| Please note that thisis not a verbatim transcript of the Press
 Briefing. It is merely a summary.
 
             Date:06.04.2006
 
 Time: 12:00
 
 Registryand Chambers:
 
 Christian Chartier, Senior InformationOfficer, made the following statement:
 
 Good Afternoon.  
 As you may know, I will be giving theweekly briefing until we secure a replacement
 for Jim Landale. Alexandra Milenov is
 now back doing her work as the Registry
 liaison officer in the Tribunal's Belgrade
 office.
 
 During the extraordinary plenary sessionheld on Wednesday, 29 March, the Judges
 amended Rule 15bis (Absence of a Judge)
 and adopted a new Rule 15ter (Reserve
 Judges). Entering into force today, the
 new rules reflect Security Council Resolution
 1660 passed on 28 February 2006. As a
 reminder: Security Council resolution
 1660 permits the Secretary-General to
 appoint, at the request of the Tribunal
 President, Reserve Judges from the Tribunal’s
 pool of Ad litem Judges to specific trials.
 Reserve Judges will be present at each
 stage of a trial and may replace a judge
 on a bench if he or she is unable to
 continue sitting. This measure assists
 the Tribunal in its efforts to complete
 its work by avoiding situations in which
 a specific trial would have to be restarted
 if one of the judges on the bench is
 unable to continue.
 
 	At the request of the Tribunal'sPresident, the UN Secretary General has
 appointed two additional ad litem judges
 - Judge Stefan Trechsel from Switzerland
 and Judge Arpad Prandler from Hungary.
 Both Judges have been assigned to the
 Prlic et al. case, which will be presided
 over by Judge Jean-Claude Antonetti.
 
 	Judges Trechsel and Prandler willbe sworn-in tomorrow in Courtroom I at
 9 AM. To accommodate this, the trial
 against Milan Martic, a high-level political
 leader of the war-time Croatian Serb
 entity, will sit from 10:30 to 15:30.
 Next week this trial will continue in
 Courtroom II at 9:00.
 
 	In terms of the courtroom schedulefor the days to come, the sentencing
 hearing against Ivica Rajic, former Commander
 in the Croatian Defence Council, will
 take place this Friday at 15:00 in Courtroom
 II.
 
 The closing arguments against BosnianArmy officer Naser Oric will continue
 tomorrow at 14:15 in Courtroom III and,
 if necessary, will continue next week.
 
 The trial against Yugoslav Army officersMile Mrksic, Miroslav Radic and Veselin
 Slivancanin continues this Friday at
 9:00 in courtroom III. Next week it will
 sit in Courtroom I at 14:15 on Monday
 and Tuesday and in courtroom III on Wednesday
 and Thursday at 9:00.
 
 The trial against Momcilo Krajisnik,a former high-level leader of the Bosnian
 Serb political entity, will continue
 this week on Friday morning at 9:00 in
 courtroom II. The trial will sit next
 week Monday through Thursday at 9:00
 in courtroom I.
 
 A status conference against former high-levelCommander of the Croatian Army, Ante
 Gotovina, will be held this Friday at
 8:00 in Courtroom II.
 
 There will be a status conference nextTuesday in the case against former Minister
 of Interior of the Former Yugoslav Republic
 of Macedonia, Ljube Boskoski and former
 ministry of Interior bodyguard, Johan
 Tarculovski in Courtroom II at 14:15.
 
 There will also be a status conferencein the case against a number of the highest-level
 leaders of the Bosnian Croat wartime
 entity, and one of the Republic of Croatia,
 the Prlic et al. case, next Wednesday
 at 9:00 in Courtroom III.
 
 As a reminder, the Tribunal will beclosed next Friday, 14 April and the
 following Monday, 17 April for Easter.
 
 Office of the Prosecutor: 
 Anton Nikiforov, Advisor to the Prosecutorand acting Spokesperson of the Office
 of the Prosecutor, made the following
 statement:
 
 	I would just like to make a coupleof comments on the meetings the Prosecutor
 had last week. As you all know she met
 European Union Commissioner for Enlargement
 Olli Rehn and we just wanted to reiterate
 our gratitude to all support we were
 provided from the European Union in terms
 of conditionality of the states of the
 former Yugoslavia for cooperation with
 the Office of the Prosecutor. This meeting
 provided us with strong and clear support
 in terms of cooperation provided by Belgrade
 authorities and as a result of that we
 also received clear assurances from Prime
 Minister Kostunica in Belgrade
 for the delivery of Ratko Mladic by
 the end of April which is obviously very
 important not only for the Office of
 the Prosecutor but for the Tribunal in
 general.
 
 	Prosecutor also met with the FrenchJustice Minister Pascal Clément
 who visited the Tribunal and had a very
 useful discussion with the Prosecutor
 in regard to the law of the Tribunal,
 legal proceedings in the ICTY and the
 future of the ICTY. France provided full
 support to the Tribunal through the visit
 of Minister Clément and through
 recent discussions in the United Nations
 Security Council.
 
 	Finally in regard to the changeof the Office of the Prosecutor Spokesperson
 I would like to say the following: The
 Prosecutor has decided to reassign Florence
 Hartmann to other special project within
 the Office of the Prosecutor. We will
 not go into further details regarding
 this decision. The Prosecutor is grateful
 to Florence for all her past valuable
 and very special contribution to the
 activities and efforts of the Office
 of the Prosecutor.
 
 Questions: 
 	Askedto comment on a statement made by Michael
 Johnson, former Registrar of the BiH
 State Court, in which he stated that
 both Mladic and Karadzic could
 be tried in by the BiH Court, Chartier
 replied with the following:
 
 
              The suggestion that high level allegedperpetrators Mladic and Karadzic
 could be tried in BiH Courts is highly
 improbable.
               The Statute of the Tribunal explicitlyprovides that it has primacy over domestic
 courts in cases of concurrent jurisdiction.
 Moreover, in Resolution 1503 (2003)
 the Security Council specifically mandated
 the Tribunal concentrate on the prosecution
 and trial of the most senior leaders
 suspected of being most responsible
 for crimes within the Tribunal’s
 jurisdiction and, pursuant to Rule
 11bis of the Rules of Procedure and
 Evidence, only cases of low level or
 intermediate responsibility may be
 transferred to competent national jurisdictions.
 The Tribunal has begun to transfer
 lower level and intermediate accused
 to the Special War Crimes Chamber ("WCC")
 of the BiH court.
               Apart form these legal considerations,it is also unlikely that the WCC of
 the BiH court would have the capacity
 to hold the trials of these high level
 individuals due to security concerns
 in the region. The trial of such high
 accused in the region could have a
 destabilizing effect on a still fragile
 security situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
               Another noteworthy aspect is thatseveral member states to, such as the
 United Kingdom, France and the USA
 to name a few, have made various statements
 in which they very clearly stated that
 the Tribunal could and should not close
 its doors without the arrest and the
 transfer to Ratko Mladic and Radovan
 Karadzic to the Hague in order to be
 tried. The European Union also made
 an announcement to the same effect,
 in December 2005.
 
 	Asked to elaborate on the clearassurance that Kostunica had given to
 the Tribunal, Nikiforov replied that
 the Tribunal could not give any further
 information on this issue, except for
 the fact that same assurances were given
 not only to the Prosecutor but also to
 Commissioner Olli Rehn. He added that
 Belgrade had requested to work in quiet
 in order to achieve results without any
 media pressure.
 
 	Asked about the status of evidencehanded over to the Defence in the Milosevic
 case,
 
 Chartier replied that great cautionshould be exercised by the holders of
 the documents disclosed by the Office
 of the Prosecutor to the Defence. He
 stated that the mandate of the legal
 advisers to the accused had been terminated
 with the termination of the case but
 that that did not mean that the documents
 had become private documents. Some documents
 have a public character and are publicly
 accessible; but some others have been
 filed confidentially, are confidential
 and must remain so until a Trial Chamber
 orders otherwise, if ever.
 
 	Finally a journalist asked to commenton rumors that Dragomir Andan (director
 of the RS police) was removed from his
 position at the request of Carla Del
 Ponte, Nikiforov answered that he could
 not comment on this.
 
 Documents: 
 | Date | CaseDescription
 | DocumentTitle |  | 05-Apr-06 | Blaskic(Contempt)
 | MOTIONOF THE ACCUSED MARKICA REBIC FOR
 SUSPENSION OF THE ORDER ON PAYMENT
 OF FINES
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Blaskic(Review)
 | DECISIONBY THE REGISTRAR ACCEPTING MR SZE
 |  | 05-Apr-06 | Blaskic,Kordic and Cerkez (Contempt)
 | RESPONSEOF THE ACCUSED JOSIP JOVIC TO THE
 PROSECUTOR'S JOINT PRE-TRIAL BRIEF
 PURSUANT TO RULE 65 TER(E)
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Boskoskiet al
 | CORRESPONDENCEFROM SLO TC II RE. RULE 65TER MEETING
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Boskoskiet al
 | DECISIONON DEFENCE MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION
 OF TIME
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Boskoskiet al
 | PROSECUTION'SNOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH PRE-TRIAL
 JUDGE'S THIRD SCHEDULIGN ORDER
 SETTING TIME FOR SUBMISSIONS DATED
 15 DECEMBER 2005 AND SUBMISSION
 OF FIRST AMENDED WITNESS LIST,
 FIRST AMENDED EXHIBIT LIST AND
 EXPERT REPORTS WITH ANNEXES A TO
 G
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Boskoskiet al
 | SCHEDULINGORDER
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Bralo(Appeal)
 | MIROSLAVBRALO REPLY TO THE PROSECUTION'S
 RESPONSE TO HIS MOTION FOR ACCESS
 TO CERTIFIED TRIAL RECORD
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Cermak & Markac | DEFENDANTANTE GOTOVINA'S MOTION TO EXCEED
 THE WORD LIMITATION IN HIS RESPONSE
 IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROSECUTION'S
 CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO AMEND THE
 INDICTMENT AND FOR JOINDER
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Cermak & Markac | DEFENDANTANTE GOTOVINA'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION
 TO THE PROSECUTION'S CONSOLIDATED
 MOTION TO AMEND THE INDICTMENT
 AND FOR JOINDER
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Gotovina | DEFENDANTANTE GOTOVINA'S MOTION TO EXCEED
 THE WORD LIMITATION IN HIS RESPONSE
 IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROSECUTION'S
 CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO AMEND THE
 INDICTMENT AND FOR JOINDER
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Gotovina | DEFENDANTANTE GOTOVINA'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION
 TO PROSECUTION'S MOTION FOR NON-DISCLOSURE
 TO PUBLIC OF MATERIALS DISCLOSED
 PURSUANT TO RULES 66 AND 68
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Gotovina | SCHEDULINGORDER FOR STATUS CONFERENCE
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Gotovina | DEFENDANTANTE GOTOVINA'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION
 TO THE PROSECUTION'S CONSOLIDATED
 MOTION TO AMEND THE INDICTMENT
 AND FOR JOINDER
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Haradinajet al
 | DÉCISIONRELATIVE A LA DEMANDE DE LA DEFENSE
 TENDANT AU REEXAMEN DES CONDITIONS
 DE LA MISE EN LIBERTE PROVISOIRE
 ACCORDEE A RAMUSH HARADINAJ LE
 6 JUIN 2005
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Haradinajet al
 | DÉCISIONRELATIVE À LA DEMANDE DE
 MISE EN LIBERTÉ PROVISOIRE
 DE RAMUSH HARADINAJ
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Haradinajet al
 | CORRIGENDUM À LADÉCISION RELATIVE À LA
 DEMANDE DE MISE EN LIBERTÉ PROVISOIRE
 DE RAMUSH HARADINAJ
 |  | 05-Apr-06 | Kovacevic | NOTIFICATIONOF ADDITIONAL MEDICAL REPORT REQUIRING
 URGENT ACTION BY THE TRIAL CHAMBER
 |  | 05-Apr-06 | Limajet al (Appeal)
 | DECISIONON EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Limajet al (Appeal)
 | ORDONNANCEPORTANT DESIGNATION DE JUGES DANS
 UNE AFFAIRE DONT EST SAISIE LA
 CHAMBRE D'APPEL ET NOMINATION D'UN
 JUGE DE LA MISE EN ETAT EN APPEL
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Lukicet al
 | PROSECUTOR'SNOTIFICATION TO THE REFERRAL NECH
 AS TO REALIZATION OF CONDITIONS
 FOR RESUMPTION OF RULE 11BIS PROCEEDINGS
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Lukicet al
 | SREDOJELUKIC'S DEFENCE MOTION FOR ACCESS
 TO ALL CONFIDENTIAL & UNDER
 SEAL MATERIAL IN THE MILOŠEVIC
 CASE RELATING TO THE MUNICIPALITY
 OF VIŠEGRAD
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Milosevic | MOTIONOF GENERAL GVERO FOR ACCESS CONFIDENTIAL
 INFORMATION IN THE MILOSEVIC CASE
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Milosevic | VINKOPANDUREVIC'S DEFENCE NOTIFICATION
 ON JOINING THE "MOTION OF GENERAL
 GVERO FOR ACCESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
 IN THE MILOSEVIC CASE"
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Milosevic | SREDOJELUKIC'S DEFENCE MOTION FOR ACCESS
 TO ALL CONFIDENTIAL & UNDER
 SEAL MATERIAL IN THE MILOŠEVIC
 CASE RELATING TO THE MUNICIPALITY
 OF VIŠEGRAD
 |  | 06-Apr-06 | Milosevic | ORDERASSIGNING A TRIAL CHAMBER TO CONSIDER
 GRANTING ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL
 MATERIAL IN A CASE
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Milutinovicet al.
 | PROSECUTIONQUARTERLY REPORT ON THE SITUATION
 OF WITNESS WITH CONFIDENTIAL AND
 EXPARTE ANNEX A
 |  | 05-Apr-06 | Milutinovicet al.
 | SECONDAMENDED INDICTMENT
 |  | 05-Apr-06 | Milutinovicet al.
 | PRETRIALORDER AND APPENDED WORKPLAN
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Mrksic | DECISIONON PROSECUTION'S ADDITIONAL MOTION
 FOR VARIATION OF PROTECTIVE MEASURES
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Mrksic | PROSECUTIONMOTION TO AMEND ITS RULE 65 TER
 WITNESS LIST
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Oric | PROSECUTION'SSUBMISSION OF PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION
 OF 'THE PROSECUTION'S RESPONSE
 TO THE DEFENCE CLOSING BRIEF'
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Oric | PROSECUTION'SSUBMISSION OF PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION
 OF 'PROSECUTION'S FINAL TRIAL BRIEF'
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Perisic | PROSECUTION'SCONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO "GENERAL
 MILETIC'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO
 CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS IN THE PERISIC
 CASE" AND TO THE "JOINDER MOTIONS" OF
 MILAN GVERO, LJUBOMIR BOROVCANIN,
 DRAGO NIKOLIC AND VINKO PANDUREVIC
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Popovicet al
 | DECISION(BY THE REGISTRAR ASSIGNING MR.
 C. MEEK AS CO-COUNSEL FOR MR. BEARA
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Popovicet al
 | GVERODEFENCE NOTIFICATION ON JOINING
 THE " REQUÊTE DU GENERAL
 MILETIC AUX FINS DE TRADUCTION
 DE CERTAINES REQUÊTES DU
 PROCUREUR DANS LA LANGUE DE L'ACCUSE "
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Popovicet al
 | PROSECUTION'SCONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO "GENERAL
 MILETIC'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO
 CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS IN THE PERISIC
 CASE" AND TO THE "JOINDER MOTIONS" OF
 MILAN GVERO, LJUBOMIR BOROVCANIN,
 DRAGO NIKOLIC AND VINKO PANDUREVIC
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Popovicet al
 | (STANISIC)DEFENCE RESPONSE TO REQUESTS BY
 GENERAL MILETIC AND OTHERS REGARDING
 ACCESS TO CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
 |  | 04-Apr-06 | Popovicet al
 | GENERALMILETIC'S MOTION FOR TRANSLATION
 OF THE PRE-TRIAL BRIEF IN THE LANGUAGE
 OF THE ACCUSED
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Popovicet al
 | VINKOPANDUREVIC'S DEFENCE NOTIFICATION
 ON JOINING THE "MOTION OF GENERAL
 GVERO FOR ACCESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
 IN THE MILOSEVIC CASE"
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Popovicet al
 | MOTIONOF GENERAL GVERO FOR ACCESS CONFIDENTIAL
 INFORMATION IN THE MILOSEVIC CASE
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Popovicet al
 | BOROVCANINDEFENCE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
 TIME AND FOR A LEAVE TO FILE A
 CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO PROSECUTION'S
 MOTIONS TO AMEND THE INDICTMENT
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Prlicand Others
 | ORDERASSIGNING JUDGES TO A CASE BEFORE
 A TRIAL CHAMBER
 |  | 05-Apr-06 | Prlicand Others
 | ORDONNANCEPORTANT MODIFICATION DU CALENDRIER
 D'UNE CONFERENCE DE MISE EN ÉTAT
 |  | 05-Apr-06 | Prlicand Others
 | DECISION  |  | 04-Apr-06 | Prlicand Others
 | DECISIONON THE ADMISSION OF RULE 92 BIS
 WRITTEN STATEMENTS
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Prlicand Others
 | OBSERVATIONSRELATIVES AU PROJET DE LIGNES DIRECTRICES
 DESTINÉES À RÉGIR
 L'ADMISSIBILITÉDES ÉLÉMENTS
 DE PREUVE ET GARANTIR UN FONCTIONNEMENT
 EFFICACE DE LA CONDUITE DU PROCÉS,
 PRÉSENTÉES PAR SLOBODAN
 PRALJAK
 |  | 05-Apr-06 | Prlicand Others
 | MÉMOIREDE MILIVOJ PETKOVIC PRÉALABLE
 AU PROCÈS EN APPLICATION
 DE L'ARTICLE 65 TER F) DU RÈGLEMENT
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Rasevic & Todovic | SAVOTODOVIC'S DEFENCE MOTION FOR LEAVE
 TO FILE A RESPONSE AND THE DEFENCE
 RESPONSE TO "PROSECUTION'S SUBMISSION
 OF SECOND JOINT AMENDED INDICTMENT
 WITH ANNEX A AND CONFIDENTIAL ANNEX
 B"
 |  | 03-Apr-06 | Stanisic | MOTIONTO WITHDRAW AS PRO BONO COUNSEL
 |  | 31-Mar-06 | Stanisic & Simatovic | DEFENCERESPONSE TO REQUESTS BY GENERAL
 MILETIC AND OTHERS REGARDING ACCESS
 TO CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
 | 
 |