| 
 Please 
  note that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing. It is merely 
  a summary. 
  
ICTY Weekly 
  Press Briefing 
  
  Date: 19.02.2003
  
  Time: 12:10  
  
REGISTRY AND 
  CHAMBERS  
 Christian 
  Chartier, Head of the Public Information Services, made the following announcement:   
  
Good afternoon to you all. 
  For a change, I would like to give the floor immediately to the Office of the 
  Prosecutor, namely Jean-Jacques Joris for an important announcement. 
  
Jean-Jacques Joris, the 
  advisor to the Prosecutor, made the following statement:
 
 
  
  “The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) confirms 
  that Fatmir Limaj was arrested at 5.42 p.m. (local time) on Tuesday 18 February 
  by the Slovenian authorities in Kransjka Gora. Fatmir Limaj was brought at 7.10 
  p.m. before a Judge of the Higher Court in Kranj, prior to being detained in 
  Radovlijca.  
Following the arrest of 
  the accused, the ICTY is making arrangements for the speedy transfer of Fatmir 
  Limaj to the Detention Unit of the Tribunal. 
The Office of the Prosecutor 
  wishes to commend and to thank the Slovenian authorities for their remarkably 
  swift and efficient cooperation”.  
Now turning to other matters. 
  The Prosecutor was in Belgrade, Podgoridca and is now in Skopje and I believe 
  that you all have read what she said at a press stake out in Belgrade and Podgoridca. 
  In Belgrade, she reminded in clear terms that cooperation was and remains insufficient. 
  There has basically not been any progress since her last address to the Security 
  Council regarding arrest and transfer of indictees, regarding the difficulties 
  we still experience in access to sources of evidence in general and particularly 
  archives documents and the difficult legislation of the waivers for the witnesses 
  in the Milosevic Trial. So, nothing new regarding Serbia and Montenegro. As 
  for Montenegro, the Prosecutor highlighted that she had received some valuable 
  important documents but of course Montenegro did not hold much in comparison 
  to Belgrade. Regarding the arrest of fugitives it is the assessment of the Prosecutor 
  that Montenegro could do more since some of our indictees are reported on and 
  off to be in Montenegro. 
 REGISTRY AND CHAMBERS  
 Christian Chartier then 
  retook the floor and delivered the following statement:  
Following the conference 
  that took place in Sarajevo in the middle of January between the OHR and the 
  ICTY, on the prosecution of war crimes in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the next round 
  of talks will take place tomorrow and Friday, at the Tribunal. An OHR delegation, 
  led by Ambassador Fassier, Senior Deputy High Representative, will meet with 
  ICTY representatives from the Presidency, the OTP and the Registry. Their discussion 
  will focus on the estimation of costs attached to the establishment and functioning 
  of a Specialized Chamber within the State Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina.  
 With regard to developments 
  related to on-proceedings:  
 The Initial Appearance 
  of the three accused who were transferred yesterday afternoon has been scheduled 
  and will take place on Thursday 20 February (tomorrow) at 2.15 p.m in Courtroom 
  I, before Judge Liu.  
Also tomorrow, a hearing 
  will be held at 3 p.m. to hear arguments with regards to the Motion for Provisional 
  Release filed on 27 January by Dusko Knezevic. On 14 February the Trial Chamber 
  ordered the attendance of the Liaison Officer of Republika Srpska, M. Trivun 
  Jovicic.  
A Status Conference has 
  been rescheduled in the case The Prosecutor vs. Tihomir Blaskic. Judge Fausto 
  Pocar, Pre-Appeal Judge, scheduled this conference for Friday 28 February at 
  4.30 p.m.
 
 
  Finally, with regard to recent decisions issued by the Chambers, the following 
  are brought to your attention:   
   Earlier this week, the 
    Appeals Chamber (Judge Hunt, Presiding; Judge Güney, Judge Gunawardana, 
    Judge Pocar and Judge Meron) dismissed the appeal of Vidoje Blagojevic against 
    the renewed dismissal of his request for provisional release on 19 November 
    2002 by Trial Chamber II. The Appeals Chamber held that the Trial Chamber 
    had again failed to take the Republ ika Srpska’s guarantee into account, and 
    then determined for itself that, notwithstanding the validity of that guarantee, 
    it was not satisfied that Blagojevic would appear for trial if provisionally 
    released.  
  On 14 February, Trial 
    Chamber I Section A (Judge Liu, Presiding; Judge Clark and Judge Diarra) issued 
    an order to the parties in the case The Prosecutor vs. Naletilic and Martinovic 
    to file “detailed sentencing submissions” by the end of this week. The Chamber 
    considered that neither the parties’ final written submissions as well as 
    their closing arguments failed to meet the requirements of Rule 86 (C) and 
    101 (B), setting forth their obligation to address matters of sentencing and 
    factors to be taken into consideration by the Chamber.  
  
  On 13 February, Trial 
    Chamber III (Judge May, Presiding; Judge Robinson and Judge Kwon) dismissed 
    the Motion by Dragoljub Ojdanic challenging the jurisdiction of the Tribunal 
    on persons who are alleged to be members of a joint criminal enterprise. The 
    Trial Chamber based its Decision on the Appeals Chamber’s jurisprudence.  
  
  In order to 
    save time for the Q & A session, other Decisions, Orders and legal filings 
    by the parties are listed on a separate page (please find attached). 
 Questions:   
 A correspondent remarked 
  on the problems the OTP had with waivers for witness in the Milosevic trial, 
  referring to the former Yugoslav President Lilic who mentioned this problem 
  himself in the Courtroom, asked whether Joris could tell the media who the other 
  potential witnesses in the Trial were?  
  
Joris replied that he could 
  not and added that he had omitted to mention one point regarding the general 
  themes of non-cooperation. He stated that Minister Mihailovic last week publicly 
  said that Serbia and Montenegro would not accept any new Indictments and would 
  not transfer any citizens to The Hague.  
  
Asked whether 
  the Tribunal could confirm that Seselj would come to the Tribunal on 24 February 
  as he had reported himself in the media, both Joris and Chartier said that they 
  could not confirm this but that Seselj was welcome since he had been indicted 
  last Friday. His arrival at the Detention Unit should already have taken place 
  and could take place any time. 
  
  
***** 
 
  |