Case No.: IT-95-14-A

BEFORE THE PRE-APPEAL JUDGE

Before:
Judge Fausto Pocar, Pre-Appeal Judge

Registrar:
Mr. Hans Holthuis

Decision of:
25 August 2003

PROSECUTOR

v.

TIHOMIR BLASKIC

_________________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________________

Counsel for the Prosecutor:

Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr. Anto Nobilo
Mr. Russell Hayman
Mr. Andrew M. Paley

I, FAUSTO POCAR, Pre-Appeal Judge in this case;

NOTING the confidential submission of the Prosecution entitled "Prosecution’s Reply to the "Appellant’s Opposition to Prosecution’s Rebuttal Evidence and Arguments in Response to the Appellant’s Fourth Additional Evidence Motion on Appeal"", filed on 15 August 2003 ("Prosecution’s Reply to Appellant’s Opposition to Rebuttal Evidence");

CONSIDERING that the Appellant Tihomir Blaškić, when consulted, did not oppose this filing;

HEREBY RECOGNIZE as validly done the filing of the Prosecution’s Reply to Appellant’s Opposition to Rebuttal Evidence and DIRECT the Appellant to file, if he so wishes, a further reply to the Prosecution’s Reply to Appellant’s Opposition to Rebuttal Evidence, no later than 1 September 2003.

Done in both English and French, the English text being authoritative.

Done this 25th day of August 2003,
At The Hague,
The Netherlands.

____________
Fausto Pocar
Pre-Appeal Judge

[Seal of the Tribunal]