| Pleasenote that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing. It is merely
 a summary.
 
 
 
 ICTYWeekly Press Briefing
 
 Date: 29 March 2000
 
 
 Time: 11:00 a.m.
 
 REGISTRYAND CHAMBERS
 
 Jim
 Landale, Spokesman for Registry and Chambers made the following statement:
 
 
 Firstly,as most of you saw earlier this morning, the contempt of court case against
 Milan Simic and his counsel Branislav Avramovic was dismissed unanimously by
 Trial Chamber III, who found that the allegations against the two individuals,
 namely "bribery, intimidation of witness and suborning perjury of witness"
 had not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
 
 Next,you should have received the press release that we sent out yesterday, announcing
 that Spain had become the seventh country to sign an enforcement of sentences
 agreement with the United Nations.
 
 
 	Theagreement differs from other agreements signed by states with the United Nations
 on the enforcement of sentences in that it provides for inspections of the conditions
 of detention and treatment of the convicted persons by a Parity Commission instead
 of by the ICRC. In addition, it provides that Spain will only consider the enforcement
 of sentences pronounced by the International Tribunal where the duration of
 the sentence imposed does not exceed the highest maximum sentence for any crime
 under Spanish law (currently 30 years).
 
 
 Theagreement will enter into force upon receipt of notification by Spain that the
 necessary national legal requirements have been met.
 
 Therewill be a pre-trial hearing on 12 April at 4.00 p.m. for Dragoljub Prcac. It
 is unclear at this stage as to whether the hearing will be open or closed.
 
 
 Inthe so-called Foca case, on 22 March 2000, the Trial Chamber II denied the joint
 confidential motion filed by the defence on 14 March 2000, in which the accused
 requested that the press and public be excluded from parts of the proceedings
 when certain specified Prosecution witnesses testify.
 
 
 TheTrial Chamber was of the view that it is of great importance that proceedings
 before the Tribunal should be as public as possible and non-public proceedings
 should be the exception. "Over and above the reasons that public proceedings
 facilitate public knowledge and understanding and may have a general deterrent
 effect, the public should have the opportunity to assess the fairness of the
 proceedings. Justice should not only be done, it should also be seen to be done".
 
 
 	Finally,this Friday at 11 a.m. Judge Liu Daqun from The People’s Republic of China will
 be sworn in officially as a Judge of the Tribunal. We hope to release a short
 biography of the new Judge on Friday.
 
 
   
 OFFICEOF THE PROSECUTOR
 
 Paul
 Risley, Spokesman for the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), made the following
 statement:
 
 
 Inthe Foca trial, the protected witness testifying after the break will be the
 daughter of the protected witness who completed her testimony yesterday. I believe
 that this testimony will continue today and tomorrow.
 
 
 Landaleadded that the Krstic trial would not be in Courtroom II next week. However,
 it would be back in Courtroom II the following week.
 
 
   
 QUESTIONS: 
   Asked why theKrstic proceedings were being held in Courtroom II, Landale replied that many
 journalists had expressed their unhappiness about the holding of the Krstic
 trial in Courtroom II and these concerns had been passed on to the relevant
 people within the Tribunal. However, he added that there were often reasons
 for such a decision that were not immediately apparent to the public and which
 had an effect on deciding in which courtroom a particular trial was held.
   Asked whetherin the cases of protected witnesses, the accused could see the witnesses,
 Landale replied that were some instances where a witness could request for
 the view of the accused to be obscured. He added that this had happened in
 the past, however not yet to his knowledge in the Foca trial. He concluded
 that it was an issue for the Judges to decide upon if and when requested.
   Asked why therewere separate indictments in the Kunarac, Kovac and Vukovic case, Risley replied
 that it was due to the fact that these were all sealed indictments and the
 best way to keep indictments sealed was to reveal them one at a time.
 
 Landale addedthat it was also due to timing, when these people were detained in Bosnia
 and when they arrived at the Tribunal.
 
   Asked for thereason behind a number of visits by the Croatian Ambassador to the Tribunal,
 Risley replied that his visit last week was to the OTP. He added that the
 Croatian Ambassador met with the Prosecutor and with officials of the OTP.
   Asked for acomment on the significance of the visit by the Justice Minister of Republika
 Srpska, Risley replied that this was a long-scheduled meeting. The Justice
 Minister met with the Prosecutor and Deputy Prosecutor. He conclude that Mr.
 Dodik and his Government had very publicly supported the work of the Tribunal
 and very publicly stated their intention to bring about the surrender and/or
 arrest of persons indicted for war crimes that may be in the Republika Srpska.
 These questions were raised last week and discussions followed, he concluded.
   Asked for thenationality of the Prosecution co-counsel Peggy Kuo, Risley replied that she
 was American.
   
 
 ***** 
 |