to visit his family, I saw him ..." did

 2     you ask that to be replaced with the wording:  "The first time I saw him

 3     visit his family after his arrest"?

 4        A.   Correct.

 5        Q.   Mr. Zivkovic, regarding all the other questions asked of you when

 6     you gave that statement, if I asked the same questions today, would you

 7     provide the same answers as in the statement?

 8        A.   Yes.

 9             MR. CEPIC: [Interpretation] Your Honours, may I tender this

10     statement?

11             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.

12             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you.

13             THE REGISTRAR:  As 2D41, Your Honours.

14             MR. CEPIC:  Could I ask for Exhibit 65 ter number 32.  ID number

15     is 2D05-0270 in B/C/S, and in English, 2D05-2071.  I'm sorry.  We have

16     corrections for the version in English language, so according to the

17     notification from 20th of November, it is 2D05-0293.  Just translation.

18     It is official translation from the service of ICTY.

19        Q.   [Interpretation] Mr. Zivkovic, can you see the document before

20     you?

21        A.   Yes.

22        Q.   Would you tell us what it is.

23        A.   Well, this is a certificate issued by our priest, Petar Paraklis.

24        Q.   Thank you.  What does it confirm?  What does it certify?

25        A.   It certifies that it is --

Page 3613

 1             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, I kindly ask admission of this exhibit.

 2             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] -- a celebration for the village of

 3     Krtinska.

 4             THE REGISTRAR:  That's 2D42, Your Honours.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, thank you.

 6             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you.  Could we have in e-court system 65 ter

 7     number 13.  It's the wrong exhibit.  Defence exhibit 65 ter 13, ID number

 8     2D03-0374 and 0375.

 9             I do have this document in hard copy.  It was in our package in

10     accordance with Rule 65 ter.

11        Q.   [Interpretation] Mr. Zivkovic, what is this document on our

12     screens?

13        A.   It's our church calendar.

14        Q.   For which month, for which year?

15        A.   June.

16        Q.   What about the year?

17        A.   I can't see the year.  Oh, right.  Right.  It's 1992.

18        Q.   Can you tell us about the St. Trinity holidays?  On what dates

19     did they fall?

20        A.   St. Trinity changes dates but is always on Sunday.  Which month

21     do you mean?

22        Q.   June, 1992.

23        A.   Sunday the 14th.

24        Q.   Thank you, Mr. Zivkovic.

25             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, we kindly ask for admission of this

Page 3614

 1     exhibit, please.

 2             JUDGE ROBINSON:  What is the -- what is the date that we are to

 3     look at here?  Because it's not translated.  What are you bringing to our

 4     attention in this church diary?

 5                           [Trial Chamber and registrar confer]

 6             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I understand the translation is now on the

 7     screen.  Ah, yes.  I see it.  I still want you to tell us, though, what

 8     is it that you're bringing to our attention, now that we have it in

 9     English.

10             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Shall I answer?

11             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  Yes.

12             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Well, we should pay attention here

13     to the month of June, 14th June, a Sunday.  It's a celebration of my --

14     celebrated in my village where I live, Holy Trinity.

15             MR. CEPIC:  Scroll down in English version, please.

16             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  Thank you.  I see it now.  Yes.

17             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you.  And also, if I may add, this exhibit was

18     in Mitar Vasiljevic case.  It was admitted as Defence exhibit.

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  And you wish to have it admitted?

20             MR. CEPIC:  Yes, Your Honour.  I forgot to tender it.

21             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, we admit it.

22             THE REGISTRAR:  That's Exhibit 2D43, Your Honours.

23             MR. CEPIC: [Interpretation]

24        Q.   Mr. Zivkovic, thank you.  I have no further questions for you.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Thank you.  Cross-examination, Mr. Groome.

Page 3615

 1             MR. GROOME:  Thank you.  Thank you, Your Honour.

 2                           Cross-examination by Mr. Groome:

 3        Q.   Good morning, Mr. Zivkovic.  My name is Dermot Groome, and I'll

 4     be asking you some questions on behalf of the Prosecution, okay?  I first

 5     want to ask you about your relationship with Sredoje Lukic.  Would it be

 6     fair to say that you know him for approximately 20 years?

 7        A.   Yes.

 8        Q.   And would you consider yourself a good friend of Sredoje Lukic's?

 9        A.   We were acquaintances.  We were not dear friends.  My best

10     friends live where I live, and I see them every day, but I was good a

11     good acquaintance with him.  We were sound acquaintances, so to speak.

12        Q.   Well, during the war, you and Sredoje Lukic lived quite close to

13     each other.  Is that not correct?

14        A.   Sredoje Lukic lived in that village of Krtinska, relatively

15     close.  I don't know what you mean by the word "close."

16        Q.   Well, how far did he live from your home?

17        A.   Around 1 and a half kilometers while he used to live in the

18     centre of the village, 1 and a half kilometers, approximately.

19        Q.   Now, do you recall having -- or giving an interview to an

20     investigator of the Office of the Prosecutor, Phillip Caine, about your

21     testimony here today?  Do you recall having such an interview?

22        A.   Yes.

23        Q.   Now, during that interview, you stated that after the war began,

24     Sredoje Lukic would come from Visegrad to visit his family in Obrenovac,

25     and you also described that he would bring you things from Visegrad.  Let

Page 3616

 1     me read a portion of your statement.

 2             MR. GROOME:  And for counsel, I'll be referring to the English

 3     translation of the statement when I give the transcript references.

 4             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just a minute.  Mr. Cepic.

 5             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, we gave -- actually, we found many

 6     errors, even in B/C/S translation, and I never found that Sredoje Lukic

 7     brought the things to this witness.

 8             MR. GROOME:  I'm about to read the actual passage.

 9             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Let us hear the passage.

10             MR. GROOME:  And counsel can check the transcript.

11        Q.   So this is on page 21 of that transcript, line 4, and it says:

12     "Many times he," referring to Sredoje Lukic, "helped us out too."

13             So my question to you is, how was it that Sredoje Lukic helped

14     you out during the war?

15        A.   Sredoje Lukic did not help me out during the war, and this is not

16     my statement, sir.

17        Q.   So you don't recall saying that to Phillip Caine?

18        A.   No.  I did not say this.

19        Q.   Okay.  As far as you know --

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just a minute.  Mr. Cepic.

21             MR. CEPIC:  I'm sorry.  We have couple versions of that

22     transcript in English, in B/C/S, so could my learned friend Mr. Groome

23     clarify us from which precisely transcript is page 21?

24             MR. GROOME:  It's what I told Mr. Cepic before Court and what

25     I've said here in court.  There are various translations, and it appears,

Page 3617

 1     Your Honour, that the translator that attended the interview was quite

 2     poor, made a number of errors that Mr. Cepic has pointed out.  So what

 3     I'm using is the English translation of the original B/C/S under the view

 4     that's what's most important is what question was put -- did the witness

 5     hear, and what was the witness's response?  So what I'm referring to when

 6     I give transcript references, it's the English translation of the B/C/S

 7     that was spoken during the course of the interview.

 8             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I'm just wondering, Mr. Groome, if you were to

 9     read from the translation what was said just before the disputed passage

10     and what comes after.  Maybe we might have a fuller context.  Mr. Cepic,

11     you wanted to say something.

12             MR. CEPIC:  Yes, Your Honour.  With your leave, just if we can

13     have from which transcript is -- was 21st page which Mr. Groome quoted.

14             MR. GROOME:  Again, it's the English translation of the B/C/S.

15     It's not the merged translation that has the -- what we now know to be

16     incorrect translations made during the course of the interview.  It is

17     simply the English translation of the B/C/S, and it bears the number

18     T001-1686.

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  What I was suggesting, Mr. Groome, is that

20     perhaps the witness might have a better recollection of what you put to

21     him, if you reminded him of what went immediately before.

22             MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.  I'll read the entire passage.

23        Q.   So, sir, Mr. Caine asked you the following question:  "How do you

24     know that he," referring to Sredoje Lukic, "was coming to visit his

25     family?"

Page 3618

 1             And your response was:  "Well, because we have time to visit each

 2     others, usually on Saturdays and Sundays over the weekend.  He was coming

 3     usually at that time, and whatever I was doing, something with the car,

 4     with the truck, I have only the weekend, since I usually say," and

 5     there's a word that was not caught on tape, "since I usually say to find

 6     a job.  That I do that.  Let's say in the afternoons and over the weekend

 7     and so.  And my house is also on the way.  It is in view.  It has always

 8     been like that, always.  Many times he helped us out too.  I would give

 9     him something, I do not know, some part and so."

10             So again, sir, my question is, do you remember giving that answer

11     to Mr. Phillip Caine?  Do you recall giving that answer?

12        A.   Yes, I did say what you just read out, but I did not say that he

13     brought things.  This is an obvious mistake.  I have my own tape while I

14     was giving this statement, and I know that it can be translated in detail

15     what -- the first thing you said, it was not true, but the latter

16     statement that you read out was correct.  Yes.

17        Q.   So where I read:  "Many times he helped us out too."  Again, what

18     was the help that Sredoje Lukic gave you and your family, or you?

19        A.   While working at Milojko Popadic's, while I was repairing his

20     trucks, and when he would come over the weekend when he was free, Sredoje

21     used to help us out with those trucks.  I would give him a part to

22     sandpaper and prepare for installation.  In this context, it was that I

23     said this.

24        Q.   So that the Chamber is clear, you are a car mechanic in that you

25     fix the locks of cars and you fix the body of cars, and it is your

Page 3619

 1     testimony that Sredoje Lukic helped you out during this period.  Is that

 2     correct?

 3        A.   I'm a locksmith by trade, but I've been dealing with car body

 4     mechanics, painting of cars.  I do everything except the mechanical

 5     parts.  I can deal with everything else concerning cars and trucks.

 6        Q.   And that's what Sredoje Lukic helped you out with, that type of

 7     work, correct?

 8        A.   Yes.  When he would come to Mr. Popadic where I was usually

 9     working on trucks over weekends, when Sredoje used to come, he would help

10     out, not always, not regularly, but when he happened to be at

11     Mr. Popadic's.

12        Q.   Sir, just in the interest of time, if I could ask you to answer

13     my question with a simple yes or no if possible, I'd appreciate that.

14     Did you attend Sredoje Lukic's wedding?

15        A.   No.

16        Q.   And can I ask you to clarify the following portion from the

17     transcript.  This is page 23 beginning at line 11:  "Why I think he

18     worked in Visegrad first, it is because when he got married to Milojko's

19     sister, when they invited me to celebrate it, then they said that he was

20     a policeman and that he worked in Visegrad."

21             Can you explain what you meant when you said that in your

22     interview to Mr. Caine?

23        A.   Well, he married -- he married most probably at Visegrad, but

24     first time I visited Milojko Popadic's after his marriage, when he came

25     to that place, I was there working on trucks.  This is how we met.  But I

Page 3620

 1     did not attend his wedding at Visegrad.  I've never been to Visegrad in

 2     my life.

 3        Q.   Can I ask you, what height is Sredoje Lukic?

 4        A.   Sredoje Lukic is around 180 centimetres, give or take a couple of

 5     centimetres.

 6        Q.   What was his age, approximate age, in 1992?

 7        A.   I don't know exactly.  I don't know the year he was born.

 8        Q.   Your best estimate.  Your best estimate.

 9        A.   25, 26 years.

10        Q.   And --

11        A.   What did you mean, when I met him how old he was?  I didn't

12     understand your question.

13        Q.   In 1992, the period of time that you've come to testify about,

14     that's the time, the age at that time.

15        A.   Yes.  In 1992, 25, 26 years or thereabouts.

16        Q.   And what would have been his approximate weight at that stage?

17        A.   Maybe 90, 90 kilogrammes.  We are similar, approximately, in

18     stature.

19        Q.   And do you ever remember him going unshaven around that time

20     period?

21        A.   There were times when he had some leisure time, he did not have

22     any duties.  When he was off-duty, he would grow a couple of days' beard,

23     but of course when he went back to work, he had to be clean-shaven

24     because that comes with the job.  He was a policeman.

25        Q.   And when he had not shaved for a couple of days, would that be

Page 3621

 1     something that would be clearly visible?

 2        A.   I don't understand.  What could be visible?  What do you mean?

 3        Q.   Well, I'm asking you is, some people have a light beard, some

 4     people have a heavy beard.  When he didn't shave for a couple of days,

 5     was it something that was readily seen by people who would see him?

 6        A.   Yes.  It could be noticed, yes.

 7        Q.   Now, there's a witness scheduled to testify here by the name of

 8     Milojko Popadic.  What is your relationship to Mr. Popadic?

 9        A.   I'm a good friend with Milojko Popadic.  We've been working

10     together for years, and we grew to be friends over that time, following

11     from all the jobs that I did for him at his place.

12        Q.   Is it true that Mr. Popadic owns a trucking firm and he regularly

13     gave you work during this period in the repair of his trucks?

14        A.   Yes.  In 90 per cent of cases, I repaired his trucks, and I still

15     do that when the need arises.  Whenever there is a job to be done on a

16     truck, I do it, when he works at construction house or something gets

17     bent or ...

18        Q.   Are you also related to him by marriage?

19        A.   No.  No, we're no relatives.

20        Q.   He's not your brother-in-law?

21        A.   No.

22        Q.   There's also another witness by the name of Branko Bugarski.  Is

23     he a friend of yours?

24        A.   I do know Branko Bugarski.  We're not friends that would visit

25     each other, but I know of him, and he lives in the same community of

Page 3622

 1     Krtinska where I live.

 2        Q.   And have you also done work for his son, Darko?

 3        A.   Yes.  He bought him a truck, and then we overhauled the whole

 4     truck, of course, except the mechanics, but the body, the locks, paint,

 5     everything except the mechanics.

 6        Q.   Now, during the war -- I see from your interview with Mr. Caine

 7     that you told him that during the war Sredoje Lukic first came to live

 8     with Milojko Popadic and then moved to an apartment that Milojko found in

 9     the centre of Krtinska.  Is that correct?

10        A.   Yes.

11        Q.   And who owned the apartment that Milojko found for Sredoje Lukic

12     to live in?

13        A.   Branko Bugarski from Krtinska was the owner.  His mother used to

14     live there.  Then it was empty, vacant, and he rented it out to

15     Mr. Sredoje Lukic.

16        Q.   And according to you, on the Day of Holy Trinity in 1992,

17     Sredoje Lukic was living in the apartment owned by Bugarski.  Is that

18     correct?

19        A.   Yes.

20        Q.   Do you know if he was paying rent?

21        A.   I don't know about that, neither did I ask him nor did I have a

22     need to know that.

23             MR. GROOME:  I'd ask that the following exhibit be called up on

24     e-court.  It's 0635-2002.

25        Q.   Sir, during -- while that's being called up, during the course of

Page 3623

 1     your interview with Mr. Caine, did he ask you to make some marks on a map

 2     of Krtinska to indicate where different people lived, including yourself?

 3        A.   Yes.  He showed me a map, but it is not an original map of that

 4     village.  It would have been much easier if it were an original.  It is a

 5     tourist map, but I can find my bearings on it.

 6        Q.   Okay.  It's being loaded now, and while we're working with this

 7     map, I would ask if we could prepare for e-court the e-court exhibit

 8     named Mlad.  It's a large photograph.  It may take a while to upload.

 9             So sir, while we're looking at that map there, is that the map

10     that you made markings on during the interview with Mr. Caine?

11        A.   This is better, yes.

12        Q.   That's your handwriting?

13        A.   Yes, correct.

14        Q.   Is there anything you want to change in this map?  Is it still

15     accurate?

16        A.   It's approximately accurate, but not all the roads and paths are

17     indicated here.  There are many more roads and paths than are shown on

18     this map, but I orientate myself by this main road, and this is -- I

19     indicated in relation to that main road where each house is.  If I had a

20     precise map of Krtinska, I could show you all the houses.

21        Q.   Okay.  I think I may be able to assist you with that.  So based

22     upon your testimony that this is the map that you marked during your

23     interview --

24             MR. GROOME:  -- I would now tender into evidence, Your Honour,

25     ERN 0635-2002.

Page 3624

 1             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.

 2             THE REGISTRAR:  That's Exhibit P198, Your Honours.

 3             MR. GROOME:  And I'd ask that the document Mlad be called up.

 4        Q.   Sir, this is an aerial photograph of the Krtinska village.  I'd

 5     ask you to take a look at it and ask you, do you recognize it?  Are you

 6     able to get your bearings from this aerial photograph?

 7        A.   I don't know where the thermo electrical or power plant is.  This

 8     is my main reference point.  If I were to know where it is in relation to

 9     this section, I could tell you where it was.

10             MR. CEPIC: [Previous translation continues] ... and if my learned

11     friend has got a bigger map, and this is map is misleading.  Thank you.

12             MR. GROOME:  It's simply a picture -- I'm not sure how it could

13     be misleading.  It's a photograph taken from the air.  I can assist

14     the --

15             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Are you saying it's not accurate?

16             MR. CEPIC:  This is just part, one part of that suburb.  It's not

17     the whole area.  This is just part -- this is Mlad.  It's not the whole

18     Krtinska.  Thank you.

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Well, let us see whether the witness can help us

20     with it.

21             MR. GROOME:

22        Q.   Sir, if it helps orient you, the power station would be on the

23     road going to the right of the map.  Does that assist you?  You will be

24     able to make marks on this map, but I just want to see if you're able to

25     orient yourself on this map.

Page 3625

 1        A.   I cannot.

 2        Q.   Okay.  If you cannot --

 3             JUDGE ROBINSON:  It really is not very clear, Mr. Groome.

 4             MR. GROOME:  If he's not able to identify where it is,

 5     Your Honour, then I'll move on.

 6        Q.   Sir, during your interview with Phillip Caine, you indicated that

 7     you knew Sredoje Lukic worked in Belgrade for a period of time, but you

 8     were uncertain about when.  What is your memory, best memory, with

 9     respect to when Sredoje Lukic worked in Belgrade?  In the interview, you

10     thought it might have been 1987, 1988, or 1989.  Is that correct?

11        A.   Yes.  Approximately from 1988, 1989.

12             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I thought Mr. Cepic was on his feet, but he's

13     not.

14             MR. CEPIC:  It is late on better translation in B/C/S.  They

15     started something wrongly and later on it is proper.  Thank you.  I

16     apologize for interrupting.

17             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, Witness.  Please give us your answer.

18             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Your Honours, I think it was in

19     1988, 1989.  I stated that I'm not 100 per cent certain, but

20     approximately that would be it, that period when Sredoje Lukic used to

21     work in Belgrade.

22             MR. GROOME:

23        Q.   And for how long a period is it your belief he worked in

24     Belgrade?

25        A.   For a brief period, he worked there, but I don't know whether one

Page 3626

 1     or two years.  A brief period.  I remember that by the fact that he would

 2     visit Milojko more frequently because that's closer to where he lived at

 3     the time.

 4        Q.   Now, you said that you're not sure, it was either in 1988 or

 5     1989.  Do you recall in your interview with Mr. Caine you also said that

 6     it might also be 1987?

 7        A.   Well, as I say, during that period I think it was around 1988,

 8     1988.  I reiterate, I cannot tell you precisely the year, the date.  What

 9     I do not know, I do not know.

10        Q.   Okay, but your memory with respect to dates is quite important in

11     your evidence.  You recognize that, don't you?

12        A.   Well, yes, that's correct.  But I cannot give you a precise date

13     when he worked in Belgrade.  He was a policeman in Belgrade.  What I do

14     know is that he used to frequent Milojko's place more frequently because

15     he lived closer by.

16        Q.   If I could read you a portion of your statement or your interview

17     with Mr. Caine, and if you could tell me whether it's correct, and it's

18     at page 19 beginning on line 20.

19             "If my memory is good, he worked in Belgrade for one period,

20     sometime in 1987, 1988, 1989.  I do not know exactly which period.  I

21     cannot assert that."

22             Do you recall saying that to Mr. Caine?

23        A.   Yes.

24        Q.   Now, you've had numerous cases before the courts of Serbia, some

25     having to do with violations of traffic laws, and others having to do

Page 3627

 1     with violations of the law of public order and peace and other violations

 2     of the Criminal Code.  In order to save time, I've prepared a table from

 3     the information we have received from the government of Serbia.  I'm

 4     going to ask that it be called up.

 5             MR. GROOME:  It is document ZIV-CONV.

 6        Q.   I'm going to ask you to look at this table and examine it, and

 7     tell us whether it accurately summarizes the numerous cases you have had

 8     brought against you.

 9             MR. GROOME:  Could I ask, to give the witness the benefit of

10     seeing the entire document if it's possible, perhaps we could just look

11     at the B/C/S at this stage, and then if he recognizes ...

12        Q.   So, sir, could I ask you just to read over that, and my question

13     to you is, does it accurately summarize the cases that you have had

14     before the courts of Serbia?

15        A.   Well, I don't know much about these documents.  I had traffic

16     violations.  I know that, and I know of another case when there was a

17     traffic jam -- sorry, there was a commotion.  My uncle had come, and I

18     arrived then and pulled my uncle out of it.

19             MR. GROOME:  Sir, I will ask you some specific questions about

20     one of the cases here.  I'm just asking you -- there's three pages to

21     this document.  Let me please ask the usher to advance to the second

22     page.  If you would look at that, and all I'm asking you is whether the

23     information on this -- again, it's a table created from information

24     received from the government of Serbia, if it appears accurate to you, to

25     be an accurate record of the cases you've had before the courts of

Page 3628

 1     Serbia.

 2             JUDGE ROBINSON:  But did he address the first page?  Did he speak

 3     to the accuracy of the first page?  You have moved to the second now.

 4             MR. GROOME:  I was going to give him an opportunity to see the

 5     entire document, but I can --

 6             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Very well, yes.  Proceed.  But let us hear

 7     Mr. Cepic.

 8             MR. CEPIC:  I do not object to this document, but most of this --

 9             THE INTERPRETER:  Could Mr. Cepic please speak into the

10     microphone.  Mr. Cepic is inaudible.

11             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Please speak into the microphone.  They can't

12     hear you.

13             MR. CEPIC:  I apologize.  I apologize.  Your Honour, I do not

14     object informations, but related to most of these procedures, this

15     witness is acquitted, according to this document, so I don't see the

16     purpose to discuss about some cases where he's acquitted.

17             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, it's just an accurate reflection of the

18     cases.  I'm certainly not going to question him on anything other than a

19     conviction.

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Let us hear what the witness says.

21             MR. GROOME:

22        Q.   Sir, I'm going to ask that you be shown the last page.  I'm

23     sorry.  There's very little on the last page.  But sir, do you recognize

24     these is being accurate descriptions of cases that you had before the

25     courts of Serbia?

Page 3629

 1        A.   Could you please repeat that?

 2        Q.   The table is a summary of information we received from the

 3     government of Serbia regarding cases that you had that were brought

 4     against you in the courts of Serbia, so my question to you is, looking at

 5     that table, and we can go back to any page that you want to take another

 6     look at, does it accurately reflect -- does it agree with your memory of

 7     the cases you had before the courts of Serbia?

 8        A.   I can't remember in the last ten years that I have ever appeared

 9     in court.  Maybe if you told me again about some of these cases, I would

10     remember, but maybe not.

11        Q.   Okay.  Well, let's maybe go back to the first page.  Let me ask

12     you about number 3 on the first page.  Now, on the 13th of April, 2001,

13     you were convicted in the municipal court of Obrenovac of paragraph 1 of

14     Article 220 of the Criminal Code of Serbia, a code starting with the

15     title called "Violent Behavior," and it's a very long title that

16     describes several ways in which that crime can be committed.  Do you

17     recall being convicted of that crime in 2001, arising out of an incident

18     that occurred in May of 2000?

19        A.   I remember vaguely.  It's some sort of disgrace inflicted upon

20     citizens.

21        Q.   Before I ask you specific questions about it, do you admit that

22     you were convicted of this crime, this violation of Article 220,

23     paragraph 1?  Do you admit that you were convicted of that crime?

24        A.   Well, I can't remember exactly.  I remember very vaguely some

25     sort of incident, but I don't know if I was convicted or if I was

Page 3630

 1     sentenced or fined.

 2        Q.   Let me call up the judgement --

 3             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic.

 4             MR. CEPIC:  I think that my learned friend wrongly quoted the

 5     paragraph of this article, and also, as I said, we do not object the

 6     procedures against this client, but what is the source of -- this table,

 7     is it made by OTP or from the government of Republic of Serbia which we

 8     have on our screens now?

 9             MR. GROOME:  As I stated, Your Honour, it is a table made of

10     information provided by the government of Serbia.  I do actually have the

11     computer printout from the government detailing all of these cases.  It's

12     a little bit hard to read, but I'm certainly happy to call that up and

13     tender that as a companion to this table if Mr. -- and I see Mr. Cepic is

14     agreeing with that procedure.  So it'll take me a minute to get that

15     released.  It wasn't released before.  Then I'll call that up.

16        Q.   But for now, could I call up the actual judgement against you,

17     and that is 0645-2787, 0645-2801.

18             While that's being called up, sir, is it your testimony that you

19     do not recall being convicted of a criminal offense seven years ago?

20        A.   Well, I had these traffic violations, and if I had any more

21     serious offenses than that, I would need to be reminded.  I can't

22     remember.

23        Q.   Well, sir, this is an incident that arose and you were accused of

24     driving your car into a fence that was put up by a neighbor of yours.

25     There was some dispute over the fence, that you drove your car knocking

Page 3631

 1     down the fence and then assaulted at least one person.  Do you recall

 2     that?  It occurred on the 20th of May, 2000?

 3        A.   I remember that when I grazed that fence, that man hit me, and

 4     then a commotion ensued.  I cannot remember all the details, but I

 5     remember grazing that fence.  Then that man started chasing me, and then

 6     we had a clash.  That's what I remember, but not the details.

 7        Q.   You recognize that you've been convicted of assaulting that

 8     person and knocking down that fence in the municipal court of Obrenovac,

 9     do you not?

10        A.   Well, if this is a document from our courts, I accept it.  It's

11     probably true that I was convicted if it says so in the document.  If

12     it's a document from our authorities, I accept it.

13        Q.   And then when the case was appealed to the appellate court, the

14     second-instance court actually increased your sentence to a 6-month

15     sentence.  Is that not correct?

16        A.   I don't.  Not at all.

17             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I would tender the document that's on

18     the screen, 0645-2787, 0645-2801.  It's the first instance judgement.

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Thank you.

20             THE REGISTRAR:  Your Honours, this is admitted as Exhibit P199.

21             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome, was the other person who was

22     involved in the altercation also charged?  Do you know?

23             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, reading the judgement, it does not seem

24     so, but I did not ask for the record of the other person, but there are

25     certain statements made in this document before you that I think it makes

Page 3632

 1     clearing that the judges in this case rejected that theory put forward by

 2     Mr. Zivkovic.

 3        Q.   So, sir, do you accept responsibility for the crime that you were

 4     convicted for?

 5        A.   Well, I simply don't remember.  I cannot tell you honestly very

 6     precisely.  I remember something happened, but whether I was convicted,

 7     how I was sentenced, I don't remember.

 8             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, at this stage I would call up

 9     0645-2690, 0645-2691.  This is the criminal history printout, and I think

10     Mr. Cepic will have more familiarity than all of us with reading such

11     computer printouts.  And if Mr. Cepic has no objection, then I will be

12     tendering this.

13             MR. CEPIC:  It is not.  If we're speaking about the previous

14     document, Your Honour --

15             MR. GROOME:  No, it's not the previous document.  It's not on the

16     screen yet.

17             MR. CEPIC:  Can we see it, and later on I can raise maybe

18     objection, maybe no objection.

19             THE INTERPRETER:  Would the counsel please speak into the

20     microphone.

21             MR. CEPIC:  Just for clarification, the previous document which

22     we've seen on our screens -- I'm sorry, which we have seen on our screens

23     is not a criminal record from our country.  It doesn't look like any

24     criminal record from Serbia.  Thank you.

25             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, just so the record's clear, what's on

Page 3633

 1     the screen now is what has just been introduced in evidence, and it's the

 2     actual judgement.  Now what's appearing on the screen is the computer

 3     printout of the record of convictions in the original.  And if Mr. Cepic

 4     has no objection, I would tender this into evidence.

 5             MR. CEPIC:  No objection.  This is -- I think that is authentic

 6     document from my country, but it is a different procedure than the

 7     criminal procedure, this record of verdicts or whatever is from

 8     completely different procedure than is the criminal procedure, but no

 9     objections.  It is authentic --

10             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I'm sorry.  What are you saying?  It's not a

11     criminal procedure?

12             MR. CEPIC:  No.

13             JUDGE ROBINSON:  But what kind of procedure was it?

14             MR. CEPIC:  We call that [Interpretation] misdemeanor procedure.

15     [In English] Misdemeanor.

16             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Okay.

17             MR. CEPIC:  It is -- if I may add some clarification, just for

18     traffic fines.

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I understand.  I understand the difference.

20     Yes.

21             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, just so the record is clear, what

22     Mr. --

23             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just a minute.

24             MR. GROOME:  Sorry, Your Honour.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just a minute, please.

Page 3634

 1             MR. GROOME:  Sorry, Your Honour.

 2                           [Trial Chamber confers]

 3             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome.

 4             MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  My colleagues are wondering what the point is of

 6     this cross-examination.  The substance of this witness's evidence is that

 7     the 14th of June was Pentecost.  Now, you're cross-examining him about

 8     his record, whether misdemeanor or criminal, and of course that is

 9     entirely proper in certain cases.  It goes to credibility.  But it's

10     either the 14th of June is Pentecost or not.  His credibility as that

11     doesn't really matter.

12             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I would take a very different view.

13     It's not whether the 14th is really Pentecost, and I would probably

14     concede that according to the church calendar it seems that it is.

15     What's really is important is whether this witness can be believed when

16     he says that on that day he was having a beer with Sredoje Lukic when it

17     is alleged by the Prosecution that he was some distance away perpetrating

18     a crime in Visegrad.  So his credibility is important, and I believe with

19     the next few questions it will be even clearer why, Your Honour.

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, yes.  I agree.

21             MR. GROOME:

22        Q.   Sir, you did say that, just a few minutes ago, that you grazed

23     the fence, so it seems that you admit that you did drive your car into a

24     fence.  You admit that, do you?

25        A.   To the best of my recollection, there was a bend, and that's

Page 3635

 1     where I grazed that fence.  I cannot be quite sure now how serious it was

 2     and what exactly it looked like.

 3        Q.   Is it also true that -- well, did you knock down some of the

 4     poles on the fence?

 5        A.   I think I did.  As far as I remember, I did.  That's how it

 6     started, but I can't remember every detail very clearly.

 7        Q.   And the fence that you knocked down was a fence that you -- there

 8     was a dispute regarding that fence.  Is that not true?

 9        A.   Yes, yes.

10        Q.   Do you admit that you struck someone during this exchange, that

11     you hit someone?

12        A.   I can't remember whether I struck anyone.  There was a push -- a

13     lot of pushing and shoving, but whether I really hit someone, I can't

14     remember.

15        Q.   Do you accept the possibility that you may have hit someone?

16        A.   Well, I can't remember.  That man whose fence I grazed, he was

17     more aggressive.  He was violent.  He started that fight.  I cannot

18     remember precisely.

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Well, was he also charged with a misdemeanor or

20     any other offense, Witness?  I'm asking whether the other man was also

21     charged with a misdemeanor or some other offense, or were you the only

22     one who was charged?

23             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] I don't know.  I can't remember at

24     all whether he was charged because when you have a fight with someone

25     over something, it's quite normal that you are not on good terms after

Page 3636

 1     that, so I couldn't come up to him and ask him if he was charged or

 2     convicted.

 3             MR. GROOME:  Could I ask that 0645-2701, 0645-2704 be brought to

 4     the screen.

 5        Q.   Sir, I'm asking that what be brought to the screen now is the

 6     record of interview that the -- the questions that the judge asked you

 7     and the recording of your answers.  Do you recall being questioned by a

 8     judge with respect to this?

 9             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic.

10             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, I really don't see any relevance for

11     this case.  There is a judgement -- we did not object about the

12     judgement, but we -- if we open now, that case, I think that is not

13     subject for cross-examination here before this high-ranking Court.

14             JUDGE ROBINSON:  It goes to credibility.  I think this is what

15     Mr. Groome is saying, whether the witness is credible.  So let us see

16     where Mr. Groome is going.

17             MR. GROOME:  Could I ask that we go to the bottom of page 3 in

18     the English translation.  And I apologize, I'm not exactly sure where in

19     the B/C/S.  I'm trying to get that information now.  It's also at the

20     bottom of page 3 in the B/C/S version.

21        Q.   So you've admitted here today at least to the possibility that

22     you struck someone, and you do admit that you did knock down some of that

23     fence.  So I want to read you a portion of the statement that you gave to

24     the judge in this case.

25             "So it is not true that I hit Branislav or Petar with my fist,

Page 3637

 1     and it is also not true that on that day I broke down several poles of

 2     the fence by car."

 3             So my question to you now is whether you now admit that the

 4     statement that you originally made to the investigating judge was false.

 5        A.   It can't be false.  I can't have given a false statement before a

 6     judge.

 7        Q.   But here in court, you admit to knocking down at least the fence,

 8     and here in the statement that you gave to the judge, you deny knocking

 9     down the fence.  So which is the truth and which is not?

10        A.   What's true is probably that he was claiming that I had

11     deliberately knocked down the fence, and there was nothing deliberate in

12     what I did.

13        Q.   Do you remember saying to the judge in this case that you denied

14     knocking down -- or I could quote again:  "It is also not true that on

15     that day I broke down several poles of the fence by car."

16        A.   Well, I don't remember.  You have to believe me.  I can't

17     remember.

18             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I would tender 0645-2701, the record of

19     interview, into evidence.

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.

21             THE REGISTRAR:  As Exhibit P200, Your Honours.

22             MR. GROOME:

23        Q.   With respect to --

24             MR. GROOME:  If I may have a moment, Your Honour.

25                      [Prosecution counsel confer]

Page 3638

 1             MR. GROOME:  I'd ask that the appeals judgement, the second

 2     instance judgement be called up.  It's 0645-2787, 0645-2801.

 3        Q.   And in this judgement, there are certain findings made with

 4     respect to some of your -- with respect to your character and some of

 5     your propensities.

 6             While it's being called up, on page 4 of the judgement, it

 7     states:  "It is a common knowledge that accused Dragoljub and Veroljub,"

 8     that being you, the second one, "are in bad relation themselves.  It is a

 9     common knowledge that the accused Dragoljub used to beat up his parents

10     and that the accused Veroljub still does the same."

11             Were the judges correct when they made a finding that you, in the

12     past, had beaten up your parents?

13        A.   Absolutely not.  It's a blatant lie.

14        Q.   Similarly, on page 4 of the judgement, the judges credit the

15     evidence provided by a person by the name of Jelena Novakovic, that:

16     "The accused Veroljub beat up his wife approximately 16 years ago when

17     she was 8 months pregnant.  Both accused have the reputation of having a

18     tendency to fight and argue."

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic.

20             MR. CEPIC:  I'm going to raise now objection as I heard many

21     times from OTP.  My learned friend Mr. Groome now quotes testimony of

22     other witnesses in that procedure.  That was in previous situation, now,

23     again, related to that lady, which name is --

24             THE INTERPRETER:  Could the counsel speak in the mic, please.

25             MR. CEPIC:  He's just quoting allegations of witness.  And as I

Page 3639

 1     understood, Mr. Groome now would like to raise the issue of character,

 2     which is not the issue of credibility.

 3             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome, what do you say to that?

 4             MR. GROOME:  I think character has an awful lot to the with

 5     credibility, and I think someone -- court were to find that someone beat

 6     their 8-month-pregnant wife it's something that the Chamber would be

 7     entitled to consider with respect to credibility.

 8             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] That's not true.  And, Your Honour,

 9     may I just say something.  This person, Jelena, who gave that statement,

10     that's the daughter of the person whose fence I grazed.  Her husband was

11     director, Mr. Markovic, and our courts at that time were so corrupt that

12     the powerful people who could pull the strings in a little town like ours

13     could swing the judgement in their favor.  Everyone knows, who lives in

14     our parts, how things were at that time.  In my country, I admit that we

15     had those wars.  We had inflation.  We had a lot of corruption, and we

16     still have some, although to a lesser degree, but it's really horrific.

17     I can spend months telling you about that.  I have had no incident less

18     serious than this one, but that's how it --

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Sir, I would not allow the objection raised by

20     Mr. Cepic because character is an aspect of credibility, but, Mr. Groome,

21     it seems to us that you have dealt with this issue sufficiently.

22             MR. GROOME:  That's my last question.  If I just could summarize

23     what I believe the witness's position, and then I'll move on,

24     Your Honour.

25        Q.   So sir, it seems that what you're saying is that you deny

Page 3640

 1     responsibility despite being convicted for this crime, and you assert

 2     that you were convicted wrongly of this crime because the courts in

 3     Obrenovac are corrupt, even in the year 2002.  Is that a correct

 4     statement of your position?

 5        A.   At that time and even now, the courts are quite corrupt,

 6     especially when dealing with people in power who have money, because it's

 7     a small town where I live, Obrenovac.  Everybody knows everyone.  Many,

 8     many things were in play here.

 9        Q.   So it's your position that you were wrongfully convicted.  Is

10     that correct?

11        A.   I suppose so, because I told you how it started.  It was a most

12     trivial incident that grew into a whole mountain by the end it was over.

13             MR. GROOME:  At this time I would tender 0645-2787, that's the

14     second instance judgement against Mr. Zivkovic.

15        Q.   I want to now move --

16             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just a second.

17             THE REGISTRAR:  As Exhibit P201, Your Honours.

18             MR. GROOME:

19        Q.   I want to move to the Feast of the Holy Trinity.  You stated in

20     your interview with Mr. Caine that 90 per cent [Realtime transcript read

21     in error "October"] of the people celebrate the Feast of the Holy Trinity

22     in the village because it is the patron saint of the village.  Is that

23     correct?

24        A.   It's the religious holiday of our village, Pentecost.

25             MR. CEPIC:  I apologize.  I think that we have a wrong word in

Page 3641

 1     the transcript, page 38, line 3, "90 October," but I think that

 2     Mr. Groome did not mention October.

 3             JUDGE ROBINSON:  What was the date you gave, Mr. Groome?

 4             MR. CEPIC:  I don't believe I've given a date.  I think I just

 5     said Holy Trinity, Feast of Holy Trinity.  I'm sorry.  I said 90 per cent

 6     of people.  That's the number I gave.

 7        Q.   So my question to you, Mr. Zivkovic, is, is it true that 90 per

 8     cent of the people in your village celebrate the Feast of Holy Trinity

 9     because it is the patron saint of the village, it's a village feast day?

10     Is that correct?

11        A.   Yes.  Yes, it is.

12             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, before I get too far, I neglected to

13     formally tender the criminal history printout, the court document that

14     Mr. Cepic recognized as 0645-2690, 0645-2691, and I would tender that at

15     this stage.

16             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  Mr. Cepic.

17             MR. CEPIC:  If it is a table which is made by OTP, I object.  If

18     it's just the document issued by government of Serbia, we do not object.

19             MR. GROOME:  Well, Your Honour, it's the same information.  It

20     can be checked -- I mean, there's nothing added.  It's just placed in a

21     way that I think is more accessible to Your Honours.  Can Mr. Cepic

22     please state specifically upon what basis he finds that that table's

23     objectionable?

24             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Is the printout?

25             MR. GROOME:  Well, there's the printout, Your Honour, that's a

Page 3642

 1     computer printout that's somewhat cryptic.  The table organises it into

 2     about five columns and includes the information from the printout.

 3     Again, I don't understand what the -- why it would be objectionable to

 4     make it a little bit more organised and more easily read.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, Mr. Cepic.

 6             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, it is not a printout.  It is a document

 7     which is made probably by the source of government of Serbia.  I cannot

 8     say that, but it is a document, as far as I remember, it is a table which

 9     is made by OTP.

10             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, if I might summarize.

11             JUDGE ROBINSON:  It is made by OTP, but it is -- are you saying

12     it doesn't accurately reflect -- Mr. Cepic, I am asking you.  Are you

13     saying it doesn't accurately reflect what was in the government document?

14             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, I did not object related to the

15     judgement, and we already have admitted the judgement in the system, but

16     other procedures are acquitted.

17             JUDGE ROBINSON:  If there are acquittals there, then we will see

18     that, but Mr. Groome was referring to a charge that led to a conviction.

19     Are you saying that that is not so?  The witness hasn't really denied it.

20     He has said that he was wrongly convicted.

21             MR. CEPIC:  With your leave, the point is, we did not object the

22     content, but the source is a problem because that table made OTP, we

23     haven't got official letter from government of Serbia.  Thank you.

24                           [Trial Chamber confers]

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  We'll admit it.

Page 3643

 1             THE REGISTRAR:  As Exhibit P202, Your Honours.

 2             MR. GROOME:

 3        Q.   Sir, there's just one additional question I wanted to ask you

 4     about the criminal conviction.  I note from the criminal record papers

 5     that we were provided, I note that one month before you gave your

 6     statement in this case, an effort was made to expunge this conviction

 7     from your record.  And my question to you is, what, if any, relationship

 8     in your mind exists between the attempt to expunge that conviction in

 9     October 2007 and your giving of a statement in this case in November of

10     2007?

11             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome, I think that needs to be broken

12     down.  Who made the attempt to have it expunged?

13             MR. GROOME:  There's simply an item in the printout, Your Honour,

14     saying that there was an expungement in October of 2007, and I'm just

15     inquiring from the witness --

16             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I think first you should find out from him if he

17     knows anything about that.

18             MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.  I will do that.

19        Q.   Sir, are you aware that in October of 2007 there is an entry on

20     your record indicating an expungement of the criminal conviction that we

21     are now discussing?

22        A.   I'm not aware of that, but I do know, in accordance with our

23     laws, three years after your sentence expires, you receive a letter that

24     something is erased or expunged.  Moreover, I heard that this was done

25     automatically pursuant to the law because it is, as I understand it,

Page 3644

 1     considered that a sentence has been served, and it can be expunged ex

 2     officio after a certain lapse of time.

 3        Q.   Did you --

 4        A.   I personally don't know, and I don't recall ever appearing in

 5     court in the last ten years.

 6        Q.   And you don't recall ever receiving a letter?

 7        A.   I may have received.  I know that it is a usual practice of our

 8     courts, after your sentence expires, three years from that date you

 9     receive a letter.  It's possible I may have received such a letter, but I

10     do not recall it as a fact.

11        Q.   Thank you.  Now, if we could return to the Feast of the

12     Holy Trinity.

13             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, Mr. Cepic.

14             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, I would be glad to assist my learned

15     friends from OTP about that issue if there is any doubt exist because

16     according to criminal law of my country, under the Article 94 or 95, it

17     is possible in all judgements, you know, for the low-level crimes --

18             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  Mr. Groome did not press the question

19     after I suggested that --

20             MR. CEPIC:  I apologise.  Thank you.

21             JUDGE ROBINSON:  -- preliminary questions need to be asked and

22     answered.

23             MR. GROOME:

24        Q.   Sir, now, returning to the Holy Trinity feast, you stated in your

25     interview that earlier that day, you assisted your wife in cooking a

Page 3645

 1     lunch on the morning of Trinity.  Is that correct?

 2        A.   I always usually do so.  I help her out, yes.

 3        Q.   And is the meal that celebrates the feast day, is that a mid-day

 4     meal, a lunch?

 5        A.   Yes, approximately so, yes.  It's lunch.

 6        Q.   And according to the custom, what do people eat in the evening?

 7     Do they simply eat what's left over from the mid-day meal, or do they

 8     cook another meal to celebrate Trinity in the evening?

 9        A.   Mostly, the leftovers from lunch.  Whoever makes pot roast, there

10     are leftovers.  In my case, this was so.  Whoever wanted to have some

11     leftovers for dinner did so.

12        Q.   And would it be your understanding that that would be the custom

13     in the village; the similar practice would have been followed by other

14     families in Krtinska?

15        A.   In which sense do you mean?

16        Q.   That everyone would celebrate with a large meal mid-day and in

17     the evening simply eats whatever is -- remains.

18        A.   I don't know about other households.  There are people who, if

19     they had a heavy lunch, they skip dinner, and people do not visit each

20     other customarily on that day.  Everybody celebrates it at their own

21     home.

22        Q.   So am I right in thinking that the big shopping day for the

23     preparations for the meal would be the Saturday or Friday before the

24     Sunday?

25        A.   What shopping do you mean?

Page 3646

 1        Q.   When people buy the food to prepare for the meal.  Am I correct

 2     in believing that it would be done on the Saturday or the Friday before

 3     the feast day, which is on the Sunday?

 4        A.   That depends on the household.

 5        Q.   Now, you indicated in your interview and you've just indicated

 6     now, that it is a time for family.  And in your interview at page 27,

 7     beginning at line 18, you stated:  "When it was lunchtime, then mainly

 8     household members were there again because, as I am saying, everyone in

 9     the village celebrates and thus it is not right to go to someone else's

10     house, et cetera."

11             Do you recall making that statement to Mr. Caine?

12        A.   Well, some 90 per cent of the people in my village do so.  I

13     don't want to say 100 per cent because there may be people living there

14     who had moved in recently and have not acquired the customs, but 90 per

15     cent of the village do celebrate Holy Trinity as the village feast day.

16        Q.   And you also indicated in your interview that no one works on

17     this day.  Reading again from the transcript of your interview:  "Well,

18     when we woke up in the morning, it is the day when no one works in the

19     village, so no one is doing anything.  It is not good to work on that day

20     because the village celebrates its feast."

21             Later on that page, you say:  "Absolutely no one works anything,

22     except feed the livestock if you have any."

23             So is it your testimony that no one works on this feast day in

24     the village?

25        A.   For you to fully understand me, I must say this.  I described the

Page 3647

 1     situation in my village.  Whoever celebrates this do that at home, but

 2     people who work in shifts or in the state administration or in the power

 3     plant, this is not a holiday, a bank holiday, so that such people have to

 4     work; but what I meant by not working, I mean they are not working the

 5     land or anything in their -- in their yards.  If they have livestock,

 6     they have to feed it.  As I stated, this is not a bank holiday, a public

 7     holiday.  People who work in such services have to work on that day.

 8        Q.   But it seems that you indicated that at least the people in

 9     Krtinska who were celebrating this as their village feast day, they did

10     not go to work.  Is that correct?

11        A.   I reiterate, people who do not work in companies, if it happened

12     that I had to work my shift, I would have come home after the shift and

13     celebrated Holy Trinity.  Other people usually rest on weekends, and the

14     Holy Trinity always falls on a weekend.

15             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome, it's time for the break.  How much

16     longer will you be?

17             MR. GROOME:  It's hard to approximate, Your Honour, but there are

18     still a fair few questions that I wish to ask.

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Well, the question of time for cross-examination

20     will arise.  The court deputy will inform me how long you have been, and

21     we'll decide how much longer you -- oh, you have taken 50 minutes.

22     Another 15 minutes, another 15, 20 minutes.  We'll adjourn.

23                           --- Recess taken at 10.32 a.m.

24                           --- On resuming at 10.56 a.m.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, Mr. Groome.

Page 3648

 1             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, the witness isn't in the courtroom.

 2             JUDGE ROBINSON:  We have some preliminary matters.

 3             MR. IVETIC:  Just to be brief, Your Honour, because it relates to

 4     our ability to bring witnesses for this week.  I didn't want to interrupt

 5     Mr. Cepic's case when it started and we had advised court staff of this.

 6             Your Honour, I have to report that the two witnesses we had

 7     scheduled for this week cannot attend due to scheduling of other

 8     obligations.  We of course will work on trying to obtain witnesses for

 9     the following week but have no possibility of obtaining any visas for any

10     new witnesses to come to replace them for this week.  There was a -- that

11     was one of the logistical considerations why we had requested more time

12     previously, that the witnesses are in the region and they cannot just

13     fax, e-mail or send copies of passports which are needed for the visa

14     procedure.  We need to send someone on the terrain to go to Serbia, to

15     Bosnia to pick those up.  We had asked the registry to approve our case

16     manager as an investigator for those purposes, and that request was

17     denied.  We are now working on trying to get another person authorized

18     for that.

19             The phone ban that was in effect in the last week prevented

20     counsel from going out into the field because the only communications the

21     client had were with the privileged line number here in the Hague, and we

22     were therefore in the gaol every day and dealing with that situation last

23     week.  That could not let us -- could not let us go out into the field.

24     We do have to report that there was adverse media coverage that is still

25     being felt out in the field.  In that regard, we may have to do a filing

Page 3649

 1     to try and get some of that straightened out, but we are bringing that to

 2     the attention, and as a corollary to that, it is anticipated that the

 3     Sredoje Lukic case will likely conclude sometime by Wednesday.  If that

 4     is the case, we would ask to postpone our opening statement until the

 5     Thursday, because as I'd indicated Mr. Alarid will be returning that

 6     Wednesday morning and would like to have an opportunity to get his feet

 7     under him and prepare a concise and proper opening in that regard.  And

 8     that way, since we would not have any ability to present witnesses, we

 9     would not be using up more of the time that we would have allocated for

10     the case for this week, Your Honours.  And that's all I have at this

11     moment.  Thank you.

12             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Well, it's not a good start, because the two

13     witnesses who are scheduled to testify on the behalf of Mr. Lukic you say

14     can't attend because of scheduling conflicts with other obligations, but

15     when did you find that out?  I mean, isn't that something that should

16     have been discovered?

17             MR. IVETIC:  Your Honour, I had spoken with one of the gentlemen

18     on Friday, and we have not yet heard back from the second individual, so

19     that was when I had personally found out about it when contacting them

20     via telephone to -- this gentleman lives in, I believe, in Austria is

21     where I contacted him at the time, and that's when we came up with that

22     information.  That's why I brought it to the Court's attention at the

23     first available opportunity, as I believe it is my obligation to do.  And

24     again, the situation was hampered by the inability to go out into the

25     field this past week because we were dealing with the matters that have

Page 3650

 1     now been resolved as to the ban on Mr. Lukic's communications with the

 2     field that was initiated upon the Office of the Prosecutor.  Without

 3     going into the details of that, I think we know the parameters of that

 4     and we'll probably be doing a filing with respect to that, but it's

 5     unfortunate that the timing was such that it really prevented any work on

 6     that aspect being done upon the filing of the 65 per list that was filed

 7     just, I think, a day after the ban was asked for by the Office of the

 8     Prosecutor.  Thank you.

 9             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Let us see how we get on, and we'll deal with

10     your problems when we reach your case.  But what I understand you to be

11     saying is that Mr. Alarid would be in a position to make his opening

12     statement on Thursday.

13             MR. IVETIC:  That is correct, Your Honour.

14             JUDGE ROBINSON:  All right.  Yes, Mr. Groome.

15             MR. GROOME:  I believe the usher has gone to get the witness,

16     Your Honour.

17                           [Trial Chamber confers]

18                           [The witness entered court]

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, Mr. Groome.

20             MR. GROOME:  Thank you, Your Honour.

21        Q.   Sir, I am limited in the time that I have to ask you questions,

22     so I'm going to ask you, wherever possible, to answer yes or no.  I ask

23     you to excuse me if I interrupt you, and know that Mr. Cepic will have

24     some additional time that he can ask you questions if he feels some

25     information has been -- should come out, okay?  So I'd ask for your

Page 3651

 1     cooperation in that regard.

 2             Sir, you also said in your interview with Mr. Caine that during

 3     the period of great inflation that took over the former Yugoslavia that

 4     the store that is the subject of your testimony had practically nothing

 5     on its shelves.  Do you remember saying that?  Yes or no.

 6        A.   I said that when inflation started, not immediately but a bit

 7     later, two or three years later, this store was closed.  Now we have a

 8     different privately owned store, and the one that I discussed used to be

 9     publicly owned.

10        Q.   Let me read from your interview, and you tell me whether you said

11     this.  This is at page 32, line 27:  "No, the store does not operate

12     anymore.  It does not operate for a long time.  When there was inflation,

13     from the moment of the inflation on, it was operating during the

14     inflation, and the situation was becoming worse and worse, so that the

15     shelves were practically empty."

16             Do you remember saying that to Mr. Caine?  Yes or no, please.

17        A.   Yes, but later.  Inflation was not felt immediately, but its

18     effects were felt later, and this is how I tried to explain it.

19        Q.   Well, sir, in doing some research after you had said that, it

20     seems that in June of 1992, that very month, the record of inflation had

21     been broken, and I have a newspaper article I could call up, but to save

22     time, let me read you the headline of the newspaper article and see if

23     you will not agree with me.

24             It's from Borba, and the head of the article, it's dated the 1st

25     of July --

Page 3652

 1             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic.

 2             MR. CEPIC:  I apologize, but I think that this witness is not

 3     expert for economic issues.

 4             MR. GROOME:  I'm not asking him about --

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic, is he being cross-examined as to

 6     suggest that expertise is required?

 7             MR. CEPIC:  My learned friend is trying to ask him some economic

 8     parameters from news articles, so I'm a little bit confused about that,

 9     Your Honour.

10             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Well, let me hear the questions first, and then

11     I'll determine whether they're questions for an expert or just somebody

12     with ordinary common sense.

13             MR. GROOME:

14        Q.   So sir, the title of this article from the 1st of July in Borba

15     is:  "The June triple-digit inflation of 102.3 per cent ingloriously

16     broke the record as the highest in the history of Yugoslavia."  My

17     question to you is, do you recall that in June 1992 there was an

18     extremely high rate of inflation in Yugoslavia?

19        A.   Inflation did not peak then.  Hyperinflation went and stood at a

20     couple of thousand of per cent, not just a couple of hundred per cent.

21             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic, the witness even knows about

22     hyperinflation.

23             MR. CEPIC:  I'm a little bit confused, Your Honour.

24             MR. GROOME:

25        Q.   So sir, is it your evidence that this grocery store owner had his

Page 3653

 1     shop open on a day, a holiday, in which you have said that most people in

 2     the village did not work, that everyone was home with their families,

 3     that people had their main meal of the day at lunchtime, and that in the

 4     evening many people ate leftovers, and that if we accept that there was

 5     inflation during this period, there may have been very little on his

 6     shelves to sell.  Is it still your testimony that that shop was open on

 7     the Feast of the Holy Trinity in 1992?  Yes or no.

 8        A.   You asked me several questions.  I cannot answer whether yes

 9     or --

10        Q.   My question simply is, was -- given all the factors that I have

11     mentioned to you, is it your evidence that that shop was open on the 14th

12     of June, 1992, the Feast of the Holy Trinity, which was celebrated in

13     Krtinska as the village feast day?  Was the shop open or closed that day?

14        A.   Yes.

15        Q.   Sir, I put it to you that while the argument you described may

16     have taken place at some point in time, that it was impossible for it to

17     have taken place on the 14th of June because I believe that grocery store

18     was not open.  How do you respond to my assertion to you?

19        A.   I state that the store was open and that that incident took place

20     on that day.  My memory serves me well.

21        Q.   If your memory --

22             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome, in the transcript at 50, line 8,

23     your question was:  "Was the shop open or closed that day?"  And the

24     answer is yes.  We need to know, what is he answering affirmatively to?

25             MR. GROOME:  I'll clarify.

Page 3654

 1        Q.   Is it correct that your evidence is that that shop was open on

 2     that day?  Is that your evidence?

 3        A.   Yes.

 4        Q.   Sir, I want to read you a portion of your interview and ask you

 5     whether it is accurate.  The portion is from page 30, beginning at line

 6     6, and it was in response to a question from Phil Caine regarding how you

 7     were so certain it was 1992.

 8             You said:  "Well, I know because it was -- because it was the

 9     first.  It was the first.  I remember because of the war, when the war

10     broke out.  So after the war, it was maybe two months after the war.  It

11     was the first post-war Trinity, in fact, in the beginning of the war."

12             Is this the information that you provided Mr. Caine?

13        A.   Yes, this was the first Holy Trinity after the war broke out.

14        Q.   So you are certain that this event took place on the first June

15     14th, approximately two months after the start of the war, correct?

16        A.   Yes, this happened on the 14th of June.

17        Q.   So you mark this day by its relationship to the start of the war,

18     correct?

19        A.   Well, immediately after the break-out of the war it happened,

20     this is the first Holy Trinity.  Everybody remembered that day because

21     the war had broken out not a long time ago prior to that, and this was

22     the first Holy Trinity that we celebrated after the breakout of the war.

23        Q.   Well, sir, many people would agree that the war began with the

24     conflict that occurred in Borovo Selo on the 2nd of May, 1991, when Serb

25     Croats attacked Croatian police forces, beginning a very long period of

Page 3655

 1     conflict.  A very violent war occurred throughout the summer of 1991 and

 2     into the fall of 1991.  The siege of Vukovar took place between August

 3     1991 and November 1991, during which nearly the entire city was destroyed

 4     and thousands killed.  Immediately following the fall of Vukovar was the

 5     well-publicized executions of captives in Ovcara.  The war broke out in

 6     the late summer or spring of 1991.

 7             Isn't that when the war broke out, sir?

 8        A.   Well, in our minds, the real war started in Bosnia.  That was the

 9     most serious war.  There had been a war, if you wish, in Slovenia, too

10     but that was nothing much.  We think of the real war as the one in

11     Bosnia.

12        Q.   So, sir, you living in Belgrade did not consider the separation

13     of Croatia from Yugoslavia and the siege of Vukovar a war?

14        A.   Well, at that time, I did not believe they would really separate.

15     As far as I remember, the army was already deployed there, and I thought

16     it wouldn't happen.  The real war started in Bosnia.

17        Q.   Sir, the first Holy Trinity two months after the start of the war

18     would have been in June of 1991.  Isn't that correct?

19        A.   No, no.  It was on the 14th of June, 1992, because I'm telling

20     you, it was after the war broke out in Bosnia.  We'll always remember

21     that Pentecost.

22        Q.   I want to read your characterization of the argument that you

23     witnessed between Sredoje Lukic and the shopkeeper.  This is page 42,

24     beginning at line 17.  Mr. Caine asked you:  "When it came to the verbal

25     conflict or whatever, was it something strong, was there screaming a bit,

Page 3656

 1     or was it --"

 2             And then you say:  "Well, it was not.  It was a little argument

 3     about empties, something like, Milojko will return it to you.  Do you not

 4     know me.  Well, Vesko will confirm that I am Milojko's guest, and so.

 5     The salesman was really a little bit crueler as a salesman.  I mean, take

 6     me for example.  If I was a salesman and I know an inhabitant having

 7     guests, I would tolerate that, but it was nothing serious.  They were

 8     just verbally ..."  And then you finish your answer.

 9             Am I correct in understanding that it was really a very minor

10     incident, this dispute that Sredoje Lukic had with the store owner about

11     the deposits on a crate of beer bottles, correct?

12        A.   Yes.  It was more like persuasion, Why aren't you letting me do

13     this, and so on.

14        Q.   And after this happened, there was no real reason to ever discuss

15     this again between you and Sredoje Lukic, was there?

16        A.   Well, yes.  When we got out, we continued that talk.  We did

17     discuss it.

18        Q.   But after that night was behind you, in the 15 years that have

19     elapsed, up until the time Mr. Cepic asked you about this, had you ever

20     discussed this dispute with Sredoje Lukic again?

21        A.   Well, I can't remember whether I talked about it with him, but

22     with my own friends, whenever we celebrated the Pentecost for the next

23     two or three years, we remembered it.  On that day, there is usually no

24     incidents.  Everybody is in a good mood and everybody's getting along

25     well, and that day was memorable because of that incident.

Page 3657

 1        Q.   So it's your evidence that in the years since then, you have

 2     talked about it with people who weren't there about this short verbal

 3     dispute about a deposit over empty beer bottles.  Is that your evidence?

 4        A.   No.  I'm saying that with the friends with whom I had been

 5     standing together then, the friends I usually meet at those celebrations,

 6     I discussed it later, over the next two or three years.  I can't talk

 7     about the incident with someone who did not see it.

 8        Q.     Sir, I want to change the topic now.  You know that

 9     Sredoje Lukic was held by some Muslims at the dam in Visegrad.  He was

10     held captive.  You know about that event, don't you?

11        A.   Well, I saw it in the evening news bulletin on Radio Television

12     Serbia.  They showed it in the prime-time news bulletin.

13        Q.   And when you saw the news bulletin, it actually showed

14     Sredoje Lukic after he was released from captivity, correct?

15        A.   No, no.  I saw it on the news, just that they had been arrested.

16     It was a brief piece of news.

17        Q.   I'm going to show you a news item and see if you recognize this.

18             MR. GROOME:  Could I ask that V000-1286 be played, and we'll be

19     playing it on the Sanction system, control from the Prosecutor's desk.

20             Your Honour, we were unable to synchronize the transcript, so I

21     have hard copies here.  I'd ask that they be passed out before we play

22     it.

23        Q.   Sir, there'll be a film played on one of the screens before you,

24     I believe the one on the left.

25                           [Videotape played]

Page 3658

 1             MR. GROOME:

 2        Q.   Who's back is that that we saw just before this man here?

 3        A.   Well, I can't see properly.  I didn't see the face.  Will you

 4     rewind it so I can look more carefully?

 5             MR. GROOME:  [Previous translation continues] ...

 6                           [Videotape played]

 7             THE INTERPRETER:  [Voiceover] "They wanted to slaughter us."

 8             MR. GROOME:  Sorry.  We're rewinding it now.  Did you see

 9     Sredoje Lukic on this tape?

10             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Yes, I did see him.

11             MR. GROOME:

12        Q.   Is this not the back of Sredoje Lukic?

13        A.   Yes, that's the back of Sredoje Lukic.

14        Q.   Now, sir, in your interview with Mr. Caine, you said that there

15     were scars from where cigarettes had been put out on his back.  Are we

16     able to see those scars here?

17        A.   I don't know if they can be seen here.  I can't see on this

18     screen, but I know that Sredoje Lukic had told me he had been mistreated,

19     beaten, they had shaved their hair, extinguished cigarettes on their

20     skin.  I don't know about this extinguishing of cigarettes, whether they

21     did it only to him or to everyone.  That's the story he told me.

22        Q.   But he told you that they put out cigarettes on his skin.

23        A.   No.  He said in the plural, Up there when they had arrested us,

24     they mistreated us, they beat us, they shaved our heads, they beat us,

25     they put out cigarettes on us.  He was talking in the plural.  I don't

Page 3659

 1     know who he was referring to specifically.

 2        Q.   If I could draw your attention once again to the screen, and

 3     we'll continue playing the video.

 4                           [Videotape played]

 5             MR. GROOME:

 6        Q.   Is that Sredoje Lukic that we're looking at there now?

 7        A.   On the right is Sredoje Lukic.

 8             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I would tender that exhibit V000-1286.

 9             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.

10             THE REGISTRAR:  It is admitted as Exhibit P203, Your Honours.

11             MR. GROOME:

12        Q.   Sir, the last few questions I have for you have to deal with how

13     you came to be a witness in this case, and I would like to read you a

14     portion of your interview and ask you whether it is still accurate.  And

15     this is at page 50, line -- beginning at line 27.

16             Mr. Caine asked you:  "Can you explain to us how come that you

17     are giving this statement?"

18             And you state:  "Well, one day he came, and a lawyer came, and

19     this Milojko Popadic came, because when he was coming, he remembered the

20     incident.  Well, I don't know how he got in touch with Milojko, what kind

21     of contacts they had.  I don't know that, but he came that day.  One day

22     he and Milojko and the lawyer came."

23             My question to you is, when you say "he remembered the incident,"

24     you were referring to Milojko Popadic as the one who remembered what

25     happened on Holy Trinity in 1992; is that correct?

Page 3660

 1        A.   Milojko Popadic came together with the lawyer, Mr. Djuro Cepic,

 2     to visit me.  And then Milojko asked me if I remembered that incident on

 3     that Holy Trinity, and I asked him, Which Holy Trinity, there have been

 4     many.  And then he recalled to me the day, the first Holy Trinity after

 5     the war and the incident with Milan Kozica in the shop, and that was it.

 6     That was my first contact with Mr. Cepic.

 7        Q.   So it was Milojko Popadic who 15 years after the event reminded

 8     you of what happened on this Holy Trinity, what you say is the first Holy

 9     Trinity after the war.  Is that correct?

10        A.   No, it's not that he reminded me.  I remembered that incident

11     because I remembered it was the first Holy Trinity after the war.  I

12     looked up the church calendar for that year, and I looked up the date.  I

13     know that Holy Trinity is always on a Sunday, but it can be on different

14     dates.

15        Q.   Now, this first conversation that you had about this event, you

16     had it with Mr. Cepic, correct?

17        A.   Yes.

18        Q.   And present during that interview, that first conversation you

19     had about this, was Milojko Popadic, correct?

20        A.   No.  Milojko just asked me what I described to you a moment ago,

21     and then Mr. Cepic took me towards his car.  He had come by car, and then

22     we talked a little while Milojko was looking at some cars.  Since my job

23     is to paint cars and repair the body of cars, he was looking at some cars

24     in my shop.

25        Q.   Sir, I'm going to play you the actual audiotape of the interview.

Page 3661

 1             MR. GROOME:  And it's T001-1686, and it's marked as clip 2.

 2        Q.   I'm going to ask you to listen to it.

 3             MR. GROOME:  Are we ready to play it?

 4        Q.   So it's going to be played now for you, sir.

 5                           [Audiotape played]

 6             PC:  "So did you actually take Mr. Cepic to the shop to show

 7     him?"

 8             VZ:  "Yes, because it was close to my place, and Mr. Cepic asked

 9     if could we go and see the shop, and I said, yes, of course, because it's

10     very close by."

11             PC:  "Okay, and did Mr. Popadic go with you?"

12             VZ:  "Yes, he was present too."

13             PC:  "Okay.  And then what -- presumably you described the events

14     of that day when Sredoje had had the conflicts with the shopkeeper?"

15             VZ:  "Yes."

16             PC:  "Okay.  And Mr. Popadic was there all the time throughout

17     those discussions?"

18             VZ:  [No interpretation]

19                           [End of audiotape]

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic, I saw you, you but I wanted to wait

21     until this was concluded.

22             MR. CEPIC:  Yes, Your Honour, I didn't want to disturb.  Some

23     portions of this transcript does not represent all of the record, as far

24     as we know it, in B/C/S and also in English.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Well, if it does so in any material particular,

Page 3662

 1     you can bring it to our attention.  Mr. Groome.

 2             MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.  I would also note -- well, for

 3     the record, let me just ask a couple of questions.

 4        Q.   Sir, is that -- is that an accurate recording of what you said

 5     during the interview with Phil Caine?

 6        A.   Well, I said that Mr. Popadic was present.

 7        Q.   Sir, I'm not asking for a fuller explanation.  Mr. Cepic can ask

 8     you that.  I'm just asking, what you heard here on tape, did you

 9     recognize your voice?  Were those your words that we heard on the tape?

10        A.   Yes, I recognized my words.

11             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I would tender T001-1686, clip 2, into

12     evidence, recognising that maybe over the course of today I will work

13     with Mr. Cepic to resolve whatever he sees as an inaccuracy, and

14     hopefully we can resolve that.  If not, then I would ask that the tape be

15     submitted to CLSS, and I will be bound by their determination of what is

16     said.

17             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic.

18             MR. CEPIC:  Just to continue where my learned friend stopped, I

19     propose that this exhibit would be marked for identification until we

20     clarify situation related to those mistakes.

21             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.

22             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour.  I'd agree with that with respect to

23     the translation, but the witness has said, Those are my words, and it's

24     really his words that are really what's important.  The translation is

25     something that can be corrected, but I'd hate to let this witness leave

Page 3663

 1     without having resolved that this is in evidence.

 2             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic, the witness did say that those were

 3     his words.

 4             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, we do not object that the witness gave

 5     interview.  We do not object that those words are his words, but the

 6     problem is in translation.  As Mr. Groome said, we had very bad

 7     translation in Belgrade during that interview, so that's the problem, and

 8     a couple times we changed a couple -- we tried to solve that situation.

 9     And finally on the first day, we received additional translation,

10     actually, the new translation of that interview, and during the week, we

11     checked that and found quite a number of mistakes, and yesterday

12     afternoon we sent to OTP all those mistakes which we found.

13             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Now, Mr. Ivetic, you wish to wade in?

14             MR. IVETIC:  Just because I was following the -- it appears the

15     English is not even correct, so it's not a matter of translation.  It's

16     just a matter of a bad transcript, so I think we should probably resubmit

17     it or somehow get a transcript, because as it stands now, we don't have a

18     translation of the man's words into a language that non-B/C/S speakers

19     can appreciate.

20             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, perhaps I might be able to shorten

21     this.  I will agree that only the tape is introduced at this stage, and I

22     will work over the next few days to have a transcript that is agreeable

23     or is agreed by all the parties as an accurate transcript of the tape.

24     But it seems to me that voice, that the recording itself has been

25     authenticated.  That really must come into evidence.  It's really a

Page 3664

 1     question about translation, and I will agree to undertake, to work with

 2     my colleagues to ensure that everyone agrees that the translation is

 3     satisfactory.

 4             JUDGE ROBINSON:  And then that can be admitted separately.

 5             MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

 6             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Very well, then.  So we'll admit the tape and

 7     the translation will be considered for admission at a later date after it

 8     has been verified.

 9             THE REGISTRAR:  Your Honours, it will become Exhibit P204.

10             MR. GROOME:  Thank you, Mr. Zivkovic.  I have no further

11     questions.

12             Your Honour, there is some confusions about exhibits but perhaps

13     we could wait until the end of the examination, and then we can clarify

14     that then, Your Honour.

15             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, Mr. Cepic.

16             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you, Your Honour.  Just a couple questions.

17                           Re-examination by Mr. Cepic:

18        Q.   [Interpretation] Mr. Zivkovic, here I go again.  First of all,

19     have you ever actually served a prison sentence?

20        A.   No.

21        Q.   Compared to you, what age is Mr. Sredoje Lukic?  Younger?  Older?

22        A.   Approximately my age.  I don't know his exact year of birth, but

23     he's approximately my age.

24        Q.   Mr. Zivkovic, this shop, was it the only one or were there other

25     shops in the village?

Page 3665

 1        A.   No, it was the only shop in our village.

 2        Q.   Mr. Zivkovic, do you remember the year 1992 for other things

 3     except the breakout of the war?

 4        A.   I remember it by the inflation, the beginning of the war.  In my

 5     memory, those are the darkest years of my life.

 6             MR. CEPIC: [Interpretation] Thank you, Mr. Zivkovic.

 7             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Witness, that concludes your evidence.  We thank

 8     you for coming to the Tribunal to give it.  You may now leave.

 9                           [The witness withdrew]

10             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome.

11             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, there's one matter that's unresolved.

12     Perhaps we might deal with it now.  It has to do with the table prepared

13     by the Prosecution of the information provided by the government of

14     Serbia.  It's ZIVK-CONV.  According to the registrar, there hasn't been a

15     ruling on that.

16             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I thought we had admitted it.

17             MR. GROOME:  That was my memory, as well, Your Honour, but I

18     think perhaps that matter needs to be clarified.

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  We admitted it.

20             THE REGISTRAR:  As Exhibit P205, Your Honours.

21             MR. GROOME:  Then, Your Honour, just to clarify, I think there

22     seems to be some confusion, I think perhaps in part caused by me when I

23     misquoted an ERN number, but the first instance judgement is ERN

24     0645-2787, 0645-2801.  I believe that was admitted as P199.  And then the

25     second instance judgement was 0645-2807, 0645-2809, and I believe that

Page 3666

 1     was admitted as P201.  I just wanted to clarify that was in fact accorded

 2     with the Chamber's and the registrar's recollection of that.

 3             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Is that correct, Madam Registrar?

 4             THE REGISTRAR:  That is correct, Your Honours.  Thank you.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic.

 6             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, with your leave, two matters.  First

 7     thing, I hope that we will receive from Mr. Groome the document which he

 8     mentioned in his examination relating to the attempt of deleting of

 9     judgement, so I would be very grateful if OTP provides me with that

10     document.  And for the second issue, before we have witness in the

11     courtroom, I kindly ask for a private session.

12             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Private session, yes.

13                           [Private session]

14   (redacted)

15   (redacted)

16   (redacted)

17   (redacted)

18   (redacted)

19   (redacted)

20   (redacted)

21   (redacted)

22   (redacted)

23   (redacted)

24   (redacted)

25   (redacted)

Page 3667











11  Page 3667 redacted. Private session.















Page 3668

 1   (redacted)

 2   (redacted)

 3   (redacted)

 4   (redacted)

 5   (redacted)

 6   (redacted)

 7   (redacted)

 8   (redacted)

 9   (redacted)

10   (redacted)

11   (redacted)

12                           [Open session]

13             THE REGISTRAR:  We're back in open session.

14             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Let the witness make the declaration.

15             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] I solemnly declare that I will

16     speak the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

17                           WITNESS:  ZORKA LUKIC

18                           [Witness answered through interpreter]

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  You may sit, and you may begin, Mr. Cepic.

20             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you, Your Honour.

21                           Examination by Mr. Cepic:

22        Q.   [Interpretation] Madam Lukic, good morning.

23        A.   Good morning.

24        Q.   For the record, could you please state your full first and family

25     name.

Page 3669

 1        A.   Zorka Lukic.

 2        Q.   Could you please state the date and place of birth.

 3        A.   The 7th of October, 1966, in Prijepolje.

 4        Q.   Thank you.

 5             MR. CEPIC:  [Previous translation continues] ... Exhibit

 6     number -- 65 ter exhibit number 26.  ID number of this document is in

 7     B/C/S 2D05-0130, and in English, 2D05-0276, in accordance with the

 8     Defence notification from 28th of November.

 9        Q.   [Interpretation] Madam Lukic, did you speak to Prosecution

10     investigations on the 4th of June, 2008, in Belgrade?

11        A.   Yes.

12        Q.   Could you please take a look at the screen.  Madam, did you --

13     28th of November, during your proofing session with lawyers of the

14     Defence of Mr. Sredoje Lukic, after being shown a transcript, you

15     explained the statements -- statements on page 2, 16th and 17th line, and

16     on page 3, 5 and 6 -- lines 5 and 6, words, Sredoje remembered exactly

17     the date when I gave birth and that he visit me the next day and he

18     informed the lawyers.  What did you want to make more precise in relation

19     to this transcript?

20        A.   I wanted to say that Sredoje Lukic visited me with his family on

21     the 27th of June, 1992, the following day that I had emerged from the

22     hospital.

23        Q.   Thank you.  Madam Lukic, if I were to ask you the same questions

24     today that you were asked by the Prosecution investigator during that

25     interview, would you provide the same answers that you provided on that

Page 3670

 1     occasion?

 2        A.   Yes.

 3             MR. CEPIC:  [Previous translation continues] ... admission of

 4     this exhibit.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.

 6             THE REGISTRAR:  Exhibit 2D44, Your Honours.

 7             MR. CEPIC: [Interpretation]

 8        Q.   Madam Lukic, why would June 1992, be significant to you?

 9        A.   It is very significant to me because on the 22nd of June, 1992,

10     my second child was born.

11             MR. CEPIC:  Could we have in e-court system, ID number is

12     2D04-0186, and in English is 87.

13        Q.   [Interpretation] Please take a look at the screen, and please

14     explain what this document we see means.

15        A.   This is a birth certificate of my child, which states the date of

16     birth, the place of birth of my -- and the name of my child.

17        Q.   Thank you very much.

18             MR. CEPIC:  I'm sorry.  It is not in the record.  I kindly ask

19     for admission of this exhibit.

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.

21             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you.

22             THE REGISTRAR:  Exhibit 2D45, Your Honours.

23             MR. CEPIC:  Could we have document, ID number is 2D03-0264, in

24     English is 65.  If we have technical problems, I can provide a hard copy.

25             We cannot see on our screens.  Okay, thank you.

Page 3671

 1        Q.   [Interpretation] Madam, what does this document represent?

 2        A.   This document states the date when I was discharged from

 3     hospital, when I went out of the hospital with my baby.

 4        Q.   Could you state the date.

 5        A.   26th of June, 1992.

 6             MR. CEPIC:  Could we see copy in English language, which is also

 7     attached to B/C/S version on ELMO.

 8             THE REGISTRAR:  Both documents are in e-court now.

 9             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, I kindly ask admission of this exhibit.

10             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.

11             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, could I just inquire, is the original

12     of this document being tendered, or is it simply a scanned of the

13     original?  Just want to know exactly what is being tendered.  It's a

14     very, very important document.

15             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, the OTP had opportunity to check this

16     document, and Mr. Cole visited my assistant in the Defence room to check

17     the authenticity of this document, a couple of months ago during the OTP

18     phase, and they checked that.  So we admit this document, and original is

19     available in any moment, if you need to check something, just call us.

20             MR. GROOME:  I would ask that the -- given the critical nature of

21     this, I would ask that the original of this document be what's tendered

22     into evidence.

23             MR. CEPIC:  It is not possible, Your Honour.  Technically,

24     technically it is not possible to be in e-court system original sheet.

25     As I said, Mr. Cole gave me a call, he checked the document, and he

Page 3672

 1     didn't ask anything additional about that document.  It was a couple

 2     months ago.  I also kept that e-mail, and the 13th of November was the --

 3                           [Trial Chamber and registrar confer]

 4             MR. CEPIC:  And the 13th of November was the deadline for the

 5     checking of documents.  We fully complied with the rules and also with

 6     this document, so we ask admission.

 7             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, I --

 8             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, but Mr. Groome, if the document is

 9     admissible in accordance with our rules, why are you asking for the

10     original?

11             MR. GROOME:  Because, Your Honour, I think the best evidence rule

12     would really be applicable here because if you look at the image,

13     Your Honour, you can see a faint line running down from about the middle

14     of the top, down across the right-hand corner, and coming out on the

15     bottom.  The critical information on this document has been torn.  The

16     document, as far as I understand it, and please, Mr. Cepic, correct me if

17     I'm wrong, but the critical information on this document was actually

18     torn.  The document is a torn document.

19             I believe for the Chamber to assess its reliability, the Chamber

20     should have the benefit of seeing the original document itself and not

21     have to rely on simply a photocopy of the document.  If it's available, I

22     mean, I submit that this should be marked for identification, and I

23     certainly won't object to Mr. Cepic seeking to replace that document at a

24     later stage with the original as soon as he can bring it to The Hague.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Where do you say the critical information is

Page 3673

 1     that is torn on the document?

 2             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, if you look at the fourth --

 3             THE INTERPRETER:  Microphone for the --

 4             MR. GROOME:  If you look at the fourth line down, the critical

 5     piece of information for this document is 26.6.92, the day that Ms. Lukic

 6     says that she was discharged from the hospital, that being the day before

 7     Sredoje Lukic came to visit, and now with it enlarged, you can see the

 8     tear along the document and how that portion of the document is actually

 9     torn from the remainder of the document.  So I would submit the Chamber,

10     in order to properly assess the reliability of this document, should have

11     the original before it so it can examine the torn document and make its

12     own assessment about its reliability.

13                           [Trial Chamber confers]

14             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic, is it possible to produce a clearer

15     scan of this document?

16             MR. CEPIC:  My assistant will try to do their best in that way,

17     but I also, for the record, have to add a line one more time.  OTP had

18     the opportunity of a couple months to check this document.  Mr. Cole

19     checked the original document in the Defence room.

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  But that doesn't prevent -- that doesn't prevent

21     any party from raising an objection in court.

22             MR. CEPIC:  Of course.  And they had opportunity, of course, to

23     check in a hospital or somewhere else that -- the authenticity of this

24     document, from who it's issued and the dates and other necessary things.

25             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, so the record is clear, we did attempt

Page 3674

 1     that, and all records were destroyed.  They're destroyed after a period

 2     of ten years, so again, this is the only remaining copy of this document.

 3     The original is available.  It seems prudent that it should be produced

 4     before the Court so the Court can assess it.

 5                           [Trial Chamber confers]

 6             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour --

 7             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Is the original available?

 8             MR. CEPIC:  Yes.  In my possession is --

 9             JUDGE ROBINSON:  It's in your possession?

10             MR. CEPIC:  On the first break -- on the first break, I need 20

11     minutes to reach my office and to bring it back to the courtroom, so just

12     if --

13             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  We would like to see the original.

14             MR. CEPIC:  Yes, Your Honour.  With pleasure.

15             JUDGE ROBINSON:  In the meantime, we'll admit this one, but we'll

16     see the original.

17             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you very much.

18             THE REGISTRAR:  That's Exhibit 2D46, Your Honours.

19             MR. CEPIC: [Interpretation]

20        Q.   Madam Lukic, just one question.  You explained quite a lot of

21     things in the interview with the Prosecutor, and you stated at one point

22     that Sredoje Lukic had done everything he could to leave Visegrad and to

23     settle in Serbia.  Was his intention to do so temporarily, for a certain

24     period of time?

25        A.   Sredoje's intentions were to leave Visegrad indefinitely because

Page 3675

 1     in Visegrad the war had started, the living conditions were inadequate,

 2     the children couldn't go to school, there was a shortage of food together

 3     with all the other dire circumstances.

 4             MR. CEPIC:  [Interpretation] Thank you, Madam Lukic.  I have no

 5     further questions for you.

 6             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome.

 7                           Cross-examination by Mr. Groome:

 8        Q.   Good afternoon, Mrs. Lukic.  My name is Dermot Groome, and I'll

 9     be asking you a few questions on behalf of the Prosecution.  I'd first

10     like to begin by asking you, can you tell us, your last name is Lukic.

11     How precisely are you related to Sredoje Lukic?

12        A.   My family name is Lukic.  That's correct.  Sredoje is my

13     husband's brother, so he's my brother-in-law.

14        Q.   And what is your husband's name?

15        A.   Slavko Lukic.

16        Q.   What other siblings are there aside from Sredoje Lukic and

17     Slavko Lukic?

18        A.   They have another brother, Rade Lukic, and two sisters, Vojka and

19     Savka.

20        Q.   Now, is it true that prior to the war, you would make the trip to

21     Visegrad to visit Sredoje Lukic and his family at his family home?  Is

22     that correct?

23        A.   That's correct.

24        Q.   And according to your interview, you did that approximately two

25     ore three times a year.  Is that correct?

Page 3676

 1        A.   Approximately, yes.

 2        Q.   And the name of the neighborhood that he lived in Visegrad is

 3     Seganje, S-e-g-a-n-j-e, correct?

 4        A.   It's Seganje, that's correct.

 5        Q.   He was a policeman in Visegrad, was he not?

 6        A.   That's correct.

 7        Q.   And on the occasions that you went to see him there, did it

 8     appear that he was well-liked by his neighbors and the people of

 9     Visegrad?

10        A.   He was liked.  They liked him, yes.

11        Q.   Did you get the sense that he was well known in Visegrad?

12        A.   Since he was working as a policeman, it's most probable that he

13     was well known.  Yes, he was well known.

14        Q.   What would you estimate his height to be?

15        A.   What would I estimate his height?  Well, he's as tall as my

16     husband.  He's tall, strapping, 1 metre and 80 centimetres,

17     approximately.  I never really paid that much attention.

18        Q.   And what would you say he weighed in 1992?

19        A.   What he weighed in 1992?  I can tell you approximately between 80

20     and 90 kilograms.

21        Q.   And how did he wear his hair in the summer of 1992?

22        A.   Short, cropped.

23        Q.   Did you work outside the home?

24        A.   How do you mean?  I did not understand the question.

25        Q.   In addition to being the mother of your children and taking care

Page 3677

 1     of the household, did you ever engage in any other work outside the home?

 2        A.   Well, I was on maternity leave during that period.  After

 3     maternity leave, I went back to employment.  I was employed, yes.

 4        Q.   And what was your employment?

 5        A.   Do you ask me where I work?

 6        Q.   I'm more interested, in 1992, are you working at the same

 7     place --

 8        A.   In 1992, I did not work.  I was on maternity leave.  I was at

 9     home with the baby.

10        Q.   Where did you work prior to going on maternity leave?

11        A.   I worked in Lipov Lad in the Boulevard of Revolution.  First I

12     was on sick leave during my pregnancy and then went on maternity leave

13     after giving birth.  This means I was missing from work for one month --

14     one year and six months.

15        Q.   What kind of work did you do?  I'm trying to get at what type of

16     work did you engage in?

17        A.   I work in the catering and hospitality industry.  That's my

18     trade.

19        Q.   Now, I want to draw your attention to the birth of your child in

20     1992.  What is the child's name?

21        A.   Dragana Lukic.  That's the name of my child.

22        Q.   And I imagine that you and your husband took photographs as all

23     proud parents do at the time of a birth, and you'd be able to produce

24     them to the Court if required?

25        A.   I did not bring any photos, but if necessary, I can supply at a

Page 3678

 1     later date.  I can give it -- give them to the lawyer, but I don't have

 2     them with me.

 3        Q.   Now, is it your evidence that Sredoje Lukic came to visit you the

 4     day after you arrived home after giving birth to your child in June of

 5     1992?  Is that correct?

 6        A.   Sredoje Lukic visited on the 27th of June, and I was discharged

 7     from hospital on the 26th of June.  So the following day from my

 8     discharge from hospital, Sredoje and his family visited me at my home.

 9        Q.   And what time that day did they arrive at your home?

10        A.   Around mid-day, noon.

11        Q.   And approximately how long did they stay?

12        A.   Some four hours.

13        Q.   I'd also imagine that in the four hours that they were there,

14     pictures were also taken of Sredoje Lukic holding his new niece.  Would

15     you be able to provide us with photographs taken on the 27th showing

16     Sredoje Lukic holding this newborn?

17        A.   Unfortunately, we did not take any photographs.  We did not have

18     a camera at the time, so we did not take any pictures.

19        Q.   So you do not have a picture of Sredoje Lukic holding the baby

20     shortly after birth on the 27th of June, 1992?

21        A.   No, I don't have such a picture.

22        Q.   According to your account, both your husband Slavko Lukic and

23     Sredoje's wife Vidjenka Lukic were present during this visit and could

24     also speak to it.  Do you know why your husband is not coming to testify

25     about this event?

Page 3679

 1             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour --

 2             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] After which visit, you mean?

 3             MR. CEPIC:  This question is calling for speculation.

 4             THE INTERPRETER:  Inaudible.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I agree, Mr. Groome.

 6             MR. GROOME:  Can I ask her, Your Honour, if she knows why her

 7     husband -- I mean, presumably they discuss --

 8             JUDGE ROBINSON:  No, I don't think it's a proper question for her

 9     at all.

10             MR. GROOME:  Okay.  I'll move on, Your Honour.

11        Q.   You know that Sredoje Lukic was held by some Muslims -- held in

12     captivity in Visegrad, correct?

13        A.   Given that I had a small child and was pregnant with another, of

14     course I heard and I saw on TV that he had been captured.

15        Q.   And you said in your interview that he visited you and your

16     family shortly after his release when he was looking for a job in

17     Belgrade.  Is that correct?

18        A.   I did not understand the question well.

19        Q.   In your interview, you said to the investigator that shortly

20     after he was released from captivity, he came to Belgrade to look for a

21     job and that he visited with you and your family.  Is that not correct?

22        A.   He visited me after I had been discharged --

23             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just a minute, please.  Mr. Cepic.

24             MR. CEPIC:  I'm sorry.  Could we have the reference for this

25     question, please?

Page 3680

 1             MR. GROOME:  I'm sorry.  It's page 6, beginning at line 30.

 2        Q.   Mrs. Lukic, I'm talking about before you had the baby but after

 3     the period between the time Sredoje Lukic was released from captivity in

 4     Visegrad but prior to when you had Dragana.  Did Sredoje Lukic come and

 5     visit you during that period?

 6        A.   I think he did once.  I don't remember the exact date or time.

 7        Q.   And the purpose of coming to Belgrade was he was looking to get a

 8     job in Belgrade with the police.  Is that not correct?

 9        A.   Well, he was trying to leave Visegrad, of course.  I told you

10     earlier he was looking for a way to leave Visegrad because of the

11     situation that prevailed there and because of his children.  He couldn't

12     keep his children in school there.  He couldn't put any food on the

13     table.

14        Q.   But his intention was to attempt to get a job through a relative

15     who was working in the police in Belgrade.  Is that not correct?

16        A.   Yes.  Yes.  He was trying through a relative of theirs whose name

17     is Sreten Lukic who was already working in the SUP.

18        Q.   And this person, Sreten Lukic, had a high-ranking position in the

19     Ministry of the Interior.  Is that correct?

20        A.   Correct.

21        Q.   And this is the same Sreten Lukic that is currently in custody

22     here in The Hague.  Is that not correct?

23        A.   Correct.

24        Q.   Now, when you saw Sredoje Lukic after he had been released from

25     captivity, did he describe the treatment that he was subjected to?

Page 3681

 1        A.   No, he did not discuss these things with me or before me or

 2     before my children and certainly not before his own children.  He talked

 3     to my husband, though, and I don't know what exactly they talked about.

 4        Q.   Did you ever observe any of the injuries he sustained when he was

 5     held in captivity?

 6        A.   No.  No, he didn't show me.

 7        Q.   Now, is it your understanding that after Sredoje Lukic was

 8     released from captivity, he returned to work as a police officer in

 9     Visegrad?

10        A.   Yes.  He returned to work there as a policeman in Visegrad.  His

11     family was away.  He went back to Visegrad to work, but he regularly

12     visited with his family in Belgrade, and in the meantime he was looking

13     for a job as well.

14        Q.   Now, also according to your interview, you also know Milan Lukic.

15     Is that correct?

16        A.   Yes.

17        Q.   And in fact, he attended your wedding.  Is that correct?

18        A.   Correct.

19        Q.   What would you say his height is?

20        A.   His may be a little less tall than Sredoje.

21        Q.   And what would you say his weight was back in 1992?

22             MR. IVETIC:  Objection, Your Honour.  There's been no foundation

23     that she saw him in 1992.

24             MR. GROOME:

25        Q.   Can I ask you, does --

Page 3682

 1        A.   Well, I can answer.  He was a bit thinner, maybe 75 to 80 kilos.

 2             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome --

 3             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Saying all this roughly because I

 4     didn't weigh them.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, you didn't weigh him.  It's time for the

 6     break.

 7             MR. GROOME:  Yes, Your Honour.

 8             JUDGE ROBINSON:  We break for half an hour.  Just before the

 9     break, Mr. Cepic, you had undertaken to fetch the original of a document.

10             MR. CEPIC:  That's correct, Your Honour.

11             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  Okay.

12             MR. CEPIC:  That's correct.

13             JUDGE ROBINSON:  And half an hour will be enough?

14             MR. CEPIC:  Half an hour.

15             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  Well, half an hour.  Yes.

16                           --- Recess taken at 12.14 p.m.

17                           --- On resuming at 12.50 p.m.

18             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, Mr. Groome.

19             MR. GROOME:  Thank you, Your Honour.

20        Q.   Mrs. Lukic, we were talking about Milan Lukic just when we took

21     the break.  The last question I have from -- with respect to Milan Lukic

22     is that during the month of June 1992, you don't ever recall seeing him

23     in Belgrade, do you?

24             MR. IVETIC:  Your Honour, foundation, speculation.  This is not

25     proper testimony for this witness.  It's not raised in direct.

Page 3683

 1             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome.

 2             MR. GROOME:  I believe it is a proper question.  She's a relative

 3     of his.  I'm just asking a simple question of whether she saw him in the

 4     month of June 1992.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  I'll allow it.

 6             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] No, I did not see him.

 7             MR. GROOME:

 8        Q.   I have read in your interview how you described becoming involved

 9     as a witness in this case.  Can I conclude that your husband first spoke

10     to you about this, or maybe -- can you tell us how you first became

11     involved as a witness in this case?

12        A.   Lawyer Cepic contacted me sometime around the new year, and

13     Sredoje remembered the date when I gave birth and that the day after I

14     left the hospital, he visited me.  He told that to his lawyer, and that's

15     how I established contact with his lawyer.  However, since I was unable

16     to find the letter of discharge - I had misplaced it - I couldn't

17     remember whether it was the 25th or the 26th of June when I left the

18     hospital.  I found the letter of discharge later, and my husband gave it

19     to the lawyer.

20        Q.   Did you ever discuss with your husband the possibility of

21     testifying on behalf of his brother?

22        A.   No, I did not.

23        Q.   So prior to Mr. Cepic contacting you, you had no idea about the

24     important testimony that you might be able to provide?

25        A.   No.  I did not think about that.

Page 3684

 1        Q.   And as you've stated here, it was Sredoje Lukic who remembered

 2     the exact date of the birth of Dragana, not you remembering that Sredoje

 3     was accused of a crime in proximity to the birth of Dragana.  Is that

 4     correct?

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  That's a little confusing.

 6             MR. GROOME:  I recognize that, Your Honour.  Let me break it up.

 7     I apologize.

 8        Q.   I apologize for giving you such a confusing question.  Let me try

 9     to break it down.  As you've said here, it was Sredoje who first realized

10     that -- or remembered the exact date that Dragana was born?

11        A.   Correct.

12        Q.   So your best recollection of when Mr. Cepic contacted you and

13     told him -- and you told him that Sredoje was visiting you shortly after

14     the birth of your child was around last new year.  Is that correct?

15        A.   It was towards the end of 2007, the beginning of 2008, around the

16     new year.

17        Q.   Okay.  Are the -- is the -- are the earphones okay?  You seem to

18     be maybe having -- experiencing some discomfort when I speak.  Are they

19     too loud?  We can get you some assistance with that.

20        A.   It's fine.

21        Q.   Now, after the new year, on 8th of January, 2008, to be precise,

22     Mr. Cepic filed what is referred to here as alibi notice where he is

23     required to provide information about where Sredoje Lukic says that he

24     was and the witnesses who will testify on his behalf.  In that filing,

25     after the time you said you spoke with Mr. Cepic --

Page 3685

 1             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just a minute.  I see Mr. Cepic on his feet.

 2             MR. CEPIC:  Does Mr. Groome raise his final arguments or what.

 3     This witness is not able to --

 4             THE INTERPRETER:  Mr. Cepic is inaudible.  Terribly sorry.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic, you're not being heard.  You have to

 6     speak into the mic.

 7             MR. CEPIC:  I'm sorry.  I'm sorry.  I think that Mr. Groome now

 8     did not raise his final arguments because I think that this witness

 9     cannot provide us information related to the Defence motions or similar

10     issues.

11             JUDGE ROBINSON:  We haven't yet heard the question.  What is the

12     question, Mr. Groome?

13             MR. GROOME:

14        Q.   I won't repeat the whole explanation, but on the 8th [Realtime

15     transcript read in error "28th"] of January, 2008, when Mr. Cepic, as

16     required by the rules, provided the names of the people who would be able

17     to testify about Sredoje Lukic's whereabouts during the time he was

18     alleged to have committed the crime, you were not put forward as a

19     witness.  You were only put forward as a witness in June of 2008.  Does

20     that change your recollection as to when you spoke to Mr. Cepic about

21     this evidence that you had?

22        A.   I told you that I was unable to find the letter of discharge

23     immediately, so I told Mr. Cepic that until I find the letter of

24     discharge I cannot be sure.  I found the letter of discharge only in

25     April.  I had mislaid it in some books where you normally don't keep

Page 3686

 1     documents, but that's where I put it, apparently.

 2        Q.   Now, the indictment against Sredoje Lukic was made public in

 3     October of the year 2000, and he was a fugitive for about five years

 4     until he turned himself in in September of 2005.  Did you see him during

 5     that period of time?

 6        A.   No.

 7        Q.   Do you know if your husband was in communication with him during

 8     that time?

 9        A.   I don't think so.

10        Q.   Do you know where he was staying during that period of time?

11        A.   I don't know.

12        Q.   But when the case was made public against him, you recognized

13     that Sredoje Lukic, the relative of yours, was -- had been indicted for

14     some serious crimes committed in Visegrad in June of 1992, were you not?

15        A.   I didn't understand the question.  Could you please repeat it?

16        Q.   Once the indictment became public and there were public arrest

17     warrants issued for Sredoje Lukic, it was publicized in the media, you

18     recognized that the Sredoje Lukic who had been indicted was the

19     Sredoje Lukic who was your husband's brother.  Is that not correct?

20        A.   Of course he's my husband's brother.

21        Q.   But you were aware once the indictment became public that your

22     husband's brother was wanted, was a fugitive, with respect to some

23     serious crimes that occurred in Visegrad in June of 1992, were you not?

24        A.   Yes, I knew he was on the run, but I didn't know where he was.

25        Q.   And did you and your husband ever discuss the crimes with which

Page 3687

 1     Sredoje Lukic had been charged?

 2        A.   I'm not aware of any crimes that he may have committed.  I didn't

 3     see that, so I couldn't talk about it.

 4        Q.   But there was substantial media coverage about this case and

 5     about the crimes underlying this case.  Were you not exposed to any of

 6     that media coverage during this time period?

 7        A.   Sir, I did listen to all the talk that was going on, and there

 8     was a lot of talk, but I didn't see anything for myself and therefore

 9     couldn't talk about it.

10        Q.   Did it never occur to you prior to Mr. Cepic calling that the two

11     most serious acts that Sredoje was charged with occurred in the same

12     month as the birth of your own daughter?  Did that never occur to you?

13        A.   I don't even know when these acts were committed.  I never gave

14     it any thought.  All I know is that he visited the day after my second

15     child was born, and when these crimes were committed, I don't know.  I

16     was not interested.  You have to believe that I don't even know what

17     happened on that 27th.  All I know is that he called on me.  He came with

18     his wife and his children.

19        Q.   Mrs. Lukic, is it your testimony that you had no interest in the

20     fact that your husband's brother had been indicted by an international

21     criminal tribunal for serious crimes?  Is that your evidence, that you

22     had no interest in that?

23        A.   I don't know in which way you mean it, I had no interest.

24        Q.   You testified --

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just a minute.  Mr. Cepic.

Page 3688

 1             MR. CEPIC:  I just want to intervene.  In transcript, page 84,

 2     line 3, "All I know is that he called on me."  But witness said [B/C/S

 3     spoken].  Thank you.

 4             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Which is what?

 5             THE INTERPRETER:  The witness said, Mr. Cepic quotes, "He was at

 6     my place."  Interpreter's note, it's -- Mr. Cepic misunderstands the

 7     meaning of the expression "call on someone."

 8             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes.  That's virtually the same thing in

 9     English.

10             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you very much.

11             JUDGE ROBINSON:  "He was at my place" is virtually the same thing

12     as "he called on me," in English.

13             MR. GROOME:

14        Q.   Mrs. Lukic, at page 83, line 25, the record records you as

15     saying, "I was not interested."  My question to you is, is that really a

16     true statement, that you had no interest in the fact that your husband's

17     brother had been indicted for serious crimes by an international criminal

18     tribunal?

19        A.   You know what?  It's not that I had no interest.  Of course I had

20     some interest, but I had one very small child, and I was pregnant with

21     another, and after that I had a third child, and I was so busy with my

22     children that I had no time to deal with other things, really.

23        Q.   Did you and your husband ever, over the dinner table or after the

24     children had gone to bed, ever discuss that his brother had been charged

25     by an international tribunal and there was an outstanding arrest warrant?

Page 3689

 1        A.   Well, yes.

 2        Q.   And in those discussions, did it never -- was it never discussed

 3     what the substance of the allegations were against Sredoje Lukic?

 4        A.   I heard he was indicted and charged with certain crimes, but

 5     again, I had not that much interest in it, not enough to go into things

 6     like whether it was on that date or on a different date.  I had too many

 7     of my problems to go into the details of what he's supposed to have done

 8     or if he had done it at all.

 9        Q.   Mrs. Lukic, I appreciate that you may be in a difficult position,

10     but I put it to you that the reason that you never came forward with this

11     information prior to just a year ago is the same reason that you do not

12     have a photograph of Sredoje Lukic holding his newborn niece, and that is

13     that while you may have been discharged from the hospital on the 26th of

14     June --

15             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. --

16             MR. GROOME:  Can I finish --

17             JUDGE ROBINSON:  What is the objection?

18             MR. CEPIC: [Interpretation] Your Honours, we had an assertion

19     here, and we don't know what this assertion is corroborated by.

20             THE INTERPRETER:  [Previous translation continues] ...

21     microphone, thank you.

22             JUDGE ROBINSON:  What assertion are you talking about?  He's

23     putting his case as he's obliged to.

24             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you, Your Honour, but it sounds a little bit

25     different to me.

Page 3690

 1             JUDGE ROBINSON:  That's his case on his instructions, and he's

 2     quite rightly putting it, and I just wish more lawyers would do that.

 3             Yes, go ahead.

 4             MR. GROOME:

 5        Q.   Let me just recap my question to you.  So I'm putting to you that

 6     the reason that you had not come forward in the seven years since the

 7     indictment was made public with this very, very important information

 8     that could exonerate him is the very same reason that you do not have a

 9     photograph of him during his four-hour visit with your newborn niece, and

10     that is because, although it may be true that you were discharged from

11     the hospital on the 26th, I put it to you that it is not true that he

12     visited you on the 27th, the precise day he is alleged to have been in

13     Visegrad.

14        A.   I maintain to you that he visited me on the 27th of June, 1992,

15     the day after I left the hospital with my newborn.  He visited me

16     together with his wife and his children.  I did not have a camera at the

17     time to be able to take a photo, and he didn't have one either.  I had a

18     picture of my baby taken only at the hospital as we were leaving.  There

19     is a picture of the baby alone.

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just tell us, who are the other persons who were

21     there during that visit by Sredoje?  Can you just list all of them for

22     me?

23             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] My husband; myself; my elder

24     daughter, a baby; Sredoje; his wife; and his children.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Anybody from outside the family?  Was there

Page 3691

 1     anybody there not a member of family?

 2             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] No.  No.  There was no one else.

 3             MR. GROOME:

 4        Q.   Mrs. Lukic, is there any possibility in your mind that it may

 5     have been a different day shortly after the birth of the baby, perhaps

 6     the 28th, the 29th, the 30th?  Is there any possibility that that could

 7     be true given the fact that it's so many years in the past now?

 8        A.   It's a very important date to me.  I remember all the first

 9     visits that I received after the birth of my first, my second, and the

10     third baby.  The birthdays of my children are very important to me, and

11     also important to me are the people who came to visit me immediately

12     after I left the hospital, the maternity ward.

13        Q.   What gift did Sredoje bring?

14        A.   The custom in our parts is to give a gift of money, and that's

15     what he gave us.

16        Q.   So if I were to ask you for each of your children all of the

17     people who visited -- visited you, the first time they visited, you are

18     confident that you would be able to give an accurate and reliable list of

19     those people and the dates on which they visited -- visited you after

20     giving birth to a child?

21        A.   Certainly.  After the birth of my first child, my mother and

22     brother were the first to visit as soon as I came home.  After my second

23     child, it was Sredoje with his wife and children.  After my third child,

24     unfortunately, no one came within the first month because Belgrade was

25     being bombed at the time and nobody was able to come.

Page 3692

 1        Q.   But --

 2             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Why are you able to recollect Sredoje's visit as

 3     taking place on the day after you came out of the hospital as distinct

 4     from, say, two or three days after that?

 5             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Because I always remember these

 6     things, the first people who call on me, and he came the day after,

 7     immediately after I came back home.

 8             MR. GROOME:

 9        Q.   Mrs. Lukic, I just want to conclude by --

10             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Just a second.

11             MR. GROOME:  Oh, I'm sorry, Your Honour.

12                           [Trial Chamber confers]

13             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic, are you calling any of the other

14     family members who were present during Sredoje's visit?

15             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, just -- we announced the list just of

16     four witnesses.

17             JUDGE ROBINSON:  So that's -- you don't intend to call her

18     husband or the children, any of the children?

19             MR. CEPIC:  We thought that would be sufficient for that purpose.

20             JUDGE ROBINSON:  All right.  Thank you.

21             Yes, Mr. Groome.

22             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, just a correction to the transcript.

23     On page 81, line 7, it's been made known to me that it should say 8th of

24     January, 2008, not 28th of January, so I'd ask that that correction be

25     made to the transcript.

Page 3693

 1        Q.   Mrs. Lukic, could you tell us the dates of birth of

 2     Sredoje Lukic's two children?

 3        A.   I can't give you the exact date.  I know that his son is older

 4     than my eldest daughter.  Danijela [phoen] was born in 1988, and my

 5     daughter was born in 1989.

 6        Q.   I want to --

 7             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic.

 8             MR. CEPIC:  -- just intervene in transcript.

 9             THE INTERPRETER:  Could Mr. Cepic come closer to the microphone,

10     please.

11             MR. CEPIC:  [Previous translation continues] ... line 14, it is

12     not Danijela but Danila [phoen], the name of the child.

13             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Danila.

14             MR. CEPIC:  Thank you.

15             MR. GROOME:

16        Q.   I just want to read you a brief transcript of your interview,

17     which is now in evidence, and the reference is page 2, lines 2 to 9.

18     Mr. Caine asked you:  "How did he contact you?"  And the "he" refers to

19     Mr. Cepic.  And you responded:  "Well, Sredoje remembered the exact date

20     when I gave birth and that he visited me the next day, so he has informed

21     the attorney to contact me, and that is how we got in touch ."

22             It remains a fact that you did not come up -- that you did not

23     realize that the date that Sredoje Lukic came to visit you was important.

24     It was something that was told to you actually quite recently.  Is that

25     not true?

Page 3694

 1        A.   Correct.

 2             MR. GROOME:  Thank you, Mrs. Lukic.

 3             JUDGE ROBINSON:  The Chamber has been given the original document

 4     with the discharge.  Have you seen it, Mr. Groome?

 5             MR. GROOME:  I took a quick look at the break, Your Honour.  I do

 6     plan to take a closer look, perhaps, but I have no objection now to that

 7     document being introduced into evidence.

 8             JUDGE ROBINSON:  We'll admit the original of the document.  Court

 9     deputy.

10             THE REGISTRAR:  The original will be admitted and kept in the

11     vault, Your Honours.

12             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Here it is.  Mr. Cepic [microphone not

13     activated] --

14             MR. CEPIC:  No, Your Honour.

15             THE INTERPRETER:  Microphone for his Honour.

16             MR. CEPIC:  Witness, that concludes your evidence.  We thank you

17     for coming to the Tribunal to testify.  You may now leave.

18             THE WITNESS: [Interpretation] Thank you.

19             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, your mic.

20                           [Trial Chamber confers]

21                           [The witness withdrew]

22             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Groome, the indictment in counts 13, 14, 15,

23     16, and 17 recites on or about 27th June, et cetera, et cetera.  And is

24     it your case that this event took place on the 27th or on or about the

25     27th?

Page 3695

 1             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, as stated in the indictment, it is on

 2     or about.  As the Chamber will recall during the course of the

 3     Prosecution case, some witnesses had slightly different recollections as

 4     to the precise date, so that is why it is pled in that way.  That is pled

 5     with as much specificity as possible, again, to take into account the

 6     variation, the slight variation of the date between the different

 7     witnesses.

 8             JUDGE ROBINSON:  We'll, of course, be checking into that.  I

 9     thought most of the witnesses did testify fairly specifically to the

10     27th, but that is something which we'll obviously be checking.

11             The next witness.  No, before you call the witness, Mr. Ivetic.

12             MR. IVETIC:  Yes, Your Honour.

13             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I'm not happy with the explanation that has been

14     offered by the Defence for the unavailability of the two witnesses.  You

15     said that was disclosed to you just recently.

16             MR. IVETIC:  Right.  Friday evening is when I talked with the one

17     witness.  I have not heard back from the second witness, Mr. -- I don't

18     know if their -- the filing was confidential, but I think I can testify

19     that it was the one -- the first witness is the one that I had spoke with

20     on the telephone.

21             JUDGE ROBINSON:  It's not a good start, Mr. Ivetic, because you

22     have to do your best.  I know it may be difficult, but you have to have

23     your witnesses.  I will be fairly flexible, but I don't expect a Defence

24     case to be presented on the basis where we are going to have a witness on

25     a Monday, then the case breaks down because that witness's testimony is

Page 3696

 1     finished, and there is no other witness available.  So I really have to

 2     express the hope that this is going to be the exception, you know?

 3             MR. IVETIC:  I hope so, as well, Your Honour.

 4             JUDGE ROBINSON:  But what is the nature of the other engagement

 5     that makes it impossible for this witness to attend?

 6             MR. IVETIC:  This witness --

 7             JUDGE ROBINSON:  And was it not -- why wasn't that known from the

 8     time the witness was asked to testify?

 9             MR. IVETIC:  As Your Honour may recall, when we filed the 65 ter

10     statements and then we received -- we received the notice that we were

11     going to redo the statements, we only had two witnesses that we could

12     call that we for sure were going to keep on the list, which are the two

13     witness that we identified in our weekly notification.  The witnesses had

14     previously scheduled professional obligations.  This one that I talked

15     with had the professional obligation that kept him unable to travel this

16     week.  I'm hopeful that we can schedule him perhaps for next week or by

17     that time we'll have the revised list with the final list of witnesses so

18     we can try to get someone else over here.  With respect to the second

19     witness, I haven't heard back from him, so I can't confirm him, and I

20     believe the notification that we filed said that we had not yet had an

21     opportunity to confirm those --

22             THE INTERPRETER:  Would the counsel please slow down.

23             MR. IVETIC: [Previous translation continues] ... testimony with

24     these witnesses.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Slow down.  Slow down.

Page 3697

 1             MR. IVETIC:  The notification that we filed said that we have not

 2     yet had an opportunity to confirm the appearance of those two witnesses

 3     for this week.  The notification notice was filed on Thursday of last

 4     week.

 5             JUDGE ROBINSON:  But the question is why?  You say it's now

 6     likely that we are going to have a breakdown.  The pace at which your

 7     colleague is progressing, it's quite quick.

 8             MR. IVETIC:  That's correct, Your Honour, and had we not had the

 9     last week with me engaged in the other matter, perhaps I could have gone

10     to terrain and gotten some more witnesses.  All these things have an

11     effect on the Defence case, Your Honour.  All these things have an effect

12     on the work that we have to do, and as counsel we have obligations to

13     take care of everything that comes up, and especially when something

14     comes up on an emergent basis as it did last week, that is something that

15     affected our ability to do more than we did to prepare for the beginning

16     of our Defence case, Your Honour.

17             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Did you explain to me what the nature of the

18     other obligation is?  I can't remember.  I just asked you.

19             MR. IVETIC:  We had -- the other obligation, Your Honour, was we

20     had the Prosecution file a request under Rule 65 --

21             JUDGE ROBINSON:  No, no.  I meant the other obligation which

22     makes it not possible --

23             MR. IVETIC:  Previously scheduled professional obligation for

24     Mr. Rasic.

25             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Yes, but what is the nature of that professional

Page 3698

 1     obligation?

 2             MR. IVETIC:  I'm waiting to get the written confirmation from him

 3     but I thought I'd bring it to Your Honours' attention as soon as possible

 4     precisely because of the fact that it involves scheduling for this week

 5     which is why I raised it today rather than waiting to get the

 6     confirmation from him.  But when I spoke to him on the phone he mentioned

 7     that he could not travel this week because of the previously scheduled

 8     obligation.

 9             JUDGE ROBINSON:  That sounds very vague.  You must have that

10     explanation by tomorrow --

11             MR. IVETIC:  Fair enough.

12             JUDGE ROBINSON:  -- to give the Chamber.

13             MR. GROOME:  Your Honour, just to go back to the prior issue

14     about the date, one of the ways where it is not clear is Vidovdan Day is,

15     according to the calendar that's in -- before the Chamber now, is on the

16     28th, and some witnesses talked about the event happening on

17     Vidovdan Day.  Although I'm not clear whether it was the night into the

18     morning of Vidovdan or Vidovdan Day.

19             JUDGE ROBINSON:  Mr. Cepic.  Next witness.

20             MR. CEPIC:  Your Honour, with your leave, could we start tomorrow

21     morning?  We did not expect that we would be quite fast.  We expected

22     that we would spend more time in preliminary issues.

23             JUDGE ROBINSON:  I see.  In the circumstances, I think yes.

24     We'll adjourn and resume tomorrow.

25                           --- Whereupon the hearing adjourned at 1.25 p.m.,

Page 3699

 1                           to be reconvened on Tuesday, the 2nd day of

 2                           December, 2008, at 8.50 a.m.