| Pleasenote that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing.
 It is merely a summary.
 
 ICTY Weekly Press Briefing 
 Date: 15.09.2004
 
 Time: 12.45 p.m.
 
 Registry and Chambers: 
   
 Jim Landale, Spokesman for Registry and Chambers,made the following statement:
 
 
 Good afternoon,  
 
 Following the meeting between President Meron anda Bosnian delegation headed by the Croat member of the Presidency
 of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mr. Dragan Covic, at the end of last
 week, a number of inaccurate and misleading statements were carried
 in the media. For the record, I can categorically state that President
 Meron did not discuss the referral of any ICTY case to any court
 in the former Yugoslavia. Statements to the contrary are unhelpful
 and irresponsible and detract from the stated purpose of the visit.
 
 
 	As you will have seen from our press releaseon Monday, a conference is being held at the ICTY between the ICTY
 Victims and Witnesses Section (VWS) and health/welfare professionals
 from Kosovo and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM)
 to discuss the physical, emotional and psychological needs of witnesses.
 
 	The purpose of the conference is to discuss how the establishmentof health and welfare networks throughout Kosovo and FYROM could
 assist in providing preparation and follow-up services to witnesses
 who testify at the Tribunal. These services will supplement the
 services undertaken by VWS while the witnesses are in The Hague.
 
 	This three-day workshop has brought to the ICTY, a group ofpsychiatrists, medical doctors, psychologists and social workers
 from Kosovo and FYROM. The professionals invited are currently practicing
 in the areas where most ICTY witnesses reside.
 
 	Similar conferences were held in December 2003 with expertsfrom Bosnia and Herzegovina, in May 2004 with experts from Serbia
 and Montenegro, and in June 2004 with experts from Croatia. The
 series of conferences has been funded by the European Commission.
 
 In terms of court documents, I would draw yourattention to a Decision rendered by Trial Chamber II which we received
 this morning, denying Ivan Cermak and Mladen Markac’s Second Motions
 for provisional release. Copies of that Decision will be available
 immediately after this.
 
 
 I would also point out that we have received thepre-trial briefs for Milan Milutinovic, Nikola Sainovic and Dragoljub
 Ojdanic.
 
 
 In addition, we have also learned that the closingarguments in The Prosecutor v. Blagojevic and Jokic will
 be heard from Wednesday, 29 September 2004, with each party permitted
 four and a half hours to present its arguments, and 30 minutes for
 rebuttal or rejoinder arguments, if any.
 
 
 There is a list of the most recent court documentsavailable to you.
 
 
 Finally, I understand that the ADC will give abriefing after this.
 
 Seealso the latest ADC-ICTY press briefing.
 
 Office of the Prosecution: 
 
 Florence Hartmann for the Office of the Prosecutormade no statement.
 
 
 Questions: 
 	No questions were asked. 
 Court documents: 
 The Prosecutor v. Jovica Stanisic and FrankoSimatovic
 
 
 13 September 2004 "Prosecution Response To‘Defence Appeal From the Trial Chamber Order Granting Stay Of
 Decisions On Provisional Release Of July 29, 2004’." (Jovica
 Stanisic)
 
 
 10 September 2004 "Order Replacing JudgesIn Cases Before The Appeals Chamber."
 
 The Prosecutor v. Prlic, Stojic, Praljak,Petkovic, Coric and Pusic
 
 
 13 September 2004 "Appeal Against The DecisionOf The Trial Chamber Dated July 30, 2004 Regarding The Motion To
 Appoint Zeljko Olujic Lead Counsel."
 
 The Prosecutor v. Milutinovic, Sainovic,and Ojdanic
 
 
 13 September 2004 "Defence Pre-Trial BriefFiled On Behalf Of Mr Milan Milutinovic Pursuant To Rule 65 Ter
 (F)."
 
 
 13 September 2004 "Defence Submission: Pre-TrialBrief."
 
 
 13 September 2004 "General Ojdanic’s Pre-TrialBrief."
 
 The Prosecutor v. Vidoje Blagojevic and DraganJokic
 
 
 13 September 2004 "Decision On Prosecution’sMotion To Admit Evidence In Rebuttal And Incorporated Motion To
 Admit Evidence Under Rule 92 bis In Its Case On Rebuttal And To
 Re-Open Its Case For A Limited Purpose."
 
 The Prosecutor v. Rahim Ademi and Mirko Norac 
 
 14 September 2004 "Mirko Norac’s ResponseToThe Prosecution’s Motion Under Rule 11 bis."
 
   
 ***** 
 |