| Pleasenote that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing. It is merely
 a summary.
 
 ICTY WeeklyPress Briefing
 
 Date: 23 February 2000
 
 Time: 11:30 a.m.
 
 
 REGISTRY ANDCHAMBERS
 
 Jim Landale, Spokesman for Registry and Chambers made the following statement:
 
 
 Firstly, I’d liketo announce that we have received a scheduling order officially confirming that
 the Krstic trial will start on 13 March at 9.30 a.m. in Courtroom I.
 
 
 Krstic has beencharged on the basis of his individual and superior criminal responsibility
 with two counts of genocide, five counts of crimes against humanity and one
 count of violations of the laws or customs of war for his alleged part in the
 massacre of approximately 8,000 Bosnian Muslims after the fall of the Srebrenica
 enclave in July 1995.
 
 
 	In addition,we have received a scheduling order officially confirming that the trial of
 Miroslav Kvocka, Milojica Kos, Mladjo Radic and Zoran Zigic will begin on Monday
 28 February at 1030 a.m. in Courtroom III.
 
 
 Next, we sentout a media advisory yesterday confirming that the Judgement in the Blaskic
 case will be rendered by Trial Chamber I on Friday 3 March at 9.00 a.m. You
 are all invited to attend.
 
 
 Also, on 18 February,the Appeals Chamber denied a confidential request filed on 10 February from
 Zlatko Aleksovski for his "direct" release. This follows a ruling
 by the Appeals Chamber on 9 February dismissing Aleksovski’s appeal against
 conviction; allowing the Prosecution’s appeal against sentence and ordering
 that Aleksovski be returned to custody to await a revised sentence.
 
 
 Finally we havecopies of the updated Radic defence pre-trial brief in the Kvocka and others
 case, and also the Prosecutor’s pre-trial brief on Zoran Vukovic.
 
 
   
 OFFICE OF THEPROSECUTOR
 
 Paul Risley, Spokesman for the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), made the following
 statement:
 
 
 The Prosecutoris in Arusha where yesterday she argued before the Appeals Chamber regarding
 the Barayagwiza Appeal Review. Madame Del Ponte is expected back in The Hague
 on Friday.
 
 
 The Deputy Prosecutoris in Helsinki today, at a preparatory meeting for the International Criminal
 Court.
 
 
 On Tuesday 29February, the Prosecutor expects to meet with President Chirac of France.
 
 
 Jim Landale addedthat President Chirac would also meet with President Jorda and the Registrar.
 A media opportunity with interpretation would be arranged and a media advisory
 with full details would be dispatched in due course.
 
 
   
 QUESTIONS: 
 
   	Asked whenand where the Decision on Barayagwiza would be made and how the documents
 would be made available, Risley replied that the Appeals Chamber expected
 to make a decision very quickly, possibly as early as next week.
 
 	Landaleadded that he expected that judging on past experience, the Decision would
 be announced in Arusha.
 
 Risley continuedthat the documents would be released from Arusha.
 
 Landale concludedthat whatever was received by fax from Arusha would be distributed to those
 who were interested.
 
 
   	Asked whetherthe Prosecutor had requested the Registrar to send a team of doctors to examine
 "Tuta", Risley replied that he believed so.
 
 	Landaleadded, however, that he had not heard anything officially yet.
 
   	Asked forconfirmation that the Prosecutor had proposed to the Judges that trials could
 be conducted in Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, Risley replied that the
 most likely possibility the OTP was exploring was not to hold complete trials
 in specific countries but rather to hold specific hearings. He added that
 this was a very real possibility that the Prosecutor was exploring with the
 Judges. He went on to say that it depended upon security arrangements and
 finding the appropriate facilities. Risley did not believe that there was
 any expectation of holding an entire trial away from The Hague, only a proportion
 of a trial, depending on the Judges determining that it was something they
 were able to do.
   	Asked whetherthe proposal depended upon the Judges, Risley replied that it did. He said
 that they would have the final word on this issue. He added that, based on
 her discussions with the Judges, there was a sense from the Prosecutor that
 this was an idea worth exploring.
   	Asked forsome background information on the Prosecutor’s proposal, Risley replied that
 he believed that the issue first arose during the fall Plenary session, during
 discussions between the Prosecutor and the Judges as to how to improve the
 visibility of the Tribunal, within the former Yugoslavia specifically. He
 added that this was also an idea that the Tribunal for Rwanda had explored,
 providing suitable courtrooms in Kigali could be found to allow for either
 sub trials or proportions of trials to take place.
 
 	Risley wenton to say that the proposal being considered was to hold hearings of a specific
 trial, for example hearing the testimony of specific witnesses. This would
 mean that the court as a whole, would move to a specific location, would hear
 the testimony of specific witnesses and then return to The Hague.
 
   	Asked whetherthe purpose of this would be to speed up proceedings, Risley replied that
 he believed it was to make the Tribunal more visible to the local community.
   Asked whetherthis idea was also being explored in connection with Croatia as well as Bosnia,
 Risley replied that it was a possibility, however, he was not aware of it
 being explored for the very simple logistical reason that most of the trials
 being looked at over the next 12 months concerned events that took place in
 Bosnia. He added that looking at the trials announced by Jim Landale, parts
 of any of those hearings could be held in Bosnia. He concluded that there
 would be logistical reasons such as expense and security but certainly the
 Prosecutor was very interested in seeing that this Tribunal was seen to be
 open to the public especially the public within the former Yugoslavia, a concern
 felt also by the Judges.
   	Asked whofirst came up with the proposal, Risley replied that the issue was raised
 during a meeting between the Prosecutor and the Judges at the time of the
 last Plenary.
   Asked whetherit was in response to the request by the Republika Srpska to be allowed to
 hold trials in Republika Srpska and was it a compromise, Risley replied that
 it was a separate initiative. He added that when the Prosecutor was in Banja
 Luka she met with the Prime Minister of the Republika Srpska and he had made
 his own proposal.
   	Asked whetherPrime Minister Dodik would visit before the end of this month, Risley replied
 that far as he was aware, he would not. He added that there where currently
 no plans for a visit.
   	Asked whetherthe accused would also be taken there, Risley replied that they would and
 that this was a security issue for the protection of the accused. He added
 that this was probably the most serious hurdle to consider.
   Asked whetherthe final decision of the proposal was in the hands of the Judges, Risley
 replied that the proposal would mean moving the court not just hearing depositions
 in other countries and that there would be a decision from the Registry on
 such an issue.
 
 	Landaleconfirmed that it was the President and Judges who would ultimately decide
 a step as important or a significant as this. He was not prepared to say anymore
 at this stage. When the time was appropriate and enough exploration and investigation
 had taken place into the idea and it was at a position where it could move
 forward, something would probably then be said.
 
 
   	Asked whetherthe proposal had been discussed with the Bosnian Government, Landale replied
 that he was not prepared to go into any further detail at this time.
 
 Paul Risleyreminded the group of tomorrow’s Press Briefing taking place in Brussels.
 
 ***** 
 |