| Please note that thisis not a verbatim transcript of the Press
 Briefing. It is merely a summary.
 
 Date: 18.01.2006
 Time: 12:00
 
 Registry and Chambers: 
 Alexandra Milenov, Spokesman for Registryand Chambers, made the following statement:
 
 Good Afternoon, 
 My name is Alexandra Milenov, I am theRegistry Liaison Officer for Serbia and
 Montenegro. I am normally posted to the
 Belgrade Field Office. As many of you
 already know, Jim Landale, who served
 as the Tribunal’s Registry and
 Chambers Spokesperson with distinction
 for quite a number of years has left
 the Tribunal. I will be fulfilling the
 Spokesperson’s functions on a temporary
 basis, while at the same time continuing
 my work in Belgrade. I intend to go back
 to Belgrade as soon as this is possible.
 While I am here, I can be reached at
 the same phone numbers that you used
 to contact Jim Landale.
 
 	I would like to welcome you allback after the holiday season. As you
 may be aware, the Tribunal’s trials
 are back in session and working full
 steam. The trials against Republika
 Srpska leader Momcilo Krajisnik, Republika
 Srpska Krajina leader Milan Martic,
 Bosnian Army officer Naser Oric have
 recommenced and will be in session for
 the rest of the week. Also in court this
 week is the trial against Croatian journalist
 and editor Ivica Marijacic and former
 Croatian Security Service head Markica
 Rebic for contempt of the Tribunal. The
 trail against Slobodan Milosevic is set
 to recommence next week on Monday 23
 January.
 
 	I would like to draw your attentionto a couple of status conferences that
 will be held in the next week. The status
 conference in the case against Croatian
 army and police leaders Ivan Cermak and
 Mladen Markac will take place on Friday
 20 January. During this status conference
 the accused will be asked to enter a
 plea to new charges which were confirmed
 in the latest amended indictment on 14
 December. The accused will enter their
 pleas via videolink. Please check the
 court schedule in order to confirm the
 time of the status conference, as there
 may be a change. There will also be a
 status conference in the case against
 Vojislav Seselj, which is scheduled for
 Tuesday 24 January 2006 at 12:00.
 
 	I would like to bring to your attentionthat the Tribunal’s budget for
 2006 and 2007 was approved at UN headquarters
 in New York to the amount of 276 million
 dollars. The Tribunal went to great effort
 to streamline its work and there is zero
 growth in the budget based on the previous
 biennium (in fact, there is negative
 growth.) I note that the General Assembly
 praised the Tribunal for "presenting
 a logical results-based budgeting framework
 that is well-structured both quantitatively
 and qualitatively."
 
 	Since the last press briefing, quitea number of documents have been filed
 with the court. Please do take a moment
 to review our last weekly update (no.
 385), which sets them all out. If you
 require any of them, my office will be
 pleased to assist you.
 
 	Lastly, the reconstruction of thecourtrooms is well underway. The reconstruction
 is being done principally in order to
 accommodate trials involving multiple
 accused. Court room II has been completed,
 court room one is currently being worked
 on, and reconstruction of court room
 III is scheduled to start next month.
 Please check the court room schedule
 for the next couple of weeks in order
 to confirm the location of trials.
 
 	I would like to take this opportunityto say that I look forward to working
 with you in the coming weeks.
 
 Office of the Prosecutor: 
 Florence Hartmann, Spokesperson forthe Office of the Prosecutor, made the
 following statement:
 
 Ms. Del Ponte will be traveling to Brusselstomorrow for meetings with the following
 officials. There will be a press opportunity
 after the Prosecutor’s meeting
 with Olie Rehn and possibly after her
 meeting with Solana.
 
 11:30 – NATO Secretary GeneralHoop Scheffer
 
 15:30 – EU Foreign Policy ChiefJavier Solana
 
 16:15 – EU Commissioner of ExpansionOlie Rehn (Press opportunity after)
 
 Questions: 
 	Asked if there was any informationon the guarantees from the Russian government
 for the request for provisional release
 of Slobodan Milosevic, Milenov stated
 that the Trial Chamber had issued an
 order last week requiring the defence
 for Milosevic to submit any further materials,
 including guarantees by the Russian government
 by the end of today and that she had
 no further comment.
 
 	Asked if there was any informationon the operation of the Bosnian police
 launched to capture Ratko Mladic, Hartmann
 replied that she had no comment and that
 according to all information available
 at the OTP, Mladic was in Serbia.
 
 	Asked if there would be a motionby the Prosecution to join the Ivan Cermack
 and Mladen Markac case with the Ante
 Gotovina case, Hartmann stated that she
 had no information on what will be discussed
 at the status conference.
 
 	Asked if the Tribunal planned totake action against Domogoj Margetic
 for revelaing the identity of two protected
 witnesses on a website, Milenov stated
 that she was not aware of any particular
 measure being taken at the moment in
 relation to the Margetic case but that
 the Tribunal does take these matters
 seriously and that indictments have been
 issued in the past for those kinds of
 actions.
 
 	Milenov pointed out that the Tribunal’sorders that it issues to protect certain
 witness testimonies were done so for
 important reasons. These reasons were
 to protect the witness or to protect
 other witnesses or victims who the witness
 may be discussing during this testimony.
 Violating the orders of the Tribunal
 to protect the confidentiality of a witness
 was a serious matter and that there had
 been several indictments against those
 who had in various ways breached the
 orders of the Tribunal. There was an
 ongoing trial at the moment and one expected
 in the future for contempt. Any further
 incidence the Tribunal would take very
 seriously, Milenov said.
 
 	Asked if there was confirmationthat the Prosecutor would be in Belgrade
 on 6 February 2006, Hartmann said that
 she could confirm that there would be
 a visit in the beginning of February
 and that a precise date would be announced
 in due time. The visit would be a working
 visit relating to the remaining issues,
 access to documents and the issue of
 the fugitives. Hartmann reiterated that
 there were six remaining fugitives, five
 of these believed to be in Serbia amoung
 which two were indicted for genocide.
 
 	Asked if the Prosecutor would requestaction from NATO during her meeting tomorrow,
 Hartmann replied that it was a working
 visit relating to their relationship.
 Hartmann said that NATO continued to
 collect information related to fugitives
 and that they are in position to take
 action on any future information, as
 done so in the past.
 
 	Hartmann said that during the Prosecutor’smeeting with the EU was to give an update
 on the degree of cooperation of Serbia
 with the Tribunal. The EU required in
 the SAA agreement in October 2005 that
 Serbia fully cooperate with the Tribunal
 and an update would be made by the Prosecutor
 on the quality and reality of this cooperation,
 as she does on a regular basis with other
 states. Hartmann stated that in the case
 of Serbia, there was the issue of remaining
 fugitives and that no one had been arrested
 in Serbia since Beara and that the only
 transfers that took place in early 2005
 were the result of voluntarily surrender.
 The Tribunal expects the authorities
 to solve the problem of the remaining
 fugitives by arrests.
 
 	Asked if the Prosecution would requestthe 100 unredacted documents from Croatia
 mentioned in the Marijacic and Rebic
 trial, Hartmann replied that she would
 check into the matter.
 
 Documents: 
 | CaseNumber | CaseDescription | DocumentTitle |  | IT-02-60-A | Blagojevicet al. (Appeal)
 | SchedulingOrder
 |  | IT-95-14-R77.2 | Blaskic(Contempt)
 | DecisionOn Prosecution Motion For Judicial
 Notice And Admission Of Evidence
 |  | IT-95-14-R77.2 | Blaskic(Contempt)
 | DecisionOn Prosecution's Motion For Variance
 Of Protective Measures In The Prosecutor
 V. Marijacic & Rebic Case
 |  | IT-95-14-R77.4 | Blaskic(Contempt)
 | DecisionReferring The Defence "Appeal Dated
 29 December" To The Appeals Chamber
 |  | IT-95-14-R | Blaskic(Review)
 | DecisionOn Prosecution's Motion For Variance
 Of Protective Measures In The Prosecutor
 V. Marijacic & Rebic Case
 |  | IT-95-11 | Martic | DecisionOn Prosectution's Motions For Admission
 Of Transcripts Pursuant To Rule
 92 Bis (D) And Of Expert Reports
 Pursuant To Rule 94 Bis
 |  | IT-95-11 | Martic | DecisionOn Prosecution's Motion For The
 Admission Of Written Evidence Pursuant
 To Rule 92 Bis Of The Rules
 |  | IT-02-54 | Milosevic | BookOf Authorities For Prosecution's
 Motion For Specific Order Relating
 To Trial In Absentia
 |  | IT-02-54 | Milosevic | Prosecution'sMotion For Specific Order Relating
 To Trial In Absentia
 |  | IT-03-68 | Oric | DecisionOn Partly Confidential Defence
 Motion Regarding The Consequences
 Of A Party Failing To Put Its Case
 To A Witnesses Pursuant To Rule
 90 (H) (Ii)
 |  | IT-03-68 | Oric | DecisionOn Defence Motion To Admit The
 Evidence Of A Witness In The Form
 Of A Written Statement Pursuant
 To Rule 92 Bis
 |  | IT-03-68 | Oric | Prosecution'sResponse To Defence Motion To File
 An Expert Statement Pursuant To
 Rule 94 Bis
 |  | IT-05-88 | Popovicet al
 | TheNotice Of The Defence Of Vujadin
 Popovic Pursuant Rule 94 Bis
 |  | IT-04-74 | Prlicand Others
 | TheAccused Valentin Coric's Response
 To The Prosecution Motion For Judicial
 Notice Of Facts Of Common Knowledge
 And Admission Of Documentary Evidence
 Pursuant To Rules 94(A) And 89(C)
 |  | IT-04-74 | Prlicand Others
 | ResponseOf The Defence For The Accused
 Petkovic To Prosecution Motion
 For Judicial Notice Of Facts Of
 Common Knowledge And Admission
 Of Documentary Evidence Pursuant
 To Rules 94(A) And 89(C), Of 27
 December 2005
 |  | IT-04-74 | Prlicand Others
 | JadrankoPrlic's Response To Prosecution
 Motion For Judicial Notice Of Facts
 Of Common Knowledge And Admission
 Of Documentary Evidence Pursuant
 To Rules 94(A) And 89(C)
 |  | IT-04-74 | Prlicand Others
 | ProsecutionSubmission Pursuant To Trial Chamber's
 Order Of 12 January 2006
 |  | IT-03-67 | Seselj | RequestOf Dr Vojislav Seselj For The Revocation
 Of The Decision To Assign Standby
 Counsel (Submission No. 125)
 |  | IT-03-67 | Seselj | RequestOf Dr Vojislav Seselj For The Issuing
 Of An Order To Approve The Payment
 Of Expenses For Preparation Of
 His Defence (Submission No. 124)
 | 
   
 |