IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER
Before:
Judge Richard May, Presiding
Judge Patrick Robinson
Judge O-Gon Kwon
Registrar:
Mr. Hans Holthuis
Decision of:
5 February 2004
PROSECUTOR
v.
SLOBODAN MILOSEVIC
_________________________________________________
DECISION ON PROSECUTION’S MOTION UNDER RULE 73 (A) FOR A RULING ON THE COMPETENCE OF THE AMICI CURIAE TO PRESENT A MOTION FOR JUDGEMENT OF ACQUITTAL UNDER RULE 98 BIS
__________________________________________________
The Office of the Prosecutor
Ms. Carla Del Ponte
Mr. Geoffrey Nice
Mr. Dermot Groome
The Accused
Mr. Slobodan Milosevic
Amici Curiae
Mr. Steven Kay, QC
Mr. Branislav Tapuskovic
Prof. Timothy L.H. McCormack
THIS TRIAL CHAMBER of the International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("the International Tribunal"),
BEING SEISED of a "Prosecution’s Motion Under Rule 73 (A) for a Ruling on the Competence of the Amici Curiae to Present a Motion for Judgement of Acquittal Under Rule 98 bis", filed on 4 February 2004 ("Motion"), in which the Prosecution seeks reconsideration of the Trial Chamber’s Order of 27 June 20031 to the effect that the Amici Curiae may file a Motion pursuant to Rule 98 bis of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Tribunal ("Rules"), and for consequential orders,
CONSIDERING that it was open to the Prosecution to seek certification to appeal the Trial Chamber’s Previous Order within seven days of that Order, but that the time for such an application has long since expired,
CONSIDERING that the main ground for reconsideration of the Previous Order asserted by the Prosecution is a Separate Opinion by Judge Shahabuddeen in a recent Appeals Chamber Decision,2
CONSIDERING that the Appeals Chamber itself in that case decided to consider the appeal brought by the Amici Curiae, and in so doing proceeded on the basis they had locus standi,
CONSIDERING that the filing by the Amici Curiae of a Motion pursuant to Rule 98 bis does not in any way prejudice the Prosecution, does not infringe the interests of the Accused, and that it is in the interests of justice as a whole for the Motion to be brought,
PURSUANT TO Rule 54 of the Rules
HEREBY DISMISSES THE MOTION.
Done in English and French, the English text being authoritative.
_____________
Patrick Robinson
Judge
Dated this fifth day of February 2004
At The Hague
The Netherlands
[Seal of the Tribunal]