| Pleasenote that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing. It is merely
 a summary
 
 ICTY WeeklyPress Briefing
 
 Date: 7 November 2001
 
 Time: 11:30 a.m.
 
 
 
 
 REGISTRY AND CHAMBERS
 Jim Landale,
 Spokesman for Registry and Chambers, made the following statement:
 
 
 Firstly,we have copies of the order signed by Judge Nieto-Navia on 2 November 2001 to
 vacate a non-disclosure order on an indictment against Dragomir Milosevic. This
 follows a request by the Prosecutor to vacate the order that was filed the same
 day. We hope to have copies of that indictment for you once it has passed through
 the obligatory checks and processing within the Registry.
 
 
 On30 October, a decision was handed down by Trial Chamber I in the Stakic case
 on his motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. There has been a
 notice of appeal filed on that decision. Copies of both those documents will
 be available after this.
 
 
 Wehave also received the pre-trial defence brief in the Galic case. Copies are
 available on request.
 
 
 Finally,a reminder that the Sentencing Judgement in the Sikirica and others case will
 be rendered next Tuesday, 13 November at 2.30 p.m. in Courtroom III. You are
 all of course welcome to attend.
 
   
 OFFICE OF THEPROSECUTOR
 
 Florence Hartmann,
 Spokeswoman for the Office of the Prosecutor, made no statement.
 
 
 
   
 
 QUESTIONS: 
 
   	Asked toelaborate on the contents of the Dragomir Milosevic indictment, Landale replied
 that he could not as the indictment had not been made public yet. He did say,
 however, as it indicated on the order, that Dragomir Milosevic was jointly
 charged with Stanislav Galic.
 
   Asked whetherthis meant that he would be charged with crimes committed in Sarajevo, Landale
 replied that this could be assumed, however, for actual details it would be
 necessary to look at the indictment once it had been released.
 
   		Askedfor the OTP’s reaction to the evidence of the Bosnian Serb authorities against
 Mr. Izetbegovic, Hartmann replied that the OTP had not received any letter
 or documents from Banja Luka at this time.
 
   	Asked whatdocuments the OTP was expecting to receive from them and whether it had been
 their initiative to request that they be sent, Hartmann replied that she could
 not answer this question. The OTP had not yet received anything. She added
 that she had read in the press that something had been sent. This was presented
 as an indictment against Mr. Izetbegovic. The OTP had not received this nor
 had it been informed by its offices that anything was on its way. On other
 occasions things had been announced to the press much earlier than they had
 been sent to the Tribunal.
 
   	Asked toconfirm whether reports made by the Bosnian authorities, that the Prosecutor
 had informed them that she would indict Mr. Izetbegovic, were true, Hartmann
 replied that this was media speculation and she had no comment to make on
 media speculation.
 
   	Asked whetherthe OTP planned to appeal the Kvocka Judgement, Hartmann replied that the
 decision had not yet been taken. The OTP was studying all the details of the
 Judgement, but still did not know whether it would appeal.
 
   	Asked whetherthe accused Mr. Ljubicic had made any contact with the Tribunal, following
 reports that he was prepared to surrender voluntarily, Landale replied as
 far as he was aware Ljubicic had not made any contact.
 
 Hartmann addedthat the OTP was informed through official channels and also by Mr. Ljubicic’s
 lawyer that he was contemplating voluntary surrender, but this information
 had not come directly through the OTP’s offices in the region. She added that
 the OTP would wait for him to be at the Tribunal before commenting. Ljubicic
 was under an arrest warrant and voluntary surrender was one of the options.
 He could choose to do this or the authorities competent to arrest him should
 do so.
 
 
   	Asked whetherthe Tribunal knew where he was, whether in Croatia or Bosnia, Hartmann replied
 that the OTP did not know. The OTP was informed through Croatia, of his possible
 wishes. This did not mean that he was in Croatia. His lawyer could be anywhere.
 Hartmann did not have any indication as to his whereabouts.
 
 ***** 
 |