| Pleasenote that this is not a verbatim transcript of the Press Briefing. It is merely
 a summary.
 
 ICTY WeeklyPress Briefing
 
 Date: 4 August 1999
 
 Time: 2:00 p.m.
 
 REGISTRY ANDCHAMBERS
 
 Jim Landale, Spokesman for the Registry and Chambers made the following announcements:
 
 To begin, twopoints from the Foca indictment. First, a reminder that the initial appearance
 of Radomir Kovac will take place at 5pm in Courtroom I. (Trial chamber II.)
 
 Second, on 30July, Judge Lal Chand Vohrah issued an order granting the Prosecutor leave to
 withdraw the indictment against Dragan Gagovic, who, as you all know, died earlier
 this year.
 
 Also on 30 July,the Appeals Chamber issued its scheduling order for the Aleksovski Appeal. The
 orders are as follows:
   The Appellantsbriefs and authorities shall be filed by 24 September 1999;
 The Respondents
 briefs and authorities shall be filed within 30 days of the filing of the
 Appellants briefs, at the latest by 25 October 1999;
 The Appellants
 may file briefs in reply within 15 days after the filing of the Respondents
 briefs, at the latest by 10 November 1999.
 Also on 30 Julyin the Kupreskic and others case, Trial Chamber II denied a motion
 from four of the accused for provisional release. The Trial Chamber was satisfied
 that exceptional circumstances existed for at least two of the accused. However,
 in coming to their decision, the Trial Chamber noted the refusal of the authorities
 of Bosnia and Herzegovina to sign a document to accept the security requirements
 necessary to allow such a provisional release. They also noted a letter from
 the Prime Minister of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, in which he
 informed the Tribunal that, "on the basis of prior consultation with
 the Federal Ministry of the Interior, it will not be possible for the federal
 organs to guarantee the re-arrest and return of the indictees, should they attempt
 to go into hiding while in the territory of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina".
 This is the first time that a motion for provisional release has been denied
 for this reason.
 
 Also, copies arebeing made of the Defendants Appellate Brief in the Furundzija Appeal.
 However, it is a very lengthy document and copying will take some time. In the
 meantime we have copies of the table of contents for those who are interested.
 
 Also, for yourinterest weve come up with some figures for the Blaskic trial. If the
 entire trial hearings are condensed into court days, then we can see that the
 trial lasted 174 full court days, which is eight and half months. During this
 time 158 witnesses were heard, which is almost one witness a day.
 
 Finally, justto remind you that the courts are in recess from tomorrow until 30 August and
 that in fact todays hearings will be the last public hearings
 
   
 OFFICEOF THE PROSECUTOR
 
 Graham Blewitt, Deputy Prosecutor had no announcements to make.
 
   
 QUESTIONS: 
 Asked forhis opinion on an article in a Croatian paper which stated that the Croatian
 Government would now not expect the accused Martinovic ("Stela")
 to serve eight years prior to his surrender to The Hague, Blewitt replied
 that, according to the letter the Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) had received
 from the Justice Minister on Friday, "Stela" would not be kept
 in Croatia to serve his eight year sentence prior to being surrendered.
 Blewitt said that he saw this as the Croatian Government withdrawing from
 its most recent position. However, he added that the Prosecutor had made
 it clear that because "Stela" was on the same indictment as Tuta,
 both accused should stand trial together. Therefore delay of the trial of
 "Stela", due to Tutas absence before the Tribunal, would
 be the fault of the Croatian authorities.
 
 Asked to confirmthat the documents received on Monday from the Croatian Justice Minister
 contained nothing relating to Operation Storm, Blewitt replied
 that the OTP was in the process of reviewing the documents. Currently, however,
 the indices appeared to show no Operation Storm documentation.
 The OTP would view it as non-compliance on the part of the Croatian Government
 until Operation Flash and Storm documentation was handed over
 to the Tribunal. He added that the Croatian Government was maintaining that
 the Tribunal had no jurisdiction over Operation Flash and Storm.
 Blewitt added that it was not for Croatia to determine whether the OTP had
 the jurisdiction to investigate.
 
 Asked aboutthe statement made by the Minister of Justice on Saturday stating that Croatia
 would not deliver documents to the Tribunal concerning Storm
 regardless of any Tribunal ruling in that regard, Blewitt noted that the
 position of the Prosecutor was that she would not participate in any proceeding
 before a Chamber on this subject unless the Croatian Government agreed to
 abide by any decision of a Judge or a Trial Chamber.
 
 Asked whetheror not the President had contacted the Security Council on the subject of
 Croatian non-compliance, Blewitt and Landale replied that as far as they
 knew she had not yet done so, as the President was absent from the Tribunal.
 
 Asked whetherthe reason Croatia would not hand over documents to the Tribunal was for
 reasons of national security, Blewitt responded that national security had
 been raised as a potential reason, however it was a secondary issue and
 was an issue that had not been reached as yet. He added that at this point
 the only opposition raised was that the Croatian authorities continued to
 contest that Storm and Flash fell within the Tribunals
 jurisdiction.
 
 Asked aboutthe rumours that Carla Del Ponte had been proposed as a candidate for the
 position of Prosecutor, Blewitt confirmed that he had heard the rumours.
 He added that from the rumours, her candidacy appeared strong, however that
 this was a matter for the Security Council to decide on.
 
 Asked whatjurisdiction the Tribunal had in the matter of the 14 Serbs killed in Gracko,
 Blewitt replied that the position of the OTP was that the armed conflict
 had not finished. He added that there was indeed a cessation in the hostilities,
 however they could erupt again. The view of the OTP was that they were dormant,
 therefore the OTP had jurisdiction on this matter. He added the OTP were
 alert to the possibility that the KLA had begun a bout of ethnic cleansing
 in the guise of revenge. If this were true it would fall within the jurisdiction
 of the Tribunal, he added.
 
 Asked whetherthe figures quoted by UN Special Representative for the Secretary-General
 for the United Nations Mission in Kosovo Bernard Kouchner of 11,000 bodies
 in Kosovo corresponded to the Tribunals figures, Blewitt replied that
 these figures were not from an official Tribunal source. He added that it
 was too premature to give figures as investigations were still ongoing.
 It was a matter of seeing how many people were killed and distinguishing
 between those who had died in combat and those who had died due to criminal
 activity.
 
 The OTP wouldnot be releasing figures at this stage, however some may be given in an
 amended, extended indictment or in a future indictment.
 
 Asked aboutthe arrests in Foca and the indictees who remained at large in Foca, Blewitt
 responded that the OTP would like to see the remaining indictees on the
 indictment tried together. He added that the stresses in terms of resources
 and time in the three cases of Aleksovski, Blaskic and Kordic who had all
 been indicted together, should be avoided. He concluded that he was pleased
 to see SFOR take such robust action, both on public and sealed indictments
 and again urged the remaining indictees to surrender voluntarily to avoid
 the possibility of injuries.
 
 Asked whetheran attorney on behalf of President Milosevic had approached the OTP, Blewitt
 responded that no such approach had been made.
 
 
 ***** 
 |