| Please note that thisis not a verbatim transcript of the Press
 Briefing. It is merely a summary.
 
             Date:31.05.2006
 
 Time: 12:00
 
 Registryand Chambers:
 
 Christian Chartier, Senior InformationOfficer, made the following statement:
 
 As you all know by now,the Tribunal released earlier today the
 report of the internal inquiry panel
 concerning the circumstances surrounding
 the death of Slobodan Milosevic on 11
 March 2006.
 
 Headed by Tribunal'sVice-President, Judge Kevin Parker, the
 panel conducted an extremely thorough
 inquiry, including but not limited to
 statements and reports received from
 more than 60 persons. Their final report
 is detailed and comprehensive.
 
 It confirms that SlobodanMilosevic was not poisoned, was not murdered
 and did not commit suicide.
 
 Most importantly, itdemonstrates that the Tribunal provided
 the accused, from his arrival to his
 death and throughout his detention, with
 professional medical care of high-standard.
 The Trial Chamber was also very flexible
 in adapting the trial’s schedule
 to the defendant’s health situation.
 Those two elements illustrate that the
 Tribunal has been constantly sensitive
 to the health condition and requirements
 of the accused.
 
 At the same time, instriving to ensure a fair trial by enabling
 the accused to properly conduct his own
 Defence, the Tribunal provided Slobodan
 Milosevic with unique facilities and
 detention arrangements. These arrangements
 inadvertently allowed Slobodan Milosevic
 to obtain, and to take in, a number of
 medications not prescribed by treating
 doctors, thus putting himself at a higher
 risk than he already was. In addition
 to self-medicating, the accused refused
 on occasions to be tested or refused
 to be taken to the hospital.
 
 Slobodan Milosevic diedof natural causes from a heart attack,
 on 11 March 2006.
 
 Another press releasewas issued this morning about a visit
 to the Detention Unit by The Minister
 of Foreign Affairs of the Former Yugoslav
 Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), Ilinka
 Mitreva. More specifically, she visited
 Ljube Boskoski, the former Minister of
 the Interior of FYROM, who is charged
 with command responsibility for the attack
 on the village of Ljuboten.
 
 Yesterday, the Judgesof the Tribunal held an Extraordinary
 Plenary Session at which they discussed
 ways to better organize the pre-trial
 and trials proceedings in order to adjudicate
 cases more expeditiously. A number of
 changes to the Rules are anticipated.
 They will be announced in due course.
 
 Next week, the Presidentof the Tribunal, Judge Fausto Pocar,
 and the Prosecutor, Carla del Ponte,
 will address the Security Council on
 the progresses made in implementing the
 completion strategy. Their appearance
 is scheduled in the morning of Wednesday
 7 June, at around 10a.m. New York time.
 
 Finally, the Registrar,Hans Holthuis, wishes to express his
 concern at an incident in Kosovo last
 Thursday in which members of a defence
 team representing the former Yugoslav
 Army Chief-of-Staff, Dragoljub Ojdanjic,
 were prevented from carrying out their
 independent enquiries. Ojdanjic is indicted
 by the Tribunal for war crimes against
 Kosovar Albanians during 1999 and his
 trial in The Hague is due to commence
 10 July.
 
 While travelling inan UNMIK-supported convoy to the village
 of Kruse e vogel or Mala Krusa in south-west
 Kosovo the convoy appears to have been
 mistaken by residents for that of a group
 of Serb refugees wishing to inspect their
 former properties. A clash ensued between
 residents and security personnel in the
 UNMIK-supported convoy forcing the defence
 team to leave the area. More than 20
 persons, including a language assistant,
 were reported injured in the incident.
 
 The Registrar recognizesthe gravity of the crimes alleged by
 the Tribunal's prosecution to have occured
 in Kruse e vogel or Mala Krusa. Specifically,
 it is charged that more than 100 men
 and boys were coralled into a house and
 shot by Serbian forces before the building
 was torched.
 
 The Tribunal is committedto bringing the perpetrators to justice
 and providing justice for the victims
 of these and other crimes in Kosovo.
 To do so, it is imperative that trials
 are fair and that no party, the defence
 in this instance, is prevented from carry
 out their work.
 
 	With regard to the schedule of proceedingsfor the days to come, I would like to
 point out that an appeals hearing is
 scheduled for Blagoje Simic this Friday
 from 9:00 to 18:00 in courtroom III.
 
 	Also, please note that Monday 5June 2006 is a holiday and there will
 be no court proceedings for this day.
 
 	The Vukovar trialof former Yugoslav Army high-ranking
 officers Mile Mrksic, Miroslav Radic
 and Veselin Sljivancanin, will continue
 this and next week in courtroom I. Tomorrow
 it will sit from 9:30 to 16:30, on Friday
 from 9:00 to 13:45. Next week it will
 sit Tuesday, through Thursday from 9:30
 to 16:30 and on Friday from 9:30 to 13:45.
 
 The trial of MomciloKrajisnik continues for the rest of this
 week at 9:00 in courtroom II. Next week
 the proceedings will continue Tuesday
 through Thursday in the same courtroom
 and Friday in courtroom III at 14:15.
 
 The trial of Milan Marticwill continue for the rest of the week
 at 14:15 in courtroom II. Next week the
 proceedings will continue Tuesday through
 Thursday in the same courtroom and Friday
 in courtroom III at 9:00.
 
 The proceedings againstthe six accused in the Prlic et al. case
 Jadranko Prlic, Bruno Stojic, Slobodan
 Praljak, Milivoj Petkovic, Valentin Coric
 and Berislav Pusic, former high-ranking
 political and military officials of the
 then Herceg-Bosna wil continue tomorrow
 at 9:00 sitting in courtroom III. There
 will be no proceedings for this case
 next week.
 
 Office of theProsecutor:
 
 	Anton Nikiforov,Advisor to the Prosecutor and acting
 Spokesperson of the Office of the Prosecutor,
 made no statement.
 
 Questions: 
 	Asked if precautionswere being taken with other accused representing
 themselves to prevent this from happening
 again, Chartier stated that a number
 of steps were recommended by the Milosevic
 report.
 
 	The report recommendedthat Tribunal authorities look into the
 detention unit arrangements when an accused
 would like to defend himself, and basically
 said that no such regime should be applied
 again.
 
 	Chartier said thegist was that a better balance must be
 struck between the principes of ensuring
 fair trials and allowing accused to defend
 themselves, and not compromising the
 security of the detention unit.
 
 	Asked if Seseljwould have the same rights as Milosevic,
 Chartier said that he was not aware of
 any such order made by the Trial Chamber.
 
 	Asked would therebe a follow up inquiry to find out who
 brought in the medications for Milosevic,
 Chartier said that he did not expect
 so because the report said that no clear
 conclusion could be drawn. The fact of
 the matter was that a number of medications
 not prescribed, Rifampicine being only
 one of many, had been smuggled into the
 detention unit, said Chartier. The report
 indicated a number of theories in this
 regard such as pills or whatever being
 hidden in boxes of documents, bundles
 and folders, but also possibily in the
 clothing of privileged visitors. Thereby,
 indicating that no conclusion could be
 drawn. Chartier added that he was confident
 that if a conclusion could have been
 made then the inquiry panel would have
 found it. There would not be any further
 inquiry on this, said Chartier.
 
 	Asked if the theoriesmentioned in the report were based on
 specific fact or just speculation, Chartier
 answered that the report was not outlined
 to speculate but outlined to present
 facts. Chartier said the report was self
 explanatory giving a huge amount of details,
 dates and what had actually been done
 and discovered. These were no speculations
 but elements clearly stated.
 
 	A journalist pointedout that the death of Milan Babic was
 before the death of Milosevic. Asked
 when the report on Babic’s death
 would be released, Charter said that
 the Babic report would come very soon.
 Chartier pointed out that the order of
 release of the reports had nothing to
 do with giving priority to one case over
 the other. It had to do with the fact
 that a report by the Dutch prosecutor
 just came in last week on Babic’s
 death. As this report had to be considered
 by the inquiry panel the panel could
 not finalize their report before receiving
 this document. Chartier said that the
 panel was in the final stage of the reporting
 exercise.
 
 	Asked if the reportingof incidents to the Deputy Registrar
 by the Commanding Officer of the Detention
 Unit regarding Milosevic in August 2004
 and December 2005 resulted in measures
 being taken, Chartier said that yes measures
 had been taken. Chartier said that one
 measure was to monitor the accused more
 closely and one other had been the conducting
 of medical tests. Another example was
 a number of memorandums coming from the
 Deputy Registrar to the Commanding Officer
 of the Detention Unit recommending an
 alternative way to implementing the order
 setting forth for Milosevic specific
 detention arrangements.
 
 	Chartier added thatof course now we are now seeing in hindsight
 what was happening in 2004. In 2004 and
 in the early 2005 the picture was slowly
 emerging. At this point in time, the
 accused was a sick man with serious cardiac
 ailments known to us and the doctors.
 There was this ongoing mystery that in
 spite of the medications his blood pressure
 was not going down. Chartier said that
 then the question began to arise of how
 this could be possible. There were a
 number of specialists outside of The
 Hague with expert opinions brought in
 for examinations. After a number of examinations,
 the accused was normal for a couple of
 months again and began his defence case
 in 2004. Chartier said he then had abnormal
 pattern in blood pressure again and the
 medications were adapted and not working.
 Chartier said then the question was why
 these medications were not working. It
 was easy to say now that in October 2004
 we should have done something differently,
 but this was a progressive picture. It
 was only at the end of 2005 and beginning
 of 2006 that the picture of the accused
 self medicating and according to the
 report manipulating medications clearly
 appeared.
 
 	Asked if any commentcould be made on what President Pocar
 and the Prosecutor were going to discuss
 at the Security Council meeting next
 week, Nikiforov said that he could not
 speak for the President and could not
 tell in advance about the Prosecutor's
 text. The reports had been sent to the
 Security Council, the Danish Presidency
 of the UNSC have to organise their translation
 and distribution to the members of the
 Security Council. But all reports will
 be made public/ released on 7 June, when
 the President and the Prosecutor are
 to address the UNSC.
 
 	Asked what the maintopic might be in their address, Nikiforov
 said that as for the Prosecution the
 topics of cooperation of states would
 be discussed and also the completion
 strategy in terms of making the prosecutions
 work more efficient as well as a critical
 look at its own work and goals of completion
 strategy. Nikiforov reiterated that it
 could not be revealed in advance.
 
 	Asked if the changesto the Rules made in the plenary session
 yesterday would be included in the President’s
 address to the Security Council, Chartier
 said that they could not be included
 at this stage because they were not formally
 adopted. However, Chartier said that
 it was expected that these changes would
 be finalized and announced before the
 President’s address.
 
 	A journalist referenceda Serbian Media report from last week
 stating that the prosecution has representatives
 looking into the archives in Serbia.
 Asked if this could be confirmed, Nikiforov
 confirmed this stating that this was
 OTP’s first mission to archives
 in Belgrade. Nikiforov said that the
 mission was in the second week and it
 was not finished assuring that there
 woul be more missions. So far what could
 be said, without going into details,
 was that the mission was going well and
 well received in different locations,
 but it is yet to be fully tested, said
 Nikiforov. Once there were some physical
 results from this mission then it could
 be said how it went on this mission.
 
 	Asked if this wasconsolation for not getting Mladic, Nikiforov
 said that it was not, but he assured
 that the Prosecutor’s speech would
 be quite open on efforts on Mladic and
 fugitives.
 
 	Asked what day theincident in Kosovo took place and what
 was the name of those involved, Chartier
 answered that it happened on Thursday
 and he did not have the names of the
 people involved, but that he would find
 out the answer for the journalist.
 
 Document List  
 | CaseDescription
 | SignatureDate
 | DocumentTitle
 |  | Blagojevicet al. (Appeal)
 | 25-May-06 | ProsecutionResponse To Jokic's Motion For
 Leave To File Third Amended Notice
 Of Appeal And Amended Appelate
 Brief
 |  | Blagojevicet al. (Appeal)
 | 29-May-06 | ReplyOf Dragna Jokic To Prosectuion
 Response To Motion For Leave To
 File Third Amended Notice Of Appeal
 And Amended Appellate Brief And
 Request For Leave To File Same
 |  | Blaskic(Contempt)
 | 30-May-06 | OrderDesignating A Pre-Trial Judge
 |  | Blaskic(Contempt)
 | 25-May-06 | ResponseThe Accused Marijan Krizic To The
 Prosecution's Motion For Leave
 To Amend The Indictments Pursuant
 To Trial Chamber's Order Of 10
 May 2006 And Motion For Joinder
 Pursuant To Trial Chamber's Order
 Of 10 May 2006
 |  | Blaskic(Contempt)
 | 30-May-06 | TheAccused Domagoj Margetic's Reply
 To The Prosecution's Motion For
 Joinder Pursuant To Trial Chamber's
 Order Of 10 May 2006
 |  | Blaskic(Review)
 | 29-May-06 | ProsecutionResponse To Defence Motion Seeking
 Leave To Reply To Prosecution Response
 To Defence Motion For Access
 |  | Blaskicand Kordic and Cerkez (Contempt)
 | 30-May-06 | OrderDesignating A Pre-Trial Judge
 |  | Blaskicand Kordic and Cerkez (Contempt)
 | 26-May-06 | ResponseOf The Accused Josip Jovic To The
 Prosecution's Consolidated Motion
 And Prosecution's Motion For Joinder
 Pursuant To Trial Chamber's Order
 Of 10 May 2006
 |  | BorovcaninL (Interlocutory)
 | 29-May-06 | ProsecutionResponse To Motion Seeking Provisional
 Release Of Accused Ljubomir Borovcanin
 |  | Boskoskiet al
 | 26-May-06 | DecisionOn Prosecution's Motion To Amend
 The Indictment And Submission Of
 Proposed Second Amended Indictment
 And Submission Of Amended Pre-Trial
 Brief
 |  | Boskoskiet al
 | 26-May-06 | Prosecution'sMotion For Extension Of Time To
 Complete Motions Concerning Admission
 Of Written Statements Pursuant
 To Rule 92bis
 |  | Boskoskiet al
 | 23-May-06 | [DecisionOn The Motions On Fair Trial And
 Extensions Of Time]
 |  | Bralo(Appeal)
 | 26-May-06 | ReplyBrief
 |  | Bralo(Appeal)
 | 26-May-06 | AppealBrief On Behalf Of Miroslav Bralo
 |  | Cermak & Markac | 29-May-06 | TheProsecution's Response To Ivan
 Cermak's Motion For Temporary Modification
 Of The Conditions Of The Appeals
 Chamber Decision On Provisional
 Release
 |  | Delic | 29-May-06 | ProsecutionOmnibus: 1) Reply To Defence Response
 To Prosecution's Submissionof Proposed
 Consolidated Amended Indictment
 ; And 2) Response To Defence Motion
 Alleging Defects In The Form Of
 The Consolidated Amended Indictment
 |  | Gotovina | 23-May-06 | Prosecution'sResponse To Ante Gotovina's Motion
 For Leave To File Reply To Prosecution's
 Response To His Motion To Dismiss,
 And To Exceed Page Limitation
 |  | Gotovina | 26-May-06 | DefendantAnte Gotovina's Reply In Support
 Of His Motion Filed On 19 May 2006
 |  | Gotovina | 26-May-06 | DefendantAnte Gotovina's Motion For Leave
 To File Reply In Support Of His
 Motion Of 19 May 2006
 |  | Hadzihasanovicet al. (Appeal)
 | 26-May-06 | Prosecution'sResponse To Appellant Kubura's
 Motion For Extension Of Time To
 File Appeal Brief And Prosecution's
 Motion To File A Consolidated Response
 To Appeal Briefs
 |  | Haradinajet al
 | 29-May-06 | CorrespondenceFrom Slo Trial Chamber Ii
 |  | Krajisnik | 23-May-06 | SupplementalSubmission To Defence Application
 Of 22 May 2006 Following Receipt
 Of Further Information From Trial
 Chamber
 |  | Krajisnik | 26-May-06 | Prosecution'sResponse To Defnce Motion Concerning
 Documents Sought By The Trial Chamber
 |  | Krajisnik | 24-May-06 | DefenceApplication For Certification Pursuant
 To Rule 73(B) Of The Rules Of Procedure
 And Evidence To Appeal Against
 Trial Chamber's Decision Of 23
 May 2006
 |  | Krajisnik | 24-May-06 | DefenceReply To The Prosecution's Response
 To Defence Motion For A Ruling
 That Honour Judge Canivell Is Unable
 To Continue Sitting In This Case
 |  | Krajisnik | 30-May-06 | VerificationOf Accuracy Of The Transcript In
 The Krajisnik Hearing Of 29 May
 2006
 |  | Limajet al (Appeal)
 | 25-May-06 | PublicRedacted Prosecution Brief In Reply
 |  | Lukicet al
 | 26-May-06 | ResponseOf Defense Counsel For Milan Lukic
 To Request By Prosecutor Under
 Rule 11bis
 |  | Milosevic | 25-May-06 | OrderOn Defence Re-Application For Re-Admission
 Of Witness Henning Hensch
 |  | Milutinovicet al.
 | 26-May-06 | OrderSuspending Provisional Release
 Of Each Accused
 |  | Milutinovicet al.
 | 26-May-06 | Prosecution'sMotion For Admission Of Written
 Statements And Transcripts In Lieu
 Of Viva Voce Testimony Pursuant
 To Rule 92bis And Confidential
 Annexes A, B And C (With Accompanying
 Cd)
 |  | Milutinovicet al.
 | 25-May-06 | Prosecution'sMotion To Admit Documentary Evidence
 With Annexes
 |  | Milutinovicet al.
 | 24-May-06 | DecisionOn Lazarevic Motion For Assignment
 Of Co-Counsel
 |  | Milutinovicet al.
 | 26-May-06 | Prosecution'S Response To Joint Request By
 The Accused For Temporary Provisional
 Release During The Summer Recess
 |  | Milutinovicet al.
 | 29-May-06 | DecisionBy The Registrar Re: Assignment
 Of Mr Dragan Ivetic As Co-Counsel
 |  | Milutinovicet al.
 | 30-May-06 | ApplicationFor Leave To File A Reply And Joint
 Reply To The Proosecution's Response
 To Joint Request By The Accused
 For Temporary Provisional Release
 During The Summer Recess
 |  | Mrksic | 29-May-06 | InternalMemorandum From Interpretation
 Unit Regarding Verification Of
 Accuracy Of The Transcript In The
 Mrksic Hearing Of 17 May 2006
 |  | Mrksic | 25-May-06 | JointDefense Response To The Prosecution
 Motion To Amend Its Rule 65 Ter
 Witness List
 |  | Mrksic | 29-May-06 | ProsecutionReply To Joint Defence Response
 To Prosecution Motion To Amend
 Its Rule 65 Ter Witness List
 |  | Naletilicand Martinovic (Appeal)
 | 26-May-06 | DecisionBy The Registrar Re :Segregation
 Order
 |  | Perisic | 29-May-06 | Prosecution'sResponse To Defence Memorandum
 Brief On The Application Of The
 Rights Contained In The Icty Statute
 And The Iccpr To The Presentation
 Of Evidence
 |  | Popovicet al
 | 24-May-06 | DecisionOn Joint Defence Motions Requesting
 The Translation Of The Pre-Trial
 Brief And Specific Motions
 |  | Popovicet al
 | 26-May-06 | FurtherResponse Of The Defence For Vinko
 Pandurevic In Relation To His Application
 For Provisional Release
 |  | Rajic | 25-May-06 | DecisionOn Prosecution's Motion To Withdraw
 The Motion Under Rule 11bis For
 Referral Of The Indictment And
 The Request Under Rule 11bis For
 Referral Of The Indictment To Another
 Court
 |  | Seselj | 23-May-06 | ProsecutionSubmission Of The Expert Report
 Of Yves Tomic
 |  | Seselj | 23-May-06 | ProsecutionSubmission Of The Expert Report
 Of Andras Riedlmayer
 |  | Seselj | 23-May-06 | Prosecution'sMotion For Judicial Notice Of Adjudicated
 Facts, With Annex
 |  | Seselj | 25-May-06 | DecisionOn Appeal Against Decision Denying
 Permission For Legal Representatives
 To Visit The Detainee
 |  | Seselj | 30-May-06 | ProfessorVojislav Seselj Submits A Request
 To Be Visited By His Legal Counsels
 Representing Him Before The Bar
 Association Of The Netherlands
 In The Disciplinary Proceedings
 Instituted Against Attorney-At-Law
 Van Der Spoel
 |  | Seselj | 24-May-06 | Prosecution'sAddendum To The Expert Report Of
 Anthony Oberschall
 |  | Strugaret al. (Appeal)
 | 24-May-06 | SchedulingOrder Temporarily Cancelling Appeals
 Hearing
 | 
 |