The following judgements and decisions have been summarised:

 

YEAR 2004

 

  1. Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaškić, Case no. IT-95-14-A, Judgement, 29 July 2004 (“Blaškić AJ”).
  2. Prosecutor v. Dario Kordić and Mario Čerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-A, Judgement, 17 December 2004 (“Kordić and Čerkez AJ”).

 

YEAR 2005

 

  1. Prosecutor v. Dragan Nikolić, Case No. IT-94-2-A, Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, 4 February 2005 (“Dragan Nikolić Judgement on Sentencing Appeal).
  2. Prosecutor v. Miroslav Kvočka et al., Case No. IT-98-30/1-A, Judgement, 28 February 2005 (“Kvočka AJ”).
  3. Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-A-R77.4, Decision on Prosecution Application to Strike Appellant’s Brief in the Appeal of the Decision on Contempt of the Tribunal Kosta Bulatović, 23 June 2005 (“Milošević Decision on Application to Strike Brief”).
  4. Prosecutor v. Milan Babić, Case No. IT-03-72-A, Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, 18 July 2005 (“Babić Judgement on Sentencing Appeal”).
  5. Prosecutor v. Miroslav Deronjić, Case No. IT-02-61-A, Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, 20 July 2005 (“Deronjić Judgement on Sentencing Appeal”).
  6. Prosecutor v. Naser Orić, Case No. IT-03-68-AR73.2, Interlocutory Decision on Length of Defence Case, 20 July 2005 (“Orić Decision on Length of Defence Case”).
  7. Prosecutor v. Ljube Boškoski and Johan Tarčulovski, Case No. IT-04-82-AR72.1, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, 22 July 2005 (“Boškoski Decision on Jurisdiction”).
  8. Prosecutor v. Sefer Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-AR73.2, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Concerning Admission of Record of Interview of the Accused from the Bar Table, 19 August 2005 (“Halilović Decision on Admission of Record of Interview”).
  9. Prosecutor v. Miodrag Jokić, Case No. IT-01-42/1-A, Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, 30 August 2005 (“Jokić Judgement on Sentencing Appeal”).
  10. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Order Expunging from the Record Annexures “A” through “G” of Appendix “A” to the Consolidated Respondent’s Brief Filed on 22 November 2005, 30 November 2005 (“Nahimana Order Expunging Annexes”).
  11. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Hassan Ngeze’s Motion for a Psychological Examination, 6 December 2005 (“Ngeze Decision on Psychological Examination”).
  12. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Hassan Ngeze’s Motion to Set Aside President Mřse’s Decision and Request to Consummate his Marriage, 6 December 2005 (“Ngeze Decision on Consummation of Marriage”).

 

YEAR 2006

 

  1. Prosecutor v. Zdravko Tolimir et al., Case No. IT-04-80-AR73.1, Decision on Radivoje Miletić’s Interlocutory Appeal Against Decision on Joinder of Accused, 27 January 2006 (“Tolimir Decision on Joinder”).
  2. Prosecutor v. Savo Todović, Case No. IT-97-25-AR11bis.1, Decision on Rule 11bis Referral, 23 February 2006 (“Todović Rule 11bis Decision”).
  3. Prosecutor v. Momir Nikolić, Case No. IT-02-60/1-A Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, 8 March 2006 (“Momir Nikolić Judgement on Sentencing Appeal”).
  4. Prosecutor v. Ramush Haradinaj et al., Case No. IT-04-84-AR65.2, Decision on Lahi Brahimaj’s Interlocutory Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision Denying his Provisional Release, 9 March 2006 (“Brahimaj Decision on Provisional Release”).
  5. Prosecutor v. Ramush Haradinaj et al., Case No. IT-04-84-AR65.1, Decision on Ramush Haradinaj’s Modified Provisional Release, 10 March 2006 (“Haradinaj Decision on Modified Provisional Release”).
  6. Prosecutor v. Milomir Stakić, Case No. IT-97-24-A, Judgement, 22 March 2006 (“Stakić AJ”).
  7. Prosecutor v. Željko Mejakić et al., Case No. IT-02-65-AR11bis.1, Decision on Joint Defence Appeal Against Decision on Referral Under Rule 11bis, 7 April 2006 (“Mejakić Rule 11bis Decision”).
  8. The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case Nos ICTR-98-44-AR72.5, & ICTR-98-44-AR72.6, Decision on Jurisdictional Appeals: Joint Criminal Enterprise, 12 April 2006 (“Karemera Decision on Jurisdictional Appeals”).
  9. The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.6, Decision on Joseph Nzirorera’s Interlocutory Appeal, 28 April 2006 (“Karemera Decision on Interlocutory Appeal”).
  10. Prosecutor v. Mladen Naletilić and Vinko Martinović, Case No. IT-98-34-A, Judgement, 3 May 2006 (“Naletilić and Martinović AJ”).
  11. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Appellant Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Motion for Leave to Present Additional Evidence Pursuant to Rule 115, 5 May 2006 (“Barayagwiza Decision on Additional Evidence”).
  12. Prosecutor v. Milan Milutinović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-AR108bis.2, Decision on Request of the United States of America for Review, 12 May 2006 (“Milutinović Decision on Request of the USA for Review”).
  13. Prosecutor v. Milan Milutinović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-AR108bis.2, Decision on Request of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation for Review, 15 May 2006 (“Milutinović Decision on Request of NATO for Review”).
  14. The Prosecutor v. Athanase Seromba, Case No. ICTR-01-66-AR, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal of a Bureau Decision, 22 May 2006 (“Seromba Decision on Interlocutory Appeal”).
  15. Prosecutor v. Blagoje Simić, Case No. IT-95-9-A, Decision on Blagoje Simić’s Motion for Admission of Additional Evidence, Alternatively for Taking of Judicial Notice, 1 June 2006 (“Simić Decision on Additional Evidence”).
  16. Prosecutor v. Michel Bagaragaza, Case No. ICTR-05-86-AR11bis, Decision on Prosecution ‘s Request for a Scheduling Order, 8 June 2006 (“Bagaragaza Decision on Prosecution Request for a Scheduling Order”).
  17. Prosecutor v. Vojislav Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-AR72.1, Decision on Motion for Reconsideration of the “Decision on the Interlocutory Appeal Concerning Jurisdiction” Dated 31 August 2004, 15 June 2006 (“Šešelj Reconsideration of Jurisdiction Decision”).
  18. The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73(c), Decision on Prosecutor’s Interlocutory Appeal of Decision on Judicial notice, 16 June 2006 (“Karemera Decision on Judicial Notice”).
  19. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Appellant Hassan Ngeze’s Motions for Approval of Further Investigations on Specific Information Relating to the Additional Evidence of Potential Witnesses, 20 June 2006 (“Ngeze Decision on Further Investigations”).
  20. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Décision relative ŕ la Requęte de l’Appelant Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza demandant l’examen de la Requęte de la Défense en date du 28 juillet 2000 et réparation pour abus de procédure, 23 June 2006 [with Corrigendum of 28 June 2006] (“Barayagwiza Decision on Review and Reconsideration”).
  21. Prosecutor v. Zoran Žigić a.k.a. “Ziga”, Case No. IT-98-30/1-A, Decision on Zoran Žigić’s “Motion for Reconsideration of Appeals Chamber Judgement IT-98-30/1-A Delivered on 28 February 2005”, 26 June 2006 (“Žigić Decision on Reconsideration of Appeal Judgement”).
  22. Eliézer Niyitegeka v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR‑96‑14‑R, Decision on request for Review, 30 June 2006 (“Niyitegeka Review Decision”).
  23. The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.7, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Regarding the Role of the Prosecutor’s Electronic Disclosure Suite in Discharging Disclosure Obligations, 30 June 2006 (“Karemera Decision on Interlocutory Appeal on EDS”).
  24. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.2, Decision on Joint Defence Interlocutory Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Oral Decision of 8 May 2006 Relating to Cross-Examination by Defence and on Association of Defence Counsel’s Request for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Brief, 4 July 2006 (“Prlić Decision on Interlocutory Appeal”).
  25. Sylvestre Gacumbitsi v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-2001-64-A, Judgement, 7 July 2006 (“Gacumbitsi AJ”).
  26. The Prosecutor v. André Ntagerura et al., Case No. ICTR-99-46-A, Judgement, 7 July 2006 (“Ntagerura et al. AJ”)
  27. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Appellant Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Motions for Leave to Submit Additional Grounds of Appeal, to Amend the Notice of Appeal and to Correct his Appellant’s Brief, 17 August 2006 (“Barayagwiza Decision on Additional Grounds of Appeal”).
  28. The Prosecutor v. Vincent Rutaganira, Case No. ICTR-95-IC-AR, Decision on Appeal of a Decision of the President on Early Release, 24 August 2006 (“Rutaganira Decision on Early Release”).
  29. Prosecutor v. Zoran Žigić, Case No. IT-98-30/1-R.2, Decision on Zoran Žigić’s Request for Review Under Rule 119, 25 August 2006 (“Žigić Review Decision”).
  30. The Prosecutor v. Michel Bagaragaza, Case No. ICTR-05-86-AR11bis, Decision on Rule 11bis, 30 August 2006 (“Bagaragaza Rule 11bis Decision”).
  31. Prosecutor v. Miroslav Bralo, Case No. IT-95-17-A, Decision on Motions for Access to Ex Parte Portions of the Record on Appeal and for Disclosure of Mitigating Material, 30 August 2006 (“Bralo Decision on Access to Ex Parte Materials and Disclosure of Mitigating Materials”).
  32. Prosecutor v. Mitar Rašević and Savo Todović, Case No. IT-97-25/1-AR11bis.1 & IT-97-25/1-AR11bis.2, Decision on Savo Todović’s appeals against decisions on referral under Rule 11bis, 4 September 2006 (“Todović Decision on Referral”).
  33. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Décision sur la Requęte de Ferdinand Nahimana  aux fins de communication d’éléments de preuve disculpatoires et d’investigations sur l’origine et le contenu de la pičce ŕ conviction P105, 12 September 2006 (“Nahimana Decision on Exhibit P105”).
  34. Prosecutor v. Milan Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-AR73.2, Decision on Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision on the Evidence of Witness Milan Babić, 14 September 2006 (“Martić Decision on Evidence”).
  35. Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-AR73.2, Decision on Krajišnik’s Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision Dismissing the Defense Motion for a Ruling that Judge Canivell is Unable to Continue Sitting in this Case, 15 September 2006 (“Krajišnik Decision on Extension of Mandate”).
  36. The Prosecutor v. Théoneste Bagosora et al., Case No. ICTR-98-41-AR73, Decision on Aloys Ntabakuze’s Interlocutory Appeal on Questions of Law Raised by the 29 June 2006 Trial Chamber I Decision on Motion for Exclusion of Evidence, 18 September 2006 (“Ntabakuze Decision on Interlocutory Appeal”).
  37. Eliézer Niyitegeka v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-96-14-R, Decision on Request for Reconsideration of the Decision on Request for Review, 27 September 2006 (“Niyitegeka Decision on Reconsideration of Decision for Review”).
  38. Prosecutor v. Vojislav Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-AR73.3, Decision on Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision on Assignment of Counsel, 20 October 2006 (“Šešelj Decision on Assignment of Counsel”).
  39. Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina, Prosecutor v. Ivan Čermak and Mladen Markač, Cases Nos. IT-01-45-AR73.1, IT-03-73-AR73.1, IT-03-73-AR.2, Decision on Interlocutory Appeals Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision to Amend the Indictment and for Joinder, 25 October 2006 (“Gotovina Decision on Joinder”).
  40. The Prosecutor v. Pauline Nyiramasuhuko et al., Case No. ICTR-97-21-AR73, Decision on “Appeal of Accused Arsčne Shalom Ntahobali Against the Decision on Kanyabashi’s Oral Motion to Cross-Examine Ntahobali Using Ntahobali’s Statements to Prosecution Investigators in July 1997”, 27 October 2006 (“Ntahobali Decision on Voir Dire and Statements of the Accused”).
  41. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Appellant Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Motion Requesting that the Prosecution Disclosure of the Interview of Michel Bagaragaza Be Expunged from the Record, 30 October 2006 (“Barayagwiza Decision on Expunging the Disclosure”).
  42. Protais Zigiranyirazo v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-2001-73-AR73, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal, 30 October 2006 (“Zigiranyirazo Decision on Interlocutory Appeal”).
  43. Prosecutor v. Mlađlo Radić, Case No. IT-98-30/1-R.1, Decision on Defence Request for Review (Public Redacted Version), 31 October 2006 (“Radić Review Decision”).
  44. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Décision sur la Requęte de Ferdinand Nahimana aux fins de traduction d’enregistrements d’émissions RTLM continues dans la pičce ŕ conviction C7, 20 November 2006 (“Nahimana Decision on Translation of Exhibits”).
  45. Prosecutor v. Tihomir Blaškić, Case No. IT-98-34-R, Decision on Prosecutor’s Request for Review or Reconsideration, 23 November 2006 (“Blaškić Review Decision”).
  46. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Appellant Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Motion Contesting The Decision of the President Refusing to Review and Reverse the Decision of the Registrar Relating to the Withdrawal of Co-Counsel, 23 November 2006 (“Barayagwiza Decision on Withdrawal of Co-Counsel”).
  47. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Public Redacted Version of the Decision on Motions Relating to the Appellant Hassan Ngeze’s and the Prosecution’s Request for Leave to Present Additional Evidence of Witnesses ABC1 and EB, 27 November 2006 [public redacted version] (“Ngeze Decision on Rule 115 Motions”).
  48. Prosecutor v. Blagoje Simić, Case No. IT-95-9-A, Judgement 28 November 2006 (“Simić AJ”).
  49. Prosecutor v. Stanislav Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-A, Judgement, 30 November 2006 (“Galić AJ”).
  50. The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73(C), Decision on Motions for Reconsideration, 1 December 2006 (“Karemera Decision on Reconsideration”).
  51. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Appellant Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Motion Concerning the Scheduling Order for the Appeals Hearing, 5 December 2006 (“Barayagwiza Decision on Scheduling Order”).
  52. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Appellant Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Motions for Leave to Present Additional Evidence Pursuant to Rule 115 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, 8 December 2006 (“Barayagwiza Decision on Rule 115 Motions”).
  53. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Appellant Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Motion for Clarification and Guidance Following the Decision of the Appeals Chamber Dated 16 June 2006 in Prosecutor v. Karemera et al. Case and Prosecutor’s Motion to Object to Late Filing of Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Reply, 8 December 2006 (“Barayagwiza Decision on Clarification”).
  54. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Décision sur les Requętes de Ferdinand Nahimana aux fins de divulgation d’éléments en possession du Procureur et nécessaires ŕ la Défense de l’Appelant et aux fins d’assistance du Greffe pour accomplir des investigations complémentaires en phase d’appel, 8 December 2006 (“Nahimana Decision on Further Investigation”).
  55. Georges Anderson Nderubumwe Rutaganda v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-96-03-R, Decision on Requests for Reconsideration, Review, Assignment of Counsel, Disclosure, and Clarification, 8 December 2006 (“Rutaganda Decision on Consolidated Motion”).
  56. Prosecutor v. Vojislav Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-AR73.4, Decision on Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision (No. 2) on Assignment of Counsel, 8 December 2006 (“Šešelj Decision on Assignment of Counsel No. 2”).
  57. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Leave to Call Rebuttal Material, 13 December 2006 [public redacted version] (“Nahimana Decision on Rebuttal Material”).
  58. Prosecutor v. Milan Milutinović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-AR65.2, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal of Denial of Provisional Release During the Winter Recess, 14 December 2006 (“Milutinović Decision on Provisional Release”).

 

YEAR 2007

  1. Prosecutor v. Ljube Boškoski and Johan Tarčulovski, Case No. IT-04-82-AR72.2, Decision on Ljube Boškoski’s Appeal on Jurisdiction, 9 January 2007 (“Boškoski Jurisdiction Decision”).
  2. Prosecutor v. Miroslav Bralo, Case No. IT-95-17-A, Decision on Miroslav Bralo’s Motion for Leave to Supplement Appeal Brief in Light of New Information Concerning Ex Parte Portion of the Trial Record, 9 January 2007 (“Bralo Decision on Supplementing Appeal Brief”).
  3. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on the Admissibility of the Amicus Curiae Brief Filed by the “Open Society Justice Initiative” and on its Request to be Heard at the Appeals Hearing, 12 January 2007 (“Nahimana Decision on Admission of Amicus Curiae Brief”).
  4. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on the Appellant Hassan Ngeze’s Motion for Leave to Present Rejoinder Evidence, 12 January 2007 [public redacted version] (“Ngeze Decision on Rejoinder”).
  5. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on the Appellant Hassan Ngeze’s Motion Requesting a Postponement of the Appeal Hearing, 15 January 2007 (“Ngeze Decision on Postponement of Appeal Hearing”).
  6. Emmanuel Ndindabahizi v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-01-71-A 16 January 2007 (“Ndindabahizi AJ”).
  7. Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on “Motion Seeking Review of the Decisions of the Registry in Relation to Assignment of Counsel”, 29 January 2007 (“Krajišnik Decision on Assignment of Counsel”).
  8. Prosecutor v. Jandranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.4, Decision on Prosecution Appeal Concerning the Trial Chamber Ruling Reducing Time for the Prosecution Case, 6 February 2007(“Prlić Decision on Reducing Time for the Prosecution Case”).
  9. Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on Motion by Mićo Stanišić for Access to All Confidential Materials in the Krajišnik Case”, 21 February 2007 (“Krajišnik Decision on Protective Measures (Stanišić)”).
  10. Prosecutor v. Miroslav Bralo, Case No. IT-95-17-A, Decision on Prosecution’s Motion to Strike and on Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File Response to Prosecution Oral Arguments, 5 March 2007 (“Bralo Decision on Leave to Respond to Oral Arguments”).
  11. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion to Pursue the Oral Request for the Appeals Chamber to Disregard Certain Arguments Made by Counsel for Appellant Barayagwiza at the Appeals Hearing on 17 January 2007, 5 March 2007 (“Barayagwiza Decision on Arguments Made at the Appeals Hearing”).
  12. Prosecutor v. Miroslav Bralo, Case No. IT-95-17-A, Judgement on Sentencing Appeal, 2 April 2007 (“Bralo Judgement on Sentencing Appeal”).
  13. Prosecutor v. Radoslav Brdjanin, Case No. IT-99-36-A, Judgement, 3 April 2007 (“Brđanin AJ”).
  14. Prosecutor v. Vojislav Šešelj, Case No. IT603-67-AR73.5, Decision on Vojislav Šešelj's Interlocutory Appeal Agaisnt the Trial Chamber's Decision on Form of Disclosure, 17 April 2007 (“Šešelj Decision on Disclosure”).
  15. The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR15 bis.3, Decision on Appeal Pursuant to Rule 15bis(D), 20 April 2007 (“Karemera Rule 15bis Decision”).
  16. Prosecutor v. Milan Milutinović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-AR73.1, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Against Second Decision Precluding the Prosecution from Adding General Wesley Clark to Its 65ter Witness List, 20 April 2007 (“Milutinović Decision on Rule 70 Witnesses”).
  17. Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina et al., Case No. IT-06-90-AR73.1, Decision on Miroslav Šeparović Interlocutory Appeal against Trial Chamber’s Decisions on Conflict of Interest and Finding of Misconduct, 4 May 2007 (“Gotovina Decision on Conflict of Interest (Markač)”).
  18. Prosecutor v. Vidoje Blagojević and Dragan Jokić, Case No. IT-02-60-A, Judgement, 9 May 2007 (“Blagojević and Jokić AJ”).
  19. Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on Momčilo Krajišnik’s Request to Self-Represent, on Counsel’s Motions in Relation to Appointment of Amicus Curiae, and on the Prosecution Motion of 16 February 2007, 11 May 2007 (“Krajišnik Decision on Self-Representation”).
  20. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.4, Decision on Prosecution Appeal Following Trial Chamber’s Decision on Remand and Further Certification, 11 May 2007 (“Prlić Decision After Remand”).
  21. Mikaeli Muhimana v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-95-1B-A, Judgement, 21 May 2007 (“Muhimana AJ”).
  22. The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.9, Decision on “Joseph Nzirorera’s Interlocutory Appeal of Decision on Obtaining Prior Statements of Prosecution Witnesses After They Have Testified”, 31 May 2007 (“Karemera Rule 15bis(F) Decision”).
  23. Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina et al., Case No. IT-06-90-AR72.1, Decision on Ante Gotovina’s Interlocutory Appeal Against Decision on Several Motions Challenging Jurisdiction, 6 June 2007 (“Gotovina Decision on Jurisdiction”).
  24. Prosecutor v. Pavle Strugar, Case No. IT-01-42-Misc.1, Decision on Strugar’s Request to Reopen Appeal Proceedings, 7 June 2007 (“Strugar Decision on Reopening Appeal”).
  25. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-AR73.1, Decision on Interlocutory Appeals Against Trial Chamber’s Decision on Prosecution’s Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts and Prosecution’s Catalogue of Agreed Facts, 26 June 2007 (“D. Milosević Decision on Judicial Notice”)
  26. Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina et al., Case No. IT-06-90-AR73.2, Decision on Ivan Čermak’s Interlocutory Appeal Against Trial Chamber’s Decision on Conflict on Interest of Attorneys Čedo Prodanović and Jadranka Sloković, 29 June 2007 (“Gotovina Decision on Conflict of Interest (Čermak)”).
  27. The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR11bis, Decision on Joseph Nzirorera’s Appeal From a Denial of a Request for Designation of a Trial Chamber to Consider Referral to a National Jurisdiction, 3 July 2007 (“Karemera Rule 11bis Decision”).
  28. Prosecutor v. Milan Lukić and Sredoje Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-AR11bis.1, Decision on Milan Lukić’s Appeal Regarding Referral, 11 July 2007 (“Lukić Decision on Rule 11bis”).
  29. The Prosecutor v. Casimir Bizimungu et al., Case No. ICTR-99-50-AR73.6, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Relating to the Testimony of Former United States Ambassador Robert Flaten, 16 July 2007 (confidential; confidentiality lifted by Order of 19 April 2010) (“Bizimungu Decision on Rule 70 Testimony”).
  30. The Prosecutor v. Pauline Nyiramasuhuko et al., Case No. ICTR-98-42-AR73, Decision on Joseph Kanyabashi’s Appeal against the Decision of Trial Chamber II of 21 March 2007 Concerning the Dismissal of Motions to Vary his Witness List, 21 August 2007 (“Kanyabashi Decision on Witness List”).
  31. Prosecutor v. Fatmir Limaj et al., Case No. IT-03-66-A, Judgement, 27 September 2007 (“Limaj et al. AJ”).
  32. Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on Krajišnik Request and on Prosecution Motion, 11 September 2007 (“Krajišnik Second Decision on Self-Representation”).
  33. André Rwamakuba v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44C-A, Decision on Appeal Against Decision on Appropriate Remedy, 13 September 2007 (“Rwamakuba Compensation Decision”).
  34. The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.10, Decision on Nzirorera’s Interlocutory Appeal Concerning his Right to Be Present at Trial, 5 October 2007 (“Nzirorera Decision on Right to Be Present”).
  35. Prosecutor v. Sefer Halilović, Case No. IT-01-48-A, Judgement, 16 October 2007 (“Halilović AJ”).
  36. Aloys Simba v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-01-76-A, Judgement, 27 November 2007 (“Simba AJ”).
  37. Ferdinand Nahimana et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52-A, Judgement 28 November 2007 (“Nahimana et al. AJ”)
  38. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.6, Decision on Appeals against Decision Admitting Transcript of Jadranko Prlić Questioning into Evidence, 23 November 2007 (“Prlić Decision on Admission of Transcript”).

 

YEAR 2008

1.      Prosecution v. Ante Gotovina et al., Case No. IT-06-90-AR108bis.2 Decision on Croatia’s Request for Review of the Trial Chamber’s Decision on Provisional Release, 17 January 2008 (“Gotovina Decision on Review”).

2.      Prosecutor v. Vujadin Popović et al., Case No. IT-05-88-AR73.2, Decision on Joint Defence Interlocutory Appeal Concerning the Status of Richard Butler as an Expert Witness, 30 January 2008 (“Popović Decision on Expert Witness”).

3.      Prosecutor v. Vujadin Popović et al., Case No. IT-05-88-AR73.3, Decision on Appeals Against Decision on Impeachment of a Party’s Own Witness, 1 February 2008 (“Popović Decision on Impeachment”).

4.      Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on Momčilo Krajišnik’s Motion to reschedule Status Conference and Permit Alan Dershowitz to Appear, 28 February 2008 (“Krajišnik Decision on Alan Derschowitz Participation”).

5.      Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT04-74-AR65.5, Decision on Prosecution’s Consolidated Appeal Against Decisions to Provisionally Release the Accused Prlić, Stojić, Prljak, Petković and Ćorić, 11 March 2008 (Prlić Consolidated Decision on Provisional Release).

6.      Prosecutor  v. Athanase Seromba, Case No. ICTR-2001-66-A, Judgement, 12 March 2008 (“Seromba AJ”).

7.      Prosecutor v. Zdravo Tolimir, Case No. IT-05-88/2-AR73.1, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Against Oral Decision of the Pre-Trial Judge of 11 December 2007, 28 March 2008 (“Tolimir Decision on Self-Representation”).

8.      Prosecutor v. Pavle Strugar, Case No. IT- 01-42-A, Decision on the Defence Request Seeking Provisional Release on the Grounds of Compassion, 2 April 2008 (“Strugar Decision on Provisional Release on Compassionate Grounds”).

9.      Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52A-R, Decision on Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza’s Motion of 6 March 2008, 11 April 2008 (“Barayagwiza Decision on Review-Counsel”).

10.  Prosecutor v. Rasim Delić, Case No. IT-04-83-AR73.1, 15 April 2008, Decision on Rasim Delić's Interlocutory Appeal Against Trial Chamber's Oral Decisions on Admission of Exhibits 1316 and 1317, 15 April 2008 (“Delić Decision on Admission of Exhibits”).

11.  Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. Case No. IT-04-74-AR65.7, Decision on “Prosecution’s Appeal from Décision relative ŕ la demande de mise en liberté provisioire de l’Accusé Petković Dated 31 March 2008 », 21 April 2008 (« Petković Decision on Provisional Release »)

12.  Prosecutor v. Enver Hadžihasanović and Amir Kubura, Case No. IT-01-47-A, Judgement, 22 April 2008 (“Hadžihasanović AJ”).

13.  Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR65.6, Reasons for Decision on Prosecution’s Urgent Appeal against “Décision relative ŕ la demande de mise en liberté provisoire de l’accusé Pušić” Issued on 14 April 2008, 23 April 2008 (public redacted version) (“Pušić Decision on Provisional Release”).

14.  Prosecutor v. Tharcisse Muvunyi, Case No. ICTR-00-55-A-A, Decision on the Prosecutor’s Motion to Expunge a Submission from the Record, 25 April 2008 (“Muvunyi Decision on Rule 108”).

15.  Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR65.8, Decision on “Prosecution’s Appeal from Décision relative ŕ la demande de mise en liberté provisoire de l’Accusé Prlić Dated 7 April 2008 », 25 April 2008 (“Prlić Decision on Provisional Release”).

16.  Prosecutor v. Dragomir Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-A, Decision on Application for Provisional Release Pursuant to Rule 65(I), 29 April 2008, Public Redacted Version (“D. Milošević Decision on Provisional Release”).

17.  The Prosecutor v. Edouard Karemera et al., Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.13, Decision on “Joseph Nzirorera’s Appeal from Decision on Tenth Rule 68 Motion”, 14 May 2008 (“Karemera Decision on Disclosure”).

18.  Hassan Ngeze v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52A-R, Decision on Hassan Ngeze’s Motions of 15 April 2008 and 2 May 2008, 15 May 2008 (“Ngeze Decision on Communication with Counsel”).

19.  Prosecutor v. Vujadin Popović et al., Case Nos. IT-05-88-AR65.4, IT-05-88-AR65.5 and IT-05-88-AT65.6, Decision on Consolidated Appeal Against Decision on Borovčanin’s Motion for a Custodial Visit and Decisions on Gvero’s and Miletić’s Motions for Provisional Release During the Break in the Proceedings, 15 May 2008 (“Popović Consolidated Decision on Provisional Release”).

20.  Prosecutor v. Jovica Stanišić and Franko Simatović, Case No. IT-03-69-AR73.2, Decision on Defence Appeal of the Decision on Future Course of Proceedings, 16 May 2008 (“Stanišić Decision on the Course of Proceedings”).

21.  The Prosecutor v. Casimir Bizimungu et al., Case No. ICTR-99-50-AR73.7, Decision on Jérôme-Clément Bicamumpaka’s Interlocutory Appeal Concerning a Request for a Subpoena, 22 May 2008 (“Bizimungu Decision on Subpoena”).

22.  Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on Amicus Curiae Motion for Guidance, 11 June 2008 (“Krajišnik Decision on Clarification”).

23.  Prosecutor v. Tharcisse Muvunyi, Case No. ICTR-00-55-A-A, Decision on Muvunyi’s Request for Consideration of Post-Hearing Submissions, 19 June 2008 (“Muvunyi Decision on Post-Hearing Submission”).

24.  Eliezer Niyitegeka v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-96-14-R15, Decision on Motion for Clarification, 20 June 2008 (“Niyitegeka Decision on Clarification”).

25.  Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.7, Decision on Defendant’s Appeal Against “Décision Portant Attribution du Temps ŕ la Défense pour la Présentation des Moyens ŕ Décharge”, 1 July 2008 (“Prlić Decision on Attribution of Time to the Defence”).

26.  Prosecutor v. Naser Orić, Case No. IT-03-68-A, Judgement, 3 July 2008 (“Orić AJ”).

27.  Prosecutor v. Pavle Strugar, Case No. IT-01-42-A, Judgement, 17 July 2008 (“Strugar AJ”).

28.  The Prosecutor v. Ildephonse Hategekimana, Case No. ICTR-00-55B-R11bis, Decision on Motion for Translation and Extension of Time, 23 July 2008 (“Hategekimana Decision on Extension of Time”).

29.  Prosecutor v. Vojislav Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-AR77.2, Decision on the Prosecution’s Appeals Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision of 10 June 2008, 25 July 2008, Public Redacted Version (“Šešelj Decision on Instigating Contempt Proceedings”).

30.  Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Public Redacted Version of the “Decision on Appellant Momčilo Krajišnik’s Motion to Present Additional Evidence” Issued on 20 August 2008, 4 November 2008 (“Krajišnik Decision on Additional Evidence”).

31.  Prosecutor v. Tharcisse Muvunyi, Case No. ICTR-00-55-A-A, Judgement, 29 August 2008 (“Muvunyi Appeal Judgement”).

32.  The Prosecutor v. Gaspard Kanyarugika, Case No. ICTR-2002-78-R11bis, Decision on Request to Admit Additional Evidence of 18 July 2008, 1 September 2008 (“Kanyarugika Decision on Additional Evidence”).

33.  The Prosecutor v. Gaspard Kanyarugika, Case No. ICTR-2002-78-R11bis, Decision on request from the Republic of Rwanda for Permission to File an Amicus Curiae Brief, 1 September 2008 (“Kanyarugika Decision on Amicus Curiae Brief”).

34.  Prosecutor v. Baton Haxhiu, Case No. IT-04-84-R77.5-A, Decision on Admissibility of Notice of Appeal Against Trial Judgement, 4 September 2008 (“Haxhiu Decision on Notice of Appeal”).

35.  Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.9, Decision on Sloboda, Praljak’s Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision of 16 May 2008 on Translation of Documents, 4 September 2008 (“Prlić Decision on Translation”).

36.  Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-0039-A, Decision on Momčilo Krajišnik’s Motion for Permission for Nathan Z. Dershowitz to Act as Counsel with Alan M. Dershowitz and for Extension of Time, 5 September 2008 (“Krajišnik Decision on Nathan Dershowitz Participation”).

37.  Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.11, Decision on Slobodan Prlajak’s Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s Decision on the Direct Examination of Witnesses Dated 26 June 2008, 11 September 2008 (“Praljak Decision on Examination of Witnesses).

38.  In Re. André Ntagerura, Case No. ICTR-99-46-A28, Decision on Motion for Leave to Appeal the President’s Decision of 31 March 2008 and the Decision of Trial Chamber III Rendered on 15 May 2008, 11 September 2008 (“Ntagerura Decision on Leave to Appeal”).

39.  The Prosecutor v. Yussuf Munyakazi, Case No. ICTR-97-36-R11bis, Decision on the Prosecution’s Appeal Against Decision on Referral Under Rule 11bis, 9 October 2008 (“Munyakazi 11bis Decision”).

40.  Prosecutor v. Milan Martić, Case No. IT-95-11-A, Judgement, 8 October 2008 (“Martić AJ”).

41.  Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on Motion of Amicus Curiae to Make a Submission on Procedural Fairness to Former Counsel, 8 October 2008 (“Krajišnik Decision on Amicus Submission”).

42.  Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on Appellant Momčilo Krajišnik’s Motion to Call Radovan Karadžić’s Pursuant to Rule 115, 16 October 2008 (“Krajišnik Decision to Call Karadžić”).

43.  Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on Urgent Prosecution Motion for Clarification of the Appeals Chamber Decision on Momčilo Krajišnik’s Motion to Call Radovan Karadžić Pursuant to Rule 115, 23 October 2008 (“Krajišnik Decision on Karadžić Testimony”).

44.  The Prosecutor v. Gaspard Kanyarugika, Case No. ICTR-2002-78-R11bis, Decision on the Prosecution’s Appeal Against Decision on Referral Under Rule 11bis, 30 October 2008 (“Kanyarugika 11bis Decision”).

45.  Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Decision on Momčilo Krajišnik’s Motion to Present Additional Evidence and to Call Additional Witnesses Pursuant to Rule 115, and to Reconsider Decision Not to Call Former Counsel, 6 November 2008 (public redacted version) (“Krajišnik Rule 115 Decision (Former Counsel)”).

46.  In Re. André Ntagerura, Case No. ICTR-99-46-A28, Decision on Motion to Appeal the President’s Decision of 31 March 2008 and the Decision of Trial Chamber III of 15 May 2008, 18 November 2008 (“Ntagerura Decision on Relocation”).

47.  The Prosecutor v. Ildephonse Hategekimana, Case No. ICTR-00-55B-R11bis, Decision on the Prosecution’s Appeal Against Decision on Referral Under Rule 11bis, 4 December 2008 (“Hategekimana 11bis Decision”).

 

YEAR 2009

  1. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.13, Decision on Jadranko Prlić’s Consolidated Interlocutory Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Orders of 6 and 9 October 2008 on Admission of Evidence, 12 January 2009 (“Prlić Decision on Admission of Evidence”).
  2. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR65.13, Reasons for Decision on Prosecution’s Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s 10 December 2008 Decision on Prlić Provisional Release During Winter Recess and Corrigendum, 20 January 2009 (“Prlić Decision on Provisional Release (2009)”).
  3. Georges Anderson Nderubumwe Rutaganda v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-96-3-R, Order to the Registrar Concerning Georges Rutaganda’s Access to Documents, 22 January 2009 (“Rutaganda Order on Rule 75 Appeal”).
  4. François Karera v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-01-74-A, Judgement, 2 February 2009 (“Karera AJ”).
  5. Prosecutor v. Mile Mrkšić and Veselin Šljivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-A, Decision on Mile Mrkšić’s Second Rule 115 Motion, 13 February 2009 (“Mrkšić Decision on Second Rule 115 Motion”).
  6. Georges Anderson Nderubumwe Rutaganda v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-96-3-R, Decision on Georges A.N. Rutaganda’s Motion for Leave to File an Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision of 3 April 2008 and an Extension of Time, 16 February 2009 (“Rutaganda Decision on Leave to Appeal”).
  7. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.14, Decision on the Interlocutory Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision on Presentation of Documents by the Prosecution in Cross-Examination of Defence Witnesses, 26 February 2009 (“Prlić Decision on Fresh Evidence”).
  8. Eliezer Niyitegeka v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-96-14-R, Decision on Fourth Request for Review, 12 March 2009, Public Redacted Version (filed 21 April 2009) (“Niyitegeka Decision on Review”).
  9. Prosecutor v. Zdravko Tolimir, Case No. IT-05-88/2-AR72.2, Decision on Zdravko Tolimir’s Appeal Against the Decision on Submissions of the Accused Concerning Legality of Arrest, 12 March 2009 (“Tolimir Decision on Legality of Arrest”).
  10. Prosecutor v. Momčilo Krajišnik, Case No. IT-00-39-A, Judgement, 17 March 2009 (“Krajišnik AJ”).
  11. Prosecutor v. Mladen Naletilić a.k.a. “Tuta”, Case No. IT-98-34-R, Decision on Mladen Naletilić’s Request for Review, 19 March 2009 (“Naletilić Decision on Review”).
  12. Prosecutor v. Milan Milutinović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-A, Decision on Motions for Extension of time to File Notices of Appeal, 23 March 2009 (“Milutinović Decision on Extension of Time”).
  13. Prosecutor v. Ljube Boškoski and Johan Tarčulovski, Case No. IT-04-82-A, Decision on Johan Tarčulovski’s Motion for Leave to Present Appellate arguments in Order Different from That Presented in Notice of Appeal, to Amend the Notice of Appeal, and to File Sur-Reply, and on Prosecution Motion to Strike, 26 March 2009 (“Boškoski Decision on Notice of Appeal”).
  14. Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina et al., Case No. IT-06-90-AR73.3, Decision on Joint Request of Ante Gotovina and Mladen Markač, 27 March 2009 (“Gotovina et al. Writ of Mandamus Decision”).
  15. Edouard Karemera et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR65, Decision on Matthieu Ngirumpatse’s Appeal Against Trial Chamber’s Decision Denying Provisional Release, 7 April 2009 (“Ngirumpatse Decision on Provisional Release”).
  16. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-A, Decision on Dragomir Milošević Further Motion to Present Additional Evidence, 9 April 2009 (“D. Milošević Decision on Second Rule 115 Motion”).
  17. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR73.15, Decision on Jadranko Prlić’s Interlocutory Appeal Against the Decision Regarding Supplement to the Accused Prlić’s Rule 84bis Statement, 20 April 2009 (“Prlić Rule 84bis Decision”).
  18. Georges Anderson Nderubumwe Rutaganda v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-96-3-R, Decision on Georges A.N. Rutaganda’s Appeal Against Decision on request for Closed Session Testimony and Sealed Exhibits, 22 April 2009 (“Rutaganda Decision on Rule 75J Appeal”).
  19. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-A, Decision on Momčilo Perišić’s Request for Access to Confidential Material in the Dragomir Milošević Case, 27 April 2009 (“D. Milošević Decision on Access (Perišić)”).
  20. Prosecutor v. Mile Mrkšić and Veselin Šljivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-A, Judgement, 5 May 2009(“Mrkšić and Šljivančanin AJ”).
  21. Edouard Karemera et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.15, Decision on Joseph Nzirorera’s Appeal Agaist a Decision of Trial Chamber III Denying the Disclosure of a Copy of the Presiding Judge’s Written Assessment of a Member of the Prosecution Team, 5 May 2009 (“Nzirorera Decision on Assessment of Competencies”).
  22. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR73.2, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s Decision on Adequate Facilities, 7 May 2009 (“Karadžić Decision on Adequate Facilities”).
  23. Augustin Ngirabatware v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-54-A, Decision on Augustin Ngirabatware’s Appeal of Decisions Denying Motions to Vary Trial Date, 12 May 2009 (“Ngirabatware Decision on Trial Date”).
  24. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-A, Decision on Radovan Karadžić’s Motion for Access to Confidential Material in the Dragomir Milošević Case, 19 May 2009 (“D. Milošević Decision on Access (Karadžić)”).
  25. Prosecutor v. Milan Milutinović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-A, Public Redacted Version of the “Decision on Vladimir Lazarević’s Second Motion for Temporary Provisional Release on the Grounds of Compassion” Issued on 21 May 2009, 22 May 2009 (“Lazarević Decision on Provisional Release”).
  26. Prosecutor v. Ramush Haradinaj et al., Case No. IT-04-84-A, Decision on Lahi Brahimaj’s Application for Provisional Release, 25 May 2009 (“Haradinaj Decision on Provisional Release”).
  27. Edouard Karemera et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.17, Decision on Joseph Nzirorera’s Appeal of Decision on Admission of Evidence Rebutting Adjudicated Facts, 29 May 2009 (“Nzirorera Decision on Rebuttal Evidence”).
  28. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR73.3, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s Decision on Prosecution Motion Seeking Determination That the Accused Understands English, 4 June 2009 (“Karadžić Decision on Languages”).
  29. Alfred Musema-Uwimana v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-96-13-R, Decision on Motion Requesting Preliminary Conference With Former Legal Team for the Preparation of a Request for the Assignment of Counsel for the Purpose of a Review, 18 June 2009 (“Musema Decision on Request for Transfer”).
  30. Édouard Karemera v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.16, Decision on Appeal Concerning the Severance of Matthieu Ngirumpatse, 19 June 2009 (“Ngirumpatse Decision on Severance”).
  31. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case Nos. IT-95-5/18-AR72.1, IT-95-5/18-AR72.2, IT-95-5/18-AR72.3, Decision on Radovan Karadžić’s Motions Challenging Jurisdiction (Omission Liability, JCE III – Special Intent Crimes, Superior Responsibility), 25 June 2009 (“Karadžić Consolidated Decision on Jurisdiction”).
  32. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR72.4, Decision on Prosecution’s Motion Appealing Trial Chamber’s Decision on JCE III Foreseeability, 25 June 2009 (“Karadžić Decision on JCE III Foreseeability”).
  33. Contempt Proceedings Against Dragan Jokić, Case No. IT_05-88-R77.1-A, Judgement on Allegations of Contempt, 25 June 2009 (Public Redacted Version), (Jokić Contempt AJ”).
  34. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-05/18-AR.15.1, Decision on Appeal from Decision on Motion to Disqualify Judge Picard, 26 June 2009 (“Karadžić Decision on Disqualification”).
  35. Leonidas Nshogoza v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-2007-91-A, Decision on Appeal Concerning Sanctions, 26 June 2009 (“Nshogoza Decision on Sanctions”).
  36. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR65.15, Decision on Prosecution’s Appeal Against the Trial Chamber’s Decision on Slobodan Praljak’s Motion for Provisional Release, 8 July 2009 (“Praljak Decision on Provisional Release (2009)”).
  37. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadzić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR72.5, Decision on Appeal of trial Chamber’s Decision on Preliminary Motion to Dismiss Count 11 of the Indictment, 9 July 2009 (“Karadžić Decision on Hostage-Taking”).
  38. Jean de Dieau Kamuhanda v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-54A-R, Decision on Motion for Legal Assistance, 21 July 2009 (“Kamuhanda Decision on Legal Assistance”).
  39. Théoneste Bagosora et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-41-A, Decision on Aloys Ntabakuze’s Motion for Severance, Retention of the Briefing Schedule and Judicial Bar to the Untimely Filing of the Prosecution’s Response Brief, 24 July 2009 (“Ntabakuze Decision on Motion for Severance”).
  40. Prosecutor v. Nikola Šainović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-A, Decision on Joint Request for Extension of Time to File Respondent’s Brief, 27 July 2009 (“Šainović et al. Decision on Extension of Time for Respondent’s Brief”).
  41. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-A, Decision on Dragomir Milošević Third Motion to Present Additional Evidence, 8 September 2009 (“D. Milošević Decision on Third Rule 115 Motion”).
  42. Prosecutor v. Nikola Šainović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-A, Decision on Dragoljub Ojdanić Motion to Amen Ground 7 of his Notice of Appeal, 2 September 2009 (“Ojdanić Decision on Amending Notice of Appeal”).
  43. Prosecutor v. Nikola Šainović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-A, Decision on Nebojša Pavković’s Motion to Amend his Notice of Appeal, 9 September 2009 (“Pavković Decision of First Amended Notice of Appeal”).
  44. Simon Bikindi v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-01-72-A, Decision on Simon Bikindi’s Motions to Admit Additional Evidence Pursuant to Rule 115 of the Rules, 16 September 2009 (“Bikindi Second Decision on Additional Evidence”).
  45. Prosecutor v. Nikola Šainović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-A, Decision on Nebojša Pavković’s Second Motion to Amend his Notice of Appeal, 22 September 2009 (“Pavković Decision on Second Amended Notice of Appeal”).
  46. Siméon Nchamihigo v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-2001-63-A, Decision on Siméon Nchamihigo’s Second Motion for Leave to Present Additional Evidence on Appeal, 28 September 2009 (“Nchamihigo Decision on Second Rule 115 Motion”).
  47. Edouard Karemera et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR82, Decision on Matthieu Ngirumpatse’s Further Motions for Extension of Time and Motion for Reconsideration and on the Appeal filed on 25 September 2009, 29 September 2009 (“Ngirumpatse Decision on Certification”).
  48. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-A, Decision on Radovan Karadžić’s Motion for Variance of Protective Measures, 8 October 2009 (“D. Milošević Decision on Variation of Protective Measures”).
  49. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karad`ić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR.73.4, Decision on Karad`ić’s Appeal of Trial Chamber’s Decision on Alleged Holbrooke Agreement, 12 October 2009 (“Karad`ić Decision on Holbrooke Agreement”).
  50. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR73.5, Decision on Radovan Karadžić’s Appeal of the Decision on Commencement of Trial, 13 October 2009 (“Karadžić Decision on Trial Date”).
  51. The Prosecutor v. Tharcisse Renzaho, Case No. ICTR-97-31-A, Order on Tharcisse Renzaho’s Notice of Appeal, 14 October 2009 (“Renzaho Order on Notice of Appeal”).
  52. The Prosecutor v. Tharcisse Renzaho, Case No. ICTR-97-31-A, Decision on Tharcisse Renzaho’s Motion for Extension of Time for the Filing of Appellant’s Brief, 21 October 2009 (“Renzaho Decision on Extension of Time”).
  53. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-AR73.16, Decision on Jadranko Prlić’s Interlocutory Appeal against the Decision on Prlić Defence Motion for Reconsideration of the Decision on Admission of Documentary Evidence, 3 November 2009 (“Prlić Reconsideration Appeal Decision”).
  54. In The Case Against Florence Hartmann, Case No. IT-02-54-R77.5-A, Decision on Motions to Strike and Requests for Extension of Time, 6 November 2009 (“Hartmann Decision on Notice”).
  55. Prosecutor v. Dragomir Milošević, Case No. IT-98-29/1-A, Judgement, 12 November 2009 (“D. Milošević AJ”).
  56. Protais Zigiranyirazo v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-01-73-A, Judgement, 16 November 2009 (“Zigiranyirazo AJ”).
  57. The Prosecutor v. Casimir Bizimungu et al., Case No. ICTR-99-50-AR73.8, Decision on Appeals Concerning the Engagement of a Chambers Consultant or Legal Officer, 17 December 2009 (“Bizimungu Decision on Disqualification”).

 

YEAR 2010

  1. Prosecutor v. Jadranko Prlić et al., Case No. IT-04-74-AR65.19, Public Redacted Version of the “Decision on Prosecution’s Appeal of the Trial Chamber’s Decision to Provisionally Release Accused Praljak” Issued on 7 December 2009, 11 February (“Praljak Decision on Provisional Release”).
  2. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR73.6, Decision on Radovan Karadžić’s Appeal from Decision on Motion to Vacate Appointment of Richard Harvey, 12 February 2010 (“Karadžić Decision on Motion to Vacate Appointment of Counsel”).
  3. Gaspard Kanyarukiga v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-02-78-AR73, Decision on Kanyarugika’s Interlocutory Appeal of Decision on Disclosure and Return of Exculpatory Documents, 19 February 2010 (“Kanyarugika Decision on Disclosure”).
  4. Prosecutor v. Nikola [ainović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-A, Decision on Nebojša Pavković’s Motion for Stay of Proceedings, 2 March 2010 (“Pavković Decision on Motion for Stay”).
  5. Léonidas Nshogoza v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-2007-91-A, Judgement, 15 March 2010 (“Nshogoza Contempt AJ”).
  6. Simon Bikindi v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-2001-72-A, Judgement, 18 March 2010 (“Bikindi AJ”).
  7. Siméon Nchamihigo v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-2001-63-A, Judgement, 18 March 2010 (“Nchamihigo AJ”).
  8. Gaspard Kanyarukiga v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-02-78-AR73.2, Decision on Gaspard Kanyarugika’s Interlocutory Appeal of a Decision on the Exclusion of Evidence, 23 March 2010 (“Kanyarugika Decision on Evidence”).
  9. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR73.7, Decision on Appeal from Decision on Motion for Further Postponement of Trial, 31 March 2010 (“Karadžić Decision on Postponement of Trial”).
  10. Léonidas Nshogoza v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-2007-91-A Decision on Request for Judicial Review of the Registrar’s and President’s Decisions Concerning Payment of Fees and Expenses, 13 April 2010 (“Nshogoza Review Decision”).
  11. Prosecutor v. Nikola [ainović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-A, Decision on Sreten Lukić’s Second Motion to Admit Additional Evidence on Appeal, 29 April 2010 (“Lukić Second Rule 115 Decision”).
  12. Édouard Karemera et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.18, Decision on Josepha Nzirorera’s Appeal from Decision on Alleged Rule 66 Violation, 17 May 2010 (“Nzirorera Decision on Disclosure”).
  13. Prosecutor v. Ljube Boškoski and Johan Tarčulovski, Case No. IT-04-82-A, Judgement, 19 May 2010 (“Boškoski and Tarčulovski AJ”).
  14. In the Case Against Vojislav Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-R77.2-A, Judgement, 19 May 2010 (public redacted version) (“Šešelj Contempt AJ”).
  15. Prosecutor v. Rasim Delić, Case No. IT-04-83-A, Decision on the Outcome of the Proceedings, 29 June 2010 (“Delić Decision on the Outcome of Proceedings”).
  16. Édouard Karemera et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR91.2, Decision on Joseph Nzirorera’s and the Prosecutor’s Appeals of Decision not to Prosecute Witness BTH for False Testimony, 16 February 2010 (confidentiality lifted on 21 June 2010) (“Nzirorera Decision on False Testimony”).
  17. Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina et al., Case No. IT-06-90-AR73.6, Decision on Ivan Čermak and Mladen Markać Interlocutory Appeals Against Trial Chamber’s Decision to Reopen the Prosecution Case, 1 July 2010 (“Gotovina Decision on Reopening Prosecution Case”).
  18. Prosecutor v. Veselin Šljivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-R.1, Decision with Respect to Veselin Šljivančanin’s Application for Review, 14 July 2010 (“Šljivančanin Review Decision”).
  19. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR73.8, Decision on Appeal from Order on the Trial Schedule, 19 July 2010 (“Karadžić Decision on Trial Schedule”).
  20. Prosecutor v. Ramush Haradinaj, Idriz Balaj and Lahi Brahimaj, Case No. IT-04-84-A, Judgement, 19 July 2010 (“Haradinaj Appeal Judgement”).
  21. Callixte Nzabonimana v. The Prosecutor, Case Nos. ICTR-98-44D-AR7bis, ICTR-98-44D AR7bis.2, Decision on Callixte Nzabonimana’s Interlocutory Appeal on the Order Rescinding the 4 March 2010 Decision and on the Motion for Leave to Appeal the President’s Decision Dated 5 May 2010, 20 September 2010 (Nzabonimana Reconsideration Decision”).
  22. Édouard Karemera and Matthieu Ngirumpatse v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR50, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal of Édouard Karemera and Matthieu Ngirumpatse Against Oral Decision of 23 August 2010, 24 September 2010 (“Karemera Decision on Death of Co-Accused”).
  23. Théoneste Bagosora et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-41-A, Decision on Aloys Ntabakuze’s Motion for Injunctions Against the Government of Rwanda Regarding the Arrest and Investigation of Lead Counsel Peter Erlinder, 6 October 2010 (“Ntabakuze Decision on Arrest of Counsel”).
  24. Callixte Kalimanzira v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-05-88-A, Judgement, 20 October 2010 (“Kalimanzira AJ”).
  25. Emmanuel Rukundo v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-2001-70-A, Judgement, 20 October 2010 (“Rukundo AJ”).
  26. Théoneste Bagosora et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-41-A, Decision on Anatole Nsengiyumva’s Motion for Judicial Notice, 29 October 2010 (“Bagosora Decision on Judicial Notice”).
  27. Prosecutor v. Veselin Šljivančanin, Case No. IT-95-13/1-R.1, Review Judgement, 8 December 2010 (“Šljivančanin Review Judgement”).

 

YEAR 2011

  1. Théoneste Bagosora et al. v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-41-A, Decision on Théoneste Bagosora’s Motion for Admission of Additional Evidence, 7 February 2011 (“Bagosora Rule 115 Decision”).
  2. Prosecutor v. Ante Gotovina et al., Case No. IT-06-90-AR73.5, Decision on Gotovina Defence Appeal Against 12 March 2010 Decision on Requests for Permanent Restraining Orders Directed to the Republic of Croatia, 14 February 2011 (“Gotovina Decision on Permanent Restraining Orders”).
  3. Édouard Karemera and Matthieu Ngirumpatse v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-44-AR73.19, Decision on Matthieu Ngirumpatse’s Appeal Against a Sanction Imposed on Counsel by Trial Chamber’s Decision of 1 September 2010, 21 March 2011 (“Ngirumpatse Sanction Decision”).
  4. Tharcisse Renzaho v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-97-31-A, Judgement, 1 April 2011 (“Renzaho AJ”).
  5. Tharcisse Muvunyi v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-00-55A-A, Judgement, 1 April 2011 (“Muvunyi AJ”).
  6. Prosecutor v. Ramush Haradinaj et al., Case No. IT-04-84bis-AR73.1, Decision on Haradinaj’s Appeal on Scope of Partial Retrial, 31 May 2011 (“Haradinaj Decision on Retrial”).
  7. Prosecutor v. Milan Lukić and Sredoje Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-A, Decision on Milan Lukić’s First Motion to Admit Additional Evidence on Appeal, 6 July 2011 (“M. Lukić Rule 115 Decision”).
  8. In the Case Against Florence Hartmann, Case No. IT-02-54-R77.5-A, Judgement, 19 July 2011 (“Hartmann Contempt AJ”).
  9. Ferdinand Nahimana v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-99-52B-R, Decision on Nahimana’s Motion to Annul the Decisions of 22 April 2008 and 30 June 2010 and for Reconsideration, 27 September 2011 (“Nahimana Decision”).
  10. The Prosecutor v. Yussuf Munyakazi, Case No. ICTR-97-36A-A, Judgement, 28 September 2011 (“Munyakazi AJ”).
  11. Ephrem Setako v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-04-81-A, Judgement, 28 September 2011 (“Setako AJ”).
  12. The Prosecutor v. Pauline Nyiramasuhuko, Case No. ICTR-98-42-A, Decision on Pauline Nyiramasuhuko’s Motion to Void Trial Chamber Decisions, 30 September 2011 (“Nyiramasuhuko Decision”).
  13. Prosecutor v. Vujadin Popović et al., Case No. IT-05-88-A, Decision on Vujadin Popović’s Motion for Admission of Additional Evidence on Appeal Pursuant to Rule 115, 20 October 2011 (“Popović R115 Decision”).
  14. Prosecutor v. Popović et al., Case No. IT-05-88-A, Public Redacted Version of 22 July 2011 Decision on Vinko Pandurević’s Motion for Temporary Alteration of the Conditions of his Detention, 10 November 2011 (“Popović Decision on Custodial Visit”).
  15. Jean Uwinkindi v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-01-75-AR72(C), Decision on Defence Appeal Against the Decision Denying Motion Alleging Defects in the Indictment, 16 November 2011 (“Uwinkindi Decision on Indictment”).
  16. Théoneste Bagosora and Anatole Nsengiyumva v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-41-A, Judgement, 14 December 2011 (“Bagosora and Nsengiyumva AJ”).
  17. Dominique Ntawukulilyayo v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-05-82-A, Judgement, 14 December 2011 (“Ntawukulilyayo AJ”).
  18. Jean Uwinkindi v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-01-75-AR11bis, Decision on Uwinkindi’s Appeal Against the Referral of his Case to Rwanda and Related Motions, 16 December 2011 (“Uwinkindi Referral Decision”).

 

YEAR 2012

  1. Jean Uwinkindi v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-01-75-AR11bis, Decision on Uwinkindi’s Motion for Review or Reconsideration of the Decision on Referral to Rwanda and the Related Prosecution Motion, 23 February 2012 (“Uwinkindi Reconsideration Decision”).
  2. Prosecutor v. Jelena Rašić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-R77.2-A, Decision on Jelena Rašić’s Urgent Motion for Provisional Release Pursuant to Rule 65(I), 4 April 2012 (“Rašić Decision on Provisional Release”).
  3. Anatole Ntabakuze v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-98-41A-A, Judgement, 8 May 2012 (“Ntabakuze AJ”).
  4. Gaspard Kanyarukiga v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-02-78-A, Judgement, 8 May 2012 (“Kanyarukiga AJ”).
  5. Ildephonse Hategekimana v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-00-55B-A, Judgement, 8 May 2012 (“Hategekimana AJ”).
  6. The Prosecutor v. Pauline Nyiramasuhuko et al., Case No. ICTR-98-42-A, Decision on Jacques Mungwarere’s Motion for Access to Confidential Material, 17 May 2012 (“Mungwarere Decision on Access”).
  7. Prosecutor v. Vujadin Popović et al., Case No. IT-05-88-A, Public Redacted Version of 11 June 2012 Decision on Prosecution Motion for the Appointment of Independent Counsel to Review Material Potentially Subject to Lawyer-Client Privilege, 16 July 2012 (“Popović Decision on Lawyer-Client Privilege”).
  8. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR98bis.1, Decision on Application for Leave to Submit an Amicus Curiae Brief, 21 September 2012 (“Karadžić Amicus Curiae Decision”).
  9. Jean-Baptiste Gatete v. The Prosecutor, Case No. ICTR-00-61-A, Judgement, 9 October 2012 (“Gatete AJ”).
  10. Prosecutor v. Jelena Ra{i}, Case No. IT-98-32/1-R77.2-A, Judgement, 16 November 2012 (“Ra{i} Contempt Judgement”).
  11. Prosecutor v. Vojislav Šešelj, Case No. IT-03-67-R77.3-A, Judgement, 28 November 2012 (“Šešelj II Contempt AJ”).
  12. Prosecutor v. Milan Lukić and Sredoje Lukić, Case No. IT-98-32/1-A, Judgement, 4 December 2012 (“Lukić and Lukić AJ”).
  13. Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR73.9, Decision on Appeal from Denial of Judgement of Acquittal for Hostage-Taking, 11 December 2012 (“Karadžić Decision on Denial of Judgement of Acquittal”).

 

YEAR 2013

1.                              Prosecutor v. Vujadin Popović et al., Case No. IT-05-88-A, Public Redacted Version of 30 November 2012 Decision on Request to Terminate Appellate Proceedings in Relation to Milan Gvero, 16 January 2013 (“Gvero Decision on Continuation of Appellate Proceedings”).

2.                              Prosecutor v. Radovan Karadžić, Case No. IT-95-5/18-AR73.10, Decision on Appeal from Decision on Duration of Defence Case, 29 January 2013 (“Karadžić Decision on Duration of Defence Case”).

3.                              Prosecutor v. Vujadin Popović et al., Case No. IT-05-88-A, Decision Terminating Appellate Proceedings in Relation to Milan Gvero, 7 March 2013 (“Gvero Decision on Termination of Appellate Proceedings”).