| Pleasenote that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing. It is merely
 a summary.
 
 ICTY WeeklyPress Briefing
 
 Date: 16.04.2003
 
 Time: 11:50
 
 REGISTRY ANDCHAMBERS
 Jim Landale, Spokesmanfor Registry and Chambers, made the following opening statement:
 
 First I would like to clarifysomething said at the briefing last week with regard to what additional time
 is to be granted to the Prosecution in completing their case-in-chief in the
 Milosevic trial. The Trial Chamber ruled on the deadline for the Prosecution
 to complete its case on 2 April, indicating that they would be granted an additional
 54 days from the May 16 deadline to compensate them for trial days lost due
 to the Accused’s ill-health. The Trial Chamber is yet to receive any further
 request for additional time from the Prosecution.
 
 You would haveseen that the Stakic trial ended yesterday with the completion of the closing
 arguments. By our calculations, the trial statistics are as follows:
 
 Prosecutionwitnesses: 56 (of which 37 live and 19 under Rule 92bis)
 
 
 
 Defence witnesses: 45 (of which 37 live, 7 under Rule 92bis and
 1 under Rule 94bis)
 
 
 
 Chamber witnesses: 6
 
 
 
 Total number of trial days from 16 April 2002 until and including 15 April 2003:
 150
 
 
 You should alsohave noted that Naser Oric entered not guilty pleas to the six charges contained
 in the Indictment against him at yesterday’s initial appearance. Copies of that
 Indictment are also available to those who haven’t yet got a copy.
 
 	With regardto other developments related to on-going proceedings:
 
 
  Next week,there are no trials scheduled due to the Easter break and the continued ill-health
 of the lead Defence counsel in the Brdjanin case and this Friday is an official
 UN holiday.
 
  On 14 Aprilwe received a Scheduling Order the Prosecutor v. Blagojevic, Obrenovic,
 Jokic and Nikolic ordering that a Pre-Trial Conference be held on 5 May
 2003 in Courtroom III, commencing at 2.15 p.m. and that the trial should commence
 the following day 6 May 2003 at 2.15 p.m. in Courtroom III.
 
  And, in theProsecutor v. Milutinovic, Sainovic and Ojdanic, Milutinovic’s provisional
 release hearing has been rescheduled to Thursday 1 May 2003, commencing at
 2.30 p.m.
 
 
 Among the courtdocuments we have received since the last briefing, the following are brought
 to your attention:
 
 
  On 15 April,the The Prosecutor v. Radoslav Brdjanin, we received from Trial Chamber
 II (Judge Agius (presiding), Judge Janu and Judge Taya) an "Order
 Concerning Allegations Against Milka Maglov".
 This followeda statement of a witness who was supposed to give evidence for the Prosecution
 in this case filed on 19 April 2002, alleging that Milka Maglov, at the time
 co-counsel for Radoslav Brdjanin, intimidated the Witness; the appointment on
 26 April 2002 of an amicus curiae to investigate the allegation; and
 an oral hearing on the matter on 10 July 2002.
 
 
  The Trial Chamberfound that "facts before this Trial Chamber, if believed could lead
 to the conclusion that a) Milka Maglov approached the Witness and intimidated
 him; and/or b) Milka Maglov revealed the identity of the Witness to a member
 of the public, in violation of an order of a Chamber;"
 The Trial Chamberfurther considered "that on the basis of this, there are sufficient
 grounds to proceed against Milka Maglov for contempt" and referred
 the matter to the President to designate a Trial Chamber to proceed according
 to Rule 77(D)(ii) of the Rules.
 
 
  In the samecase and on the same day, we received the Trial Chamber’s "Decision
 on Defence Motion for Additional Adjournment", in which it ordered
 that the proceedings in the case should resume on Monday, 19 May 2003.
 
  On 11 April,Trial Chamber I issued an "Order for Termination of Provisional Release
 For Dragan Jokic and Return to the Tribunal" in the Prosecutor
 v. Blagojevic, Obrenovic, Jokic and Nikolic. The Trial Chamber ordered
 that the Accused shall surrender to the custody of the Tribunal on 29 April
 2003.
 
  On 8 April,in The Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milosevic Trial Chamber III (Judge May,
 presiding, Judges Robinson and Kwon) issued an "Order Concerning a
 Chronology of Events in the Croatia Part of the Case". The Chronology
 of events concerning the Croatia part of the proceedings were annexed to the
 Order and the parties were ordered to file any objections or proposed amendments
 to the Chronology within 14 days.
 
  On 9 Aprilin the Milosevic case, we received the "Amici Curiae Response to Additional
 Information Regarding the Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated
 Facts Dated 2 April 2003".
 
  On the followingday and again in the Milosevic case, we received the Trial Chamber’s "Decision
 on Prosecution Motion for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts",
 in which the Trial Chamber admitted "the first 130 paragraphs of facts
 set out in Annex A to the Motion, but does so in the form set out in the attached
 Schedule under the heading ‘Actual Text’, and does not admit the remainder
 of the facts set out by the Prosecution in Annex A to its Motion".
 The full text of the document will be available after this.
 
  On the sameday and again in the Milosevic case, we received an "Order Concerning
 the Response of the Government of Serbia and Montenegro to the Trial Chamber’s
 Request For an Investigation into Violation of its Order For Protective Measures".
 
  Again in theMilosevic case, on 11 April, we received the "Public in Part and in
 Part Ex Parte and Confidential Prosecution’s Further Omnibus Motion for Leave
 to Amend the Witness List and Request Protective Measures for Sensitive Source
 Witnesses".
 
  And, also on11 March in this case we received the "Prosecution’s Submission of
 the Expert Report of Audrey Budding" entitled "Serbian Nationalism
 in the Twentieth Century: Historical Background and Context". Copies
 are available on request.
 
  On 15 Aprilin The Prosecutor v. Darko Mrdja we received Trial Chamber II’s "Decision
 on Darko Mrdja’s Request for Provisional Release", in which the Chamber
 denied the application.
 
  Copies arealso available for those who want them of the "Defence Pre-Trial Brief"
 in the Prosecutor v. Sefer Halilovic.
 Copies of allthe documents I have mentioned are available to you on request.
 
 
 We also have copiesof the new Basic Documents folders for you after this. If you would like to
 receive emailed updates could you please provide us your names and email addresses
 after the briefing.
 
 
 Finally, we willkeep you posted as to whether or not there will be a press briefing next week.
 There are no trials but if there is something to be addressed there will be
 a briefing. There will be no press briefing the following week on 30 April as
 it is Queen’s Day and an official UN holiday.
 
 	Questions: 
 	Asked to confirmthat from May 16, the Prosecution in the Milosevic case would be given an additional
 54 working days to conclude their case, Landale replied that this was correct
 and that this followed an Oral ruling by Judge May. He added that an issue that
 had been raised in court was a possible further application from the Prosecution
 for additional time. This had not been received yet, but if the Trial Chamber
 received such an application, it would be considered, he said.
 
 
 	Asked whetherthe Stakic Judgement would be rendered before the summer break, Landale replied
 that Judge Schomburg indicated yesterday in court that the Trial Chamber would
 try to render the Judgement sometime in July, so, before the summer recess.
 However, he added that Judge Schomburg had cautioned that he did not want to
 set any deadlines in stone as the Trial Chamber did not want to disappoint anyone
 if a deadline was not met.
 
 
 	Asked whetherthe Tribunal had received an official request from Belgrade to interrogate Mr.
 Milosevic concerning investigations into the assassination of the Serbian Prime
 Minister, Landale replied that the Tribunal had not received anything official
 from Belgrade with regard to interviewing Mr. Milosevic.
 
 
 Asked what positionthe Tribunal would take if Milosevic’s wife requested to visit him again, in
 view of the fact that there was an arrest warrant issued for her in Belgrade,
 Landale replied that if an international arrest warrant had been issued for
 Mira Markovic, it would be a for the Dutch authorities and not just the Tribunal
 to consider any application made to visit Mr. Milosevic. The Tribunal had not
 received any such request, he concluded.
 
 
 	Asked whetherthe Tribunal was looking into what the Serbian Minister of Interior said this
 week concerning the people responsible for the Ovcara crimes, Landale replied
 that this issue had been discussed during one of the last briefings. The Tribunal
 had seen the statements that had been made. The Tribunal’s position was clear;
 Indictments were issued against a number of people concerning the Ovcara massacre.
 One person had died in custody, another was currently in custody and two others,
 Mr. Sljivancanin and Mr. Radic, were fugitives from international justice. The
 Tribunal would like those individuals to be apprehended and transferred at the
 earliest possible opportunity. They had been at large for a considerable time
 and the Tribunal would be keen to see them in The Hague so that proceedings
 could be started, he said.
 
 
 	Asked whetherit had already been decided where Biljana Plavsic would serve her sentence and
 would such information normally be announced publicly as soon as the decision
 was made, Landale replied that the Tribunal would inform the media once an individual
 had arrived in the country where they were to serve sentence.
 
 
 	Asked howlong this procedure normally took, Landale replied that there was no set period.
 Once everything had been ironed out to the satisfaction of all parties then
 a transfer could take place.
 
 
 	Asked whetherany requests had come from Belgrade to interview Mr. Seselj, Landale replied
 that he had seen media reports concerning this matter, but the Tribunal had
 not received anything official.
 
 
 ******* 
 |