| ICTY WeeklyPress Briefing
 
 Date: 18 November 1998
 
 Time: 11:30 a.m.
 
 REGISTRY ANDCHAMBERS
 
 Jim Landale, the ICTY Spokesman, began todays briefing by making the following
 announcements:
 
 First, I wouldlike to draw your attention to Security Council resolution 1207 that was passed
 in New York yesterday. The resolution, which was adopted under Chapter VII of
 the United Nations Charter, condemned the failure of the Federal Republic of
 Yugoslavia (FRY) to execute the three arrest warrants against the former JNA
 officers charged with the massacre of unarmed men after the fall of Vukovar
 in late 1991. The Security Council also called on the FRY and all other States
 that had not already done so, to take any measures necessary under their domestic
 law to implement the Tribunals Statute. It affirmed that "a State
 may not invoke provisions of its domestic law as justification for its failure
 to perform binding obligations under international law". The Security Council
 reiterated that all States had to cooperate fully with the Tribunal, including
 executing arrest warrants and complying with its requests for information and
 investigations. In addition, the authorities of the FRY, the leaders of the
 Kosovo Albanian community and all others concerned, were called upon to cooperate
 fully with the Tribunals Prosecutor in the investigation of all possible
 violations within her jurisdiction.
 
 The Tribunal welcomesthis latest resolution. It is explicit and unequivocal in what is expected from
 the authorities in Belgrade and should leave them in no doubt that the international
 community will hold them to their obligations under international law. The ball
 is now in their court and we expect them to take immediate action.
 
 We hope to havecopies of the resolution later this afternoon.
 
 The Presidentof the ICTY is in New York to deliver the Annual Report to the General Assembly.
 This will most likely take place tomorrow. Copies of the final report and the
 Presidents speech to the General Assembly will be available once they
 have been presented.
 
 Finally, followingthe swearing in ceremony for the new Judges on Monday, the Chambers are in the
 process of being reorganized and the assignment of cases is being decided. We
 should have a press release detailing the new set up by the end of the week.
 
   
 QUESTIONS: 
   Asked how thislatest resolution was different from the previous ones on Kosovo and whether
 the Tribunal expected compliance, Landale replied that the Tribunal expected
 the FRY to change its position and that this resolution was different since
 it was specifically for the Tribunal. He added that the resolution was adopted
 under Chapter VII.
   Noting thatthere was no explicit mention of the jurisdiction of the Prosecutor over Kosovo
 even though President McDonald had also addressed the Security Council on
 this issue, Landale replied that the FRY was under the obligation to follow
 this resolution. Deputy Prosecutor Graham Blewitt added that, if the view
 of the Security Council on the Tribunals jurisdiction had been different,
 the resolution would have been different as well.
   Asked whetherany appeals had been lodged in the Celebici Judgement, Landale replied that
 he was not aware of any appeals yet.
   Asked whetherthe Prosecution had decided whether to file an appeal against Mr Mucics
 sentence, Mr Blewitt replied that they were still considering all aspects
 of the Judgement and that all appeals would be filed at the same time. He
 added that any appeal could be expected towards the end of the 15 day period,
 but repeated that he had already indicated during the press conference on
 16 November that they considered Mr Mucics sentence to be inadequate.
   Asked whetheran appeal would be filed against Mr Delalics acquittal, Mr Blewitt replied
 that Grant Niemann, had announced in court that the Prosecution wished to
 lodge an appeal. He confirmed that position and added that all appeals would
 be filed at the same time.
   Asked whetherthere were any other conclusions in the Judgement that he did not agree with,
 for example the nature of the conflict, Mr Blewitt replied that there were
 many aspects favourable to the Prosecution reflected in the Judgement, and
 that he regarded it a well reasoned Judgement that the Tribunal could be proud
 of. The content of the Judgement still had to be analysed however, and Mr
 Blewitt added that it would be premature to say which other matters would
 be subject to appeal.
   Asked why theTadic Appeal was taking such a long time, Mr Blewitt replied that he understood
 that it appeared as if nothing was going on, but that there had been a series
 of filing of motions from the appellants side. Mr Blewitt said that
 he considered it likely that there would soon be a notification from the Tribunal
 on hearing of oral arguments now that the written side of filing of motions
 had been completed.
   Asked whetherthe material that Slobodan Miljkovics lawyer had turned over to the
 Tribunal had been useful, Mr Blewitt replied that he could not comment on
 that since it came in the area of operational and investigative matters.
   Asked whatthe mechanics were for Kosovo and whether there was a deadline for issuing
 the visas, Mr Blewitt replied that the embassy of the FRY still had the application
 for visas and that investigators were conducting investigations in other areas
 in the meantime.
   Asked whatother areas these were, Mr Blewitt replied that there were witnesses outside
 of Kosovo who could testify on Kosovo.
   Noting thatthe FRY had indicated that they were not aware of any outstanding requests
 for visas, Mr Blewitt confirmed that all the investigators still had their
 passports lodged with the embassy of the FRY.
   Asked whetherhe and the Prosecutor were still intending to lead the investigations, Mr
 Blewitt replied that this was unlikely and that they did not want to inflame
 matters. He would be content to have visas issued to the investigators who
 could then continue to work.
 ***** 
 |