| Pleasenote that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing.
 It is merely a summary.
 
 ICTY Weekly Press Briefing 
 Date: 23.09.2004
 
 Time: 12.00 p.m.
 
 Registry and Chambers: 
   
 Jim Landale, Spokesman for Registry and Chambers,made the following statement:
 
 Good afternoon,  
 
 Yesterday, Trial Chamber III issued its ‘Reasonsfor Decision on Assignment of Defence Counsel’ in the Milosevic
 case, which you will have seen posted on our website. This contains
 a detailed procedural history of the issue of self-representation,
 a summary of the submissions of the parties on the issue, including
 Mr. Milosevic’s, and the Judges’ assessment of them, a detailed
 discussion of the Trial Chamber’s competency to assign defence counsel,
 an overview of the health condition Mr. Milosevic, and the Trial
 Chamber’s conclusions. If you have not yet seen a copy, you can
 pick one up at the end of this briefing.
 
 
 I also draw your attention to an ‘Order GrantingExtension of Time to File Appeal’, in which President Meron
 orders that the assigned counsel’s appeal brief is due 7 days from
 the filing of the Trial Chamber’s written decision, in other words,
 seven days from yesterday.
 
 
 I would also like to note a document that we madeavailable yesterday, namely, the President’s ‘Preliminary Order
 in Response to the Prosecutor’s Request Under Rule 11 bis’ of
 the Rules of Procedure and Evidence. This follows a motion filed
 by the Prosecutor requesting that a Trial Chamber transfer the case
 against Zeljko Mejakic, Momcilo Gruban, Dusan Fustar and Dusko Knezevic
 to the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina for trial in the War
 Crimes Chamber of the State Court.
 
 
 Noting and quoting from a letter to President Meronfrom Ambassador Bernard Fassier, the Senior Deputy High Representative
 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in which Ambassador Fassier says, among
 other things, that, ‘there will be no possibility to provide
 before the planned date of January 2005 trials that meet the standards
 of international due process’, and that, ‘any premature referral
 to BiH before January could even undermine the current efforts’
 to create a judicial system capable of conducting war crimes trials,
 and ‘strongly’ recommending that ‘no referral of cases
 be made prior to [January 2005]", the President gives the
 Prosecutor ‘the opportunity to clarify the following issues,
 as well as any others that she deems important in light of the foregoing
 discussion:
 
 
 -In light of Ambassador Fassier’s recent letter,what evidence supports the proposition that "Bosnia and Herzegovina
 would provide all necessary legal and technical conditions for fair
 trials"?
 
 -In light of Ambassador Fassier’s recent letter,to what extent is Bosnia-Herzegovina capable of referring Defendants’
 cases to a competent court "forthwith"?’
 
 
 The President indicated a supplementary motionon this issue would be accepted ‘any time until 1 October 2004’.
 
 
 You will have seen from the press release and biographiesthat we sent out that two new ad litem Judges were sworn
 in on Tuesday. Judges Hans Henrik Brydensholt (Denmark) and Albin
 Eser (Germany) will sit alongside Judge Agius in Trial Chamber II
 on the trial of Naser Oric, which is due to commence on 6 October
 at 9 a.m. The pre-trial conference will be held next Tuesday, 28
 September at 2.30 p.m.
 
 
 Yesterday, we received a Scheduling Order in TheProsecutor v. Milutinovic, Ojdanic and Sainovic, in which Judge
 Robinson ordered that hearings be held on 1, 2 and 3 December 2004,
 on an application ‘for Orders to NATO and States for Production
 of Information’, filed by counsel for General Ojdanic on 15
 November 2002. A copy of that Scheduling Order will be available
 to those interested after this.
 
 
 I would also like to clarify some reporting inthe Croatian media last week which carried a letter alleged to have
 been sent by Mr. Mladen Markac from the Detention Unit describing,
 among other things, his conditions of detention. We spoke to Mr.
 Markac and to his defence counsel earlier in the week and they have
 categorically denied that Mr. Markac ever wrote any such letter
 and have distanced themselves from the allegations contained in
 it. Indeed, they stated that they were both perfectly happy with
 the conditions of detention.
 
 
 On behalf of the Tribunal’s Outreach Programme: 
 This weekend, ICTY Chambers and OTP representatives will take partin the first session of the second leg of the training seminar for
 Croatian Judges and Prosecutors involved in war crimes cases. This
 session will be held in Opatija on Friday and Saturday, 24 and 25
 September.
 
 The seminar was organised at the initiative of the Croatian Ministryof Justice and supported by ICTY Outreach, in accordance with the
 Tribunal's mandate to assist in strengthening the capacity of local
 judiciaries to handle war crimes cases. This is the fourth of six
 training sessions to be held over six months. The remaining two
 sessions will be held in October, in Trogir, Croatia.
 
 At this session, the participants will examine the definitionsof crimes under international and local laws, forms of criminal
 responsibility and association, targeting, investigation, charging
 decisions and methods of proof in war crimes trials, among other
 topics.
 
 The aim of the entire seminar is to compare the Croatian legalsystem to the rules that apply in international law and at the ICTY,
 so as to better identify all the relevant issues for conducting
 war crimes trials in Croatia, whether those trials are brought before
 local courts as a result of local investigations, or on the basis
 of information and evidentiary materials provided by the ICTY OTP
 to the Croatian State Prosecutors’ Office, or as a result of the
 possible transfer of ICTY cases involving intermediary and lower
 level accused in accordance with Rule 11 bis of the Tribunal’s
 Rules of Procedure and Evidence.
 
 The first leg of the training seminar involving a different groupof participants was held from May to July.
 
 In terms of the court schedule, a reminder thatthere will be a status conference in The Prosecutor v. Stanisic
 and Simatovic this afternoon in Courtroom I, starting at 3 p.m.
 
 
 In addition to the Krajisnik trial, which is dueto continue throughout next week, the closing arguments in The
 Prosecutor v. Blagojevic and Jokic will be heard from Wednesday,
 29 September 2004.
 
 
 A list of the most recent court documents willbe available to you after this.
 
 
 Finally, I understand that the ADC will give abriefing after this.
 
 Seealso the latest ADC-ICTY press briefing.
 
 
 Office of the Prosecution: 
 
 Florence Hartmann for the Office of the Prosecutorstated that the Prosecutor would be in Belgrade on 1 October 2004
 for an international conference organized by the Belgrade Humanitarian
 Law Center entitled ‘Dealing With the Past in ex-Yugoslavia: Post
 Conflict Strategies for Truth, Justice and Reconciliation’. On Monday,
 4 October 2004, the Prosecutor would be meeting in Belgrade with
 the relevant officials of the Union of Serbia and Montenegro and
 of the Serbian government. Hartmann noted that the Prosecutor was
 not in Saint Raphael, France, in September or at any other date.
 
 
 Questions: 
 
 Asked what the Prosecutor’s opinion was on theCermak and Markac provisional release going before the Appeal’s
 Chamber, Hartmann said she did not want to comment on issues that
 were ongoing and that it was up to the Judges to decide.
 
 
 Asked what the Prosecutor’s response was concerningthe President’s Preliminary Order related to the Prosecutor’s request
 to transfer of the Meakic et al case to the State Court of Bosnia
 and Herzegovina, Hartmann said that the Prosecutor would respond
 in detail in due course.
 
 
 She added that there was a lot of confusion inBosnia on the transfer of cases from The Hague. As of 1 October
 2004, the Bosnia and Herzegovina State Court would take over the
 screening of Rules of the Road cases, an expertise that was until
 now under the jurisdiction of the ICTY OTP. These were cases that
 were initiated in Bosnia and were not Hague cases. Some of the would
 probably be tried by the BiH State Court’s Special Chamber for War
 Crimes. Others would be transferred to entity or district courts
 within Bosnia and Herzegovina.
 
 
 Asked if some of these cases were connected withcamps, Hartmann said that she would not speak further about the
 cases except that the cases were initiated by the local prosecutors
 and all information should be given by the body that initiated the
 case.
 
 
 Asked if the President and the Prosecutor weremeeting with the Croatian Minister of Justice next week, Landale
 replied that he could not confirm this information and would get
 back to the journalist on any possible meeting between President
 Meron and the Justice Minister.
 
   
 ***** 
 |