| 
 Please note that this 
              is not a verbatim transcript of the Press 
            Briefing. It is merely a summary.  
  
            Date: 
                31.05.2006 
  
            Time: 12:00 
  
Registry 
                    and Chambers:  
  
Christian Chartier, Senior Information 
            Officer, made the following statement: 
  
As you all know by now, 
              the Tribunal released earlier today the 
              report of the internal inquiry panel 
              concerning the circumstances surrounding 
              the death of Slobodan Milosevic on 11 
              March 2006.  
  
Headed by Tribunal's 
              Vice-President, Judge Kevin Parker, the 
              panel conducted an extremely thorough 
              inquiry, including but not limited to 
              statements and reports received from 
              more than 60 persons. Their final report 
              is detailed and comprehensive.  
  
It confirms that Slobodan 
              Milosevic was not poisoned, was not murdered 
              and did not commit suicide. 
  
Most importantly, it 
              demonstrates that the Tribunal provided 
              the accused, from his arrival to his 
              death and throughout his detention, with 
              professional medical care of high-standard. 
              The Trial Chamber was also very flexible 
              in adapting the trial’s schedule 
              to the defendant’s health situation. 
              Those two elements illustrate that the 
              Tribunal has been constantly sensitive 
              to the health condition and requirements 
              of the accused. 
  
At the same time, in 
              striving to ensure a fair trial by enabling 
              the accused to properly conduct his own 
              Defence, the Tribunal provided Slobodan 
              Milosevic with unique facilities and 
              detention arrangements. These arrangements 
              inadvertently allowed Slobodan Milosevic 
              to obtain, and to take in, a number of 
              medications not prescribed by treating 
              doctors, thus putting himself at a higher 
              risk than he already was. In addition 
              to self-medicating, the accused refused 
              on occasions to be tested or refused 
              to be taken to the hospital.  
  
Slobodan Milosevic died 
              of natural causes from a heart attack, 
              on 11 March 2006.  
  
Another press release 
              was issued this morning about a visit 
              to the Detention Unit by The Minister 
              of Foreign Affairs of the Former Yugoslav 
              Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), Ilinka 
              Mitreva. More specifically, she visited 
              Ljube Boskoski, the former Minister of 
              the Interior of FYROM, who is charged 
              with command responsibility for the attack 
              on the village of Ljuboten.  
  
Yesterday, the Judges 
              of the Tribunal held an Extraordinary 
              Plenary Session at which they discussed 
              ways to better organize the pre-trial 
              and trials proceedings in order to adjudicate 
              cases more expeditiously. A number of 
              changes to the Rules are anticipated. 
              They will be announced in due course. 
  
Next week, the President 
              of the Tribunal, Judge Fausto Pocar, 
              and the Prosecutor, Carla del Ponte, 
              will address the Security Council on 
              the progresses made in implementing the 
              completion strategy. Their appearance 
              is scheduled in the morning of Wednesday 
              7 June, at around 10a.m. New York time. 
  
Finally, the Registrar, 
              Hans Holthuis, wishes to express his 
              concern at an incident in Kosovo last 
              Thursday in which members of a defence 
              team representing the former Yugoslav 
              Army Chief-of-Staff, Dragoljub Ojdanjic, 
              were prevented from carrying out their 
              independent enquiries. Ojdanjic is indicted 
              by the Tribunal for war crimes against 
              Kosovar Albanians during 1999 and his 
              trial in The Hague is due to commence 
              10 July. 
  
While travelling in 
              an UNMIK-supported convoy to the village 
              of Kruse e vogel or Mala Krusa in south-west 
              Kosovo the convoy appears to have been 
              mistaken by residents for that of a group 
              of Serb refugees wishing to inspect their 
              former properties. A clash ensued between 
              residents and security personnel in the 
              UNMIK-supported convoy forcing the defence 
              team to leave the area. More than 20 
              persons, including a language assistant, 
              were reported injured in the incident. 
  
The Registrar recognizes 
              the gravity of the crimes alleged by 
              the Tribunal's prosecution to have occured 
              in Kruse e vogel or Mala Krusa. Specifically, 
              it is charged that more than 100 men 
              and boys were coralled into a house and 
              shot by Serbian forces before the building 
              was torched. 
  
The Tribunal is committed 
              to bringing the perpetrators to justice 
              and providing justice for the victims 
              of these and other crimes in Kosovo. 
              To do so, it is imperative that trials 
              are fair and that no party, the defence 
              in this instance, is prevented from carry 
              out their work. 
  
	With regard to the schedule of proceedings 
              for the days to come, I would like to 
              point out that an appeals hearing is 
              scheduled for Blagoje Simic this Friday 
              from 9:00 to 18:00 in courtroom III.  
  
	Also, please note that Monday 5 
              June 2006 is a holiday and there will 
              be no court proceedings for this day. 
  
	The Vukovar trial 
              of former Yugoslav Army high-ranking 
              officers Mile Mrksic, Miroslav Radic 
              and Veselin Sljivancanin, will continue 
              this and next week in courtroom I. Tomorrow 
              it will sit from 9:30 to 16:30, on Friday 
              from 9:00 to 13:45. Next week it will 
              sit Tuesday, through Thursday from 9:30 
              to 16:30 and on Friday from 9:30 to 13:45. 
  
The trial of Momcilo 
              Krajisnik continues for the rest of this 
              week at 9:00 in courtroom II. Next week 
              the proceedings will continue Tuesday 
              through Thursday in the same courtroom 
              and Friday in courtroom III at 14:15.  
  
The trial of Milan Martic 
              will continue for the rest of the week 
              at 14:15 in courtroom II. Next week the 
              proceedings will continue Tuesday through 
              Thursday in the same courtroom and Friday 
              in courtroom III at 9:00.  
  
The proceedings against 
              the six accused in the Prlic et al. case 
              Jadranko Prlic, Bruno Stojic, Slobodan 
              Praljak, Milivoj Petkovic, Valentin Coric 
              and Berislav Pusic, former high-ranking 
              political and military officials of the 
              then Herceg-Bosna wil continue tomorrow 
              at 9:00 sitting in courtroom III. There 
              will be no proceedings for this case 
              next week.  
  
Office of the 
                  Prosecutor: 
  
	Anton Nikiforov, 
              Advisor to the Prosecutor and acting 
              Spokesperson of the Office of the Prosecutor, 
              made no statement. 
  
Questions: 
  
	Asked if precautions 
              were being taken with other accused representing 
              themselves to prevent this from happening 
              again, Chartier stated that a number 
              of steps were recommended by the Milosevic 
              report.  
  
	The report recommended 
              that Tribunal authorities look into the 
              detention unit arrangements when an accused 
              would like to defend himself, and basically 
              said that no such regime should be applied 
              again.  
  
	Chartier said the 
              gist was that a better balance must be 
              struck between the principes of ensuring 
              fair trials and allowing accused to defend 
              themselves, and not compromising the 
              security of the detention unit. 
  
	Asked if Seselj 
              would have the same rights as Milosevic, 
              Chartier said that he was not aware of 
              any such order made by the Trial Chamber. 
  
	Asked would there 
              be a follow up inquiry to find out who 
              brought in the medications for Milosevic, 
              Chartier said that he did not expect 
              so because the report said that no clear 
              conclusion could be drawn. The fact of 
              the matter was that a number of medications 
              not prescribed, Rifampicine being only 
              one of many, had been smuggled into the 
              detention unit, said Chartier. The report 
              indicated a number of theories in this 
              regard such as pills or whatever being 
              hidden in boxes of documents, bundles 
              and folders, but also possibily in the 
              clothing of privileged visitors. Thereby, 
              indicating that no conclusion could be 
              drawn. Chartier added that he was confident 
              that if a conclusion could have been 
              made then the inquiry panel would have 
              found it. There would not be any further 
              inquiry on this, said Chartier. 
  
	Asked if the theories 
              mentioned in the report were based on 
              specific fact or just speculation, Chartier 
              answered that the report was not outlined 
              to speculate but outlined to present 
              facts. Chartier said the report was self 
              explanatory giving a huge amount of details, 
              dates and what had actually been done 
              and discovered. These were no speculations 
              but elements clearly stated. 
  
	A journalist pointed 
              out that the death of Milan Babic was 
              before the death of Milosevic. Asked 
              when the report on Babic’s death 
              would be released, Charter said that 
              the Babic report would come very soon. 
              Chartier pointed out that the order of 
              release of the reports had nothing to 
              do with giving priority to one case over 
              the other. It had to do with the fact 
              that a report by the Dutch prosecutor 
              just came in last week on Babic’s 
              death. As this report had to be considered 
              by the inquiry panel the panel could 
              not finalize their report before receiving 
              this document. Chartier said that the 
              panel was in the final stage of the reporting 
              exercise. 
  
	Asked if the reporting 
              of incidents to the Deputy Registrar 
              by the Commanding Officer of the Detention 
              Unit regarding Milosevic in August 2004 
              and December 2005 resulted in measures 
              being taken, Chartier said that yes measures 
              had been taken. Chartier said that one 
              measure was to monitor the accused more 
              closely and one other had been the conducting 
              of medical tests. Another example was 
              a number of memorandums coming from the 
              Deputy Registrar to the Commanding Officer 
              of the Detention Unit recommending an 
              alternative way to implementing the order 
              setting forth for Milosevic specific 
              detention arrangements. 
  
	Chartier added that 
              of course now we are now seeing in hindsight 
              what was happening in 2004. In 2004 and 
              in the early 2005 the picture was slowly 
              emerging. At this point in time, the 
              accused was a sick man with serious cardiac 
              ailments known to us and the doctors. 
              There was this ongoing mystery that in 
              spite of the medications his blood pressure 
              was not going down. Chartier said that 
              then the question began to arise of how 
              this could be possible. There were a 
              number of specialists outside of The 
              Hague with expert opinions brought in 
              for examinations. After a number of examinations, 
              the accused was normal for a couple of 
              months again and began his defence case 
              in 2004. Chartier said he then had abnormal 
              pattern in blood pressure again and the 
              medications were adapted and not working. 
              Chartier said then the question was why 
              these medications were not working. It 
              was easy to say now that in October 2004 
              we should have done something differently, 
              but this was a progressive picture. It 
              was only at the end of 2005 and beginning 
              of 2006 that the picture of the accused 
              self medicating and according to the 
              report manipulating medications clearly 
              appeared.  
  
	Asked if any comment 
              could be made on what President Pocar 
              and the Prosecutor were going to discuss 
              at the Security Council meeting next 
              week, Nikiforov said that he could not 
              speak for the President and could not 
              tell in advance about the Prosecutor's 
              text. The reports had been sent to the 
              Security Council, the Danish Presidency 
              of the UNSC have to organise their translation 
              and distribution to the members of the 
              Security Council. But all reports will 
              be made public/ released on 7 June, when 
              the President and the Prosecutor are 
              to address the UNSC. 
  
	Asked what the main 
              topic might be in their address, Nikiforov 
              said that as for the Prosecution the 
              topics of cooperation of states would 
              be discussed and also the completion 
              strategy in terms of making the prosecutions 
              work more efficient as well as a critical 
              look at its own work and goals of completion 
              strategy. Nikiforov reiterated that it 
              could not be revealed in advance. 
  
	Asked if the changes 
              to the Rules made in the plenary session 
              yesterday would be included in the President’s 
              address to the Security Council, Chartier 
              said that they could not be included 
              at this stage because they were not formally 
              adopted. However, Chartier said that 
              it was expected that these changes would 
              be finalized and announced before the 
              President’s address. 
  
	A journalist referenced 
              a Serbian Media report from last week 
              stating that the prosecution has representatives 
              looking into the archives in Serbia. 
              Asked if this could be confirmed, Nikiforov 
              confirmed this stating that this was 
              OTP’s first mission to archives 
              in Belgrade. Nikiforov said that the 
              mission was in the second week and it 
              was not finished assuring that there 
              woul be more missions. So far what could 
              be said, without going into details, 
              was that the mission was going well and 
              well received in different locations, 
              but it is yet to be fully tested, said 
              Nikiforov. Once there were some physical 
              results from this mission then it could 
              be said how it went on this mission.  
  
	Asked if this was 
              consolation for not getting Mladic, Nikiforov 
              said that it was not, but he assured 
              that the Prosecutor’s speech would 
              be quite open on efforts on Mladic and 
              fugitives. 
  
	Asked what day the 
              incident in Kosovo took place and what 
              was the name of those involved, Chartier 
              answered that it happened on Thursday 
              and he did not have the names of the 
              people involved, but that he would find 
              out the answer for the journalist. 
  
Document List  
  
| 
 Case 
                      Description  | 
 Signature 
                      Date   | 
 Document 
                      Title   | 
 | 
 Blagojevic 
                    et al. (Appeal)  | 
 25-May-06  | 
 Prosecution 
                    Response To Jokic's Motion For 
                    Leave To File Third Amended Notice 
                    Of Appeal And Amended Appelate 
                    Brief  | 
 | 
 Blagojevic 
                    et al. (Appeal)  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 Reply 
                    Of Dragna Jokic To Prosectuion 
                    Response To Motion For Leave To 
                    File Third Amended Notice Of Appeal 
                    And Amended Appellate Brief And 
                    Request For Leave To File Same  | 
 | 
 Blaskic 
                    (Contempt)  | 
 30-May-06  | 
 Order 
                    Designating A Pre-Trial Judge  | 
 | 
 Blaskic 
                    (Contempt)  | 
 25-May-06  | 
 Response 
                    The Accused Marijan Krizic To The 
                    Prosecution's Motion For Leave 
                    To Amend The Indictments Pursuant 
                    To Trial Chamber's Order Of 10 
                    May 2006 And Motion For Joinder 
                    Pursuant To Trial Chamber's Order 
                    Of 10 May 2006   | 
 | 
 Blaskic 
                    (Contempt)  | 
 30-May-06  | 
 The 
                    Accused Domagoj Margetic's Reply 
                    To The Prosecution's Motion For 
                    Joinder Pursuant To Trial Chamber's 
                    Order Of 10 May 2006   | 
 | 
 Blaskic 
                    (Review)  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 Prosecution 
                    Response To Defence Motion Seeking 
                    Leave To Reply To Prosecution Response 
                    To Defence Motion For Access  | 
 | 
 Blaskic 
                    and Kordic and Cerkez (Contempt)  | 
 30-May-06  | 
 Order 
                    Designating A Pre-Trial Judge  | 
 | 
 Blaskic 
                    and Kordic and Cerkez (Contempt)  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Response 
                    Of The Accused Josip Jovic To The 
                    Prosecution's Consolidated Motion 
                    And Prosecution's Motion For Joinder 
                    Pursuant To Trial Chamber's Order 
                    Of 10 May 2006   | 
 | 
 Borovcanin 
                    L (Interlocutory)  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 Prosecution 
                    Response To Motion Seeking Provisional 
                    Release Of Accused Ljubomir Borovcanin  | 
 | 
 Boskoski 
                    et al  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Decision 
                    On Prosecution's Motion To Amend 
                    The Indictment And Submission Of 
                    Proposed Second Amended Indictment 
                    And Submission Of Amended Pre-Trial 
                    Brief  | 
 | 
 Boskoski 
                    et al  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Prosecution's 
                    Motion For Extension Of Time To 
                    Complete Motions Concerning Admission 
                    Of Written Statements Pursuant 
                    To Rule 92bis  | 
 | 
 Boskoski 
                    et al  | 
 23-May-06  | 
 [Decision 
                    On The Motions On Fair Trial And 
                    Extensions Of Time]  | 
 | 
 Bralo 
                    (Appeal)  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Reply 
                    Brief   | 
 | 
 Bralo 
                    (Appeal)  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Appeal 
                    Brief On Behalf Of Miroslav Bralo   | 
 | 
 Cermak & Markac  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 The 
                    Prosecution's Response To Ivan 
                    Cermak's Motion For Temporary Modification 
                    Of The Conditions Of The Appeals 
                    Chamber Decision On Provisional 
                    Release  | 
 | 
 Delic  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 Prosecution 
                    Omnibus: 1) Reply To Defence Response 
                    To Prosecution's Submissionof Proposed 
                    Consolidated Amended Indictment 
                    ; And 2) Response To Defence Motion 
                    Alleging Defects In The Form Of 
                    The Consolidated Amended Indictment  | 
 | 
 Gotovina  | 
 23-May-06  | 
 Prosecution's 
                    Response To Ante Gotovina's Motion 
                    For Leave To File Reply To Prosecution's 
                    Response To His Motion To Dismiss, 
                    And To Exceed Page Limitation  | 
 | 
 Gotovina  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Defendant 
                    Ante Gotovina's Reply In Support 
                    Of His Motion Filed On 19 May 2006  | 
 | 
 Gotovina  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Defendant 
                    Ante Gotovina's Motion For Leave 
                    To File Reply In Support Of His 
                    Motion Of 19 May 2006  | 
 | 
 Hadzihasanovic 
                    et al. (Appeal)  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Prosecution's 
                    Response To Appellant Kubura's 
                    Motion For Extension Of Time To 
                    File Appeal Brief And Prosecution's 
                    Motion To File A Consolidated Response 
                    To Appeal Briefs  | 
 | 
 Haradinaj 
                    et al  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 Correspondence 
                    From Slo Trial Chamber Ii  | 
 | 
 Krajisnik  | 
 23-May-06  | 
 Supplemental 
                    Submission To Defence Application 
                    Of 22 May 2006 Following Receipt 
                    Of Further Information From Trial 
                    Chamber  | 
 | 
 Krajisnik  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Prosecution's 
                    Response To Defnce Motion Concerning 
                    Documents Sought By The Trial Chamber  | 
 | 
 Krajisnik  | 
 24-May-06  | 
 Defence 
                    Application For Certification Pursuant 
                    To Rule 73(B) Of The Rules Of Procedure 
                    And Evidence To Appeal Against 
                    Trial Chamber's Decision Of 23 
                    May 2006  | 
 | 
 Krajisnik  | 
 24-May-06  | 
 Defence 
                    Reply To The Prosecution's Response 
                    To Defence Motion For A Ruling 
                    That Honour Judge Canivell Is Unable 
                    To Continue Sitting In This Case  | 
 | 
 Krajisnik  | 
 30-May-06  | 
 Verification 
                    Of Accuracy Of The Transcript In 
                    The Krajisnik Hearing Of 29 May 
                    2006  | 
 | 
 Limaj 
                    et al (Appeal)  | 
 25-May-06  | 
 Public 
                    Redacted Prosecution Brief In Reply  | 
 | 
 Lukic 
                    et al  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Response 
                    Of Defense Counsel For Milan Lukic 
                    To Request By Prosecutor Under 
                    Rule 11bis  | 
 | 
 Milosevic  | 
 25-May-06  | 
 Order 
                    On Defence Re-Application For Re-Admission 
                    Of Witness Henning Hensch  | 
 | 
 Milutinovic 
                    et al.  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Order 
                    Suspending Provisional Release 
                    Of Each Accused  | 
 | 
 Milutinovic 
                    et al.  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Prosecution's 
                    Motion For Admission Of Written 
                    Statements And Transcripts In Lieu 
                    Of Viva Voce Testimony Pursuant 
                    To Rule 92bis And Confidential 
                    Annexes A, B And C (With Accompanying 
                    Cd)   | 
 | 
 Milutinovic 
                    et al.  | 
 25-May-06  | 
 Prosecution's 
                    Motion To Admit Documentary Evidence 
                    With Annexes  | 
 | 
 Milutinovic 
                    et al.  | 
 24-May-06  | 
 Decision 
                    On Lazarevic Motion For Assignment 
                    Of Co-Counsel  | 
 | 
 Milutinovic 
                    et al.  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Prosecution 
                    'S Response To Joint Request By 
                    The Accused For Temporary Provisional 
                    Release During The Summer Recess  | 
 | 
 Milutinovic 
                    et al.  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 Decision 
                    By The Registrar Re: Assignment 
                    Of Mr Dragan Ivetic As Co-Counsel  | 
 | 
 Milutinovic 
                    et al.  | 
 30-May-06  | 
 Application 
                    For Leave To File A Reply And Joint 
                    Reply To The Proosecution's Response 
                    To Joint Request By The Accused 
                    For Temporary Provisional Release 
                    During The Summer Recess  | 
 | 
 Mrksic  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 Internal 
                    Memorandum From Interpretation 
                    Unit Regarding Verification Of 
                    Accuracy Of The Transcript In The 
                    Mrksic Hearing Of 17 May 2006  | 
 | 
 Mrksic  | 
 25-May-06  | 
 Joint 
                    Defense Response To The Prosecution 
                    Motion To Amend Its Rule 65 Ter 
                    Witness List  | 
 | 
 Mrksic  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 Prosecution 
                    Reply To Joint Defence Response 
                    To Prosecution Motion To Amend 
                    Its Rule 65 Ter Witness List  | 
 | 
 Naletilic 
                    and Martinovic (Appeal)  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Decision 
                    By The Registrar Re :Segregation 
                    Order  | 
 | 
 Perisic  | 
 29-May-06  | 
 Prosecution's 
                    Response To Defence Memorandum 
                    Brief On The Application Of The 
                    Rights Contained In The Icty Statute 
                    And The Iccpr To The Presentation 
                    Of Evidence  | 
 | 
 Popovic 
                    et al  | 
 24-May-06  | 
 Decision 
                    On Joint Defence Motions Requesting 
                    The Translation Of The Pre-Trial 
                    Brief And Specific Motions   | 
 | 
 Popovic 
                    et al  | 
 26-May-06  | 
 Further 
                    Response Of The Defence For Vinko 
                    Pandurevic In Relation To His Application 
                    For Provisional Release   | 
 | 
 Rajic  | 
 25-May-06  | 
 Decision 
                    On Prosecution's Motion To Withdraw 
                    The Motion Under Rule 11bis For 
                    Referral Of The Indictment And 
                    The Request Under Rule 11bis For 
                    Referral Of The Indictment To Another 
                    Court   | 
 | 
 Seselj  | 
 23-May-06  | 
 Prosecution 
                    Submission Of The Expert Report 
                    Of Yves Tomic  | 
 | 
 Seselj  | 
 23-May-06  | 
 Prosecution 
                    Submission Of The Expert Report 
                    Of Andras Riedlmayer  | 
 | 
 Seselj  | 
 23-May-06  | 
 Prosecution's 
                    Motion For Judicial Notice Of Adjudicated 
                    Facts, With Annex  | 
 | 
 Seselj  | 
 25-May-06  | 
 Decision 
                    On Appeal Against Decision Denying 
                    Permission For Legal Representatives 
                    To Visit The Detainee  | 
 | 
 Seselj  | 
 30-May-06  | 
 Professor 
                    Vojislav Seselj Submits A Request 
                    To Be Visited By His Legal Counsels 
                    Representing Him Before The Bar 
                    Association Of The Netherlands 
                    In The Disciplinary Proceedings 
                    Instituted Against Attorney-At-Law 
                    Van Der Spoel  | 
 | 
 Seselj  | 
 24-May-06  | 
 Prosecution's 
                    Addendum To The Expert Report Of 
                    Anthony Oberschall  | 
 | 
 Strugar 
                    et al. (Appeal)  | 
 24-May-06  | 
 Scheduling 
                    Order Temporarily Cancelling Appeals 
                    Hearing  | 
 
  |