| Pleasenote that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing. It is merely
 a summary
 
 ICTYWeekly Press Briefing
 
 Date: 10.04.2002
 
 Time: 11:00 a.m.
 
 
 
 REGISTRY ANDCHAMBERS
 
 Jim Landale,Spokesman for Registry and Chambers, made the following statement:
 
 - Three new adlitem Judges will make their solemn declarations later this afternoon at 3 p.m.
 The swearing in ceremony will be officially witnessed by the Registrar, Hans
 Holthuis. The three Judges are Mohamed El Habib Fassi Fihri from Morocco, Volodymyr
 Vassylenko from the Ukraine, and Per-Johan Viktor Lindholm from Finland.
 
 - Judges FassiFihri and Vassylenko are due to join Trial Chamber II along with Judge Schomburg
 to preside over the trial of Milomir Stakic, which will begin next Tuesday 16
 April at 9 a.m. in Courtroom III.
 
 - Judge Lindholmwill replace Judge Singh on the Bosanski Samac trial, which will resume next
 Monday 15 April.
 
 - As you shouldhave seen from our press release, Drago Josipovic was transferred to Spain yesterday
 evening to serve his sentence.
 
 - This afternoonat 4 p.m. there will be a hearing in the Banovic case before Trial Chamber III
 in Courtroom I. This follows the Prosecution's Motion to withdraw the Indictment
 against Nenad Banovic, dated 27 March 2002.
 
 In terms ofcourt documents:
 
 - On 3 April 2002,in the Naletilic and Martinovic or Tuta and Stela trial, the Trial Chamber rendered
 a "Decision on Motion of Accused Naletilic for a Trial Schedule which Incorporates
 Reasonable Breaks". The Motion was denied.
 
 - On 5 April inthe same case, an "Order for Additional Information" was issued by
 the Trial Chamber ordering the Accused "to provide additional information
 to the Chamber on the files from the High Court of Mostar".
 
 - On 3 April,we received Dragan Jokic's "Application for Leave of Court to Appeal Denial
 of Provisional Release".
 
 - On 3 April,the Prosecution filed a Motion to join the Momir Nikolic case to the Blagojevic,
 Obrenovic and Jokic case.
 
 - On 4 April,Judge Wolfgang Schomburg was appointed as the Pre-trial Judge in the Momir Nikolic
 case.
 
 - On 5 April,the Prosecution's Final Pre-trial brief in the Stakic case was filed.
 
 In addition on the same day, we received an Order providing the trial schedule
 for the Stakic case.
 
 - In the Krajisnikand Plavsic case, on 8 April, the Trial Chamber, Judge May presiding, rendered
 a "Decision on the Prosecution's Request and Second Request Pursuant to
 Rule 75 (D) for Variation of Protective Measures".
 
 - On 8 April wereceived the "Notice of Filing of Corrected Amended Indictment" in
 the Pasko Ljubicic case.
 
 Copies of allthese documents will be available after this briefing.
 
 Florence Hartmann,Spokeswoman for the Office of the Prosecutor, made the following statement:
 
 The
 Prosecutor will be back in The Hague on Friday following two weeks spent at
 the ICTR in Arusha.
 
  At the end ofnext week the Prosecutor will travel to the former Yugoslavia, where she will
 visit Belgrade, Sarajevo and Pristina.
 
 Questions: 
   Asked for theOTP's reaction to the fact that the law on cooperation to be adopted in Belgrade
 would exclude future indictees, Hartmann replied that the OTP's position on
 cooperation and the law was well known. The OTP would not comment on the law
 itself as this was an internal law and a problem of the country.
 As far as the
 OTP was concerned, however, no law was needed in order to implement the order
 of the court and to comply with the obligation towards the International Tribunal.
 The OTP expected Belgrade, as well as all other UN Member States, to comply
 with their obligations and to provide complete and regular cooperation with
 the Tribunal. The OTP expected Belgrade to remove all obstacles necessary
 to do this and not to create new ones.
 Landale added
 that on behalf of the Registry and Chambers, cooperation had to be complete
 and unconditional. First and foremost this meant the transfer of individuals
 indicted by this Tribunal who had been at large for unacceptably long periods
 of time.
 Hartmann added
 that compliance with the obligation meant compliance with the requests of
 the court - those which had been made in the past and those which will be
 made in the future.
 
 *****
 
 
 |